2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Hillary wins the Primary on the strength of her bought of Super Delegates alone, what will you do
17 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Vote for her in the General | |
2 (12%) |
|
Write in Bernie's name | |
14 (82%) |
|
stay home | |
1 (6%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)It's not going to happen.. Any talk of it is just to discourage Bernie supporters from sending money.
If the people vote for Bernie, the party will get behind the selection.
However, at the moment, the party is trying its best to make you believe resistance is futile!
Don't play the game!
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Or not how it would work based on how it ALWAYS works.
Vinca
(50,258 posts)they will need to jump ship to Bernie or watch the party disintegrate. Whatever happens, I'll vote to keep Republicans out of office. Whether that is by continuing to be a Democrat or a newly minted Independent remains to be seen.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)are not required to support one candidate. They can change their votes. If the popular vote reflects for one candidate, delegates can vote their priorities.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)We find out what I suspected, that Tweety's wife was hooked up with Hillary's Donors in return for his shilling for her. His change was remarkable and I had suspected the reason, same as I expect that all of those early political endorsements were made for the same reason.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)Have a wonderful afternoon
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...because I'm really conflicted about this scenario.
ReasonableToo
(505 posts)I suggest we reach out to the super delegates that are elected and express our displeasure and objectively point out why she is not the best choice of the two. (I know that all the supers are not elected lawmakers)
In all fairness, I think Hill learned this trick from Obama in '08.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)It would be stupid to do it, but her desire for the office seems to hold no bounds.
TheBlackAdder
(28,182 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I will vote for every other DEM on the ballot but I just can't vote for Hillary. I live in CT, where the DEM nominee will win the state with or without my vote so I feel like it's a win-win.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Figures Want to Scare You with Superdelegates. Here's Why It's Bullshit" by Shana Ryan.
A great read that explains all of this.
msongs
(67,394 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)oasis
(49,370 posts)officials who endorse Hillary. The two Bernie endorsers are above scrutiny.
MuseRider
(34,104 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I think that if the SDs overturn the will of the voters that the candidate will be seen as illegitimate.
It may be that the race becomes a lost cause. In that case I could see myself writing in Bernie's name. Hopefully that might help prevent the DNC from making the same mistake again in some future contest.
If it is still close, I don't think I could bring myself to do it.
I don't think it will happen anyways. The SDs are not that stupid.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:36 PM - Edit history (1)
so what I do or don't do is irrelevant.
I will add, though, that since Alaska has more independent, nondeclared and "other" registered voters than Democrats and Republicans combined, since almost all of my Democratic friends are Bernie supporters, and since Hillary is fairly universally disliked here (from my perspective), if Bernie were the candidate, he might stand a chance here. Much more so than Sec. Clinton.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)I just can't.
Revolutions cost. People get hurt. Corrupt systems and people cannot be supported and expected to provide any positive change in return. YOu would be delusional to think so.
HIllary and our corrupt DNC would be Business as usual. We won't survive that.