Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:43 AM Feb 2016

So, DUers - What are we doing here in GD:P, and why are we doing it?

My question to all of us - at this point, what are we doing?

Earlier tonight, I conducted a highly unscientific survey of DUers, and in results that should surprise no one, over 95% of us have pretty well made up our mind on who we are voting for. So whenever we post about how great Hillary or Bernie is, we are officially just preaching to our respective choirs. True-to-DU-form, we make post after post after post about: how third-way Hillary is; Hilary's IWR vote; Bernie's love of the gun lobby; I - VT or D- VT. And I'm as guilty as any of us -- my intent is not to claim to be holier-than -thou here. But we are spending much energy pointing fingers and name calling against one another while ignoring our broad areas of agreement -- about women's rights; about the need to improve the ACA/move toward single payer; about keeping the next three SCOTUS judges from being clones of Sam Alito; about sane immigration policy; about some sense of racial justice in this country.

Another poster (Cali, I think) made a post basically saying (and I'm oversimplifying and paraphrasing) Hillary and Bernie supporters aren't speaking the same language. They just aren't interested in the same things. In a broad sense, I'd agree with that. We tend (again -- making a simplistic generalization) to have differing views on what we want in a President and from the party.

There's nothing wrong with enthusiasm for a candidate. Go Bernie! Go Hillary! However, However, it's pretty clear that both sides are getting on one another's nerves. I'm not a Sanders supporter, but I imagine Bernie supporters are tired of being told their candidate's chances are slim and his supporters are delusional. I am certain that Hillary supporters are really sick of hearing that our candidate is little-better than Ted Cruz.

So, if we've all made up our minds, fine. If we're all going to gloat and vent about primary and caucus results - fine. Here's where I'm coming from: in 2008, Hillary v. Barack got pretty acrimonious; however, we all agreed that the Bush policies had to end. We all got behind President Obama, and he won. It has not been a perfect Presidency, but it's been pretty good, especially considering the congressional headwinds and the mess he inherited in January 2009. I'm probably being overly pessimistic, but I just don' see that now. I see two sides that are pretty embittered with one another.

So I have no idea how the rest off the primaries play out. Will we pretty much know by Super Tuesday? Will this go until June? Whatever it is, I'd like to ask these questions:

If we can't come together on who should be President, can we set aside our differences to get Dems elected to the House and Senate?
Can we at least try to agree that either Clinton or Sanders would be an improvement over Rubio, Cruz, or Trump?
Can we be honest enough with ourselves to admit that both of our candidates, Bernie and Hillary, have some imperfections, drawbacks, and flaws?

61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, DUers - What are we doing here in GD:P, and why are we doing it? (Original Post) Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 OP
Judging by your OP, I guess "we're" posting meta and calling out other DUers? merrily Feb 2016 #1
We're being hard on one another. Some of it is worthwhile discussion. Some of it is just ugly. Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #14
While I strongly agree with the OP ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #56
That makes too much sense to go over well here. Thanks for the thoughtful OP though . . . brush Feb 2016 #2
Thanks for reading it! Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #8
This is a revolution RobertEarl Feb 2016 #3
Well, if Bernie is elected, hopefully he'll ship me to a FEMA camp in Vermont Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #4
We have taken note of your requests RobertEarl Feb 2016 #11
LOL! FrenchieCat Feb 2016 #5
Whether we want to be assimilated or not? 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #34
And revolutions tend to shoot dead those that don't get behind it Blue_Adept Feb 2016 #41
Destroying the party, mostly. Happens every open primary. Recursion Feb 2016 #6
I remember '08; I remember the Lounge Wars; I remember the '09 Purge Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #10
I do. This is probably worse than '08. I came here in '06, so I missed 2004 Recursion Feb 2016 #12
I was someone else before I was Algernon Moncrieff (it's all legal) Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #17
2008 was a lot worse than 2004 LisaM Feb 2016 #29
2008 was a lot worse than 2004 LisaM Feb 2016 #30
And 2020/2024 will be even worse nxylas Feb 2016 #32
I'm hoping perhaps America Fererra vs. Donnie Wahlberg Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #37
Or Martin Shkreli (sp?) vs Tim Kaine nxylas Feb 2016 #42
For the most part, it is the same people over and over again who are causing all the drama. demmiblue Feb 2016 #38
That really was a bad time at DU, as well as for the party generally. Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #51
Yes, yes and yes... Rebkeh Feb 2016 #7
That sums it up nicely - We probably should take it down a notch Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #9
The discourse is part of the process, Rebkeh Feb 2016 #19
For anyone who hasn't quite figured it out yet .. Fumesucker Feb 2016 #13
This is "being hit on the head lessons" Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #15
Or fish slapping. CentralMass Feb 2016 #28
They fight. They bite lovemydog Feb 2016 #18
Perfect! 7wo7rees Feb 2016 #31
Yeah, I like your reasonable posts. lovemydog Feb 2016 #16
Thanks. I'm not always reasonable. Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #21
Yeah, go Tammy Duckworth! lovemydog Feb 2016 #23
No, that is not a fair description of Sanders supporters. TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #53
Thanks. I appreciate your response. lovemydog Feb 2016 #61
Sorry Algernon Moncrieff, but there are *contradictions* between the candidates. delrem Feb 2016 #20
Bill Clinton got in trouble for comparing Sanders supporters to the Tea Party Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #22
You make no sense to me. So sorry, I'm leaving this thread. nt delrem Feb 2016 #25
Generally speaking, Hillary stands for more wars, fracking, the TPP, increased H-1B visas, djean111 Feb 2016 #33
Discussion is only useful if there is someone to convince or persuade Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #36
That's a good observation - but your dismissal of Bernie and Hillary as being pretty much the same djean111 Feb 2016 #39
Clinton's camp is on a belittling marathon, but somehow Sanders supperters have to be the first Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #24
Yes. It's plain as the nose on your face. delrem Feb 2016 #26
Damn fine question! 7wo7rees Feb 2016 #27
I'm here for the lolz nt firebrand80 Feb 2016 #35
DU performance art featuring the Lord of the Flies. nt hack89 Feb 2016 #40
This is a non-productive food fight. Nothing more, nothing less. Agschmid Feb 2016 #43
As long as we all realize that. Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #47
Excellent post Dem2 Feb 2016 #44
Problem is ---we are still continuing the Bush policies, even worse. kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #45
Here, we can argue. JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2016 #46
I think you'll win the pool. Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #49
There's also the most important use of an Internet discussion board in a functioning democracy: Orsino Feb 2016 #48
Like fourth grade, but without references to "your mama" Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2016 #50
I come here for information, not to persuade other DUers. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2016 #52
Answers EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #54
Answering the question of what are we doing here artislife Feb 2016 #55
There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge. Bertrand Russell Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #57
With regard to this ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #58
I confess I only come here to read when there are big current events meadowlark5 Feb 2016 #59
Oh I agree so, so much... N_E_1 for Tennis Feb 2016 #60

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
14. We're being hard on one another. Some of it is worthwhile discussion. Some of it is just ugly.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:37 AM
Feb 2016

For a bunch of Democrats, we don't seem to like one another very much.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
56. While I strongly agree with the OP ...
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:46 PM
Feb 2016

perhaps, this:

For a bunch of Democrats, we don't seem to like one another very much.


Can be explained by recognizing/acknowledging/understanding that DU has far fewer "Democrats", participating, now, than it ever has.

brush

(53,764 posts)
2. That makes too much sense to go over well here. Thanks for the thoughtful OP though . . .
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:07 AM
Feb 2016

but there are too many "I wouldn't vote for _ _ _ _ _ _ _ if my life depended on it."

The seven blank spaces can be filled in by either "Clinton" or "Sanders".

Funny, huh?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
3. This is a revolution
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:12 AM
Feb 2016

This is way beyond the Hope and Change Obama pledged.

This is about all of us working for a real future that is a revolt against the big money politics and the old ways of catering to the special interests.

This is a real "People Campaign" and our goal is to assimilate everyone one of you. <grin>

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
4. Well, if Bernie is elected, hopefully he'll ship me to a FEMA camp in Vermont
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:16 AM
Feb 2016

If I'm to be assimilated, I'd like nice scenery - and some Phish Food.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
11. We have taken note of your requests
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:30 AM
Feb 2016

Being that you are way down the list you may not get everything you desire. What tax bracket is it which you presently occupy? It may be beneficial to your future if it is correct one.

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
41. And revolutions tend to shoot dead those that don't get behind it
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:38 AM
Feb 2016

Lots of collateral damage while pushing the cause.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
10. I remember '08; I remember the Lounge Wars; I remember the '09 Purge
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:30 AM
Feb 2016

You have to admit, this has been pretty ugly.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. I do. This is probably worse than '08. I came here in '06, so I missed 2004
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:31 AM
Feb 2016

But I heard that was pretty bad too. But I have to say this was worse than '08 was at this point.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
17. I was someone else before I was Algernon Moncrieff (it's all legal)
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:48 AM
Feb 2016

I came in in '06. I too missed '04, and heard it was pretty bad.

LisaM

(27,801 posts)
29. 2008 was a lot worse than 2004
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:26 AM
Feb 2016

But this year is the worst I have ever seen. I have been here since 2001 and just returned after a long break and the atmosphere is pretty toxic.

LisaM

(27,801 posts)
30. 2008 was a lot worse than 2004
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:28 AM
Feb 2016

But this year is the worst I have ever seen. I have been here since 2001 and just returned after a long break and the atmosphere is pretty toxic.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
32. And 2020/2024 will be even worse
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:32 AM
Feb 2016

When the arguments will be between supporters of Vermin Supreme and Kim Kardashian.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
37. I'm hoping perhaps America Fererra vs. Donnie Wahlberg
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:13 AM
Feb 2016

...but yes -- politics as infotainment seems to now be upon us.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
42. Or Martin Shkreli (sp?) vs Tim Kaine
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:40 AM
Feb 2016

The former will run on the slogan "Hey, at least I'm not a Republican", while the latter will be smeared as a radical leftist promising unicorns and rainbows to a gullible public.

demmiblue

(36,838 posts)
38. For the most part, it is the same people over and over again who are causing all the drama.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:20 AM
Feb 2016

There are also some who seem to only come back to DU during election time.

To me, the worst was the LGBT purge in 2008.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
51. That really was a bad time at DU, as well as for the party generally.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:22 PM
Feb 2016

There was a lot of very justifiable anger and bitterness after Prop 8 in California, and Prop 8 seemed so incongruous to the election of Barack Obama.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
7. Yes, yes and yes...
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:19 AM
Feb 2016
after the primary. We have primaries for a reason and it's a very important one.

The vitriol and hate is ugly, yes, and we probably should take it down a notch. However, conflict is necessary and I'm fine with it as long as it is constructive. A lot of what's on DU is constructive, some of it is not.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
9. That sums it up nicely - We probably should take it down a notch
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:27 AM
Feb 2016

My question is this -- is it constructive if we've all made up our minds? If so, to what end? (technically, 2 questions)

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
19. The discourse is part of the process,
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:52 AM
Feb 2016

We are doing more than convincing people to vote our way, we are figuring out who we are and who we are going to be. What are libprogs about? What's the party about? The country, even?

The fight is for the soul of the party - put simply, FDR v 3rd Way? Democracy is messy, we are supposed to argue. That doesn't mean we have to resort to personal attacks and petty games though.

Edited to add: FDR v 3rd Way is one way to frame it. A better way might be community v tribalism, people v business, establishment v grassroots. Who, exactly, does our government work for? Who should it work for?

Shutting down these conversations doesn't resolve anything.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
18. They fight. They bite
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:50 AM
Feb 2016

They bite and fight and bite
Bite bite bite
Fight fight fight
The Itchy and Scratchy Show!

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
16. Yeah, I like your reasonable posts.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:46 AM
Feb 2016

I don't know why but people seem to love arguing on the net. I guess maybe it's the drama. And I'm not too holier than thou about it. I love drama as long as I'm not in the middle of it.

I'm always urging people to think and talk more about local and state and congressional elections. No one seems to do it much though. And what the hell, maybe it's because it's so much easier & more fun to go to GDP instead and see who is outraged about what this minute or this day.

It's true that there is a gap in languages being spoken. Sometimes I see people arguing over something and they are each partly right and partly wrong. But neither of them will admit it. They just keep arguing the same points over and over. It's pretty funny.

Perhaps another way of looking at it too is that for most Clinton supporters republicans are the enemy that must be defeated, while for most Sanders supporters mainstream democrats are the enemy that must be defeated. What makes it even more tense and exhausting is that both of those sides know they'll need one another to get out and vote to gain anything or at the very least keep from horrible setbacks.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
21. Thanks. I'm not always reasonable.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:01 AM
Feb 2016

And you are right - drama can be fun. Playing smack-back can be fun. I plead guilty.

"Third Way" has been an ugly term for progressives for forever, and the Clintons are associated with that movement. So I get that, but I get frustrated at the zero-sum-game. I'm not with the Sanders progressives on (fill in the issue) so I'm a DINO/Pub Lite/worse names. That's frustrating. I've been a registered Democrat all of my adult life, and I'm certainly not advocating for a wall or an invasion of the Middle East. Your point is spot on, but I'm not sure we can even reach consensus on what is a "mainstream Democrat" these days.

I don't live in Illinois, but this election, I'd get joy if we could get Tammy Duckworth elected to the US Senate, and then make a collective vow that what Saxby Chambliss did to Max Cleland can never happen again!

TTUBatfan2008

(3,623 posts)
53. No, that is not a fair description of Sanders supporters.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:29 PM
Feb 2016

Sanders supporters for the most part believe the two party system itself is corrupt. Both parties are bought and paid for by the military industrial complex, the big banks, big drug companies, etc. It is not that the Democrats are THE enemy as you stated, it is that we find it sad so many of them have sold out to the big corporate interests instead of fighting for the people. Are the Democrats better than Republicans? On certain stuff, definitely! Supreme Court is a great example.

I think a lot of Sanders people will vote Democrat for the Supreme Court reason alone, but this does not mean the party is flawless. The GOP is absolutely terrible, obviously. They are THE enemy if we really want to narrow it down as much as possible. The Democrats are better than the GOP but still part of the overall problem when they do favors for corporate America instead of working for the people. Get the money out of politics and then perhaps we will have a government that is more honest regardless of each politician's ideology or even each party's ideology.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
61. Thanks. I appreciate your response.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:00 PM
Feb 2016

I should have said some (not all!) Sanders supporters. My bad. I agree with your goals & opinions. There have been many efforts over the years to limit the effects of big money on campaign financing. The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act was the most recent. Unfortunately the Supreme Court's Citizen's United decision called the legality of this into questions because the Court ruled that such efforts restrict free speech.

That's why both Clinton and Sanders have pledged that their nominee for the Supreme Court would be likely to overturn Citizen's United. Sanders has gone even further by saying he would have that question as a litmus test. It's most definitely a problem in politics and as you say it's in both parties.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
20. Sorry Algernon Moncrieff, but there are *contradictions* between the candidates.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:54 AM
Feb 2016

What Hillary Rodham Clinton is, politically, is well known, and it *contradicts* what Bernie Sanders stands for.
What Bernie Sanders is, politically, is well known, and it *contradicts* what Hillary Rodham Clinton stands for.

This isn't a tempest in a teacup, it's the real thing.

Bernie Sanders' candidacy made the schism visible. Until his candidacy, there was no viable expression of it. This is perhaps the most substantial Dem primary that I can think of, where people are genuinely given a chance to decide their future. DU has been instrumental in defining Bernie Sanders' message for the public, IMO. He's been subjected to all kinds of Rovian ratfucking crap from the beginning, and his supporters are the stronger for it.

I'm not so pessimistic as you, as to want to call off discussion of critical differences.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
22. Bill Clinton got in trouble for comparing Sanders supporters to the Tea Party
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:10 AM
Feb 2016

Frankly, I wish he'd have chosen words more carefully, but the comparison is apt at this level: the Tea Party served to pull the Republican Party further from the political center, and the Sanders wing of the Democratic party is doing much the same thing.

Having said that, the discussion is reaching a point of diminishing returns. Nobody is winning over undecided DUers -- there are virtually none to be won.

I also reject the notion that Hillary Clinton "contradicts " what Bernie Sanders stands for. On most key issues, they are in broad agreement. Sanders supporters hold that Clinton is too close to Wall Street. Clinton supporters counter that true progressives wouldn't oppose the Brady Bill. I'm a cynic. I hold that no politician of any stripe is pure.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
33. Generally speaking, Hillary stands for more wars, fracking, the TPP, increased H-1B visas,
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 06:07 AM
Feb 2016

is against single payer. To name just a few things. Bernie is against those. You have over-simplified and over-generalized in limiting comparison to Wall Street and the Brady Bill.

So yeah, Hillary does "contradict" what Bernie stands for. This is not about purity. If you don't care for the discussions, maybe just don't read them?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
39. That's a good observation - but your dismissal of Bernie and Hillary as being pretty much the same
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:33 AM
Feb 2016

was WAY off course. There would not be as much rancor, IMO, if they only differed on Wall Street and the Brady Bill.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
24. Clinton's camp is on a belittling marathon, but somehow Sanders supperters have to be the first
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:17 AM
Feb 2016

to stop splitting the party? I see what you are trying to do. I'm "sure" your intentions are all right.

"Can we be honest enough with ourselves to admit that both of our candidates, Bernie and Hillary, have some imperfections, drawbacks, and flaws?"

Clinton is the lesser of two evils. Just look at the dishonest way her campaign operates. Just look at the dismissive and arrogant way she handles any voter under 35.

Sanders has never been perfect. But he is good.

kgnu_fan

(3,021 posts)
45. Problem is ---we are still continuing the Bush policies, even worse.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 11:14 AM
Feb 2016

Listen to all those whistle-blowers who are put into prison and silenced. (Watch the movie "Silenced" @SilencedFilm )

So your assumption "we all agreed that the Bush policies had to end" may not be accurate. In order to discontinue/curtail the Bush policies, we need Bernie. That is the crux of the augments. It takes changes in our tax system, military budget, CIA, NSA... you name it.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,338 posts)
46. Here, we can argue.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 11:59 AM
Feb 2016

Try that in the Hillary group or the Bernie group, and you'll be banished instantly.

The rancorous entertainment should continue until one of them quits. Then there will be grave-dancing, followed by attempts at reconciliation.

I'm putting a dollar on June. Grovelbot will hold all the bets.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
49. I think you'll win the pool.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:17 PM
Feb 2016

Like 2008, I think we'll have a good idea after Super Tuesday, but it won't be settled until June.

I'd just like more DUers to start laying the groundwork for reconciliation -- or self-interested cooperation -- now. We know the nominee will be Hillary or Bernie (barring something bizarre); we know who supports who (or whom -- I can never keep that straight) and that everyone's support is entrenched at this point; and we know that both sides have competing interests and don't want anyone from the other side defining who is or isn't a Democrat. What we have now is both sides making essentially the same posts over and over and over.

For the record, I asked the Bernie group to banish me. They haven't done it yet. So whatever banishment is, it's not instant.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
48. There's also the most important use of an Internet discussion board in a functioning democracy:
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:17 PM
Feb 2016

Telling all those ________ supporters that they are wrong and bad. Just like in fourth grade.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
52. I come here for information, not to persuade other DUers.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:28 PM
Feb 2016

If that happens, great. But that's not primary to me. We exchange information and spread it out to the circles that each of us influences. DU is great for that.

It'll go till the convention and depending on how the cards fall, may go beyond that. For sure there will be no large scale conceding anytime beforehand. Forget about Super Tuesday, we all have the schedule of races and we know where our strengths are.

This is a year when the conventional wisdom is worthless. This isn't news to us. So all previously predictable bets are off. It's wait and see all they way.

I believe sooner or later (hopefully sooner) HRC will self-destruct, much like Mitt Romney did. I'll be very surprised indeed if she doesn't.

As to who to support all I can say is I want the corporatists out. Whatever it takes to do that.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
54. Answers
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:31 PM
Feb 2016
If we can't come together on who should be President, can we set aside our differences to get Dems elected to the House and Senate?

Depends on the Dems. If there's one thing my experience with Hillary has convinced me it's this: don't simply vote for someone based on them being a Democrat.

Can we at least try to agree that either Clinton or Sanders would be an improvement over Rubio, Cruz, or Trump?

I'm not sure. I'm with Assange; a Clinton Presidency would be a disaster. Why would I support any disaster? And why would I put my stamp of approval on a corporate and dishonest person who's a pawn of big corporations? Just because of her party? Or because I'm meant to be scared of the alternative? Forget it.. Not voting out of fear again.

Can we be honest enough with ourselves to admit that both of our candidates, Bernie and Hillary, have some imperfections, drawbacks, and flaws?

Which would you rather eat: a piece of chocolate that briefly fell on the floor, or a piece of rotten uncooked beef?

Both have flaws...

Trying to equivocate between the two based on them both having flaws is absurd. The scope of their flaws is so different that any attempt simply makes you look dishonest.

Bernie has flaws, I can list them:

- his foreign policy (hers is worse)
- his gun policies (hers are as bad)
- his support for military spending
- his willingness to accept some pork for VT

There's also some things I'd change about his campaign.

But.

To list all of her flaws would take days. And days. And new ones seem to be discovered on a daily basis.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
55. Answering the question of what are we doing here
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

My reason is to find out what the candidates are doing and saying . There is so much information. Sure, we interpret the information differently depending on our candidate of choice. Then we get into turf wars....but the information still is coming in.


That is the nugget of this site. There is real information mixed in with spin, hubris and some dog shit.

I will be voting for issues and I probably never look at the Democratic Party the same way again.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
57. There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge. Bertrand Russell
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:52 PM
Feb 2016

Or, I've been here since 2001 because I like discussing politics and current events. I'm not trying to "accomplish" anything.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
58. With regard to this ...
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:55 PM
Feb 2016
Can we at least try to agree that either Clinton or Sanders would be an improvement over Rubio, Cruz, or Trump?

Can we be honest enough with ourselves to admit that both of our candidates, Bernie and Hillary, have some imperfections, drawbacks, and flaws?


In our hearts, I think everyone knows and understand this already. Those who pledge to "never vote for the nominee if it's not their candidate" are just angry and are trying to antagonize the other candidate's supporters. If not that, then they're just feeling helpless because they don't like that there are circumstances which are totally beyond their control, so they're acting-out and seeking comfort and validation (regardless of whether they realize that's what they're doing.)

It will pass. People will cope and adapt. Most will come around, and there will (of course) be a few stragglers who do live up to their pledge to sit-out the election. That's their choice and nothing will change their minds, so why bother with them?

Fortunately, in the real world ... those types of individuals (whether for Bernie or Hillary) don't exist in number sufficient enough to make a difference. In the end, cooler heads will prevail, the SMART and MATURE voters (who know how to handle disappointment) will do the right thing.

Go, Democrats!

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)
59. I confess I only come here to read when there are big current events
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:58 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:55 PM - Edit history (1)

I don't post much because I just am plumb out of energy to argue about politics anymore. And your post struck a chord with me. You are saying what I keep thinking but not just here at DU but on other social media as well. The discourse between Hillary and Bernie supporters is pretty horrible. And that worries me very much for the fall.

When both Bernie and Hillary became candidates, I was very pleased. I thought we had two good people vying for the presidency. I had no strong pull to either. I consider myself progressive/liberal but not all the way to the left (though my conservative family would differ on that). And I have to say, reading here as well as comments on other social media is making me dislike both Hillary and Bernie And it has nothing to do with Hillary or Bernie. It is the supporters that I have to keep reminding myself is causing this misplaced dislike. I have to consciously separate the candidates from the rhetoric of the supporters.

There are a lot of people/voters out there like me. We don't live and breathe politics. We read and try to be informed but we don't want or need to argue every issue. And fighting and name calling and insults only drives people away.

N_E_1 for Tennis

(9,715 posts)
60. Oh I agree so, so much...
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 01:37 PM
Feb 2016

Read some posts and answers. " I have 15,000 on ignore, oh yeah I have more and DU is sooo much better if you do that ignore thingy".
How can you possibly have a discourse if you don't listen?

No matter the political bent, people in this country are angry at how things are going.
Trump and Sanders are proving that statement. We need to change stuff up.
But here's the odd point.... Change is difficult, it requires those who want it to become engaged.

"Oh crap, you now want me to DO something? You want me to give up a little of my time?
I want change, but my TV show is on now and I really can't get behind. I want and need this counry to change its ideas but will it effect my savings? I want change but I'm going to Myrtle Beach for break and it's just not a great time, by the way I hate the direction this country is going, does that help? I hate the way corporatism is driving this country, I just won't buy anything after I get my new curved TV, new router, some cables, and a new sofa, so I can watch the debates in style." And on and on and on.

Get my point?

We here at DU are a slightly different animal. We are more politically engaged than most.
Most of America really doesn't give a flying fuck. We are a lazy, nonengaged populace. Just give me comfort.

A perfect candidate? There is no such beast.

Real problem between the two camps... Some see the need for change, others can't fathom it. It's just easier to do the same, over and over. It just feels right.

I must add that some of this is sarcasm.

It a sorry fact that I have to add that.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So, DUers - What are we d...