2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHave we forgotten Climate Change?
Seriously. Regardless of your ideal choice for president, can we not agree that this single issue is important enough to put whatever qualms you might have aside and vote for whoever refuses to deny science?
I haven't posted much here since 2004. It's become so divisive. But I feel the need to chime in here. You can make whatever argument you wish for either candidate being BETTER for the environment, but it must be clear that either of them would be better than any republican, and to sit this election out because you didn't get your preferred candidate would be highly irresponsible. It is extremely troubling to see this kind of division when we absolutely must not, for the sake of our children and grandchildren, lose sight of the BIG picture.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)it will take a willingness to act boldly, decisively and quickly
daleanime
(17,796 posts)And the ability to rally the people to make substantial changes in their lifestyles.
Now what candidate best fits those requirements?
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Hillary Clinton's Complicated Ties to Big Oil - EcoWatch
http://ecowatch.com/2016/01/20/clinton-ties-to-big-oil/
Hillary Clinton's Biggest Campaign Bundlers Are Fossil Fuel Lobbyists
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-bundlers-fossil-fuel_us_55a8335ee4b04740a3df86c5
Hillary Clinton Sides With Big Oil
Hill, Baby, Hill!
http://freebeacon.com/blog/hillary-clinton-sides-with-big-oil/
How Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
Green groups attack Hillary Clinton over fracking, Keystone
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/23/hillary-clinton-attacked-green-groups-over-frackin/
Just one of the many reasons why I support Bernie.