Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:41 AM Feb 2016

Most Americans Don't Deserve Someone Like Bernie

Last edited Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:58 AM - Edit history (1)

I am blue n the face talking to other liberals here in Georgia.
Friends and family members that agree with me on most political issues won't even consider Bernie.
The won't even watch his stump speech on utube.
They just can't get past the word Socialist.
They claim that Bernie would be destroyed by Trump or any republican.
I've shown them the many polls showing Bernie doing better than Hillary against Trump.
They don't believe those polls.

So, here I am with all of this.
Someone smart once said that we get the government that we deserve.
Bernie is too good.
He's too honest and caring.

Most of us dint deserve someone like him yet. Sigh.
Maybe someday America will.

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most Americans Don't Deserve Someone Like Bernie (Original Post) Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 OP
That sounds like a winning message. (nt) Skinner Feb 2016 #1
lol PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #2
Not a campaign message. Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #3
Don't let people disparaging you get you down..it happens here. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #8
Atlanta is a blue dot in the middle of Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #11
Primary season here at DU can be obnoxious, so I would pay no mind to it. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #18
A little late here now. Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #22
You were told that? To focus off of your state? n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #26
Not by the state folks Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #28
I suggest you consider listening to what the leaders from his campaign think is best.. but of Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #30
It almost reads like the lyrics for a song!!! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2016 #5
Almost as winning as "We can't advance a liberal agenda because (fill in the blanks)" Armstead Feb 2016 #21
... alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #40
Is this satire? sufrommich Feb 2016 #4
Seriously? Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #9
Well if THAT doesn't convince them Codeine Feb 2016 #6
Someone like Bernie will be prevented from running ever again yourpaljoey Feb 2016 #7
Cool story bro. NaturalHigh Feb 2016 #10
Not trying to win over voters. Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #14
LMAO. nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #12
You may not believe this . .. pdsimdars Feb 2016 #13
I love DU performance art. Bravo! hack89 Feb 2016 #15
Well I do enjoy Bravos Real Housewives of Atlanta Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #17
I am both sad and humbled vdogg Feb 2016 #16
"Pure"? Did you even know Sanders existed 6 months ago? randome Feb 2016 #19
Nope never have really followed politics Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #27
The only thing I disagree with is the word 'pure'. randome Feb 2016 #29
To someone versed in religious studies Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #20
I am reading my second book written by North Korean refugees DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #24
I'm not very religious... Funtatlaguy Feb 2016 #25
I'm not familiar and it sounded like the New Testament to me nt Quayblue Feb 2016 #49
You'd probably be better off saying it is just not his time Godhumor Feb 2016 #23
It's NEVER time according to the New Democrat Template Armstead Feb 2016 #34
That's how many of us feel about a female president Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #35
He's been building a movement for 40 years Armstead Feb 2016 #36
Really? Where is it? Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #38
Pay attention to history Armstead Feb 2016 #45
You really think that is enough? Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #46
Yeah move those goalposts...Buh Bye. I'm too busy for circular arguments Armstead Feb 2016 #47
He founded the congressional progressive caucus. lostnfound Feb 2016 #37
Well, that's something. nt. Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #39
The Progressive caucus is actually the largest caucus but not very powerful because money talks lostnfound Feb 2016 #52
Oh good grief jcgoldie Feb 2016 #31
I'm with you on that. Shadowflash Feb 2016 #32
The opposite is what you need to remember. Octafish Feb 2016 #33
50% of Americans would not vote for a socialist Freddie Stubbs Feb 2016 #41
Nobody is that good KingFlorez Feb 2016 #42
We didn't deserve Bush either. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Hiraeth Feb 2016 #44
They have been lied to for decades by Big Money... Orsino Feb 2016 #48
just give them the head-to-head polls MisterP Feb 2016 #50
I think it may actually be to your benefit that he has no shot of winning the nomination. Bleacher Creature Feb 2016 #51
fear has trained the authoritarian democrats well autonomous Feb 2016 #53

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
3. Not a campaign message.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:47 AM
Feb 2016

Just my own personal observations.
Am I not, as a loyal blue dog Dem who will work for Hillary in the general, allowed to feel this disappointment?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
8. Don't let people disparaging you get you down..it happens here.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:51 AM
Feb 2016

When you are advocating in Georgia, do you ask them what it is they
want to see in their government they don't see now?

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
11. Atlanta is a blue dot in the middle of
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:00 AM
Feb 2016

A sea of very red, marooness in the rest of the state.
The repubs own every state position of power and have a Super majority in statehouse.
This happened when Gov Sonny Perdue and many other former yellow dog Dems switched parties.
I can't talk to those people.
They are all racist, xenophobic, homophobic, semi morons.

The liberals here are not like northern state liberals.
Most have some conservative positions on god, guns, and gays.
So, you have to pick your arguments carefully.

Most want to just not be laughed at when they claim to be a Democrat.
That's why they could never add the word Socialist onto the word Democrat.

I don't understand why Hillary supporters are laughing at me or my statements.
I greatly admire her.
She's just not as liberal as me. Bernie is.
But I will work like heck for Hillary to beat Trump.


Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
18. Primary season here at DU can be obnoxious, so I would pay no mind to it.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:16 AM
Feb 2016

If Bernie loses the nomination I will be voting against any Republican, has nothing
to do with support for Clinton, that's how she gets my vote in the GE.

You certainly have your work cut out for you. Have you been working with
the Sanders campaign in your area?

When you speak to voters if you ask them what is important to them
you may get info back that allows them to consider Bernie...before
you just go into what his platform is about. I would encourage you
to look at the conservatives in Vermont, I know they are a different
breed than Georgia, but they may be more like your Georgia Dems.
They like Bernie, and have supported him, some people see that as
a bad thing, I don't. There might be a bridge of commonality in approach
you could use to help people consider Bernie.






Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
22. A little late here now.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:23 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary will beat Bernie by at least 20 points here in Georgia and probably more than30.
We are not wasting our time on Georhia but instead phone banking to more winnable places like Massachusetts.

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
28. Not by the state folks
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:35 AM
Feb 2016

Others who r realists....Move on type folks....not leadership,,,just rank and file.
Winning Mass is much more important than trying to brin down the totals and, eve, delegates in what will be a Georgia Hillary landslide Tuesday.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
30. I suggest you consider listening to what the leaders from his campaign think is best.. but of
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:42 AM
Feb 2016

course that is up to you.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
21. Almost as winning as "We can't advance a liberal agenda because (fill in the blanks)"
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:20 AM
Feb 2016

The reasons change, but the message is always the same:

"We can't do anything proactive now because: The GOP has the WH...the GOP has control of Congress....We have the WH and control of Congress but the GOP has enough people to block anything we do....We have a mixed Congress..... ...and the currently implausible 'We have overwhelming majority in Congress and the White House -- but we can't do anything because that will only revitalize the GOP.'"

.

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
9. Seriously?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:52 AM
Feb 2016

You haven't encountered any fellow Democrats who say that the word Socialist disqualifies Bernie for their consideration?

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
7. Someone like Bernie will be prevented from running ever again
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:49 AM
Feb 2016

The GOP/DNC have fixed the procedural requirements over the last few months
so as to preclude that possibility going forward.
If Bernie wins, of course, the game may change in the favor of the People.

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
14. Not trying to win over voters.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:06 AM
Feb 2016

Just Telling you what I've experienced in my social circle.
Why does that bother you?
I didn't say one disparaging word about Hillary. Nor will I. She is my second choice and a quality, brilliant person.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
13. You may not believe this . ..
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:04 AM
Feb 2016

but I say that Bernie is actually going to be the next President.
I know it doesn't look like it. I know it sounds like wishful thinking . . but, there are many reasons and subtle indicators that point to it.

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
17. Well I do enjoy Bravos Real Housewives of Atlanta
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:13 AM
Feb 2016

Can't believe they added Tootie and that she's a real religious conservative.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. "Pure"? Did you even know Sanders existed 6 months ago?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:17 AM
Feb 2016

And if his past quarter century of purity was known at the time, why weren't people talking him up before now?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
27. Nope never have really followed politics
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:31 AM
Feb 2016

Other than having worked in about 10 different local, state, and federal campaigns in the past 30 years and keeping my tv on cspan 2 most of the time...esp when the Senate is in session.
Voted in every election my entire life.
I phone bank for many endangered Dems nationally.
And, yes, I have admired Bernies positions for many years.
Always thought he was a little droll and too crusty for my taste.
Still do, at times.
It's his policy positions that draw me to him, not his personality.
Why test my political bonafides just because you don't agree with me?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
29. The only thing I disagree with is the word 'pure'.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:39 AM
Feb 2016

I agree Sanders would make a fine President. Early on, I said I would prefer just about anyone other than Clinton simply because I was tired of the entire Bush/Clinton era.

But she does seem fated to win this election so we must make the best of it. And I'm sure she will surprise many of her detractors.

I was making a generic comment about those who think Sanders is some sort of miracle man who descended from Olympus to save us.

You sound like you've been busy and that's always commendable.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
24. I am reading my second book written by North Korean refugees
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:24 AM
Feb 2016

They are taught that "Dear Leader" is so perfect he doesn't even have to relieve himself.

Funtatlaguy

(10,868 posts)
25. I'm not very religious...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:24 AM
Feb 2016

Probably would not have drank the koolaid but I did enjoy the Jonestown movie.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
23. You'd probably be better off saying it is just not his time
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:23 AM
Feb 2016

But that he could start influencing the next generation of politicians to bring his message to the masses in the future.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
34. It's NEVER time according to the New Democrat Template
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:50 AM
Feb 2016

The issues Bernie is leading on should have been part of the political discussion since 1990. He is not talking about some new trend or radical concept.



Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
35. That's how many of us feel about a female president
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:52 AM
Feb 2016

when people say "I'd love a female president, just not THIS one." It seems it's NEVER time for one according to the patriarchal template.

I get your frustration, though. The problem is that Bernie has never before tried to build a movement around his issues. That's what's needed to bring about a revolution.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
36. He's been building a movement for 40 years
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:24 AM
Feb 2016

He, Wellstone and other progressives have been working to build a movement as a counterbalance to the GOP and Democrat Corporatism for a longtime...The fact the his campaign has come so far so fast is evidence if that.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
38. Really? Where is it?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:44 AM
Feb 2016

Bernie should have worked for years to help elect other progressives. He would probably have done better if he had joined the Dems a long time ago in order to help build the necessary infrastructure for a revolution. Suddenly running for president at the age of 74 does not a evolution make. I like Bernie, but I don't see it.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
45. Pay attention to history
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:59 PM
Feb 2016

There has been plenty of activity over the years, and Bernie has been involved. For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is the largest membership organization within the Democratic congressional caucus in the United States Congress with 69 declared members.[4] The CPC is a left-leaning organization that works to advance progressive and liberal issues and positions.[5][6][7]

The CPC is currently co-chaired by U.S. Representatives Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN). It was founded in 1991 and has grown steadily since then, having more recently added 20 members since 2005 and having hired its first full-time Executive Director, Bill Goold

The CPC is committed to government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Their policy agenda is rooted in four core principles: (1) fighting for economic justice and security in the U.S. and global economies; (2) protecting and preserving civil rights and civil liberties; (3) promoting global peace and security; and (4) strengthening environmental protection and energy independence. Their fundamental fairness plan reflects national priorities that are consistent with the values, needs, and hopes of all Americans, not just the powerful and the privileged. Accordingly, the CPC also advocates "universal access to affordable, high quality healthcare", fair trade agreements, living wage laws, the right of all workers to organize into labor unions and engage in collective bargaining, the abolition of the USA PATRIOT Act, the legalization of same-sex marriage, US participation in international treaties such as the climate change related Kyoto Accords, strict campaign finance reform laws, a crackdown on corporate welfare and influence, an increase in income tax rates on upper-middle and upper class households, tax cuts for the poor, and an increase in welfare spending by the federal government.[8]

Legislative history[edit]
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) was established in 1991 by six members of the United States House of Representatives: U.S. Representatives Ron Dellums (D-CA), Lane Evans (D-IL), Thomas Andrews (D-ME), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Maxine Waters (D-CA), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT). .....Then-U.S. Representative Bernie Sanders was the convener and first CPC Chairman. Bill Goold served as Staff Coordinator for the Progressive Caucus in its early years until 1998.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
46. You really think that is enough?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:01 PM
Feb 2016

If you want to see how a revolution happens, look at the way conservatives have taken over school boards et al, gerrymandered districts to the point where they control Congress even without lifting a finger, etc. A revolution is built from the bottom up. Where are the progressives that Bernie helped elect? How can you be the leader of a revolution if you don't build one?

Not only do I pay attention to history, I've lived through and participated in huge social transformation as a young person in South Africa. I have seen first hand what it takes if you want to fundamentally change a society. I'm not seeing anything like that here (and I've lived in the United States now for almost two decades). I'm just seeing an old man who no longer has enough years left to build a movement, and bunch of angry, aggressive followers. I don't see a movement. So color me skeptical.

lostnfound

(16,169 posts)
37. He founded the congressional progressive caucus.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:42 AM
Feb 2016

Unfortunately Americans as a whole are entertained to death, worked to death, and made to feel marginalized in politics.

lostnfound

(16,169 posts)
52. The Progressive caucus is actually the largest caucus but not very powerful because money talks
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:47 PM
Feb 2016

In my opinion, Americans are trained to be passive and entertained to death from birth.
Organizations like the Tea Party arise because they are funded by the billionaires who expect a payback in political power.
It's gone beyond political favors into direct political power, because in the Bush years, the lobbyists have been able to literally WRITE the legislation that gets voted upon.
The revolutionary part of Bernie is in breaking the link between a viable presidential candidacy and corporate / superPAC money.
You are right that we don't have the big movement you saw elsewhere. You probably won't see it here, either, because the constructs in our minds have been carefully pruned from a young age.

I for one will go back to political sleep and/or drink myself into oblivion, when Bernie loses.

Shadowflash

(1,536 posts)
32. I'm with you on that.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:43 AM
Feb 2016

Though, I'm not going to let it stop me from voting for Bernie or someone else who shares my values.

In the primary AND the general.

No more voting for 'good enough' or the lesser of the two evils.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. The opposite is what you need to remember.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:47 AM
Feb 2016

The nation's about to fly apart. We need a person who knows how to build coalitions to work togeth-ah.

Here in Michigan, despite what the polls say, even republicans are dumping their greed long enough to vote for Bernie.

That's going from discussions with neighbors, family, strangers around SE Michigan.

In other parts of the state, they haven't heard much about Bernie. When they do, they will like what they learn.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
43. We didn't deserve Bush either.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:55 AM
Feb 2016

Bush stole the election. Gore won and is who Americans deserved by way of the vote.

Strange way to message.

Response to Funtatlaguy (Original post)

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
48. They have been lied to for decades by Big Money...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:07 PM
Feb 2016

...and you think they don't deserve some relief.

This smacks of victim-blaming, I'm afraid.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
50. just give them the head-to-head polls
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 05:53 PM
Feb 2016

Sanders is ahead, Clinton behind, because she has nothing to offer against Trump besides 1. watered-down versions of what he proposes or 2. vague liberish promises nobody trusts her to keep

the party's encouraged mislogic to keep going for 20 years, and you have to point it out to your friends that they're letting the party and its carefully-cultivated fears do their thinking for them

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
51. I think it may actually be to your benefit that he has no shot of winning the nomination.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:12 PM
Feb 2016

Because winning the Presidency and then actually having to do something would be a harsh reality check for most of Bernie's supporters.

The fact his, he's a career politician who has been playing the game for three decades. And there's nothing wrong with that. He seems like a great guy who is on the right side of many, many issues, but running an entire branch of government takes a whole lot more than just good ideas.

In a hypothetical Sanders presidency, he either sticks to his positions and crashes and burns, or he compromises and gets accused of being a "corporatist" or "third wayer" or whatever nonsensical name is the insult of the day here. Either way, it would have been an extremely rude awakening. Better to have it all be a pipe dream, and let you keep the magical halo in your imagination.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Most Americans Don't Dese...