Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jillan

(39,451 posts)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:38 PM Mar 2016

Boston Magazine now reporting on what is going on in New Bedford Mass

Last edited Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:53 PM - Edit history (1)

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2016/03/01/bill-clinton-massachusetts-voting-laws/

Did Bill Clinton, Mayor Walsh Break Massachusetts Voting Laws for Hillary?
Depends on your definition of ‘campaign materials.’

Adam Reilly ?@reillyadam
If I read the pool report right, @hillaryclinton's #1 surrogate--the former POTUS--worked Holy Name for 44 minutes. https://twitter.com/conoryunits/status/704765886205468672
1:33 PM - 1 Mar 2016

Adam Vaccaro ✔ ?@adamtvaccaro
Spokesman in Sec. of state's office says it has reached out to remind campaign of the rule. https://twitter.com/reillyadam/status/704745947499257856
Follow
Adam Vaccaro ✔ ?@adamtvaccaro
Asked whether his presence constitutes campaigning: "He's a well known person. And he's a spouse of a candidate. That should answer the ?."
12:23 PM - 1 Mar 2016
5 5 Retweets 5 5 likes

The former president was spotted in the Newton Free Library in Newton, as well as the Holy Name gymnasium in West Roxbury—both polling locations. He was joined at the latter by Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, a Clinton supporter.


Trouble is, that’s precisely what he and Walsh seem to be doing, according to the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s voting regulations.

“Within 150 feet of a polling place…no person shall solicit votes for or against, or otherwise promote or oppose, any person or political party or position on a ballot question, to be voted on at the current election,” the text reads. In addition, campaign operatives are prohibited from distributing “campaign material intended to influence the vote of a voter in the ongoing election” within 150 of a polling location.



WTG Bill!
112 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boston Magazine now reporting on what is going on in New Bedford Mass (Original Post) jillan Mar 2016 OP
Attention: "Calling Trey Gowdy, calling Trey Gowdy TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #1
lol DrDan Mar 2016 #19
HAHAHA Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #65
cheaters cheaters....and I do believe the vote machines will be tampered with too. bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #2
His being there could be the excuse... Skwmom Mar 2016 #8
Yep. The Bill incident gives them plausible deniability to cover for radical results actually GoneFishin Mar 2016 #52
That has nothing to do with campaigning w/in 150 feet of a polling place - which is Mass voting regs jillan Mar 2016 #15
I know that I also think because they want to win so bad that the machines bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #20
I wouldn't be surprised. jillan Mar 2016 #23
But he didn't campaign inside, he just shook hands with people passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #75
When they flagrantly, willfully break rules for everyone to see, pacalo Mar 2016 #16
Kick.. madfloridian Mar 2016 #3
He did not belong in or in earshot of SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #62
It is a form of voter intimidation. That's not simple disregard. How could he be so careless? The Wielding Truth Mar 2016 #89
I think "careless" covers it. He knew but didn't care. nt SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #95
That's not what I want in the next administration. sigh... The Repub's are even worse though. The Wielding Truth Mar 2016 #100
Let the apologetics... begin! Mufaddal Mar 2016 #4
They already have - just look at the first replies. jillan Mar 2016 #7
Sigh Mufaddal Mar 2016 #14
Do they have electronic voting machines there? monicaangela Mar 2016 #5
I don't know. Do they? jillan Mar 2016 #9
I believe Boston uses the optical scanner but... monicaangela Mar 2016 #17
It was proven in 2008 that the tabulators were incorrect after the county election. bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #24
Bingo! monicaangela Mar 2016 #30
Like always rules don't apply to the Clintons. NT. WDIM Mar 2016 #6
WTF is he thinking? He is deliberately breaking the law. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #10
Yep. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #11
Win by crook...what is the saying bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #26
By hook or by crook monicaangela Mar 2016 #39
When has that ever stopped a Clinton? nt nichomachus Mar 2016 #27
He's just being himself....and to think I used to LOVE that jerk. Punkingal Mar 2016 #31
I loved him in since 1991 and I was furious for what the repugs did to him, but actually, thereismore Mar 2016 #33
Yep. It took me a long time but I woke up. Punkingal Mar 2016 #36
My oldest son is a child of the 90's dragonfly301 Mar 2016 #43
He's just holding a neutral seminar on banking. JackRiddler Mar 2016 #12
An honest candidate, who is SURE to win, would not need to do this n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #13
That would require an honest candidate, you can see the Clintons' problem here. /nt Dragonfli Mar 2016 #22
Bernie's got the enthusiasm in a country that is Clinton-weary. pacalo Mar 2016 #28
From the NYT madfloridian Mar 2016 #18
Wow! It's really getting press. The one who is to blame, imho, is the Mayor! jillan Mar 2016 #21
Oh geez Kittycat Mar 2016 #25
You don't think the Mayor is in bed with the Clintons...maybe a nice apointment bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #29
He's a Hillary supporter. jillan Mar 2016 #32
And he knows he is breaking the law but ya know when you are offered a good bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #40
Bill Clinton is a lawyer and has run a lot of campaigns. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #57
The mayor campaigned for Hillary in NH. nt Chezboo Mar 2016 #94
Bill broke no laws as reported so far. Gwhittey Mar 2016 #34
Just posted this below - here is the law, as posted by Boston Magazine jillan Mar 2016 #38
Billy boy not talk bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #41
"otherwise promote"...that's the part he absolutely broke. There is no other reason JimDandy Mar 2016 #68
Exactly. There is no HONEST way to claim this was some random visit to a random public place. arcane1 Mar 2016 #70
as long as he does not talk, AlbertCat Mar 2016 #83
He can talk--he just can't hand out buttons or say "Hey everyone, vote for my wife" MADem Mar 2016 #93
It is not illegal for candidates or their surrogates to be at polling places 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #35
In Mass they cannot be within 1500 feet, jillan Mar 2016 #37
Are you trying to claim that actually went to the booths with voters? 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #42
He was inside of the polling place and that is against rules and regs according to the sec of state. jillan Mar 2016 #44
Heads are spinning trying to come up with the right memo to counter this arcane1 Mar 2016 #46
I don't know what happened, I'm asking what is being alleged 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #47
Please read this - jillan Mar 2016 #50
"within the guard rail" 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #53
"Within 150 feet of a polling place" n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #55
150 feet. In my Los Angeles neighborhood, the average lot is 50 feet of the street lenght. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #58
No, what you're claiming is not what he was doing. MADem Mar 2016 #91
They weren't "solliciting" votes. What they were doing is entirely legal, sorry. MADem Mar 2016 #45
It's just the typical Clinton overstepping, noblesse oblige attitude. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #61
And if you find out that Sanders and/or his surrogates did the same thing.....? MADem Mar 2016 #69
Show me that they did in a state in which it is against the law. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #77
They are only limited by what they can get away without being caught or held accountable for. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #97
Just out for a stroll, of course, everybody believes that. I mean what else could it be? A Simple Game Mar 2016 #82
Don't be coy. MADem Mar 2016 #85
And don't think the rest of us are fools. A Simple Game Mar 2016 #111
Oh please. Intimidating? They were so intimidating that people were falling over themselves to MADem Mar 2016 #112
With a MEGAPHONE. Also reported voters couldn't get into vote.... AzDar Mar 2016 #106
There was no violation of law. Read through to the end. MADem Mar 2016 #48
This is from the office of the Sec of State of the Commonwealth jillan Mar 2016 #51
She should be disqualified from receiving delegates berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #49
shameless kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #54
He was probably just looking for young women. jalan48 Mar 2016 #56
Laws and rules are for the little people The Traveler Mar 2016 #59
There are reports of people not being able to vote, due to Bill's Hilarious HiJinks... AzDar Mar 2016 #60
What was that? And where? Ned_Devine Mar 2016 #64
They CLOSED OFF polling places while Slick Willy ( and the Mayor of New Bedford) CAMPAIGNED there... AzDar Mar 2016 #67
You do realize how absurd that sounds on its face. MADem Mar 2016 #74
Easy. They aren't as likely to be voting for Hillary in New Bedford. Only Bernie signs here. FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #84
Signs don't always translate to actual voter support, you know. nt MADem Mar 2016 #87
Every single post by you in this thread... dchill Mar 2016 #110
But, but...rules don't apply to the Clintons. SoapBox Mar 2016 #63
I'm sure he changed a lot of minds. if Bernie loses there tonight, blame Bill!!!! wyldwolf Mar 2016 #66
Seriously? He violated the election laws of the Commonwealth. It has nothing to do with votes. jillan Mar 2016 #71
link that says He violated the election laws of the Commonwealth? wyldwolf Mar 2016 #88
Would you care to back up that assertion with actual proof? Tarc Mar 2016 #105
Depends on zentrum Mar 2016 #72
the rules don't apply in the Clinton family Merryland Mar 2016 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author itsrobert Mar 2016 #76
Look people (please) the Clintons do not want Bernie to win MA which is what Bernie bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #78
If people actually support this bull shit bec Mar 2016 #79
Losers cheat to win. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #80
Well, he's slick Willy for a reason... Helen Borg Mar 2016 #81
There Are Rules, Then There's "The Clinton Way" gordyfl Mar 2016 #86
Here's an interesting link: Clinton was SCHEDULED to be in New Bedford since YESTERDAY. MADem Mar 2016 #90
Scheduled to speak outside the Buttonwood Park Warming House at 12:05pm Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #102
It is NOT illegal. I know you want it to be, but it's not. MADem Mar 2016 #107
I posted this in another thread on this topic: Mr.Bill Mar 2016 #92
This is exactly why I don't want him in the WH again The Blue Flower Mar 2016 #96
The most important thing to remember Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #98
In case you didn't figure it out years back mike dub Mar 2016 #99
I would get tired of making excuses for this campaign if I were in the business of doing so renate Mar 2016 #101
Bedford or NEW Bedford - two separate places in MA - like night and day Justice Mar 2016 #103
Fixed - thanks jillan Mar 2016 #104
Prison. Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #108
"I did not run interference for that wom...the former First Lady". n/t jtuck004 Mar 2016 #109

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
1. Attention: "Calling Trey Gowdy, calling Trey Gowdy
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:40 PM
Mar 2016

report to the announcer's booth, ASAP, and bring your select committee"

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
52. Yep. The Bill incident gives them plausible deniability to cover for radical results actually
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

caused by electronic voting machine fraud.

They are such cheating dirtbags.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
15. That has nothing to do with campaigning w/in 150 feet of a polling place - which is Mass voting regs
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:48 PM
Mar 2016

It's all in the article.

It's NOT about the voting machines. It's about campaigning inside of a polling place.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
20. I know that I also think because they want to win so bad that the machines
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:52 PM
Mar 2016

owned by corporate America will be tampered with...they have the codes.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
75. But he didn't campaign inside, he just shook hands with people
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016

wink wink

It's illegal to have pictures inside that would be considered "campaign material" for one candidate or another...but a famous person like Bill can walk around inside shaking hands with workers, and not be considered "campaign material". Well in my book, that's not campaigning, as long as he's wearing a paper bag over his head.

Oh, wait...he's not!

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
16. When they flagrantly, willfully break rules for everyone to see,
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:50 PM
Mar 2016

what must they do when no one can see?

For all we know, he could have been at these polling places 'on business'. Shady.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
62. He did not belong in or in earshot of
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:26 PM
Mar 2016

the area where people were not allowed to have political signs because of distance. Period.

I doubt it made any difference, but it shows a disregard for the rules.

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
100. That's not what I want in the next administration. sigh... The Repub's are even worse though.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:41 PM
Mar 2016

God. It turns my stomach to think the only guy worth leading this country is so buried in paid bull sh*t and out and out corruption.

Who really wants to go back to segregation, illegal abortion, a open racial and sex caste system, laws that protect only the wealthy, and allows this country to throw away one who seeks an honest life.

I don't get it!!

It is not what makes our country "Great again".

I Bern for a revival of honesty!

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
17. I believe Boston uses the optical scanner but...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:50 PM
Mar 2016

One form of wholesale fraud possible with optical scan voting systems is during the recording of votes. Douglas W. Jones of the University of Iowa states that if a potential attacker were to gain access to the voting system configuration files, they would be able to "credit one candidate with votes intended for another." He found these files are exposed in the computer system used to prepare the election, making them vulnerable to anyone setting up the election. The files are then transferred to the voting system using removable media, and "anyone with access to these media could potentially attack the system.

Another form of wholesale fraud is during tabulation. Possible attacks have been demonstrated by Harri Hursti and the University of Connecticut.

If an attacker is able to obtain a blank ballot (by theft, counterfeit, or a legitimate absentee ballot) the attacker can then mark the ballot for their chosen candidates and convince (through intimidation or bribery) a voter to take the pre-marked ballot to a polling station, exchange it for the blank ballot issued and return the blank ballot to the attacker. This is known as chain voting

Some suggest many of these well-known vulnerabilities can be effectively mitigated. Ballot stuffing may be resolved with incorporation of randomly generated ballot identifier for each paper ballot and capturing digital ballot images of scanned ballots as electronic audit.

Tabulation fraud and wholesale tampering can also be prevented by adding a cryptographic verification mechanism. This approach is mathematically based, and thus invariant to software attacks or breaches in chain-of-custody of the paper ballots. One such system is Scantegrity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_scan_voting_system

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
24. It was proven in 2008 that the tabulators were incorrect after the county election.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

officer kept saying they work great...he ate crow. What I meant is that votes can be tampered with with vote machines, with people counting wrong and with tabulation...and if someone wants to win bad enough, which the Clintons do then they can rig the system...now where have I heard rig before. They have the connections to do it and the establishment has said they don't want Bernie.

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
39. By hook or by crook
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:10 PM
Mar 2016

Some even say by hook, by crook or by pocket book meaning either one or all three of the three methods is necessary for some who are trying to win. Hook=anything that catches; snare; trap. Crook=a dishonest person, especially a sharper, swindler, or thief. Pocketbook=a person's financial resources or means.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
33. I loved him in since 1991 and I was furious for what the repugs did to him, but actually,
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

he did it to himself. And to that woman.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
36. Yep. It took me a long time but I woke up.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:07 PM
Mar 2016

I mean, how brazen can a person be? He knew they were after him, and he just went ahead with his idiotic behavior. And he would still be denying it if not for the blue dress.

dragonfly301

(399 posts)
43. My oldest son is a child of the 90's
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:14 PM
Mar 2016

one day after school he had two neighbor girls over to play. Things got quiet and I went in to check on them and found them under a blanket playing tent. I was busy making dinner and couldn't spend my time watching them so I asked the little girls to go home. After they left my 8yo said "I did not have sex with those women." Thanks Bill Clinton. The 8yo is now an improv comic in Chicago.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
28. Bernie's got the enthusiasm in a country that is Clinton-weary.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

I'm very wary about Clinton being the so-called front runner.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
21. Wow! It's really getting press. The one who is to blame, imho, is the Mayor!
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:53 PM
Mar 2016

He should know the voting rules and regs of his state & should have stopped Bill from going into the polling places.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
29. You don't think the Mayor is in bed with the Clintons...maybe a nice apointment
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

when she gets elected ...no...

jillan

(39,451 posts)
32. He's a Hillary supporter.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:03 PM
Mar 2016
The former president was spotted in the Newton Free Library in Newton, as well as the Holy Name gymnasium in West Roxbury—both polling locations. He was joined at the latter by Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, a Clinton supporter
.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
40. And he knows he is breaking the law but ya know when you are offered a good
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:11 PM
Mar 2016

place in the Adminstration...they bribe all the time in DC they blackmail too...The Clintons have been in DC a long long time.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
57. Bill Clinton is a lawyer and has run a lot of campaigns.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:16 PM
Mar 2016

He was flaunting the law. Just more corruption and disrespect for the law.

After all, when you have that much money, I suppose you begin to think that the law is just for the little people.

Uggh! Hillary!

How can anyone vote for her???

 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
34. Bill broke no laws as reported so far.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

Him being in polling place is allowed as long as he does not talk, approach voters. I mean if people buy that you are not going to be influenced by someone giving you 9 million dollars for a few hours work, they are not going to think Slick Willy was up to no good.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
68. "otherwise promote"...that's the part he absolutely broke. There is no other reason
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:36 PM
Mar 2016

for:
--the presence of a candidate's husband;
--on election day;
--at multiple polling stations;
--in a state where he does not reside and which state is a toss up btw his wife and Sanders
--in a county that was going for Sanders;
--and whose presence shut down (security denied voters access to the polls for hours before and during his visit) access to those polling sites and caused hours long voting lines after he left.

If I were the judge, I'd extend the voting times for each of those locations and fine Clinton's campaign to kazoo for knowingly violating the law.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
83. as long as he does not talk,
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:57 PM
Mar 2016

Baloney.

Bill Clinton walking into a voting place is no different from a stranger walking in with a big sign that says " VOTE FOR CLINTON!"

The conflict of interest is HUGE.


Where's Chelsea? Someone keep an eye on her.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
93. He can talk--he just can't hand out buttons or say "Hey everyone, vote for my wife"
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:10 PM
Mar 2016

but he can say "Nice day"....

And Bernie Sanders is free to do the very same thing.

So's his wife.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
35. It is not illegal for candidates or their surrogates to be at polling places
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:05 PM
Mar 2016

I don't remember the last election I voted in that some were not present.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
42. Are you trying to claim that actually went to the booths with voters?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:12 PM
Mar 2016

Everyone who has ever run for office knows you an be at the polling place. If he says "Vote for Hillary" he's broken the rules. If he says "I'm Bill Clinton, nice to meet you" he has not.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
44. He was inside of the polling place and that is against rules and regs according to the sec of state.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:16 PM
Mar 2016

I posted 2 links on this.

You can argue all you want - it's in black and white http://www.mass.gov/courts/docs/lawlib/900-999cmr/950cmr53.pdf

And it's now being reported in Boston & has hit the NYT.



But whatever.....

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
46. Heads are spinning trying to come up with the right memo to counter this
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:19 PM
Mar 2016

And then there is the matter of distributing said memo before the story gets too much attention.

It must suck, supporting the unsupportable.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
47. I don't know what happened, I'm asking what is being alleged
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:21 PM
Mar 2016

The rules that you posted do not state that it was illegal for him to be inside the polling place. What he may or may not have done there is a separate matter.

Not worth making a big deal about in any case.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
50. Please read this -
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:28 PM
Mar 2016

This is from the Sec of State of Mass.
http://www.mass.gov/courts/docs/lawlib/900-999cmr/950cmr53.pdf

(20) Only the Following Personnel shall be Permitted Within Guard Rail.
(a) Election officials
(b) Voters in the process of voting
(c) Police officers with the permission of the warden
(d) Representatives of the clerk's office
(e) Children may accompany a voter within the guardrail, unless the wardendecides that it would
disrupt good order.

This is what has been documented:

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2016/03/01/bill-clinton-massachusetts-voting-laws/

Inside the polling location, Clinton purchased a cup of coffee from a bake sale and shook hands with poll workers. When another woman asked for a photo, he said, “As long as we’re not violating any election laws.”

Trouble is, that’s precisely what he and Walsh seem to be doing, according to the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s voting regulations.

“Within 150 feet of a polling place…no person shall solicit votes for or against, or otherwise promote or oppose, any person or political party or position on a ballot question, to be voted on at the current election,” the text reads. In addition, campaign operatives are prohibited from distributing “campaign material intended to influence the vote of a voter in the ongoing election” within 150 of a polling location.


http://www.nytimes.com/live/super-tuesday-2016-elections/bill-clinton-gets-a-little-too-close-to-voters-in-boston/?smid=tw-nytpolitics&smtyp=cur

A pool report from Mr. Clinton’s visit to Boston’s West Roxbury neighborhood on Tuesday morning said that he went inside the polling place with the city’s mayor, Martin J. Walsh. Mr. Clinton stopped at a bake sale at the entrance and then shook hands with poll workers.

He then showed up at a library in Newton, Mr. Galvin said, and the poll workers were flummoxed.

“We had to remind everybody what the rules are, that there is no campaigning within 150 feet of the voting booths because people are entitled to their privacy,” Mr. Galvin said. “And it’s not just him but his media entourage.


--------------
Done with this convo

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
58. 150 feet. In my Los Angeles neighborhood, the average lot is 50 feet of the street lenght.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:22 PM
Mar 2016

so that's 3 Los Angeles city lots in my area.

He had no business being there. His face is a campaign ad.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
91. No, what you're claiming is not what he was doing.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:09 PM
Mar 2016

Otherwise, Galvin wouldn't have allowed him to continue on.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
45. They weren't "solliciting" votes. What they were doing is entirely legal, sorry.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:19 PM
Mar 2016

You can talk to poll workers--you can even talk to voters to say "Nice weather," or "Thanks so much" or "how are you today." You can't say "Vote For Clinton!" or anything like that.

Marty Walsh is a consummate politician--he knows the rules up one side and down the other.

File this under "baseless conspiracy theories that will nonetheless gain currency" -- but there's no there, there. They walked up to the line, and not over. There is nothing that might have prevented Bernie and Jane Sanders from doing the very same thing in a state they wanted to influence.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
61. It's just the typical Clinton overstepping, noblesse oblige attitude.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:24 PM
Mar 2016

I cannot stand those people.

No humility.

Dishonest and trying to take advantage.

It's just disgusting.

Bernie, on the other hand, goes out of his way to try to be fair and do the right thing.

The contrast is incredible.

No to the Clintons. no. no. no.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
77. Show me that they did in a state in which it is against the law.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:48 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie was in Vermont voting in his precinct today. I already read about it. He is allowed to vote in his own precinct. There is no law against that. And Vermont may permit this. But California and Mass. don't.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
97. They are only limited by what they can get away without being caught or held accountable for.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

Fuck this shit.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
82. Just out for a stroll, of course, everybody believes that. I mean what else could it be?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:55 PM
Mar 2016

I do it all the time on election days, just wander around a polling place then drive to the next one and do the same, no big deal.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
85. Don't be coy.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:59 PM
Mar 2016

Of course they were looking for advantage--up to and within the confines of the law.

Sanders could do this, too--for all you know, he did.

Would you be as outraged if you learned he was doing the same darn thing? Hmmm?

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
111. And don't think the rest of us are fools.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:11 PM
Mar 2016
They weren't "solliciting" votes.

Of course they weren't just soliciting votes, they were also intimidating people some of the time.

And thanks for the compliment, I haven't been called coy in years. But I'm not sure you know what the word means.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
48. There was no violation of law. Read through to the end.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:25 PM
Mar 2016
Walsh’s office denies any wrongdoing. “President Clinton joined Mayor Walsh to thank poll workers in West Roxbury this morning. They were not campaigning inside the polling location,” spokesperson Bonnie McGilpin said.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
51. This is from the office of the Sec of State of the Commonwealth
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:30 PM
Mar 2016

950 CMR: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH

950 CMR 53.00: VOTING AND COUNTING PROCEDURES FOR VOTING MACHINES


(20) Only the Following Personnel shall be Permitted Within Guard Rail.
(a) Election officials
(b) Voters in the process of voting
(c) Police officers with the permission of the warden
(d) Representatives of the clerk's office
(e) Children may accompany a voter within the guardrail, unless the wardendecides that it would
disrupt good order.

ETA link http://www.mass.gov/courts/docs/lawlib/900-999cmr/950cmr53.pdf

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
67. They CLOSED OFF polling places while Slick Willy ( and the Mayor of New Bedford) CAMPAIGNED there...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:33 PM
Mar 2016

MADem

(135,425 posts)
74. You do realize how absurd that sounds on its face.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:42 PM
Mar 2016

If polling places are closed, how will people vote for Hillary Clinton? By osmosis?

dchill

(38,474 posts)
110. Every single post by you in this thread...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:48 PM
Mar 2016

is deliberately obtuse. Or is it worse? Can you really believe yourself?

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
63. But, but...rules don't apply to the Clintons.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

NO More Clintons.

(and the thought of him skeezing around the White House makes me sick.)

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
72. Depends on
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:40 PM
Mar 2016

…what your definition of "election" is.

For some, it means coronation by any means possible.

Response to jillan (Original post)

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
78. Look people (please) the Clintons do not want Bernie to win MA which is what Bernie
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:48 PM
Mar 2016

is hoping for. So they are going to try everything they can to make sure he does not win including Bill's celebrity. So they can use a loss in MA for Bernie against him to make him look like a failure. Wonder if Bernie knows about this crap going on.

 

bec

(107 posts)
79. If people actually support this bull shit
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:50 PM
Mar 2016

you need to check yourself. I see this as a form of voter suppression. Plus it is illegal.

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
81. Well, he's slick Willy for a reason...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:54 PM
Mar 2016

He wants badly to go back to the WH. Even as a trailing spouse. Ah, those memories...

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
102. Scheduled to speak outside the Buttonwood Park Warming House at 12:05pm
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:49 PM
Mar 2016

And yet "The former president was spotted in the Newton Free Library in Newton, as well as the Holy Name gymnasium in West Roxbury—both polling locations. He was joined at the latter by Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, a Clinton supporter."

Are both of those locations outside the Warming House? I do not think that they are.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
107. It is NOT illegal. I know you want it to be, but it's not.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:08 PM
Mar 2016

So long as he doesn't electioneer, he's allowed to be there. He was there with the Mayor of Boston, Marty Walsh. He later went to New Bedford--it's not a long drive.

The Blue Flower

(5,442 posts)
96. This is exactly why I don't want him in the WH again
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:35 PM
Mar 2016

One can only imagine the damage he would do, upstaging and undermining her administration. In fact, imagination fails. It would be an unmitigated disaster.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
98. The most important thing to remember
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

is that just the sight of Bill Clinton is an high impact advertisement for his wife. As much as I dislike some of the things he did, I would probably still be a bit in awe seeing or meeting him in person. It absolutely could influence some people that are right on the fence.

It's just not right. Not at all.

renate

(13,776 posts)
101. I would get tired of making excuses for this campaign if I were in the business of doing so
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:44 PM
Mar 2016

Lucky for me I don't have to.

Sheesh. I'll vote for her if I have to but I sure won't like it.

Justice

(7,185 posts)
103. Bedford or NEW Bedford - two separate places in MA - like night and day
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:51 PM
Mar 2016


Most people in the north shore town of Bedford will be voting Republican

Most people in the southcoast city of New Bedford will be voting for a Democrat.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
108. Prison.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:10 PM
Mar 2016

He should know the voting laws of all 50 states. Especially the distance away from a polling place where he is allowed to make a speech. Shame on you Bill.

Prison. Right. Fucking. Now.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Boston Magazine now repor...