Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:48 PM Mar 2016

NYT says campaign report indicates Bill Clinton went inside the polling place with mayor.

Bill Clinton Gets a Little Too Close to Voters in Boston

Some poll workers in Boston did a double-take on Tuesday at the unusual sight of a former president of the United States campaigning inside polling places.

Bill Clinton, an inveterate campaigner who has always loved Election Day, was ranging over the state trying to pump up voters to cast their ballots for his wife, Hillary Clinton.

“We had to remind some of our poll workers that even a president can’t go inside and work a polling place,” William F. Galvin, the Massachusetts secretary of state, said in an interview.

A pool report from Mr. Clinton’s visit to Boston’s West Roxbury neighborhood on Tuesday morning said that he went inside the polling place with the city’s mayor, Martin J. Walsh. Mr. Clinton stopped at a bake sale at the entrance and then shook hands with poll workers.

When one woman asked for a photo, Mr. Clinton said, “As long as we’re not violating any election laws,” the pool report said.
168 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT says campaign report indicates Bill Clinton went inside the polling place with mayor. (Original Post) madfloridian Mar 2016 OP
Thanks for this! NWCorona Mar 2016 #1
"campaigning inside polling places" arcane1 Mar 2016 #2
Because, just like Nixon, they want to make sure their plans... truebrit71 Mar 2016 #120
Did he break any laws? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #3
He's a former president, he would never break rules...would he? madfloridian Mar 2016 #6
Yes. gcomeau Mar 2016 #19
It would be the same law Jane Sanders broke when she went into the precinct. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #51
If... gcomeau Mar 2016 #61
Show the law which was broken. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #66
Not just campaigning. He bogged down the precinct. 2 laws broken. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #80
I watched the video provided, did not see him obstructing any one, in fact I did not see him. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #86
they blocked the entrance? very doubtful. I bet people there elected to stay outside.... bettyellen Mar 2016 #89
They just chose to stand outside and complain about Clinton holding up the vote? Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #94
I take it she *didn't* do that then? gcomeau Mar 2016 #104
No electioneering within 150 feet. Basically every state has a rule like that Land Shark Mar 2016 #113
Primaries are run by political parties, not the state. emulatorloo Mar 2016 #129
All PA primary & general elections funded by county govts Divernan Mar 2016 #158
Yes, I've found out I was incorrect on this. Simply put I was confusing IA caucus w Primaries. emulatorloo Mar 2016 #160
Nice deflection passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #118
Damn those pesky facts. vdogg Mar 2016 #64
Which pesky fact would that be? gcomeau Mar 2016 #107
Link to a source? nt redwitch Mar 2016 #73
What source are you looking to find? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #90
Proof that Jane Sanders was wandering around polling places not her own. nt redwitch Mar 2016 #95
I saw her here in Ca Politicalboi Mar 2016 #123
It's maddening! redwitch Mar 2016 #125
From what I read, he was shaking the hands of the poll workers, and thanking them passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #119
He did if he uttered the name Hillary Clinton to a voter. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #24
That's the "otherwise promote" part of the law, definitely. arcane1 Mar 2016 #30
if he uttered the name Hillary Clinton to a voter. AlbertCat Mar 2016 #42
He didn't even have to do that. gcomeau Mar 2016 #53
He could have been a poll watcher, the rules has to be followed, does not Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #63
Does the following lead you to believe he could have been a poll watcher? cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #98
I could have been an observer, did he act to challenge, if the answer is no then this does not apply Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #99
If he isn't an appointed poll watcher and isn't a resident, he had no business in the polling place. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #106
You are being intentionally obtuse about this passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #122
You know damn well he wasn't. Your efforts are getting pathetic now. -eom gcomeau Mar 2016 #114
Just his presence would be part of the campaign. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #68
The Globe also reports Clinton told one voter, “Pull the lever for Hillary.” w4rma Mar 2016 #112
Have you seen a SINGLE Hillary supporter say "Yeah, that looks bad."? cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #117
Most every informed Hillary supporter that I am encountering is an authoritarian. (nt) w4rma Mar 2016 #135
Yes: Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #36
if he did not solicit for any votes within 150 ft it is not a violation. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #56
It is unethical at the very least. redwitch Mar 2016 #67
It isn't any more unethical than Jane Sanders in the precinct this morning. A law Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #93
She voted in HER precinct in VT ONLY Politicalboi Mar 2016 #128
There has to be a violation of statues, what statue has been violated? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #132
JANE. WAS. THERE. TO. VOTE! Divernan Mar 2016 #159
Did she solicit any voters? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #163
"Is Obama a Muslim?" "Not that I'm aware of." - Hillary Clinton highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #48
California law prohibits campaigning in a polling place. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #60
Exactly, it qualifies as "otherwise promoting" n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #69
Really? madfloridian Mar 2016 #4
Bill's sense of what is appropriate and what is not fails again... CTyankee Mar 2016 #8
Once a cheater, always a cheater dragonfly301 Mar 2016 #50
I'm voting for Bernie in our primary, which unfortunately, is in late April... CTyankee Mar 2016 #55
Just the sight of UglyGreed Mar 2016 #9
I don't think he should have been given access unless he could prove that he was eligible to vote Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #14
How about campaigning with a bull horn INdemo Mar 2016 #151
.... riversedge Mar 2016 #5
The ho-hum attitude by Hillary supporters toward questionable behavior is noted... AlbertCat Mar 2016 #26
Well who do they resemble??? UglyGreed Mar 2016 #62
You'd think they'd worry about the stench rubbing off on them. senz Mar 2016 #75
Your concern over the lack of respect for election rules is noted passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #29
If Sanders did this Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #47
I thought you could go into a polling place not your own, you jsut could not talk to people hollysmom Mar 2016 #7
Mayor huge supporter of Bill's wife. Should think twice even if legal. madfloridian Mar 2016 #10
Massive obvious conflict of interest going on here. Bubzer Mar 2016 #28
well, that is pretty obvious, the rules are different for different people hollysmom Mar 2016 #71
Bill Clinton is fast becoming the INdemo Mar 2016 #156
Being a former president and husband of a candidate, it's hard to remove the electoral context. arcane1 Mar 2016 #11
I think you have it right. Of course, it's only a crime if you're affiliated with the MADem Mar 2016 #13
Please tell me then SheenaR Mar 2016 #57
He was there "to thank poll workers." Bernie could have gone round thanking poll workers, too, if MADem Mar 2016 #74
I don't think anybody will be so forgiving Lazy Daisy Mar 2016 #88
You can "not like it" but so long as he stays within the lines, ya gotta go with the flow. MADem Mar 2016 #97
No they cannot within Mass law SheenaR Mar 2016 #105
This is not true. I am IN Massachusetts. MADem Mar 2016 #109
The law was posted before in several threads SheenaR Mar 2016 #111
I am not going to argue with you about this. MADem Mar 2016 #115
This message was self-deleted by its author SheenaR Mar 2016 #103
Bill would have to put a bag over his head passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #32
Only registered voters allowed in polling places. Period! Divernan Mar 2016 #161
Stupid, stupid, stupid. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #12
You sure about that? MADem Mar 2016 #16
Bernie is allowed to vote. Whereas Bill was hanging out in Mass - not where he lives. TBF Mar 2016 #21
Marty Walsh is NOT stupid. He knows where the line is--so does Clinton. This dog won't hunt. MADem Mar 2016 #23
Then it's all okay then. madfloridian Mar 2016 #37
I do not understand what that post has to do with what I have written. MADem Mar 2016 #78
Yes, of course, if Bill did it, so did Bernie passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #38
Who said "so did?" He could, though if he wanted--you should probably read what people MADem Mar 2016 #65
So did Bernie? For all we know he might have done it, we haven't seen the news reports yet? passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #83
That's a quote? RiverNoord Mar 2016 #77
"Coloring within the lines" is not enough to win the general. TBF Mar 2016 #81
Look--no one is preventing the Sanders Camp from doing the same thing. And for all you know, MADem Mar 2016 #92
If he's breaking the rules, it matters. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #102
Susan Sarandon is not a former president TBF Mar 2016 #127
Arel you implying that Bernie does not have the right to vote? passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #35
No, I'm "demostrating" (as opposed to IMPLYING) that it's not illegal to take a photo in a polling MADem Mar 2016 #45
YOu deny it? passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #52
I admire your persistence. Some people just can't accept Purrfessor Mar 2016 #124
Uh, you do know Vermont is voting today? Freaked Out Mar 2016 #79
Are you sure it's 50 ft? Another MA poster said 150 ft. JimDandy Mar 2016 #54
It's 150 Feet INdemo Mar 2016 #154
Thanks. Apparently some lawyer is already looking into filing a case. JimDandy Mar 2016 #162
This message was self-deleted by its author INdemo Mar 2016 #164
Just outrageous. I have no respect left for him at all. Punkingal Mar 2016 #15
I wonder about his sanity marions ghost Mar 2016 #17
It's called hubris, and neither of them bother to hide it anymore. Punkingal Mar 2016 #18
Yep! nt Duval Mar 2016 #136
I was just waiting to see what they'd pull this time. nt TBF Mar 2016 #20
Rules are for peasants, not their masters. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #22
is that OK? kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #25
Primaries aren't subject to the same election laws as general elections scheming daemons Mar 2016 #27
Whatever Bill does is okay. Whatever the Clintons want they get. madfloridian Mar 2016 #33
Then link us to the special primary-only election laws. arcane1 Mar 2016 #34
This is the look I am giving the clintons right now. retrowire Mar 2016 #31
Well Nicky Haley in SC did this less than two weeks ago... scscholar Mar 2016 #39
Oh, it's been decided.... madfloridian Mar 2016 #41
"Republicans do it too" is the worst possible defense n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #46
Because SC and MA have identical laws. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2016 #131
Is this illegal or not? retrowire Mar 2016 #40
Illegal SheenaR Mar 2016 #58
Bill Clinton's aura is always within 150 feet of any polling place in whatever state he's in. LuvLoogie Mar 2016 #43
OMG-that's hilarious....!!!! nt MADem Mar 2016 #49
Okay, that is funny. Orsino Mar 2016 #152
Where I live this would be illegal. Vinca Mar 2016 #44
Damned illegal in Pennsylvania Divernan Mar 2016 #91
The defense (such as it is) so far appears to be that he wasn't actually "campaigning." arcane1 Mar 2016 #96
Campaigning is WHY he was there. dchill Mar 2016 #126
Exactly n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #139
Still wouldn't work in Penn. Divernan Mar 2016 #144
He wasn't doing no stinkin' campaigning Oilwellian Mar 2016 #168
Far be it from Bill to do anything that would have the appearance of impropriety. Mufaddal Mar 2016 #59
arrest the bum stupidicus Mar 2016 #70
The Clintons seem to assume money & power grant entrée senz Mar 2016 #72
Electioneering. Freaked Out Mar 2016 #76
I think we need a new acronym. EmperorHasNoClothes Mar 2016 #82
Speaking on a megaphone outside a poll xloadiex Mar 2016 #84
Truth trumps bullshit, no pun intended. nc4bo Mar 2016 #101
That is an outrageous interference with voting - low, even for a Clinton! Divernan Mar 2016 #145
Clear breach of Mas Election Law "Obstructing voters". Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #85
Ick! SoapBox Mar 2016 #87
WTF!!! Phlem Mar 2016 #100
Kick! FloriTexan Mar 2016 #108
Shenanigans! Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #110
I am a Precinct Inspector in my county in California. Mr.Bill Mar 2016 #116
And if the person in charge was a Hillary INdemo Mar 2016 #157
Well. in theory, the person in charge Mr.Bill Mar 2016 #165
Yes you would but dont think that was the case with Bill's obstruction. INdemo Mar 2016 #166
Well, every election, temporary poll workers are hired. Mr.Bill Mar 2016 #167
A Clinton showing a disregard for rules. Shocking! /s PoliticalMalcontent Mar 2016 #121
Aiyaiyai...just fine him the 50 bucks and be done with it. Wednesdays Mar 2016 #130
It's election fraud. redwitch Mar 2016 #134
He did NOT violate any laws. fun n serious Mar 2016 #133
It's nere coincidence that his wife is running for president, and he randomly stopped by arcane1 Mar 2016 #140
It's common fun n serious Mar 2016 #141
NEVER inside the polling place. Divernan Mar 2016 #146
This is ugly and wrong ms liberty Mar 2016 #137
Areas being roped off near a polling place and added traffic congestion by his SS detail ... slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #138
And it's not the way a "guaranteed winner" would behave, either n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #142
Yes! And not the way to behave towards people trying to vote :( nt slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #147
Massachusetts as a silver spike through the heart. Octafish Mar 2016 #143
IOKIYRC Here's the video of Bill with the megaphone. madfloridian Mar 2016 #148
He was holding up voting. Where's the outrage? madfloridian Mar 2016 #149
It's in another thread noiretextatique Mar 2016 #150
The tape don't lie. Octafish Mar 2016 #153
Boston Globe Article baran Mar 2016 #155
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
19. Yes.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:11 PM
Mar 2016

The well known spouse of a candidate cannot just stroll into a polling place to start glad handing the damn voters. The MA Secretary of State's office had to send the Clinton campaign a "reminder" about the election laws after this.

I'm sure their wrists are throbbing from that stinging slap.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
61. If...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:52 PM
Mar 2016

...she strolled into some polling place she had no voting business in and wandered around for 30 or 40 minutes chatting it up with every voter in the place... in a state where doing that at a polling place is illegal... yup.

So when and where did this happen?

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
80. Not just campaigning. He bogged down the precinct. 2 laws broken.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

They shut down voting for 2 hours.There is video of the lines that formed. This is a breach of 950 C.M.R. § 54.04(22)(a). "Observers are allowed inside the polling place, outside the guardrail, unless they are disorderly or obstruct the access of voters."

WORD DOC MASS ELECTION LAW ---> https://t.co/duNiALwVQY

VIDEO FROM BEDFORD --->

&feature=youtu.be

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
86. I watched the video provided, did not see him obstructing any one, in fact I did not see him.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:27 PM
Mar 2016

Don't stretch this one, as this post indicated observers are allowed in the voting place, was he disorderly, no, no video to prove he was, no video to prove he was obstructing access of any voters. There is not any violation.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
89. they blocked the entrance? very doubtful. I bet people there elected to stay outside....
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:28 PM
Mar 2016

and vote afterward. As is their right.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
104. I take it she *didn't* do that then?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:41 PM
Mar 2016

Ma Secretary of State's office said it broke the law. What more do you freaking want?

You. Can't. Campaign. In. Polling. Places. And strolling into a polling place you are not voting in and then hanging out chatting up the voters when you are the incredibly well known spouse of one of the candidates IS CAMPAIGNING.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
158. All PA primary & general elections funded by county govts
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:18 PM
Mar 2016

In Allegheny County, the county pays for the machines, the training, and all the salaries for poll workers.

You are confusing primary campaigns with the actual primary elections.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
123. I saw her here in Ca
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:16 PM
Mar 2016

Yes I know it was her. She said she was looking for the Colonel Sanders, but I knew it was her. She can't hide from me. I told her yes, I am voting for Bernie too, but in June. She's early.

Rules and laws do NOT apply to the Clinton's. Even her supporters will look for excuses they never thought they would have to. I would be embarrassed, but that's me.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
119. From what I read, he was shaking the hands of the poll workers, and thanking them
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:01 PM
Mar 2016

Not shaking the hands of the voters. But we may just have to wait to see how this one "shakes" out...pun intended.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
24. He did if he uttered the name Hillary Clinton to a voter.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:30 PM
Mar 2016

And if he didn't talk to voters, then why go in?

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
30. That's the "otherwise promote" part of the law, definitely.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:34 PM
Mar 2016

As a former president whose wife is a candidate, his mere appearance is going to be interpreted as "otherwise promoting". There is literally no other reason for him to be there, inside the actual polling place.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
42. if he uttered the name Hillary Clinton to a voter.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:41 PM
Mar 2016

He doesn't have to do that.

It's impossible to separate him from the candidate.

It's the same as if someone walked in with big sign that said: "VOTE FOR HILLARY".

I'm not naive enough to think the Clintons are not aware of the conflict of interest.

Unbelievable..... and low down dirty. MY cat is less of an opportunist.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
53. He didn't even have to do that.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:48 PM
Mar 2016

He's a former president. EVERYONE knows who he is and who his wife is.

Just being there chatting it up with voters as they are voting is campaigning. As the MA secretary of state's office had to "remind" the Clinton campaign after this happened.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
63. He could have been a poll watcher, the rules has to be followed, does not
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:53 PM
Mar 2016

Say anything about not allowing him into the polls, the law does not allow soliciting, do you know if he solicited?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
98. Does the following lead you to believe he could have been a poll watcher?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:36 PM
Mar 2016
The state committee of a political party may appoint a person to act as a challenger of voters at any polling place in the commonwealth at a state election, and a city or town committee of such a party, in a city or town in which municipal officers are nominated by primaries or by caucuses of political parties, may appoint a person to act as such challenger at any polling place in such city or town at a municipal election. Such challenger may challenge any voter during the hours that said polling place is open for the purpose of voting; and a statement signed by the chairman of the committee appointing him shall be sufficient evidence of his right so to act. He may be compensated for his services by the political party whose committee appointed him. He shall be assigned by the election officer presiding at the polling place to such position within the polling place as will enable him to see and hear each voter as he offers to vote. Nothing herein contained shall deprive any other person of the right to challenge a voter as provided by law.

That's the Massachusetts Poll Watcher Rule. Care to comment?
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
106. If he isn't an appointed poll watcher and isn't a resident, he had no business in the polling place.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:41 PM
Mar 2016

I guess that's lost on you.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
68. Just his presence would be part of the campaign.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:55 PM
Mar 2016

I don't know Mass. law, but if true, Clinton should have known better.

If people didn't know who he was and he avoided drawing any attention to himself, he might get by with it.

But his very person is a campaign sign.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
112. The Globe also reports Clinton told one voter, “Pull the lever for Hillary.”
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:50 PM
Mar 2016

According to the Clinton campaign’s pool report, Bill took at least one photo with a voter outside Holy Name, kissed an elderly woman on her head, and signed another voter’s Hillary sign. The Globe also reports Clinton told one voter, “Pull the lever for Hillary.”
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2016/03/01/bill-clinton-massachusetts-voting-laws/

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
117. Have you seen a SINGLE Hillary supporter say "Yeah, that looks bad."?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:58 PM
Mar 2016

One? That's what I find wildest about this whole thing.

I was the Lead Poll Worker Trainer for Orange County, CA. I wrote the book that was used for four years as far as Poll Worker training and polling place practices goes. I know what's allowed and what isn't in a polling place. Hell a PICTURE of Bill Clinton wouldn't be allowed on a T-shirt in a polling place during California's upcoming primary.

Change it and come back, put a jacket over it, turn it inside out, or leave and if you refuse to do one of those things I'm calling the Sheriff. One thing I can promise you though is that if one of my Poll Workers allowed that person to vote they'd be permanently barred from working the polls ever again.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
36. Yes:
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:36 PM
Mar 2016
Activities at Polling Place. Within 150 feet of a polling place as defined in 950 CMR 53.03(18)(c), no person shall solicit votes for or against, or otherwise promote or oppose, any person or political party or position on a ballot question, to be voted on at the current election.


http://www.mass.gov/courts/docs/lawlib/900-999cmr/950cmr53.pdf

Cut and dried.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
93. It isn't any more unethical than Jane Sanders in the precinct this morning. A law
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:31 PM
Mar 2016

has to be broken, I could go into a precinct and observe, ergo, "poll watchers", it is not against the voting laws.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
128. She voted in HER precinct in VT ONLY
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:29 PM
Mar 2016

How many people really know what Jane Sanders looks like. Bill Clinton is a billboard for Hillary, and he wasn't even voting in Ma. This is what we call CHEATING. But you continue to come up with excuses, you guys are going to need to get used to doing this.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
48. "Is Obama a Muslim?" "Not that I'm aware of." - Hillary Clinton
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:44 PM
Mar 2016

Election Laws? Not if we're breaking any, because I am completely unaware of the geographical distance that political parties have to keep from polling booths on election day.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
60. California law prohibits campaigning in a polling place.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:52 PM
Mar 2016

Bill Clinton's very presence in a polling place is a campaign in and of itself.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
4. Really?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:54 PM
Mar 2016
“He can go in, but he can’t approach voters,” Mr. Galvin said. “We just took the extra precaution of telling them because this is not a usual occurrence. You don’t usually get a president doing this.”


Good grief I hope this is not a usual occurrence. I did not think it was legal for him to be inside. Bill Clinton esp. since he is known by everyone.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
151. How about campaigning with a bull horn
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:48 AM
Mar 2016

Within the restricted zone of a polling place
A voter in that precinct should file a complaint and it would stick because Bill Clinton violated the law.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
26. The ho-hum attitude by Hillary supporters toward questionable behavior is noted...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

...again....and again....and again...

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
29. Your concern over the lack of respect for election rules is noted
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016

What does that say about your candidate? I hope nothing, but considering it was her husband, it might say a lot.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
7. I thought you could go into a polling place not your own, you jsut could not talk to people
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:55 PM
Mar 2016

about politics, weather is fine though. Identifying yourself or your spouse or parent as a candidate, not good, but shaking hands if you don't have a cold is ok as long as you keep your mouth shut. Ditto for the mayor.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
71. well, that is pretty obvious, the rules are different for different people
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:59 PM
Mar 2016

I was just addressing if it is legal.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
156. Bill Clinton is fast becoming the
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 11:21 AM
Mar 2016

Dick Cheney of Hillary's campaign
Hell they already have Karl Rove (David Brock)

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
11. Being a former president and husband of a candidate, it's hard to remove the electoral context.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:00 PM
Mar 2016

MADem

(135,425 posts)
13. I think you have it right. Of course, it's only a crime if you're affiliated with the
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:01 PM
Mar 2016

"wrong" candidate.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
57. Please tell me then
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:50 PM
Mar 2016

if not to act as a campaign surrogate, why he was in the polling place

in your own words.


Don't play the victim card here. "Wrong" candidate? A rule was broken. During one of our most important privileges as citizens. That's a big deal.

You and your crowd can pretend it's not all you want. Win dirty, win at all costs? See what happens when you need us in November

MADem

(135,425 posts)
74. He was there "to thank poll workers." Bernie could have gone round thanking poll workers, too, if
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:03 PM
Mar 2016

he wanted to. He could have sent his wife. His friends. Maybe he did, for all you know.

It's stupid to whine and cry about something that the other side COULD HAVE DONE AS WELL.

If Sanders did not do this (and we really don't know if he did or didn't) that's because he didn't feel like doing it, not that he "couldn't" have done it. He could have had Belafonte, West, and all of his other surrogates out there as well. He could have sent his wife out to thank poll workers and buy bake sale goods all the live-long day.

The one playing the "victim" card isn't me, here. Your post deserves to be memorialized, so "me and my crowd" will have a record of it down the years:


SheenaR
57. Please tell me then
View profile
if not to act as a campaign surrogate, why he was in the polling place

in your own words.


Don't play the victim card here. "Wrong" candidate? A rule was broken. During one of our most important privileges as citizens. That's a big deal.

You and your crowd can pretend it's not all you want. Win dirty, win at all costs? See what happens when you need us in November


The threat at the end was especially worthy of note.
 

Lazy Daisy

(928 posts)
88. I don't think anybody will be so forgiving
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:27 PM
Mar 2016

When Trump uses this same tactic in the GE. Seeing as he's backed by all kinds of really ugly people, if they show up to just give coffee and donuts to the poll workers and not say anything to the voters?

But I'm sure you will argue the KKK has every right to do so correct?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
97. You can "not like it" but so long as he stays within the lines, ya gotta go with the flow.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:35 PM
Mar 2016

They CAN say things to the voters--they can say "Nice day" and "How do you do?" and "How about those Knicks" but they can't say "Vote for me" or repeat campaign slogans, or hand out buttons, stickers, etc.

In tight races you see this often. It is what it is--you just have to make sure you don't step over the line. Trump free-associates, he might have a hard time reining in his mouth--but if he could control himself, he could get away with it, too.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
109. This is not true. I am IN Massachusetts.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:46 PM
Mar 2016

They can go in the facility, they can walk around, they can talk to people so long as they don't talk politics or electioneer, and they can pose for selfies.

They can also buy baked goods at the bake sales at those places, and talk about how tasty the cookies are.

You're just wrong in your understanding of the law here.

And there's no reason that Bernie, or his wife, or his surrogates, are prevented from doing the same.

They can't hand out buttons or bumper stickers, or wear tee shirts, or say "Vote for ____" but they can chat about non-election stuff and smile and wave and take snapshots.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
111. The law was posted before in several threads
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:49 PM
Mar 2016

President Clinton is not a registered voter. He is a surrogate and advocate of the campaign. Unless the law posted on here multiple times was incorrect, it says they are not allowed to loiter in there at all.

I'll delete all posts to the contrary if you find me the law saying otherwise. I will also delete my post calling you ignorant because it wasn't very nice

MADem

(135,425 posts)
115. I am not going to argue with you about this.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:57 PM
Mar 2016

He and Marty were walking up to but not over the line. You do not HAVE TO BE A REGISTERED VOTER to enter a public building. Sorry if you don't like that.

Sanders and his surrogates are free to do the same--for all we know, they've been doing just that.

The day you can successfully accuse someone who is the guest of a city's mayor of being a "loiterer" is the day you hit ten lotteries at once. You can't make up laws just because you don't like someone. They had business in that polling place--they were there to "thank poll workers."

Again--the Sanders team CAN do this, TOO--no one is stopping them -- and for all you know, maybe they are doing this--it's not that long a drive from Burlington to western MA, for example.

Response to MADem (Reply #74)

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
161. Only registered voters allowed in polling places. Period!
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:27 PM
Mar 2016

If you ever bothered to sign up to be a poll worker, you'd have received training and know that.

You should do that.

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
12. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:01 PM
Mar 2016

No photographs allowed inside the building, and no campaigning within 50 feet. The Clintons don't believe in following the law. Never have, judging by the number of times they have found their way around the rules.

TBF

(32,047 posts)
21. Bernie is allowed to vote. Whereas Bill was hanging out in Mass - not where he lives.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:19 PM
Mar 2016

Unbelievable.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
23. Marty Walsh is NOT stupid. He knows where the line is--so does Clinton. This dog won't hunt.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:30 PM
Mar 2016
Walsh’s office denies any wrongdoing. “President Clinton joined Mayor Walsh to thank poll workers in West Roxbury this morning. They were not campaigning inside the polling location,” spokesperson Bonnie McGilpin said.


http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2016/03/01/bill-clinton-massachusetts-voting-laws/


There's no residency requirement to enter a public building. He was accompanied by the Mayor of Boston. You might not like it, but he was coloring within the lines.

Sanders could have gotten off his best intentions and jetted off to do the same, and deployed HIS surrogates to do the very thing as well. For all we know he might have done just that and we haven't seen the news reports yet.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
37. Then it's all okay then.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:38 PM
Mar 2016

It's fine. All the ugly words toward us who supported Bernie...and as the DNC chair said in her own words...we are not Democrats if we support Bernie who she says is not a Democrat.

They played the racism game with Bernie's good name. That is not okay.

I have always voted Democratically, but now I am not one.

Go figure.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
78. I do not understand what that post has to do with what I have written.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

What Bill Clinton was doing at the polls, Jane Sanders, Bernie Sanders, all of Bernie''s surrogate celebrity supporters, they could have done (and who knows--maybe they did?) too.

There are things you cannot say- Like "Vote For Bernie!" or "Feel the Bern" - but you can shake hands with people who approach you, you can thank poll workers, you can buy bake sale goods, you can talk about football, or what a nice day it is today, so long as you don't hand out bumper stickers or buttons and "exhort."

It's illogical to get mad at people for maximizing their advantage, especially when the other team could have--and for all you know, maybe did--the very same thing.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
38. Yes, of course, if Bill did it, so did Bernie
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:38 PM
Mar 2016


And while he may have been coloring within the lines, his marker pen was bleeding out beyond the lines.

Like I said in another post, he'd have to put a bag over his head not to be recognized (in other words campaigning for) as Hillary's husband and in favor of her winning.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
65. Who said "so did?" He could, though if he wanted--you should probably read what people
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

write. You keep creating scenarios not in evidence. If he wanted to get off his duff and do it, he could have. NO ONE is stopping him. If he doesn't want to get up and go do it, it's on HIM.

But don't play the "Oh he's bad for doing that" card when it's unusual for politicians to NOT do this. They stretch it to the max and they know where the line is.

Of course he wants to be recognized--if Cornel West shook hands of people who came up to him in front of a polling place, or Harry Belafonte, or Jane Sanders, or anyone associated w/the Sanders campaign, the idea would be TO BE recognized.

The idea of electioneering near polling place laws is to limit the influence--not to eliminate it totally. That would be impossible to do, anyway.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
83. So did Bernie? For all we know he might have done it, we haven't seen the news reports yet?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:21 PM
Mar 2016

give me a break.

OK I will cede you with one victory here. You were trying to call a poster on his incorrect statement that campaigning is not allowed within 50 feet of a polling place (it's 150 feet), and/or the legality of taking a photograph inside a polling place. I don't know if he meant a campaign photo op or just any photo, but you are correct...I see no laws prohibiting photos in a polling place. I will say that a picture of Bernie voting is not a "campaign photo op".

I will admit I overreacted to your response because I did not read the post you were responding to.

You still implied Bernie "might" do the same thing Bill just did, when I think we all know, even you, that he would never go there. Bill joked about crossing the line. He knew exactly what he was doing and how far he could go.

 

RiverNoord

(1,150 posts)
77. That's a quote?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:05 PM
Mar 2016

That's even worse. I mean, a former President of the United States and spouse of a current candidate for the same office 'thanking poll workers' in the midst of an active party primary at which his spouse's candidacy is being voted on?

That's absolutely not OK. I am not a 'picker and chooser' of 'wrongs' committed by one candidate's camp vs. another. Lots of questionable things can happen during elections, and supporters of even the squeakiest-clean candidates are often right there in the thick of it.

But... this conduct is really... wow - really, really wrong. I'd like to know if President Clinton has thanked poll workers at many Democratic primaries in the past, where his wife's candidacy or any other issue he has personally supported has not been involved. But - even then, it's just fundamentally wrong for a former United States President to publicly enter polling places during any active election and speak with, well, anybody.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
92. Look--no one is preventing the Sanders Camp from doing the same thing. And for all you know,
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

maybe they ARE doing the same thing.

Not sure why you are getting so angry because he's maximizing his team's advantage. For all you know, Sanders' celebrity backers are doing the very same thing. If I learned Susan Sarandon was out there shaking hands with people or buying baked goods at polling place bake sales, I'd think "He's working his ground game" not "Waah, bad, good luck."

Politicians have ALWAYS done this kind of thing.

They know where the line is. They'll go right up to it, because the stakes are high, obviously.

And if Bill Clinton getting up off his duff and playing that card with the Mayor is a deal-breaker, well, I don't know what to tell you. I won't be annoyed if I find out Sanders was working the field south of the VT border. He would have been smart to do just that.

I think if people keep working hard for HRC, she won't need a lot of luck.

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
102. If he's breaking the rules, it matters.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:39 PM
Mar 2016

He should have no access inside a polling area unless he has been pre-approved as a poll worker, a poll witness or a voter.

TBF

(32,047 posts)
127. Susan Sarandon is not a former president
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:29 PM
Mar 2016

who is married to one of the current candidates. Not even close.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
35. Arel you implying that Bernie does not have the right to vote?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:36 PM
Mar 2016

Seriously? You said/implied a lot of sketchy things here lately, but this one takes the cake.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
45. No, I'm "demostrating" (as opposed to IMPLYING) that it's not illegal to take a photo in a polling
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:43 PM
Mar 2016

place (pull the string, read the whole conversation before you start flinging crap at people, please).

Here's another photo taken in a polling place:



And speaking of "sketchy" things to say--this is the rudest comment on this thread--pat yourself on the back:


passiveporcupine
35. Arel you implying that Bernie does not have the right to vote?
View profile
Seriously? You said/implied a lot of sketchy things here lately, but this one takes the cake.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
52. YOu deny it?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:47 PM
Mar 2016

YOu are one of the most regular snide and sarcastic posters here. At least from my observation and I tend to be snide and sarcastic, so I recognize it. And this post, trying to imply that being in a voting place while voting is even comparable to being in a polling place when you are not voting, or even legal to vote there, is one and the same thing?

This is exactly what I refer to when I say sketchy.

And I never knew sketchy was a bad word.

Sketchy...not thorough or detailed. Like this photo op.

Purrfessor

(1,188 posts)
124. I admire your persistence. Some people just can't accept
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:21 PM
Mar 2016

that Bill Clinton is within his rights to enter a voting precinct as long as he refrains from campaigning. Their hatred for anything Clinton is as deep or deeper than the Republicans hatred of Obama. I've never seen anything like it.

 

Freaked Out

(74 posts)
79. Uh, you do know Vermont is voting today?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie's casting his own vote. All perfectly legal and I'm sure he doesn't stick around and say "VOTE FOR ME!" He's already proven his case, and he will win Vermont with ease. MA will go to Bernie, because (CENSORED).

Clinton has zero reason to be in MA polls.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
54. Are you sure it's 50 ft? Another MA poster said 150 ft.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:48 PM
Mar 2016

In every jurisdiction I've lived in, it has been at least 100ft from the entrance to the polling location. I've been living in a mail-in ballot state for approx. the last decade, though, so maybe election laws have changed in the meantime.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
162. Thanks. Apparently some lawyer is already looking into filing a case.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:11 PM
Mar 2016

Pretty egregious what Clinton and that Mayor did.

Response to JimDandy (Reply #162)

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
27. Primaries aren't subject to the same election laws as general elections
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016

Primaries are events run by the individual parties, and election law doesn't apply.

Nice try, though.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
33. Whatever Bill does is okay. Whatever the Clintons want they get.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:35 PM
Mar 2016

Except there is such a bitterness now after all the lies and innuendo about Bernie and his supporters.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
39. Well Nicky Haley in SC did this less than two weeks ago...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

so what's the big deal? How is it fine when they do it, but not when we do it?

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
58. Illegal
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

per the quotes of Mass law that have been in and out of threads here.

Surrogate cannot be inside.

It's absolute bullshit

LuvLoogie

(6,991 posts)
43. Bill Clinton's aura is always within 150 feet of any polling place in whatever state he's in.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:41 PM
Mar 2016

His Presence is like a weather system that makes you bundle up or put on your your baggy shorts and a Hawaiian Shirt. He's like knockout gas that keeps you from voting for Bernie.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
91. Damned illegal in Pennsylvania
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

Only registered voters, appointed/elected poll workers and "observers" with court appointments are allowed inside the polling place. Candidates and anyone campaigning for a candidate cannot come or stand within 20 feet of the doors to a polling place.

Anyone with the least knowledge of campaigning knows of these restrictions and similar ones in other states. Is Bill slipping mentally?

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
96. The defense (such as it is) so far appears to be that he wasn't actually "campaigning."
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:34 PM
Mar 2016

Which is, of course, complete bullshit.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
144. Still wouldn't work in Penn.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:50 PM
Mar 2016

NOBODY is allowed within 20 feet of the doors to the polling place unless they are registered voters or are authorized by the courts or the local election board to be there. (And of course, it was never just Bill - there would have been his Secret Service contingent with him as well.)

Each of our polling places has a constable. If anyone doesn't leave when I (Judge of Elections) order them to, the Constable will escort them the hell out. Although I have never had to resort to that except for one asshole TeaParty member who came to vote and then refused to leave.

Good lord, with all the insanity of race hate and shootings going on in our country right now, I hope we don't have any shootings at the polling places.

Good old Bill - NOT leading by example, yet again!

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
59. Far be it from Bill to do anything that would have the appearance of impropriety.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:52 PM
Mar 2016

I mean, if he were someone with a history of improper behavior, then maybe I'd give it a second thought, you know? But luckily he's not.

EmperorHasNoClothes

(4,797 posts)
82. I think we need a new acronym.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:16 PM
Mar 2016

IOKIYAC = it's OK if you're a Clinton.

Although, IOKIYAR applies here too, come to think of it.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
101. Truth trumps bullshit, no pun intended.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:39 PM
Mar 2016

There is video and stills of what he did.

If it were anyone else, they would have told to leave or the law would be called.

Laws are for us, not them.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
145. That is an outrageous interference with voting - low, even for a Clinton!
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:54 PM
Mar 2016

I'll be going to brush up training for poll workers in a few weeks, and will bring this up for discussion. If he gets by with this, the Clinton campaign will be trying it anywhere else they can get by with it.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
85. Clear breach of Mas Election Law "Obstructing voters".
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:26 PM
Mar 2016

Mass Election code and video at link---> http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511384459#post66

He made those people stand in line so he could break the first law, campaigning within 150' of a precinct site, a trivial expansion of election law, but OK.The proble is they shut down a precinct in Bedford with hundres if not a thousand+ people waiting to vote.

This is straight from the West Wing. Posse Comitatus, and we all know where Sorkin got that idea.

SAM
There was an incumbent President, who was facing a primary challenge, and
on the day of the
primary, his staff sent his motorcade into a district that was heavily
favored by his
opponent in order to tie up traffic. Now I would like it plain that I would
never do anything
to temper an election, but...

---Toby pats Sam's cheek a few times and squishes his mouth.----

TOBY
I am so... proud of you.

The proble is, sending the motorcade wasn't a violation of election law.

Mr.Bill

(24,280 posts)
116. I am a Precinct Inspector in my county in California.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:57 PM
Mar 2016

I understand the laws may be different in my state than in Mass. Here any registered voter has the right to stand and observe and examine lists of who has voted. Campaigning or interfering with poll workers or voters is not allowed. But basically the way the law is enforced is it becomes a violation when the offender refuses to leave when ordered to do so.

There can be cases where someone's mere presence can be construed as campaigning, but that is up to the person in charge of the polling place. For instance, if the person is wearing an article of clothing supporting a specific candidate that is campaigning.

One election we had a hotly contested and controversial Sheriff's race. The incumbent was widely supported by the rank and file Deputies. A meeting with the registrar and the two candidates set some ground rules. Certainly it was common for on-duty Deputies to stop and vote during their shift. The challenger was worried they would create a presence at polling places and intimidate the voters in favor of the incumbent. He wanted to prohibit Deputies from entering the polling place in uniform.

The Registrar's decision was that they would be allowed to appear and vote in uniform, but if they loitered after voting, it would be considered campaigning. All the precinct inspectors were informed of this ruling as well as the two candidates and there were no problems.

The challenger won, by the way.

Long story, I know, I just wanted to give an example of how these laws can be interpreted. In my opinion, as long as Bill Clinton did not remain after being asked to leave by someone in charge, and was not actively handing out literature or otherwise campaigning, no foul.

I would fully expect this issue will be discussed at the poll worker training session before the next election. Myself, as a precinct inspector, I would have asked Mr. Clinton to leave, but he would not be charged with violating the law if he left when asked. If anyone was at fault here, it was whoever was in charge of the polling place.

Mr.Bill

(24,280 posts)
165. Well. in theory, the person in charge
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

is supposed to enforce the rules regardless of their political preference. I believe I could. I can't speak for others.

Mr.Bill

(24,280 posts)
167. Well, every election, temporary poll workers are hired.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:30 PM
Mar 2016

Some experienced, some not. There is usually a training session, and as I mentioned in my other post, I'm sure this issue will be discussed there.

121. A Clinton showing a disregard for rules. Shocking! /s
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:08 PM
Mar 2016

Clinton apologists defending broken rules. Shocking! /s

I will never understand the thought process behind clinging to Clinton. She's a terrific politician, but that's about the best thing I can say about her.

Who can remember saying, 'I love this politician for their political acumen.'?

Wednesdays

(17,342 posts)
130. Aiyaiyai...just fine him the 50 bucks and be done with it.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:32 PM
Mar 2016

If he was disenfranchising voters, there might be an issue here...but otherwise this is just petty.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
133. He did NOT violate any laws.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

He can go in, he just can't approach voters. They approached HIM. He allowed a picture. He was not Campaigning.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
140. It's nere coincidence that his wife is running for president, and he randomly stopped by
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:33 PM
Mar 2016


You need to look into the phrase "otherwise promoting".

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
146. NEVER inside the polling place.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:01 PM
Mar 2016

I've had one jerk running for local office who came in to vote and then turned to the man behind him, waiting to sign the voter register, and asked him to vote for him.

Before I could even say a word, that other voter immediately chewed him out and told him he was not allowed to campaign within the voting place. The local candidate, being a supreme egomaniac, got a face like a storm cloud but shut the fuck up.

And the really insane thing about the incident? The local jerk was running unopposed!

ms liberty

(8,572 posts)
137. This is ugly and wrong
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:55 PM
Mar 2016

And of course is being lauded by the Clinton supporters here, because anything to win.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
138. Areas being roped off near a polling place and added traffic congestion by his SS detail ...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:18 PM
Mar 2016

that delayed people in voting is not the direction our country should be heading.



Octafish

(55,745 posts)
143. Massachusetts as a silver spike through the heart.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:47 PM
Mar 2016


If the First Lady Senator Secretary Candidate can pull an upset in ol' Mass, it might not be oh-vah but The Shoveler's minions would come out.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
148. IOKIYRC Here's the video of Bill with the megaphone.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:39 PM
Mar 2016


The entry door was just to his left. Read the comments after the video at You Tube.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
150. It's in another thread
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:38 AM
Mar 2016

One implying that Bernie is racist. That's where you can fibd the outrage brigade. Only a few came here.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYT says campaign report ...