NYT Just ticked MA for Sanders - EDIT now back to HRC - interesting.

[Juicy_Bellows]

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results




EDIT- Well shit, back to HRC now.

[Cal Carpenter]

1. Yeah, via the AP

I just noticed that too.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/massachusetts

[morningfog]

2. Well I'll be goddamned. What's going on there?

[DiehardLiberal]

3. Is that an error? They show Hillary higher %. I want to believe you!!

[DiehardLiberal]

8. Oh crap - they fixed it..

[Avalux]

4. What the heck??

[MADem]

5. NBC and everyone else has called it for Clinton.

That's not one of those fake pages, is it.....? What's funny is, the number for HRC is higher than the one for Sanders.

Someone is asleep at the switch! Ahh, the paper of record....

[cyberswede]

6. But the numbers still display HRC 51, SBS 48

[madfloridian]

7. I was just noticing that.

[cyberswede]

10. It's back to HRC favored @ 51. nt

[DiehardLiberal]

11. They corrected it. ;-(

[kydo]

12. they switched it back

[Juicy_Bellows]

14. They did - interesting. nt.

[SidDithers]

13. Now it's ticked for Clinton...nt

Sid

[Skid Rogue]

15. I saw that...

It had to be a typo, or someone with a twisted sense of humor at the NYT.

[kydo]

16. and it now says HRC the winner

[cyberswede]

17. I think that was an error. They show HRC as the winner now. nt

[Zorra]

18. That was really weird. nt

[smiley]

19. I was following real time results on google.

It said Sanders won MASS. Screen was like that for 20 seconds and then changed to Clinton won.

Weird stuff going on for sure. Good thing Bill was there today to oversee things.