Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Times calls MA for Sanders (Original Post) shawn703 Mar 2016 OP
The people voted and that's what changed. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #1
I stand with MA voters who obviously doesn't think Clinton is the answer. Freaked Out Mar 2016 #4
Res ipsa loquitur DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #7
Not sure what's happening, but saltpoint Mar 2016 #2
I just saw this on another website and I'm confused. CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2016 #3
My Aunt in Boston said just a bit ago that it's a nail biter. Don't know what's going on. n/t JimDandy Mar 2016 #5
Error it seems. Agschmid Mar 2016 #6
 

Freaked Out

(74 posts)
4. I stand with MA voters who obviously doesn't think Clinton is the answer.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:39 AM
Mar 2016

Her delegates count will continue to slow to a molasses as Bernie continue to gain momentum before the states that favors Bernie will come his way on the 15th.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,517 posts)
3. I just saw this on another website and I'm confused.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:39 AM
Mar 2016

Unless the precincts not reporting yet are seen as favorable to Bernie.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
5. My Aunt in Boston said just a bit ago that it's a nail biter. Don't know what's going on. n/t
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:42 AM
Mar 2016

ETA: She says the local news has been wall to wall coverage of a terrible "car-plowed-into-a-restaurant" accident in Boston that killed a bunch of people.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NY Times calls MA for San...