Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:38 AM Mar 2016

The two game changers: MSM is only talking about one of them.

1. Cruz not eligible for candidacy by virtue of his foreign birth and citizenship.

2. Hillary under FBI investigation and possible criminal indictment.

The MSM is only talking about the first of those, and not often.

There is virtually no media discussion of the possibility of a criminal indictment for Hillary, or even the fact that a candidate under FBI investigation for criminal activity should be a disqualifying factor.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The two game changers: MSM is only talking about one of them. (Original Post) grasswire Mar 2016 OP
I noticed that too nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #1
Switched to Bloomberg earlier tonight ... slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #2
ha! grasswire Mar 2016 #3
Yes, intersesting to watch how others in the world see our elections and how vulnerable she might... slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #6
Watch how shocked they act if the FBI refers it for criminal charges Press Virginia Mar 2016 #4
comedy gold, in a very tragic way nt grasswire Mar 2016 #5
"the DoS inspector is a MEANIE!" MisterP Mar 2016 #7
Hillary v. the meanies nt grasswire Mar 2016 #9
That's because they don't want to damage their integrity by speculati- Maedhros Mar 2016 #8
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
1. I noticed that too
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:40 AM
Mar 2016

and the FBI might be getting close, I can see it, BREAKING NEWS, pretend we are all surprised.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
2. Switched to Bloomberg earlier tonight ...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:46 AM
Mar 2016

the commentator was in Australia and spoke about a socialist from a small state, then switched to how well Clinton did in the south with POC etc etc and then threw in at the end ... if she is not indicted.

He was obviously a supporter of Clinton, so it threw me off at the end.








slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
6. Yes, intersesting to watch how others in the world see our elections and how vulnerable she might...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:05 AM
Mar 2016

or could be if we had laws that were more equitable for all citizens.



 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
8. That's because they don't want to damage their integrity by speculati-
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:14 AM
Mar 2016


Sorry, I tried to get that out without collapsing into raucous laughter, but I couldn't.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The two game changers: MS...