Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 08:59 AM Mar 2016

Sanders Lost Massachusetts in Boston - Very Nearly Literally

Let's put aside the "who should have won," "what polls said last week," "tie, no tie, virtual tie," and all that jazz. Let's look very clearly at what actually happened.

Hillary Clinton received more votes than Bernie Sanders in Massachusetts yesterday: her spread statewide is about 20,000 votes out of nearly 1.2 million cast - razor thin, to be sure. Here's the crazy part: Clinton won Boston proper (the municipal area) by 16 points (58-42) - amounting to just shy of 20,000 votes (71,000+ - 51,000+). She nearly literally won the state in Boston itself.

In fact, Sanders lost many (if not the vast majority) of major and minor cities in Massachusetts. He lost from Boston all the way to Worcester, solid - many of those areas by 20+ points. He lost Lowell, Lawrence, and Lyle. He lost Springfield, by a lot. He lost New Bedford and Fall River and Falmouth. He even lost Pittsfield. Bernie held a major rally in Worcester, so some people thought it would make up the deficit late. It didn't: he lost Worcester. He even lost Cambridge, by 2,000 votes. Did Bernie win at all in greater Boston. Yes. He won in Somerville, Quincy, Weymouth, and Braintree.

Why didn't Sanders message take hold in Boston? Or, really, in the Boston area, or, really, in most of the major population centers?

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Lost Massachusetts in Boston - Very Nearly Literally (Original Post) alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 OP
How diverse is the electorate outside of the areas Clinton won? nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #1
I can answer that... i live here. tymorial Mar 2016 #2
That's what I was wondering. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #4
Not sure alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #7
K&R! stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #3
In 2008 Clinton won the state by more than 15% and that was even Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #5
No doubt true alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #6
"cut against a Sanders narrative..." dchill Mar 2016 #27
No, some points confirm Sanders' narrative alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #29
He will no doubt win them in November. dchill Mar 2016 #34
He would have to win them big, is the problem, and he's not connecting alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #36
But of course HRC has no liabilities. After all, it was a clean sweep last night... dchill Mar 2016 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #45
Crazy that those 20,000 Sanders voters got blocked alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #46
Sorry but most people believed that MA was a made for Sanders book_worm Mar 2016 #10
I was in Fall River when I was a kid... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #8
Why didn't Hillary win Northampton where she went to college? Punkingal Mar 2016 #9
She went to college 45 years ago, right? alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #11
Uh, probably establishment support? Punkingal Mar 2016 #13
Boston is mostly a machine town Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #18
Diverse= corrupt on it's face now. Gotta love it. bettyellen Mar 2016 #28
What has diversity to do with it? Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #32
Diversity in Boston compared to the rest of Mass means nothing? bettyellen Mar 2016 #40
Other parts of Massachusetts can be diverse Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #41
Not impugning your motives- but asking have you not checked voter demographics? You might find bettyellen Mar 2016 #43
It's experience, not CT Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #44
Well, maybe you can explain why Bernie not only lost Boston, but... book_worm Mar 2016 #19
I can't explain it, I'm no expert. I'm just guessing. Punkingal Mar 2016 #23
Like organization and the like? alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #22
Besides she went to Wellesley and won Wellesley book_worm Mar 2016 #16
She went to Wellsey near Waltham. eom. Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #12
In that case, she won in a landslide alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #15
hmm, didn't she attend Wellesley? book_worm Mar 2016 #14
Bill's appearance in New Bedford with a Bull Horn and Full SS Motorcade KoKo Mar 2016 #17
Yeah, right. book_worm Mar 2016 #21
Diversity, I would imagine. auntpurl Mar 2016 #20
Certainly makes sense in places like Brockton alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #24
Not sure about the rest of the differences. auntpurl Mar 2016 #25
It again sounds like the youth didn't show up. Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #26
The singular strength of the Democratic Party is its diversity. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #30
How is Sanders supposed to win Ohio in the general if he can't pull voters from Cleveland? alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #33
IMHO, We should not confuse the General Election with the Primary. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #39
The non-white vote played a significant part in Clinton winning KingFlorez Mar 2016 #31
Why did Hillary lose Austin Tx? Same dumb jillan Mar 2016 #35
That's mean alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #37
I miss Boston! mcar Mar 2016 #42
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
7. Not sure
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:02 PM
Mar 2016

It's also true that she won some majority white suburbs pretty handily, though.

The near suburbs and municipalities she lost badly (Somerville) or mid-level (Quincy, Weymouth, Braintree) are heavily white (with Braintree, at 94% white, 1% African American) being the most "segregated" of the lot.

Nanjeanne

(4,950 posts)
5. In 2008 Clinton won the state by more than 15% and that was even
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:12 AM
Mar 2016

After Kennedy endorsed Obama. That Sanders lost by about 1% and 20,000 votes and only 2 delegate spread is a pretty amazing thing considering how well known and popular Clinton has been in MA.

Of course that doesn't fit with the pundit slant -- so they don't talk about how much better Sanders has done than Obama did.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
6. No doubt true
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:19 AM
Mar 2016

Still, the big losses in major population areas would seem to cut against a Sanders narrative too, no? How does he lose the city of Boston by 20k votes? It bears explaining.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
29. No, some points confirm Sanders' narrative
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

But it's hard to have a political revolution if you're losing liberal population centers.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
36. He would have to win them big, is the problem, and he's not connecting
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:49 PM
Mar 2016

You don't just have to win Philly - you have to absolutely crush. You don't just have to win Cuyahoga County - you have to massacre the GOP so badly that it outweighs the rest of the state. You don't just have to win NoVa, you have to dominate. You don't just have to win Clark County, you have to smash it.

Sanders seems incapable of that. He's losing badly in major liberal population centers. It's not a promising sign for the general.

dchill

(38,471 posts)
38. But of course HRC has no liabilities. After all, it was a clean sweep last night...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

Right? Sanders is connecting just fine, when one considers the mendacious greedballs working for his opposition, and the fawning media only too willing to push their false narrative. And Bill and his bullhorn.

Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #6)

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
10. Sorry but most people believed that MA was a made for Sanders
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:09 PM
Mar 2016

up until a week or so ago he was beginning to lead in the polls and then HRC began to catch up. It's also part of his NE base. I feel that HRC also has a good shot at Connecticut.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
8. I was in Fall River when I was a kid...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:04 PM
Mar 2016

I remember the Howard Johnson motel had a swimming pool and a sauna. I also remember it was a working class city.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
11. She went to college 45 years ago, right?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:10 PM
Mar 2016


Hell, I went to college 20 years ago and I'd probably get lost there now.

Northhampton and Amherst were complete ass-kickings, to be sure.

She pulled it out in Holyoke, though.

I'm still perplexed by why Bernie loses Greater Boston so badly.

Bad Thoughts

(2,522 posts)
32. What has diversity to do with it?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:46 PM
Mar 2016

There is a very well organized set of Democratic organizations, and winning state-wide offices almost explicitly cannot be won without their participation. You can look up Coakley's loss if you want.

Bad Thoughts

(2,522 posts)
41. Other parts of Massachusetts can be diverse
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:48 PM
Mar 2016

Like the Pioneer Valley, where I lived for 13 years.

That said, the particulars of the organization are independent of ethnic composition. In the future, do not impugn my motives.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
43. Not impugning your motives- but asking have you not checked voter demographics? You might find
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:50 PM
Mar 2016

a pattern that we've seen before, and one that does not require a CT to explain the votes.

Bad Thoughts

(2,522 posts)
44. It's experience, not CT
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

Like I said, I lived in MA for several years. A worked on several political campaigns, mostly local stuff, but also for the campaigns for Deval Patrick, Wes Clark, John Kerry, and attempts to reverse Goodridge.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
19. Well, maybe you can explain why Bernie not only lost Boston, but...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:20 PM
Mar 2016

many of the minor and major cities in MA as the article says:

In fact, Sanders lost many (if not the vast majority) of major and minor cities in Massachusetts. He lost from Boston all the way to Worcester, solid - many of those areas by 20+ points. He lost Lowell, Lawrence, and Lyle. He lost Springfield, by a lot. He lost New Bedford and Fall River and Falmouth. He even lost Pittsfield. Bernie held a major rally in Worcester, so some people thought it would make up the deficit late. It didn't: he lost Worcester. He even lost Cambridge, by 2,000 votes.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
23. I can't explain it, I'm no expert. I'm just guessing.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:23 PM
Mar 2016

I have always heard that Boston has machine politics, that's all. It really doesn't matter at this point, she won.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
22. Like organization and the like?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:21 PM
Mar 2016

OK.

Still seems like Bernie should do better in population centers, especially liberal-leaning ones. Next time, I guess.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
14. hmm, didn't she attend Wellesley?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:16 PM
Mar 2016

According to this she did win:

WELLESLEY, MA - Today Wellesley voters flooded the polls to place their picks for the Democratic and Republican nominees.

According to the Wellesley Town Clerk’s office, Hillary Clinton and John Kasich earned the most votes from their respective parties.



The results are here:

Democratic Presidential Nominee:

Hillary Clinton - 4,099 votes (69 percent)

Bernie Sanders - 1,799 votes (31 percent)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
17. Bill's appearance in New Bedford with a Bull Horn and Full SS Motorcade
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:19 PM
Mar 2016

holding up traffic and blocking voters might have something to do with the low turn out there. I think he went to a few other sites but he was videoed in New Bedford and there were many callers complaining they couldn't vote.

Good Video of it all at the link:


Did Bill Clinton violate election rules by going into a polling location?

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2016/03/01/did-bill-clinton-violate-election-rules-venturing-into-polling-location/PH4FIH9jCKYKf6Fzyvfz2N/story.html#comments

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
24. Certainly makes sense in places like Brockton
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:24 PM
Mar 2016

(HRC: 63-SBS:35...31% African American)

It would suggest that Sanders has as much difficulty with northern African American voters as with southern African American voters. I don't think it accounts for all the differences, though.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
25. Not sure about the rest of the differences.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:27 PM
Mar 2016

Does Boston generally vote for the more liberal candidate than the rest of the state? In that case, this would be a surprise.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
30. The singular strength of the Democratic Party is its diversity.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

So far, Clinton has shown she is popular across a broad spectrum of the Democratic Party.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
33. How is Sanders supposed to win Ohio in the general if he can't pull voters from Cleveland?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:46 PM
Mar 2016

That's the big question here.

Is PA vulnerable if Sanders can't draw big in Philadelphia?

The Massachusetts vote distribution is a very troubling sign for a Sanders general election campaign: he can't win major population centers, even liberal ones. Why isn't he connecting?

As a side note, he also lost Northern Virginia badly: he will need that area to win Virginia in the fall. He's proven particularly incapable of attracting voters from major population centers. That's a real problem.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
39. IMHO, We should not confuse the General Election with the Primary.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

I think that his lack of appeal to large swathes of the diverse Democratic Base is what will defeat him in the Primary. We will need to wait until we have a solid nominee to look in these places and determine viability in the General Election.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
31. The non-white vote played a significant part in Clinton winning
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:44 PM
Mar 2016

If you look at the map, she carried the most diverse areas of the state by huge margins and in a close race, that helps a lot.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders Lost Massachusett...