Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 04:40 PM Mar 2016

Why Democrats didn’t feel the Bern

Why did Bernie Sanders fail?

Sanders continues his campaign after his Super Tuesday losses, but he has no real chance of wresting the Democratic presidential nomination from Hillary Clinton. The socialist insurgent went further than most thought possible, drawing huge crowds, amassing vast sums and forcing Clinton to adopt more populist positions.

But the Sanders challenge was doomed by a fatal flaw: Democrats aren’t as unhappy as he needed them to be.

It is an article of faith this year that voters are angry. But this shorthand misleads. Certainly, there is real economic anxiety in the United States, but Americans are, overall, quite content: 87?percent of Democrats and 87 percent of Republicans alike said in a Gallup poll in January that they are satisfied in their personal lives. The anger that’s out there is directed at the malfunctioning government in Washington — and this anger is mostly on the Republican side.

Americans overall have a dim view of where the country is headed: 36 percent think we’re on the right track, and 60?percent say we’re headed in the wrong direction, in the January Washington Post-ABC News poll. But break that down further and you find that 89 percent of Republicans think we’re on the wrong track. With Democrats, it’s reversed: Only 34 percent say we’re heading the wrong way.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-democrats-didnt-feel-the-bern/2016/03/01/f95c25f0-dff4-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html?tid=ss_fb

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Democrats didn’t feel the Bern (Original Post) wyldwolf Mar 2016 OP
I must have missed the article WAPO wrote in '08 about Hillary failing rocktivity Mar 2016 #1
Let's stop pretending "it's over". It isn't. nt 99th_Monkey Mar 2016 #2
I refer you here angrychair Mar 2016 #3
Jonathan is that you? azurnoir Mar 2016 #4
It's Bernout at this point. nt Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #5
only in your dreams roguevalley Mar 2016 #7
I don't know, black people seem pretty miserable if BLM is any indication... Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #6
The last paragraph is odd ejbr Mar 2016 #8
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #9
K AND R! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #10
Did the fat lady sing? GeorgeGist Mar 2016 #11

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
1. I must have missed the article WAPO wrote in '08 about Hillary failing
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 04:45 PM
Mar 2016

after HER first Super Tuesday.

Corrected that Jonathan Capeheart story yet? Nope.


rocktivity

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
6. I don't know, black people seem pretty miserable if BLM is any indication...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 05:23 PM
Mar 2016

And they voted for Clinton.

So that kind of torpedoes Dana Milbank's hypothesis right there.

Also, Dana Milbank is a douche.

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
8. The last paragraph is odd
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 05:38 PM
Mar 2016

If anyone is being voted "against", it is Hillary. I won't get into the litany of reasons here, but being satisfied with Obama does not translate into being comfortable with Hillary.

Dana, please return to the drawing board and advise us why our concerns with Hillary (all dozen or so) should be ignored so soon into the primary. A primary that is much closer than anyone may have imagined when Bernie entered the race no less. Thank you in advance.

Response to wyldwolf (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Democrats didn’t feel...