Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:32 PM Mar 2016

Boston Globe: Bernie Sanders loses like a Republican

By Evan Horowitz
GLOBE STAFF
MARCH 02, 2016


Tuesday’s Massachusetts Democratic primary revealed something surprising about Bernie Sanders: The self-proclaimed democratic socialist lost like a Republican.

Town-by-town, the map of yesterday’s contest looks like a Sanders blowout, a western sea of Bernie victories with a mid-sized archipelago left for Hillary Clinton. The trouble, for Sanders, is that most voters live on those Clinton-friendly eastern islands.


This “Greater Boston vs. everywhere else” breakdown resembles a general election more than a primary, with Sanders playing the part of a Republican candidate like Scott Brown. Exit polls reinforce the idea, showing that Sanders did well with the right wing of Democratic primary voters, including independents and moderates.

Here’s the town-by-town map, with Sanders’ strongholds in blue and Clinton’s in green. You can see how utterly dominant Sanders was across Central and Western Massachusetts.



Read more:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/03/02/bernie-sanders-loses-like-republican/rBEtRMQZHoBQSGDCf62GnN/story.html

--------

This is very interesting analysis. Bernie also lost most of the major cities in the South including places like Atlanta, Houston, and Dallas.

Those are areas where Democratic voters are heavily concentrated.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boston Globe: Bernie Sanders loses like a Republican (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 OP
Wow! bravenak Mar 2016 #1
The flip of this is if Clinton can't win crossover votes in the rural areas how can she be expected Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #32
If Sanders can't win minority votes, how can he win? mythology Mar 2016 #40
Because black voters vote Democratic en bloc. Also there are 95,000,000 white votes up for grabs Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #43
She can be expected to win easily enough anigbrowl Mar 2016 #42
The vast majority of voters are white, and she is not doing well with whites. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #44
If Bernie can't win the traditional blue areas, how can he win the General? itsrobert Mar 2016 #2
Of Course He Will fontagobay Mar 2016 #26
2012: Romney 37% Obama 61% 2016: Clinton 50.1% Sanders 48.7% = not the same GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #28
Assuming it's diversity? auntpurl Mar 2016 #3
OR fontagobay Mar 2016 #24
I think we can agree that Hillary's supporters in vast majorities auntpurl Mar 2016 #25
Obviously... fontagobay Mar 2016 #36
His best areas are consistently the most Republican areas KingFlorez Mar 2016 #4
Could it be because he wasn't a Democrat until recently? auntpurl Mar 2016 #5
Probably KingFlorez Mar 2016 #6
He's also distanced himself from Obama auntpurl Mar 2016 #7
Thi Democrat has never loved Obama Larkspur Mar 2016 #12
I was a fan of Bill Clinton as president auntpurl Mar 2016 #13
no he hasn't. blackspade Mar 2016 #14
Bernie has only recently tried to snuggle up to Obama vdogg Mar 2016 #18
Being a critic is one thing. blackspade Mar 2016 #23
Not in Colorado. earthside Mar 2016 #17
That was a caucus KingFlorez Mar 2016 #20
Which is even more troubling for Clinton. earthside Mar 2016 #31
Polling says otherwise KingFlorez Mar 2016 #34
Polling and pundits also said that ... earthside Mar 2016 #35
Perhaps we should rejoice that Conservative folk are embracing a Democratic Socialist? n/t JPnoodleman Mar 2016 #8
the states where Bernie won greymouse Mar 2016 #9
LOL. Massachusetts, Virginia, + many more to come. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #11
It's basic political science not to compare primaries to general elections KingFlorez Mar 2016 #15
Virginia and Mass both went blue the last 2 elections. vdogg Mar 2016 #19
Most of that blue is unpopulated farmland. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #10
Lamest attack ever jfern Mar 2016 #16
I was horrified when I read the headline. Lol NCTraveler Mar 2016 #21
I grew up on the north shore, this map is telling of who Bernie isn't connecting with. XRubicon Mar 2016 #22
Very interesting! mcar Mar 2016 #27
It's a lot harder to commit fraud where the votes are hand counted. mhatrw Mar 2016 #29
It couldn't be Bernie... no, it's clearly fraud. XRubicon Mar 2016 #30
Hi, Karl Rove ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #33
What that map shows is that Bernie did poorly with minorities. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #37
Maybe you should stick to California Depaysement Mar 2016 #38
The problem with this analysis is it assumes independent voters in Mass are conservative. intheflow Mar 2016 #39
I was thinking the same thing. DCBob Mar 2016 #41

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
32. The flip of this is if Clinton can't win crossover votes in the rural areas how can she be expected
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:56 PM
Mar 2016

to win?

But that would be above your usual discourse.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
43. Because black voters vote Democratic en bloc. Also there are 95,000,000 white votes up for grabs
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:25 PM
Mar 2016

and only 17,000,000 black votes, 14,000,000 Hispanic votes, and 7,000,000 Asian votes.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/08/26/demographics_and_the_2016_election_scenarios.html

Check the stats from 2012, use their calculator, and see what you think.

It's not a game and it's not one you are likely to win if you ignore the amount of voters there are, where they are, and what they are interested in.

The real question is who can win the swing states and to be honest I haven't done that calculation. But right now, South Carolina, Georgia, and Texas are not swing states.

Think before you post next time.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
42. She can be expected to win easily enough
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:11 PM
Mar 2016

As a majority (81% according to Wikipedia) of Americans live in cities. Obviously this is about as shallow an analysis as you can get, but if you're unfamiliar with the fact that the majority of US citizens live in cities and how this plays out at election time, then you're probably not interested in nuance or detail.

I mean, we go through this regularly. Every election season Republicans point to a county-level map of the results and say 'look, it's almost all red, suck it Democrats,' and Democrats wearily remind the Republicans that land doesn't vote, people do.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
44. The vast majority of voters are white, and she is not doing well with whites.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:28 PM
Mar 2016

Here's the evidence the vast majority of voters are white:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/08/26/demographics_and_the_2016_election_scenarios.html

And it's plain to see that half of Democratic whites don't like her, most white independents don't like her, and Republican whites don't like her.

Use the calculator at that link.... budge the wide vote slightly and watch the electoral changes....

Now budge the other racial groups.... watch how things don't electorally change.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
28. 2012: Romney 37% Obama 61% 2016: Clinton 50.1% Sanders 48.7% = not the same
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:45 PM
Mar 2016

And the delegates get split proportionally unlike a GOP vs DEM race. That blows their bogus frame.

The western part of the state went heavily for Obama in 2012 and for Sanders yesterday.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Massachusetts,_2012

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
3. Assuming it's diversity?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:37 PM
Mar 2016

The more diverse the area, the better Hillary does.

It's something I'm quite proud of, that I support the candidate who is pulling in the most richly diverse Democratic electorate.

 

fontagobay

(45 posts)
24. OR
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:40 PM
Mar 2016

the wealthier areas like Boston's suburbs... And before we get started talking about Cape Cod, Nantucket, and the Vineyard lets remember that the people who live and vote in those areas are largely not the wealthy people who play there over the summer.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
5. Could it be because he wasn't a Democrat until recently?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:41 PM
Mar 2016

Not sniping at all, sincere question.

I know it's one of the things that gives me pause, and certainly didn't help when I was considering who to support. I've basically been a Democrat since I was born, lol. I've voted for the Democrat in every election since I turned 18.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
6. Probably
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:47 PM
Mar 2016

Outside of New Hampshire, Clinton has carried voters to identify as Democrats. It's really hard for someone who switched to a party just to run in a primary to win over self-identified members of said party.

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
12. Thi Democrat has never loved Obama
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:56 PM
Mar 2016

I was never inspired by his speeches.

I was an Anyone but Hillary voter in 2008 and he got my vote mainly because he was the main leading rival to her in 2008.

Was disappointed but not surprised that he governed like Bill Clinton ver 2.0.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
13. I was a fan of Bill Clinton as president
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:58 PM
Mar 2016

And I am a fan of Obama (now. In 2008 I supported Hillary).

Of course, I'm a moderate. That's probably why.

vdogg

(1,384 posts)
18. Bernie has only recently tried to snuggle up to Obama
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie himself said he was one of Obama's toughest critics and he wanted to primary him in 2012. Bernie drove that wedge himself, Clinton didn't need to do a thing.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
23. Being a critic is one thing.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:36 PM
Mar 2016

Slandering Obama is Clinton's deal.
Now Clinton is trying to use Obama's coat tails to attach herself to his policies and legacy.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
17. Not in Colorado.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:27 PM
Mar 2016
Mrs. Clinton lost like a Republican in Colorado yesterday.

Actually, she didn't even do that well.
In Colorado, a swing state, Sanders wins where the most Democrats are.

Sanders wins almost everywhere

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
20. That was a caucus
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:32 PM
Mar 2016

Caucuses can produce different results than primaries. In regular primaries, Sanders has a pattern of only winning where Republicans do best.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
31. Which is even more troubling for Clinton.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:55 PM
Mar 2016

These are the most committed activists ... and they don't like Hillary.

Mrs. Clinton will not win a general election in Colorado.

Just ask former Sen. Udall how it turns out in Colorado when you ignore and disrespect the liberal/progressive base here.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
35. Polling and pundits also said that ...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

... Mrs. Clinton would win here yesterday (although it was very clear that momentum was all in Sander's direction -- we like real progressives here, not the fake kind who take money from Walmart and attend fundraisers hosted by an NRA lobbyist).

Clinton got clobbered -- 59 percent to 40 percent.

http://www.inquisitr.com/2844092/latest-democrat-super-tuesday-polls-2016-primary-caucus-exit-numbers-may-spell-bye-bye-bernie/

greymouse

(872 posts)
9. the states where Bernie won
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:53 PM
Mar 2016

are the ones by and large that go Democratic in the general. Mass is the exception. Hillary won the states that go red in the general. So, repeat after me, if Hillary is the nominee, Trump wins the general.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
15. It's basic political science not to compare primaries to general elections
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016

Take a political science course, do some studying and then try again.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
16. Lamest attack ever
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:10 PM
Mar 2016

Primaries aren't general elections. And in the 2012 general election, Berkshire county was Obama's best county. Bernie did quite well there.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
29. It's a lot harder to commit fraud where the votes are hand counted.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:53 PM
Mar 2016

And you get a lot more bang for your fraud buck in highly populated areas.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
33. Hi, Karl Rove
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 08:02 PM
Mar 2016

Were they handing cigs out to homeless people for votes too?

What a disgusting, and quite frankly, borderline racist claim. This is shit Rove, Rince Penis, and others have alleged against our party in general elections for years. You should be ashamed.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
38. Maybe you should stick to California
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:31 PM
Mar 2016

He won many dem areas: the university towns in Western Mass, Brockton, etc.

intheflow

(28,442 posts)
39. The problem with this analysis is it assumes independent voters in Mass are conservative.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:47 PM
Mar 2016

This is wrong. Some of the most liberal places in Massachusetts are in the Western part of the state: the five college towns of Northampton, Amherst, and South Hadley all went to Bernie, for instance. The artist communities in the Berkshires mostly went Bernie. The places that didn't go Bernie? The richest parts of the state. So don't tell me we're all Republicans west of Weston. The Republicans who make this part of the state conservative didn't vote in the Democratic primary. The poor artists and students and teachers and professors did. And we voted for Bernie.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
41. I was thinking the same thing.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:55 PM
Mar 2016

He wins the white male vote and losing almost everything else... just like a Republican versus a Democrat.

Texas is a good example..

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/03/01/us/elections/texas-democrat-poll.html?_r=0

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Boston Globe: Bernie Sand...