Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:09 PM Mar 2016

Calling a race before the polls close supresses votes.

This is why many of us are balking at the "the primaries are over" narrative being pushed. This thing isn't friggin' over yet!

And for any Hillary supporters who think she's inevitable and just want to be able to declare victory and shut us Bernie supporters up and move on: this hurts you too!!! Contested races mean people are interested! They mean voters are getting registered by the campaigns. They mean new people are getting involved. YOU. WANT. THAT. FOR. NOVEMBER!!!

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Calling a race before the polls close supresses votes. (Original Post) TDale313 Mar 2016 OP
No they don't, more people involved means that she loses..... daleanime Mar 2016 #1
If Repub turnout's through the roof TDale313 Mar 2016 #6
Didn't say that it made sense...... daleanime Mar 2016 #18
it will work out great for president elect trump. nt restorefreedom Mar 2016 #20
Jesus RelativelyJones Mar 2016 #2
Is that a fact? Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #8
That is to your own post. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #23
where have you been? Under a rock? yikes, wake up litlbilly Mar 2016 #13
The primary is NOT over. Agschmid Mar 2016 #3
An interested voting populace bvf Mar 2016 #4
They'll need turnout in November TDale313 Mar 2016 #10
The Republican Party would be just fine bvf Mar 2016 #15
Where was this line of thought 8 years ago? Happenstance24 Mar 2016 #5
It was eventually there. TDale313 Mar 2016 #7
what do you mean? It was there dana_b Mar 2016 #17
I don't remember it that way but then Happenstance24 Mar 2016 #19
The analysts were saying there was no way for Clinton to catch up to O's delegate count frazzled Mar 2016 #21
That's why they do it. dchill Mar 2016 #9
I'm aware. I think it's short sighted. n/t TDale313 Mar 2016 #11
Not from their POV. dchill Mar 2016 #14
That's the whole idea...supress votes, tampen down enthusiasm. NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #12
this is a very old TRICK dana_b Mar 2016 #16
Negative campaigning direct purpose is to suppress the vote. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #22
It's all over Old Codger Mar 2016 #24

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
1. No they don't, more people involved means that she loses.....
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:16 PM
Mar 2016

which they find unacceptable. They want to choke off the primary ASAP and then try to gin up enough fear to get through the general election since this is the only path that leads to a Hillary Presidency.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
4. An interested voting populace
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:19 PM
Mar 2016

is the last thing the Clinton campaign wants, or needs.

The same holds true for the Republican Party.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
10. They'll need turnout in November
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:26 PM
Mar 2016

Because believe me Trump will bring people out. Unless he self destructs which hasn't happened yet.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
15. The Republican Party would be just fine
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:42 PM
Mar 2016

with Clinton.

That's how far to the right our own party has been dragged in the last couple of decades. I'm completely convinced at this point, and I've been voting for almost forty years.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
7. It was eventually there.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:23 PM
Mar 2016

You heard the calls for wrapping things up early in the beginning. What party leaders eventually realized though was that the excitement of the contested race was bringing people in.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
17. what do you mean? It was there
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:49 PM
Mar 2016

during those primaries I remember lots of people here encouraging others to get out and vote.

Happenstance24

(193 posts)
19. I don't remember it that way but then
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 04:00 PM
Mar 2016

I too was one of those urging her to drop out. Math is math and I wanted to be prepared for the general. Maybe it was happening here (I wasn't here at the time) but not elsewhere. Every where I went Hillary was public enemy # 1 for not dropping. I won't even start with how the media treated her.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
21. The analysts were saying there was no way for Clinton to catch up to O's delegate count
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 04:35 PM
Mar 2016

And they were right. And it was much closer then than it is in this 2016 race. And yes, that caused many to suggest Clinton to exit. It didn't stop turnout for either candidate.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
12. That's the whole idea...supress votes, tampen down enthusiasm.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:29 PM
Mar 2016

They succeed, they win. It's as simple as that.

Imagine how scary it must be to the establishment to consider that they may not end up with a horse in the GE on either side. Desperate times require desperate measures.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
16. this is a very old TRICK
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 03:48 PM
Mar 2016

and we cannot fall for it. I think we really need to get the word out on social media that this race is closer than the MSM and Hillary's people and supporters are claiming. Reach out to friends/family and any groups that we belong to.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
22. Negative campaigning direct purpose is to suppress the vote.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 04:47 PM
Mar 2016

Very few calls for that to end.

Suppressing the vote by way of image control is a time honored tradition as well.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
24. It's all over
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 05:05 PM
Mar 2016

Doncha know, she has it covered all the way and you might just as well go the fuck home and forget it all til Nov. the vote vote vote for her highup...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Calling a race before the...