Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

annabanana

(52,791 posts) Sat Mar 5, 2016, 05:59 PM Mar 2016

0

Why no preliminary results for Dems in Kansas?

The repubs seem to have a bunch of numbers in. .

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why no preliminary results for Dems in Kansas? (Original Post) annabanana Mar 2016 OP

According to Google 31% reporting for GOP. 0% for Dems...... think Mar 2016 #1

This VOX MSMITH33156 Mar 2016 #2

ah. thanks!. . . . .n/t annabanana Mar 2016 #3

Thank you. Google was stating both parties caucuses ended at 3 PM central. Dem side now saying think Mar 2016 #4

Some #s I'm seeing from tweets . . . Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #5

I think we all know that Bernie has this in his pocket. But it might be better than thought for HRC Jitter65 Mar 2016 #6

think

(11,641 posts)

1. According to Google 31% reporting for GOP. 0% for Dems......

Reply to annabanana (Original post)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:02 PM

Mar 2016

MSMITH33156

(879 posts)

2. This VOX

Reply to annabanana (Original post)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:04 PM

Mar 2016

article explains it.

http://www.vox.com/2016/3/5/11165584/elections-2016-polls-time-results

Dems didnt start caucusing until 3:30 local. Republicans caucused from 10-2.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)

3. ah. thanks!. . . . .n/t

Reply to MSMITH33156 (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:07 PM

Mar 2016

think

(11,641 posts)

4. Thank you. Google was stating both parties caucuses ended at 3 PM central. Dem side now saying

Reply to MSMITH33156 (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:08 PM

Mar 2016

"Results will be available soon"....

Nanjeanne

(4,915 posts)

5. Some #s I'm seeing from tweets . . .

Reply to annabanana (Original post)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:09 PM

Mar 2016

Here Is Not Here ?@Jaxnynjapilot 9m9 minutes ago
@ThomasBernpaine @SenSanders @BernieSanders THE NUMBERS 4 Hayesville, Kansas Precinct Clinton 154 Sanders 530

natasha Gilbert
?@tashanzac
130 for @berniesanders and 67 for Hillary. In small town Hoisington, Ks. #feelthebern way to go Kansas!

Owen McLain ?@OwenMcLain 34m34 minutes ago
#KansasCaucus @BernieSanders supporters versus @HillaryClinton in my district. 154 votes for 534 votes for Bernie!!

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)

6. I think we all know that Bernie has this in his pocket. But it might be better than thought for HRC

Reply to Nanjeanne (Reply #5)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:18 PM

Mar 2016

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why no preliminary result...