Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Obama face the same sort of media manipulations in the 2008 campaign as Bernie does (Original Post) Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 OP
No. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #1
No. Obama was still an establishment candidate that was no threat to the status quo. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #2
^ This. AzDar Mar 2016 #23
No. 840high Mar 2016 #3
Obama was the media's designated anti-Clinton Buzz cook Mar 2016 #4
No. This time they're not leaving the outcome to chance. ReallyIAmAnOptimist Mar 2016 #5
No he did not. They are TERRIFIED of Bernie because they know that Bernie is a real sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #6
Whatever you're smoking, give me some jmowreader Mar 2016 #17
You need to learn about OK... Illinois is whiter, than OK Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #21
Look at Chicago specifically, not IL as a whole jmowreader Mar 2016 #22
No loyalsister Mar 2016 #7
No noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #8
Nope. This is unprecedented. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #9
2008 deepestblue Mar 2016 #10
Nope. The only Obama manipulations in 08 came from Hillary. jillan Mar 2016 #11
Nope jfern Mar 2016 #12
Nope. OZi Mar 2016 #13
Not no but Heeeelllll No! kristopher Mar 2016 #14
BUT he did get a LOT of trifling media questioning about stupid crap. School transcripts, fist bumps ancianita Mar 2016 #15
Did Obama get to do a town hall on FOX? Can't remember. ancianita Mar 2016 #16
No. grasswire Mar 2016 #18
Nope. cui bono Mar 2016 #19
No. It is very Focused and Thought Out this go around. quantass Mar 2016 #20

Buzz cook

(2,471 posts)
4. Obama was the media's designated anti-Clinton
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:16 AM
Mar 2016

So while he got some negative coverage, compared to previous democrats he got very positive coverage.

His strategy of playing to the inside the beltway media was a real winner for him.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
6. No he did not. They are TERRIFIED of Bernie because they know that Bernie is a real
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:24 AM
Mar 2016

threat to their candidate.

This is why they are TRYING so hard to 'wrap it up' as they so cavalierly describe denying millions of voters the right to vote.

Hillary wins ONLY the Conservo Dems and after March 15, she will have exhausted her 'base'. After that Bernie will be the one to 'wrap it up'.

This is why they are so DESPERATE. Word has come down to Corporate funded Kos that he must squash all criticism of Hillary, the Corp Media got the message to downplay any Victories for Bernie, and they sure did.

They MUST depress enthusiasm for Bernie BEFORE we get past March 15th.

And WE are not going to let them.

They so underestimate the people's ANGER and the more they WATCH these corrupt tactics the ANGRIER they get.

So wait until after March 15th and ignore all their desperate efforts and yes, Bernie can win this and imo he will.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
17. Whatever you're smoking, give me some
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:35 AM
Mar 2016

Bernie Sanders has not won a minority-heavy or large state yet, and he's lost a couple he needed to win - namely Iowa and Massachusetts. They simply don't trust him. Bernie's Waterloo is coming up - a very long list of minority-heavy, delegate-heavy states including California, Florida, Illinois, New York and North Carolina.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
21. You need to learn about OK... Illinois is whiter, than OK
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 09:34 AM
Mar 2016

White Alone in Illinois is 77.5% in OK 75.1%. CA 73.2% OK right in the middle....

It is a bit as if you are neglecting the Native American population. This link goes to US Census 'Quick Facts' which will easily compare all manner of demographics about the US and the various States.
http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/17,06,40

OK is not as white as many on DU keep insisting, and it does seem negligent of the Native Peoples.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
22. Look at Chicago specifically, not IL as a whole
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 05:55 PM
Mar 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Chicago

45.0% White (31.7% non-Hispanic whites);
32.9% Black or African American;
13.4% from some other race;
5.5% Asian (1.6% Chinese, 1.1% Indian, 1.1% Filipino, 0.4% Korean, 0.3% Pakistani, 0.3% Vietnamese, 0.2% Japanese, 0.1% Thai);
2.7% from two or more races;
0.5% American Indian.

Chicago has a Hispanic or Latino population of 28.9%.

The population of the Chicago metro area is 9.73 million, which translates to 3.2 million African-Americans alone plus about 2.5 million who claim Hispanic heritage - part of whom are also in the African-American group.

The ENTIRE POPULATION OF OKLAHOMA is 3.878 million. IOW there are more minorities in Chicago than there are people in Oklahoma.

Speaking of Native Americans...I've dealt with quite a few, and they are generally Not Liberal. Most would fall into the Conservadem category, and many were bona fide Republicans. A LOT of Native Americans are seriously pro-life. Do you remember Sheldon Whitehorse Campbell? His political positions seemed close to what Tulsi Gabbard's are now...and right after the Republicans routed Congress in the Contract on America fiasco, Campbell was one of the first - if not THE first - Democrat to cross the aisle.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
7. No
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:24 AM
Mar 2016

Obama is handsome, charismatic, and well spoken with a pleasing voice and tone. They loved covering him because they could easily give people what they want in programming. Bernie doesn't motivate media because he doesn't have those qualities that make people love to watch him.
As a friend said, "I like what he says, but I don't like to hear him saying it because he seems so gruff."

deepestblue

(349 posts)
10. 2008
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:07 AM
Mar 2016

On the tv side, as I recall MSNBC was favorable toward Barack, with most other television outlets favoring the other candidate all the way until Barack secured the nomination.

This time, the Bernie Blackout is real, but laughable in the sense that the more they try to shut out his message, the more it energizes his supporters. The voters are not fooled by all of this. Case in point: His wins recently in Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma etc. Just wait until liberal states get to join in on the fun!

Hence the panic.

The panic really set in beginning Super Tuesday when the media began primarily listing delegate counts that included superdelegate totals, thereby inflating Bernie's opponent's margin.

His grassroots game is spreading exponentially through social media and online fundraising. It is something to behold.

I firmly believe Sen. Sanders will be the next President of the United States.

ancianita

(36,034 posts)
15. BUT he did get a LOT of trifling media questioning about stupid crap. School transcripts, fist bumps
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 04:33 AM
Mar 2016

his wife's 'hatred for America,' his birth, their kids, his tone, his lapel pin, or no lapel pin -- I mean, the list was endless.

That crap took up 80% of media cycles.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
18. No.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 05:02 AM
Mar 2016

The media have simply tried to ignore Bernie. But, like a prairie fire, the flames spread at grassroots level. The people united cannot be divided.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
19. Nope.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 05:21 AM
Mar 2016

But he wasn't the threat to the establishment and corporate America that Bernie is. And this is the final proof that that is the truth, no matter what the apologists said.
.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Did Obama face the same s...