2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMichigan turnout "busiest ..primary in decades"
turnout is uuge so far...what this means for trump, cruz, bernie, or hillary remains to be seen, but with open primary, anything could happen
grab your
http://www.wzzm13.com/news/politics/michigan-politics/high-voter-turnout-in-michigan-primaries/73984224
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Not much info about when or where to look for out of staters.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)senseandsensibility
(16,972 posts)Looks like results will be posted soon!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)Karma13612
(4,549 posts)realize that if they keep reporting like this, readers will tune them out.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I wasn't going to bother with their link because of the SD stupidity. I'll watch for the updates there now.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Just last week, a CNN commentator was saying that they decided to not include the Superdelegates because it caused so much controversy and there was no need to play that way.
I guess they got different instructions after last week!
Make no mistake--what determines whether or not they include the SDs in their counting--is a direct reflection of their willingness to kow tow to the Clinton camp. CNN commentators made it woefully clear that the Clinton spinmeisters spend inordinate amounts of time talking to the CNN commentators and reminding them of the "realities" that need to be disseminated.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Depends what time this s over if or when we count delegates. Not supers for the record
kentuck
(111,074 posts)Very difficult to predict people's behaviors.
MSMITH33156
(879 posts)Because there was no primary in 2008. That year was historic, which is why the narrative of turnout being down developed. They keep comparing 2016 to 2008, which is silly. Since there is no 2008 comparison for Michigan, all of a sudden turnout is up.
demmiblue
(36,835 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)As you may recall, Michigan and Florida defied the DNC on scheduling, and had their delegates stripped. Clinton won both easily, but got zero delegates out of them. I think the claim here is that 2008 is a bad comparison because people knew the vote wouldn't count.
demmiblue
(36,835 posts)Not the full count, but by half.
MSMITH33156
(879 posts)it was unsanctioned and Obama wasn't even on the ballot.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I remember Michigan very well. All candidate camps signed a pledge saying that they would not compete in Michigan. They all agreed.
Clinton never took her name off the ballot. So, there was a vote and she won.
Clinton went on to argue that the Michigan delegates should be seated (after she won in a state in which Obama wasn't even on the ballot!). She argued that for quite a while.
At least she's consistent. Her snake-like behavior just boggles the mind.
From Wikipedia:
Hillary Clinton says the results [in Michigan] should count, even if Barack Obama's name did not appear on the ballot. "That was his choice...There was no rule or requirement that he take his name off the ballot. His supporters ran a very aggressive campaign to try to get people to vote uncommitted."...Clinton [says] that the Michigan and Florida pledged delegates should count because both are seen as key battleground states in the general election. But if the national party does not agree, she says, the states should re-do the primaries.[28]
When pressed by NPR, Clinton said, "We all had a choice as to whether or not to participate in what was going to be a primary, and most people took their name off the ballot but I didn't."[28] Critics have labeled Clinton's actions as dishonest, and charged her with trying retroactively to change the rules for her own benefit.[29][30][31]
demmiblue
(36,835 posts)My thoughts about Hillary Clinton are a different matter.
kentuck
(111,074 posts)They can usually predict who is going to vote before the ballots are cast.
longship
(40,416 posts)My experience at the polls this afternoon :
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511445581
BTW, WZZM is a Grand Rapids station. And G.R. is the home of the lunatic deVoss family and the Dutch Reformed church (both the same thing). Downtown G.R. all but closes down on Sunday -- it's the sabbath, you know.
It is an absolutely horrible place to measure voter turnout.
Rybak187
(105 posts)And they said there was 900 absentee ballots.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)When I cast my vote for Sanders. Just going by the ballot box counter, not including absentees.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm just thankful to see that people have gotten over the damn voter apathy and are interested in the governance of our country.
Even if someone turns out to be a crappy politician, it teaches those who care to make a different choice the next time.
People actually paying attention to the decisions those who we the people send to DC is a huge positive, in my opinion, as is casting the vote for those that are sent in the first place.
panader0
(25,816 posts)you are not allowed to complain later.