Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,470 posts)
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:34 PM Mar 2016

Why the Clinton Camp Isn't Worried After Michigan Primary Loss

(snip)

A Democratic candidate needs 2,383 delegates, or representatives who will vote for them at the convention, to be eligible as the party's nominee. Although Clinton has only won four more states than Sanders, she leads him by more than 200 pledged delegates, 760 to 546.

(snip)

According to an analysis by ABC News, Sanders would need to win all of the 34 remaining contests by 11.1 percent to win the nomination, and that is assuming that he acquires the remaining uncommitted super-delegates and has at least 50 super-delegates switch their allegiance from Clinton.

Despite the steep path for Sanders, the Clinton campaign downplayed expectations for March 15, when a total of 793 delegates will be up for grabs in five states. Mook cautioned that the demographics of Missouri, Illinois and Ohio are similar to Michigan, and that Sanders could prevail in those states as well.

But, he said, even if Sanders wins in those states, the campaign is still confident the night would rack up bigger delegate wins for Clinton due to the contests in North Carolina and Florida.

“We are confident that we are nearing the point where our delegate lead will effectively become insurmountable,” Mook said.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-camp-worried-michigan-primary-loss/story?id=37527424

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the Clinton Camp Isn't Worried After Michigan Primary Loss (Original Post) question everything Mar 2016 OP
If you weren't worried, then you probably wouldn't have posted that huh? n/t revbones Mar 2016 #1
this and the b.s. about SDs has been posted maybe 50 times today dana_b Mar 2016 #2
As you can see fron the link and the time stamp question everything Mar 2016 #7
No. Not worried. I've posted here several times that I welcome a real race question everything Mar 2016 #6
They may not admit to being worried, but I can guarantee there is panic behind closed doors Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #3
Sure. not worried... revbones Mar 2016 #4
lmao! Marr Mar 2016 #5
That's sounds accurate. DCBob Mar 2016 #8
In boxing, when an opponent gets hit and then shrugs it off, its a good sign.... Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #9
Of course it hurts question everything Mar 2016 #10

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
2. this and the b.s. about SDs has been posted maybe 50 times today
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:56 PM
Mar 2016

I'm not kidding. They are worried.

question everything

(47,470 posts)
7. As you can see fron the link and the time stamp
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:16 PM
Mar 2016

I watched ABC News and posted it soon after.

But, hey, why not jump and be happy before the end? Gallows humor?


question everything

(47,470 posts)
6. No. Not worried. I've posted here several times that I welcome a real race
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:14 PM
Mar 2016

Never liked a "coronation." Did not like it with Obama after Iowa in 2008 and was hoping not to have one this time.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
8. That's sounds accurate.
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:18 PM
Mar 2016

Certainly they are surprised they lost in Michigan but they are not worried about winning the nomination.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why the Clinton Camp Isn'...