2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWonder why Hillary's name appears on Chicago's sample ballot but Bernie's does not? Wonder no more.
From Reddit. My son just showed me this. I had to post it, but I'm going back to bed. Cheers.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)not thinly disguised endorsement lists.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)This is how Rahms get elected.
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)I was a Committee,an in the reform Ward in Philly, and we did this 40 years ago.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)You suppressed the vote to only one candidate? This is a primary we have a right to vote for all of the candidates not the candidate you decide is the "right" candidate. Yet another reason Clinton supporters are not helping Clinton.
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)Every voter had the right to vote for whomever they wanted. But MOST voters didn't want to go through the effort of studying up on who to choose for City Clerk, or Planning Commissioner, and relied on our advice.
Again, we're not talking about the ballot on the voting machine; we're talking about a sample ballot handed out to voters, which they could accept or reject.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)This is exactly what's wrong with politics.
Revolting.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)We knew they would go this route, I'm not really surprised, just disgusted.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)wasn't it?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Perfect
former9thward
(31,970 posts)on the official ballot in Chicago.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)DNC continuing to try to rig the nomination for Clinton.
amborin
(16,631 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)endorsing candidates is what party organizations do.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)If a city has partisan elections for mayor and city council then the DFL unit for that city endorses.
Candidates for the state legislature are endorsed by the party unit in the legislative district.
Candidates for the House of Representative by the congressional district party unit.
Statewide office, either state offices or federal at the state convention.
A party unit does not endorse a candidate outside that unit's area and they do not endorse a candidate that is running in a wider area even if that unit is part of the wider area. It would be completely out of line to endorse a candidate at one level who had not been endorsed by the wider group.
The DFL does not endorse in the presidential race. There are state party officials who have personally endorsed a candidate but they have done a pretty good job of keeping official party events neutral. And I guarantee that they would never have gotten by with a stunt like this sample ballot.
hack89
(39,171 posts)according to DU'rs that live in those states. I have seen them in RI.
The false outrage over this ballot should be embarrassing. I guess Bernie did pull in new voters that are new to the political process.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)prior to the state primary* and the general election but only for candidates endorsed by the appropriate party unit. If my senate district endorsed a candidate for the state legislature that the the wheels in the state DFL office really didn't not like, the sample ballot for the primary would include the endorsed candidate not the one people higher up the party food chain preferred.
(*To avoid confusion - we do have a primary but it is only for contested races within the state, it has nothing to do with presidential politics)
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)I suspect that other states have different processes. I know nothing about the Democratic Party Organization in Illinois, but it appears as though their individual party units can endorse, even for a Presidential Primary. I don't particularly like that. For example, at our recent precinct caucuses, I would not even think about speaking in favor of one of the Democratic primary candidates. As the chair of the precinct organization, I think I should be neutral on that when I'm representing the DFL, so that's what I do.
We did have people speaking in support of candidates at our caucus, but I simply introduced them. Endorsements aren't my job. My job is to help the DFL encourage Democrats to vote in elections and to support candidates who have been endorsed by our party units. That doesn't happen until the conventions take place, though. Our Senate District convention is on April 16. We''ll be endorsing our candidate for State Senator there, along with electing delegates for the Congressional District Convention. That's it.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)I just wanted it made clear that it does not happen in some states.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)My county party has been scrupulously fair to all primary candidates.
Taking sides is for the general.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Taking sides is for the General election. I'm stunned that this was done. I've seen a lot of people post that they see them all the time in Chicago but no one has stated for sure that they get them in primary races. If they do then they live in a corrupt city and they need to push back on this. Don't accept this just because this time it may be your candidate who is benefiting. This is wrong.
hack89
(39,171 posts)No point in endorsing after the primary - the choice is made. There is only one candidate left.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)has no business endorsing, except in extreme cases like that Larouche nut in Texas. Isn't that what we've been complaining about with DWS?
hack89
(39,171 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 10, 2016, 07:11 PM - Edit history (1)
I have been a member of my local party organization for a long time. We have a history of endorsing going back generations. And we are not unique. Influencing elections are why they exist in the first place.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)In my area, the party itself remains impartial in the primaries.
To answer your first remark, I am most certainly not new to politics. You draw that conclusion, apparently from the customs of your area.
Forgive him, for he believes that the customs of his tribe are the laws of nature!
George Bernard Shaw
hack89
(39,171 posts)with some of the most progressive social policies you could imagine - you would love it here.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Once again you make unsupported assumptions. Kindly stop.
Actually, I won't know if you do or don't, because I am terminating my end of this soi-disant conversation.
hack89
(39,171 posts)you call yourself progressive?
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I don't call myself progressive, I AM progressive.
I would not like your area because (you tell me) your local Democratic party endorses primary candidates in their primaries. Mine doesn't, and I think that's the way it should be. This is why many are criticizing DWS, no?
I also wouldn't like your area, frankly, if it has too many people like you, who make assumptions and tell people how to think (see evidence above).
Bye.
hack89
(39,171 posts)wow. I hope all Bernie supporters are not as ideologically rigid and judgemental as you are.
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)This is not the party endorsing, it is the party selecting the nominee ...big difference.
Segami
(14,923 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)n/t.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)with the real ballot?
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)name on it. A lot of candidates do that during campaigns.
The official sample ballot, of course, comes from the state or local election jurisdiction and has all candidates on it. Various others print and distribute all sorts of things called "sample ballots." I think most voters understand that those are endorsement ballots. Voters know the difference.
jalan48
(13,855 posts)They will just go with whoever the "Democratic Party" says they should. Group think.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)it literally means their job. Vote right or you're out.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)How would they?
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)Back in the patronage days, if your guy didn't win, your job was over. That took out your whole shop.
They had other ways, not legal, of determining how you personally voted.
I don't have contacts in that zoo any more so I can't tell you what the modern techniques are.
For a primer in Chicago politics, I recommend Mike Royko's book Boss: Richard J. Daley of Chicago.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)that's why parties send out sample ballots.
xloadiex
(628 posts)that leave off Hillary's name and only list Bernie's. It all depends on who your ward is endorsing. That's how it works in Chicago. It goes by wards.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)xloadiex
(628 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Action_Patrol
(845 posts)And the other one about the same topic is astounding.
You'd think that people that spend this much time on the internet would know about these.
It's no conspiracy. Plenty of places around the country do this.
Thank you for posting.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)Action_Patrol
(845 posts)This is why the primaries forum is garbage.
Everyone NEEDS to be outraged. The anti-Clinton people scream about the sky falling and the conspiracy to take Sanders down when they see a ward with a sample ballot preferring Clinton.
When presented with the same information with a Pro-Sanders ballot it doesn't change the outrage. The information is just ignored.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)When a Bernie supporter seems that a local dem group puts only Hillary on the ballot, they are not thinking that this is a sample ballot (when sample ballots are not known to them). That sample ballot is, to them, another DWS dirty trick. DWS has brought out this distrust of the dem party with her antics.
Z
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I have looked and looked for any other ward endorsements and can find none except Cook County and somebody posted a link to the the 35th ward. What about the other 48? Please advise if you have further information.
I find endorsements coming from within political machinery to be dangerous. I want free and fair elections and find this endorsement crap from within the election machinery unacceptable.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Take this list with you when you vote to help you make an informed decision.
In the 49th Ward Democratic Party, the members of the party, not the elected officials, make the endorsement decisions. They are progressive-minded volunteers, not paid political workers. They make their endorsement decisions after hearing from all the candidates in an open and democratic process. As the 49th Ward Democratic Committeeman, I heartily support their recommendations.
Finally, we can use your help in the final weeks leading up to the election, as well as Election Day itself. These endorsements mean nothing unless people know about them. Your help is critical in getting the word out. Please reply to this email or call the 49th Ward Democratic Party at 773-973-4949 and well sign you up!
Regardless of whom you support, I strongly encourage you to vote.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I'm not asking you look anything up, just to simply answer that question. I live in California and have no clue how stuff is run in Chicago. Please educate us if you have that information. Thanks in advance for the info.
I oppose endorsements coming from within the election machinery. I find it troubling and really inappropriate. I support free and fair elections and believe those running elections should remain neutral.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)I dont understand the outrage OPs but maybe some are unfamiliar with this
. Why not outrage over different caucus sides in a state during the dem race????? same thing imo
every ward is voicing their opinion
guess that is how we roll here and i do not think it is bad.
For those not familiar ,Chicago is a big city and diverse so there will be differences
is the preference for a word from city hall to influence the whole voting area?? Or should there be no opinion from local leaders?
FYI it is not just the presidential primary, you will see differences on states attorney etc too
for example 35th going for Foxx this is a race with 3 candidates Differences having to do with the Laquan shooting and other issues fracture the city on who gets on the sample put out
Besides a lot of these flyers wind up in bird cages and gutters
Not taken as serious as DU's concern
vintx
(1,748 posts)Got an example that's actually comparable?
xloadiex
(628 posts)That is the 34th ward page. They don't have to agree with who cook county supports.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)It shows how these so-called "sample" ballots are used.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)My county party does not play favorites. Nor do I think they should.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... disgrace the Democratic Party. I thought we were supposed to be above this kind underhanded horseshoe. Guess it's time to feed my unicorn.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)There is no requirement for them to stay neutral, unless it is in their bylaws and local parties make their own bylaws. This is nothing new.
Perogie
(687 posts)the issue is they didn't include Sanders on the sample ballot.
If they didn't have Clinton's name and only Sanders I'm sure the Clinton supporters would not like it either
metroins
(2,550 posts)Look at the stars next to the name that indicate "Contested"; they only show the name of the ones they endorse.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)If I lived in a county that worked like that, I'd be trying to change the bylaws.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Now you complain that the water is cold?
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)And they expect us to dutifully fall in line.
They're in for a surprise...... I have a feeling.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)the accepted culture right now. The Third Way has fully engulfed its' host at the moment. The party is currently taking its' antibiotics. If we finish the dose, we will be on the road to recovery.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I guess so, judging from this thread.
Reminds me of superdelegates.
For the record, I have no objection to their being given guaranteed attendance. And their vote will not matter. What I object to is the way they're being used to attempt to manipulate low-information voters.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Rahm Emmanuel is Hugely unpopular and the Chicago teachers union endorsed Bernie.
mckara
(1,708 posts)More political corruption in Chicago
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)And then they are going to wonder why 1/4 of it's membership leaves the party in the next year.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Cook County is like the DNC -- focusing only on Clinton and control.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)They are very serious about their politics, very organized and they are all about the Democratic Party. They don't always do everything right......
AzDar
(14,023 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Unbelievable.
Kick and rec
LS_Editor
(893 posts)The corporate media has tried ignoring Bernie and dismissing him as a socialist with no chance of beating Hillary Clinton. Expect more bullshit from them after the Michigan primary win. Satire warning.
Corporate Media to Begin Adding Fangs to Images of Bernie Sanders
WASHINGTON (The Nil Admirari) - Today, a confidential memo between American corporate media outlets was leaked to TNA. The memo ordered all outlets to add vampire fangs to all images of Bernie Sanders in response to his win in last night's Democratic primary election in Michigan, and his refusal to accept the narrative Hillary Clinton was the inevitable Democratic presidential nominee.
+
More @ link...
Response to AtomicKitten (Original post)
Post removed
zentrum
(9,865 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Democrats getting in on that action is not cool.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)Depends on the ward and who they are endorsing.
http://www.carlosrosa.org/sampleballot2016
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)This is the actual local Democratic party, right, not some outside organization?
I'm glad I don't live there.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I cannot find endorsements from any of the other 50 wards.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Take this list with you when you vote to help you make an informed decision.
In the 49th Ward Democratic Party, the members of the party, not the elected officials, make the endorsement decisions. They are progressive-minded volunteers, not paid political workers. They make their endorsement decisions after hearing from all the candidates in an open and democratic process. As the 49th Ward Democratic Committeeman, I heartily support their recommendations.
Finally, we can use your help in the final weeks leading up to the election, as well as Election Day itself. These endorsements mean nothing unless people know about them. Your help is critical in getting the word out. Please reply to this email or call the 49th Ward Democratic Party at 773-973-4949 and well sign you up!
Regardless of whom you support, I strongly encourage you to vote.
http://www.ward49.com/news/sample-ballot-issued-for-early-voting-including-judicial-elections/
Suggesting you vote for their endorsement does not equal tyranny
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I'm not asking you to look anything up but simply to answer the question. Please educate us if you have information. I live in California. I have no clue what goes on in Chicago.
I will reiterate I think it is hugely inappropriate for endorsements coming from within the election machinery. I think it is critical that those running elections remain neutral. We saw quite the opposite of that from those running the caucuses in Iowa and Nevada.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,165 posts)It did here in Houston. In fact there were some other people listed besides Sanders and Clinton.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Sample ballots are to see the slate whoever put out the sample ballot endorsed.
I have, at least, learned from this that this apparently isn't as common all over the country as it is in DC...
JI7
(89,244 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Or just Promotional flyers being put out by various groups.
I know that when we get closer to voting in CA, we will get a tidal wave of stuff in the mail...many times I look at it and wonder who is pushing what.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I'm not completely clear on that.
If it's from the party - no, no, no!
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)MannyG
(13 posts)I'm from New Orleans & have seen many suggested ballots that only lists whoever the group endorses, sometimes both candidates if they have no preference. They are very helpful in races where there are a lot of items on the ballot.
People who receive them KNOW WHAT IT IS and often cross out & replace the groups suggestion if they want to go a different way in a particular race or on a particular amendment. Often times I would skim through 3-4 different suggested ballots stuck on my door (they were not allowed to be put in mailboxes), pick the one closest to how I intended to vote, then cross out the races I differed with the group.
This is much to do about nothing.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)If it's repeated often enough and with enough venom, people will buy into anything. Look at all the rage generated in this thread because people want to believe the worst.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I posted something I found on Reddit with no comment about the piece. I have twice asked a naysayer to please educate us on the wards in Chicago. I live in California and have been unable to find or get a straight answer.
I'm really tired of the personal attacks on supporters. This is a political discussion board, but there are people here personally invested in their candidate such that they lash out as if the politician was a family member.
Instead of attacking the messenger, how about contributing something useful to the discussion and start with an explanation of the content of the OP and enlighten us. There is no need for your nasty, mean spirited comments. Try being a constructive part of the conversation instead of lobbying grenades from the sidelines.
randome
(34,845 posts)No insult intended but it's tiresome to see yet another 'conspiracy theory' rise from the ashes after it died last week. I apologize for the Tea Party reference. It was unnecessary.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"The whole world is a circus if you know how to look at it."
Tony Randall, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)[/center][/font][hr]
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Or forgot. My pain meds mess w/ my short term memory sometimes.
Thanks for your response. Peace.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Maybe delete it and make some good faith effort not to trash and bash one of our candidates just because you can?
I'll hold my breath.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)And the nasty and mean spirited comment is rich coming from that poster. Some folks are so nasty and mean spirited that the admin have to revoke some of their privileges.
Just sayin.... Take that comment with a grain of salt.
Uncle Joe
(58,342 posts)Thanks for the thread, AtomicKitten.
6chars
(3,967 posts)vintx
(1,748 posts)K&R
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Today Harvey Milk is a civil rights icon and everyone is eager to stand proudly with him but when he ran for office his slogan was quite righteously "Harvey Milk vs. the Machine" meaning the Democratic Party Machine and for that matter the A-List Gays of SF at the time. The Establishment, straight and LGBT opposed Harvey Milk and stood proudly with The Machine until that position became untenable.....
" Running against the entrenched Democratic party apparatus on the campaign theme "Harvey Milk vs. the Machine," Milk lost yet again, by a mere 4,000 votes. By this time, however, he had established a formidable political machine of his own, the San Francisco Gay Democratic Club. In 1977, on his third try, Milk was finally elected to the Board of Supervisors, becoming the first openly gay elected official in the city's history."
http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Harvey_Milk.aspx