Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary lost me tonight for forever. (Original Post) 7wo7rees Mar 2016 OP
How so? (nt) bigwillq Mar 2016 #1
No problem vote for Trump then bigdarryl Mar 2016 #2
Kidding, right? 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #4
Please explain marions ghost Mar 2016 #3
Mostly when she said if it sounds too good to be true. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #5
She said they were natural politicians and... jcgoldie Mar 2016 #6
So when she said if it sounds too good to be true.... 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #7
so she has less charisma than... jcgoldie Mar 2016 #8
Good point. H2O Man Mar 2016 #9
It was the "poor, poor, pitiful me" overtones starroute Mar 2016 #12
Did she have you before? DavidDvorkin Mar 2016 #10
Bernie 1st, Hill has always been second. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #11
As always, consider the alternative DavidDvorkin Mar 2016 #13
You could always vote for Trump CorkySt.Clair Mar 2016 #14
Write in Bernie Doremus Mar 2016 #15

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
5. Mostly when she said if it sounds too good to be true.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:57 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary was at her worst last night, IMHO.

Did you not watch the debate?

jcgoldie

(11,627 posts)
6. She said they were natural politicians and...
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:58 AM
Mar 2016

...she isn't. I really don't see how that's controversial. Watch the 3 of them speak and it's pretty evident.

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
7. So when she said if it sounds too good to be true....
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:02 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 10, 2016, 01:52 PM - Edit history (1)

It was OK with you?

Yes, it's not about being a "natural" politician. It is the ability to speak well and I think it is usually called charisma. She is lacking.


Oh wait, there is the HONESTY factor. That is the one!!
That is why I choked on "...if it sounds too good to be true...." she should know!!

jcgoldie

(11,627 posts)
8. so she has less charisma than...
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:05 AM
Mar 2016

Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama... a statement which holds true for 99% of Americans I'd guess. And for that your hyperbolic statement that she lost your vote "forever"... given the alternatives in November that's ridiculous.

H2O Man

(73,528 posts)
9. Good point.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:17 AM
Mar 2016

I think that everyone could agree that Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are gifted speakers. They have an ease in communicating with the public that very few other politicians have. Hillary clearly does not have that gift. (I can say, based upon watching her on television for years, and having met her twice, that she is really good in speaking with small groups -- as opposed to her speaking to larger groups.)

But being a politician is more, much more, than public speaking. Marco Rubio, for example, can deliver lines smoothly in front of a group. But is he really a politician? Or more of a cheap con man?

For a better example, let's take the Kennedy brothers. Both John and Ted are remembered as powerful public speakers. For Ted, it came naturally. John had to work very hard to become as good as he was -- and he was as good as any president we've ever had.

Robert Kennedy, on the other hand, was never a good public speaker. He definitely worked to improve his skills. Yet, while he did deliver a couple of great speeches -- June 6, 1966 in South Africa, and April 4, 1968, following MLK's assassination -- it was the content, and his energy, that made them memorable.

Still, Robert was a natural politician. Just not a natural, at ease public speaker.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
12. It was the "poor, poor, pitiful me" overtones
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 01:47 PM
Mar 2016

The crucial context is that she pulled out the not-a-natural-politician line -- which she's used before -- as a response to being asked why people might find her untrustworthy.

It was the disconnect that was so jarring. Not having the charisma of a Bill Clinton or a Barack Obama might make a politician seem clumsy or boring or out of touch onstage. But it's not clear that it could cause them to appear untrustworthy. So this had very much the appearance of Clinton pulling out a canned response in order to divert attention from the actual question.

But it also played into Clinton's victim narrative. Just as with her woman-as-ultimate-outsider line, it amounted to saying, "I haven't done anything wrong. I just don't have the advantages that some other people enjoy. And why is everybody always picking on me?"

So it's certainly not false to say that Hillary isn't a natural politician. But it didn't answer the question and it came across as a call for pity.


DavidDvorkin

(19,473 posts)
13. As always, consider the alternative
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:28 PM
Mar 2016

I dislike Sanders more all the time, but I'll vote for him over any Republican, without hesitation.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
15. Write in Bernie
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:51 PM
Mar 2016

I won't vote for:
1) a repuke
2) status quo, aka Hillary

I've voted for the 'lesser of 2 evils' for too long. I have my candidate and if his name isn't on my ballot in November I'll write it there, myself.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary lost me tonight f...