2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNAFTA
As heavily subsidized U.S. corn and other staples poured into Mexico, producer prices dropped and small farmers found themselves unable to make a living. Some two million have been forced to leave their farms since Nafta. At the same time, consumer food prices rose, notably the cost of the omnipresent tortilla.
As a result, 20 million Mexicans live in food poverty. Twenty-five percent of the population does not have access to basic food and one-fifth of Mexican children suffer from malnutrition. Transnational industrial corridors in rural areas have contaminated rivers and sickened the population and typically, women bear the heaviest impact.
Not all of Mexicos problems can be laid at Naftas doorstep. But many have a direct causal link. The agreement drastically restructured Mexicos economy and closed off other development paths by prohibiting protective tariffs, support for strategic sectors and financial controls.
NYT: Under Nafta, Mexico Suffered, and the United States Felt Its Pain
Laura Carlsen is the director of the Americas program at the Center for International Policy.
NOVEMBER 24, 2013
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Aug 2015
http://www.businessinsider.com/mexicans-get-paid-less-for-their-work-than-any-other-developed-country-2015-7
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Mexico ranks poorly as a democracy with an overall rating of 66 placing it 46 places below the US and 46th on the list of flawed democracies.
The US is crappy at 20th out of 20 "full democracies".
http://64.37.52.189/~parsifal/EIU2015.pdf
kristopher
(29,798 posts)NYT: The Drug War and Mexico
JAN. 25, 2016
To the Editor:
Re Mexicos New Blood Politics (Sunday Review, Jan. 17):
Ioan Grillos conclusion that the United States (and American taxpayers) should use its drug-war aid to push harder for anti-corruption and judicial reforms is off base.
As a political analyst living and working in Mexico for the last three decades, I have watched with horror how the United States-Mexico drug war strategy has led to the explosion of violence and criminal activity here. The deep-rooted complicity between government officials and security forces on the one hand and cartels on the other means that the training, equipment and firepower given in aid and sold to the Mexican government fuel violence on both sides.
The lines blur. The cartels are not fighting the state for political power; they are seeking to protect a $40 billion drug-trafficking business that has been converted into a war for control of territory, a war against the people.
Victim organizations that have organized throughout the country demand that the United States stop funding the drug war under any guise. They are the ones who have lost the most, and have the most at stake. We should finally listen to them.
LAURA CARLSEN
Director, Americas Program
Center for International Policy
Mexico City
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Change is too scary.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)All the good that can be done through trade "floods up," per plan.