Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton needs to answer for her actions in Honduras and Haiti
Sanders has a point Clinton is on record saying deporting children would send a responsible message to families to deter them from coming into the United States. But when it comes to Honduras, Sanders as well as the moderators missed a key opportunity to bring up Clintons record in Central America and the Caribbean, and specifically how her State Departments role in undemocratic regime changes has contributed to violence and political instability in Honduras and Haiti today.
In November 2008, then-Honduran President Manuel Zelaya called for for a poll on a nonbinding national referendum to draft a new constitution, drawing the ire of the military, the Supreme Court and the opposition, which alleged that Zelaya wanted to end the term limits that prevented him from running again. In June 2009, Zelaya was overthrown by the military held at gunpoint, he was forced to fly to a U.S military base in his pajamas. The United Nations and the Organization of American States (OAS) called the ouster a military coup, but the White House and Clintons State Department were loath to call it such despite the fact that a cable from the Honduran Embassy said, The Embassy perspective is that there is no doubt that the military, Supreme Court and national congress conspired on June 28 in what constituted an illegal and unconstitutional coup.
In November 2008, then-Honduran President Manuel Zelaya called for for a poll on a nonbinding national referendum to draft a new constitution, drawing the ire of the military, the Supreme Court and the opposition, which alleged that Zelaya wanted to end the term limits that prevented him from running again. In June 2009, Zelaya was overthrown by the military held at gunpoint, he was forced to fly to a U.S military base in his pajamas. The United Nations and the Organization of American States (OAS) called the ouster a military coup, but the White House and Clintons State Department were loath to call it such despite the fact that a cable from the Honduran Embassy said, The Embassy perspective is that there is no doubt that the military, Supreme Court and national congress conspired on June 28 in what constituted an illegal and unconstitutional coup.
Naturally, Miami was a fitting setting for a debate that focused on immigration and the Latino vote. However, considering that Wednesdays debate was held in a state that is home to nearly half of the United States Haitian population, the debate was a missed opportunity to ask Clinton serious questions about her actions and policies in Haiti, a country where she and her family have wielded immense power and influence over the course of the past two decades.
This time, the scene is Port-Au-Prince, Haiti, in January 2011. Though the uprisings in Egypt were in full swing, then-Secretary of State Clinton paid a personal visit to Haiti shortly after the first round of the countrys presidential election, on Nov. 28, 2010. It quickly became clear that the pop singer-turned-candidate Michel Martelly, whom The Post in 2002 characterized as favorite of the thugs who worked on behalf of the hated Duvalier family dictatorship before its 1986 collapse, was Washingtons pick to win. Though the voting was badly marred by irregularities (the United States had pushed for quick polls), the OAS went even further and declared without evidence that Martelly had qualified for the final round over the incumbent partys candidate. Rather than rerun the preliminary round and let the Haitian people choose, Clinton reportedly pressured then-President René Préval with the loss of U.S. and international aid unless the election results were changed to fit the OASs recommendation.
This time, the scene is Port-Au-Prince, Haiti, in January 2011. Though the uprisings in Egypt were in full swing, then-Secretary of State Clinton paid a personal visit to Haiti shortly after the first round of the countrys presidential election, on Nov. 28, 2010. It quickly became clear that the pop singer-turned-candidate Michel Martelly, whom The Post in 2002 characterized as favorite of the thugs who worked on behalf of the hated Duvalier family dictatorship before its 1986 collapse, was Washingtons pick to win. Though the voting was badly marred by irregularities (the United States had pushed for quick polls), the OAS went even further and declared without evidence that Martelly had qualified for the final round over the incumbent partys candidate. Rather than rerun the preliminary round and let the Haitian people choose, Clinton reportedly pressured then-President René Préval with the loss of U.S. and international aid unless the election results were changed to fit the OASs recommendation.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-needs-to-answer-for-her-actions-in-honduras-and-haiti/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 631 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton needs to answer for her actions in Honduras and Haiti (Original Post)
Mufaddal
Mar 2016
OP
WDIM
(1,662 posts)1. Hillary Clinton's Foreign Policy is abysmal.
Regime change is not a policy our country should be pursuing. Meddling in other country's elections is not a policy our country should be pursuing. It shows her contempt for democracy and the will of the people of these nations. It is time to stop interfering in other Governments and stop interfering with people's lives. There is to much blood on Clinton's hands because of her Foreign Policy Decisions I could never in good conscience vote for her.
Mika
(17,751 posts)2. Hil' State supported the ban on Haiti's most popular party- the socialist ...
Fanmi Lavalas. Aristide's party. The VAST majority of Haitians COMPLETLY disenfranchised.
Yes, Hil supports democracy. Uh huh.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)3. restricting the available party options to a small chunk of the actual political spectrum
seems to be a trend with the Clintons