Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:42 AM Mar 2016

Which comment is worse? Hillary's or Bernie's?

My opinion is that both are equally bad, but not reflective of either candidate, and the attention both comments got are really just "gotcha" politics. To their credit, both Bernie and Hillary offered apologies of sorts.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/03/07/bernie-sanders-clarifies-ghetto-remark-that-prompted-social-media-outcry/

In Sunday night’s debate in Flint, Mich., the Vermont senator was asked to identify his “racial blind spots.”

Mr. Sanders answered, “When you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto. You don’t know what it’s like to be poor. You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car.”

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/03/hillary-clinton-nancy-reagen-aids-inexplicable

The other point that I wanted to make too is, it may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s. And because of both President and Mrs. Reagan — in particular Mrs. Reagan — we started a national conversation when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it. And that too is something that I really appreciate with her very effective, low-key advocacy. But it penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, "Hey, we have to do something about this too."

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which comment is worse? Hillary's or Bernie's? (Original Post) Onlooker Mar 2016 OP
Clinton apologized for her comment. Sanders doubled down. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #1
+1 n/t JTFrog Mar 2016 #2
Except that Hillary's is a misstatement of facts. earthside Mar 2016 #4
Of course you don't. JTFrog Mar 2016 #12
Sanders was a bit tone deaf. Clinton was mistaken. Clinton apologized; Sanders marched on. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #17
So there are no poor white people? mythology Mar 2016 #19
Before you condemn, at least know Bernie's entire quote: tblue Mar 2016 #13
I didn't condemn anything. I simply answered the question in the OP. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #16
The quote in the post you're responding to was doctored. It's not what he said Number23 Mar 2016 #41
Precisely. When you read more than the Fox News truncated version, it's completely different. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #18
this is the first time I've heard that he was quoting someone renate Mar 2016 #37
Exactly! earthside Mar 2016 #23
+1000! KPN Mar 2016 #26
OMFG noamnety Mar 2016 #28
That's hysterical. Unfortunately the actual transcript paints an entirely different picture Number23 Mar 2016 #40
What bothers me is how many times Hillary apologizes. KPN Mar 2016 #24
Yeah, that's troubling alright. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #25
If you think apologies are bad, you might be in the wrong place. stevenleser Mar 2016 #31
Why should Bernie apologize for quoting someone from BLM? merrily Mar 2016 #32
There is that. KPN Mar 2016 #44
Nailed it. Number23 Mar 2016 #39
Bernie still seems uncomfortable dealing with and confronting race issues bigwillq Mar 2016 #3
God, you guys are desperate to minimize Clinton's offensive remarks. Marr Mar 2016 #5
The difference is obvious. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #6
Pandering for Repub votes & throwing HIV+ under the bus tblue Mar 2016 #15
So Bernie plagiarized, too? Onlooker Mar 2016 #35
When you attribute the source it's not plagiarism Fumesucker Mar 2016 #38
Please see post #40 in this thread. There was no misattributed quote. That "white people don't know Number23 Mar 2016 #42
I'm not going to condemn either candidate for those remarks. Arkansas Granny Mar 2016 #7
Coop criticized Reagan for his slow response to the AIDS epidemic NWCorona Mar 2016 #21
Bernie was QUOTING an AA woman! tblue Mar 2016 #8
Clinton's. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #9
Hillary's cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #10
One is a flat out despicable lie, the other a nuanced POV. 99Forever Mar 2016 #11
Sanders was basically correct. HassleCat Mar 2016 #14
Ta-Nehisi Coates: Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #20
Onlooker posted some bait. Then he ran away to hide. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #22
The question was about Sanders' own racial blind spots. He quoted what a rep of BLM said to him. merrily Mar 2016 #27
Sanders was quoting someone. revbones Mar 2016 #29
Bernie was quoting someone TheFarseer Mar 2016 #30
Neither. Both. Chitown Kev Mar 2016 #33
This isn't helping Hillary in the slightest. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #34
You are *seriously* comparing the two Aerows Mar 2016 #36
In between the upset over Hillary's quote, a slew of Sanders supporters raced to rec a thread where Number23 Mar 2016 #43
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
1. Clinton apologized for her comment. Sanders doubled down.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:47 AM
Mar 2016

So, I'd say Clinton's comment was worse initially but softened by her apology.

That leaves Sanders stubbornly standing behind his comment.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
4. Except that Hillary's is a misstatement of facts.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:53 AM
Mar 2016

She can apologize but she was also just flat wrong; i.e., she got caught.

Frankly, I don't have any problem with what Bernie said.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
12. Of course you don't.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:03 PM
Mar 2016

But I bet you have no problem pointing out other's cognitive dissonance.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
19. So there are no poor white people?
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

Both are factually incorrect. That said I can't really get worked up over either. Sometimes people say things that are incorrect. I don't think either meant to cause harm or be malicious.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
41. The quote in the post you're responding to was doctored. It's not what he said
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:25 PM
Mar 2016
He said, no, I don’t get cabs in Washington, D.C. This was 20 years ago. Because he was humiliated by the fact that cabdrivers would go past him because he was black. I couldn’t believe, you know, you just sit there and you say, this man did not take a cab 20 years ago in Washington, D.C. Tell you another story, I was with young people active in the Black Lives Matter movement. A young lady comes up to me and she says, you don’t understand what police do in certain black communities. You don’t understand the degree to which we are terrorized, and I’m not just talking about the horrible shootings that we have seen, which have got to end and we’ve got to hold police officers accountable, I’m just talking about every day activities where police officers are bullying people.

So to answer your question, I would say, and I think it’s similar to what the secretary said, when you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto. You don’t know what it’s like to be poor. You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/07/us/politics/transcript-democratic-presidential-debate.html


The quote in that post conveniently left out the "I would say" part and is breaking its neck trying to pretend that everything that was said was a quote from someone else when that is clearly not the case when you look at the entire quote.
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
18. Precisely. When you read more than the Fox News truncated version, it's completely different.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:16 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie was quoting an African American person, not making the statement himself. Most of the criticism of Bernie about this is based on ignorance.

renate

(13,776 posts)
37. this is the first time I've heard that he was quoting someone
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:52 PM
Mar 2016

That makes this a COMPLETE non-issue. Sheesh.

Thank you for that clarification. I doubt I'm the only person in America (possibly the only one on DU, though ) who hadn't heard that crucial detail.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
28. OMFG
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:01 PM
Mar 2016

I'm a bernie supporter and didn't even know he was quoting a conversation.

Fuck the media, and everyone here who deliberately repeated that out of context and distorted it to smear him.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
40. That's hysterical. Unfortunately the actual transcript paints an entirely different picture
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:22 PM
Mar 2016

Your quote quite conveniently takes out the "to answer your question" and the monumental "I WOULD SAY" which clearly puts the quote back on Sanders:

He said, no, I don’t get cabs in Washington, D.C. This was 20 years ago. Because he was humiliated by the fact that cabdrivers would go past him because he was black. I couldn’t believe, you know, you just sit there and you say, this man did not take a cab 20 years ago in Washington, D.C. Tell you another story, I was with young people active in the Black Lives Matter movement. A young lady comes up to me and she says, you don’t understand what police do in certain black communities. You don’t understand the degree to which we are terrorized, and I’m not just talking about the horrible shootings that we have seen, which have got to end and we’ve got to hold police officers accountable, I’m just talking about every day activities where police officers are bullying people.

So to answer your question, I would say, and I think it’s similar to what the secretary said, when you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto. You don’t know what it’s like to be poor. You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/07/us/politics/transcript-democratic-presidential-debate.html



KPN

(15,642 posts)
24. What bothers me is how many times Hillary apologizes.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

How many times have we heard her say something to the effect of "I was wrong on that. And I take responsibility for that." Seems to me like just about every time she gets called on the carpet for something she said. If it happened once or twice, fine ... give her the benefit of the doubt -- but she does it too often for it to be genuine in my view.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
31. If you think apologies are bad, you might be in the wrong place.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:05 PM
Mar 2016

Democrats apologize when they do something wrong. Republicans are the ones who refuse to apologize for their mistakes.

KPN

(15,642 posts)
44. There is that.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 01:57 PM
Mar 2016

But I'm in the right place -- for now. But you missed my point. I don't take issue with sincere apologies when called for, but apologizing as a modus oiperandi lacks sincerity in my mind -- and HRC is coming close to fitting that mo.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
3. Bernie still seems uncomfortable dealing with and confronting race issues
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:52 AM
Mar 2016

He has much work to do on this issue. I think his intent is good, but his delivery is not.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
5. God, you guys are desperate to minimize Clinton's offensive remarks.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:54 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary told a flat out lie in the service of rehabilitating one of the patron saints of the right. Her lie showed a casual disregard for gays; a group for whom she's offered only the most pandering, when-convenient-for-her-only support in the past.

Sorry.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
35. So Bernie plagiarized, too?
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 06:44 PM
Mar 2016

Supposedly Hillary Clinton was making a claim based on comments from Nancy Reagan's son, but that still doesn't excuse it.

At any rate, it's a shame that Bernie actually plagiarized someone from BLM in an effort to pander. I didn't know that, but surely not crediting his source makes his comment even worse.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
42. Please see post #40 in this thread. There was no misattributed quote. That "white people don't know
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:28 PM
Mar 2016

what it's like to be poor" came directly from Sanders.

Arkansas Granny

(31,514 posts)
7. I'm not going to condemn either candidate for those remarks.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016

I would like to add, however, that I think Reagan got credit for doing something about AIDS because of the work of C. Everett Koop, Surgeon General during Reagan's time in office.

Without Koop, the Reagan Administration famously did nothing to address the AIDS epidemic. Koop would later write that: “Our first public health priority, to stop the further transmission of the AIDS virus, became needlessly mired in the homosexual politics of the early 1980s. We lost a great deal of precious time because of this, and I suspect we lost some lives as well.” Then, in 1986, Reagan asked his Surgeon General to prepare a report about AIDS.

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/02/28/c-everett-koop-the-surgeon-general-who-put-science-before-personal-ideology/


I don't know how many of you remember, but back in the late 80's, a letter explaining what was known about AIDS was sent to every mailbox in the US. Reagan was praised for this at the time, even though he had dragged his feet about even acknowledging the problem for years.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
11. One is a flat out despicable lie, the other a nuanced POV.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:02 PM
Mar 2016

Spin it any fucking way you please, a lie is a lie is a lie.



 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
14. Sanders was basically correct.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:08 PM
Mar 2016

They have been going after him because it's not literally true, because there are white people who are poor and get hassled by the cops. But his remark reflects a basic truth about our society. For the most part, white people don't know what it's like to live like that, and they certainly don't know what it's like to be treated a certain way because of skin color.

Clinton thought her remark would fall under the blanket excuse allowed for saying something nice about recently departed persons of importance. You're allowed to fib a little, but not allowed to tell an outrageous whopper that offends a whole segment of our society. oops! She needs to publicly say it was wrong, and admit she was lying to be nice. People will understand that.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
20. Ta-Nehisi Coates:
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:33 PM
Mar 2016

"According to the most-recent statistics, North Lawndale is now on the wrong end of virtually every socioeconomic indicator. In 1930 its population was 112,000. Today it is 36,000. The halcyon talk of “interracial living” is dead. The neighborhood is 92 percent black. Its homicide rate is 45 per 100,000—triple the rate of the city as a whole. The infant-mortality rate is 14 per 1,000—more than twice the national average. Forty-three percent of the people in North Lawndale live below the poverty line—double Chicago’s overall rate. Forty-five percent of all households are on food stamps—nearly three times the rate of the city at large. Sears, Roebuck left the neighborhood in 1987, taking 1,800 jobs with it. Kids in North Lawndale need not be confused about their prospects: Cook County’s Juvenile Temporary Detention Center sits directly adjacent to the neighborhood.

North Lawndale is an extreme portrait of the trends that ail black Chicago. Such is the magnitude of these ailments that it can be said that blacks and whites do not inhabit the same city. The average per capita income of Chicago’s white neighborhoods is almost three times that of its black neighborhoods. When the Harvard sociologist Robert J. Sampson examined incarceration rates in Chicago in his 2012 book, Great American City, he found that a black neighborhood with one of the highest incarceration rates (West Garfield Park) had a rate more than 40 times as high as the white neighborhood with the highest rate (Clearing). “This is a staggering differential, even for community-level comparisons,” Sampson writes. “A difference of kind, not degree.

In other words, Chicago’s impoverished black neighborhoods—characterized by high unemployment and households headed by single parents—are not simply poor; they are “ecologically distinct.” This “is not simply the same thing as low economic status,” writes Sampson. “In this pattern Chicago is not alone.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/

Basically what Bernie said.

On the other hand, LGBT do not claim the Reagans were courageous leaders on AIDS, we call them monsters.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
27. The question was about Sanders' own racial blind spots. He quoted what a rep of BLM said to him.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:58 PM
Mar 2016

You're saying he failed to identify his own racial blind spots accurately? Interesting theory.

I wonder what a "correct" answer to that loaded question would have been, one that no one could have pulled apart to use against him.

What was Hillary's impeccable answer to that same question? That using race as a wedge issue in two different primary campaigns against two different fellow Democrats may not be cool?

Speaking of loaded questions, you still have not explained your own loaded question, namely, "Which was worse?" What exactly was it about Sanders' reply that warranted including it in you OP?

TheFarseer

(9,322 posts)
30. Bernie was quoting someone
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:05 PM
Mar 2016

Maybe you think he's a clueless idiot but when he's quoting a black person, it's hard to say the statement is clueless. I see absolutely nothing wrong with his statement and have a hard time seeing why anyone else does since it is a quote! Hillary's statement is just plain not true. It's not particularly offensive to me but I can see how it is to people affected by AIDS.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
34. This isn't helping Hillary in the slightest.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:18 PM
Mar 2016

Try coming up with a blatant lie told by Bernie that completely misrepresents a situation perpetuated by callous right wingers.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
36. You are *seriously* comparing the two
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

and holding them up for observation?

*shut up Aerows* *shut up, you will get banned*

Number23

(24,544 posts)
43. In between the upset over Hillary's quote, a slew of Sanders supporters raced to rec a thread where
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:48 PM
Mar 2016

a raving, adulterous and PROUD homophobe endorsed the Senator.

You truly cannot make this stuff up.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Which comment is worse? H...