2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhich comment is worse? Hillary's or Bernie's?
My opinion is that both are equally bad, but not reflective of either candidate, and the attention both comments got are really just "gotcha" politics. To their credit, both Bernie and Hillary offered apologies of sorts.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/03/07/bernie-sanders-clarifies-ghetto-remark-that-prompted-social-media-outcry/
In Sunday nights debate in Flint, Mich., the Vermont senator was asked to identify his racial blind spots.
Mr. Sanders answered, When youre white, you dont know what its like to be living in a ghetto. You dont know what its like to be poor. You dont know what its like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car.
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/03/hillary-clinton-nancy-reagen-aids-inexplicable
The other point that I wanted to make too is, it may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s. And because of both President and Mrs. Reagan in particular Mrs. Reagan we started a national conversation when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it. And that too is something that I really appreciate with her very effective, low-key advocacy. But it penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, "Hey, we have to do something about this too."
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)So, I'd say Clinton's comment was worse initially but softened by her apology.
That leaves Sanders stubbornly standing behind his comment.
earthside
(6,960 posts)She can apologize but she was also just flat wrong; i.e., she got caught.
Frankly, I don't have any problem with what Bernie said.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)But I bet you have no problem pointing out other's cognitive dissonance.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Both are factually incorrect. That said I can't really get worked up over either. Sometimes people say things that are incorrect. I don't think either meant to cause harm or be malicious.
tblue
(16,350 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)So to answer your question, I would say, and I think its similar to what the secretary said, when youre white, you dont know what its like to be living in a ghetto. You dont know what its like to be poor. You dont know what its like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/07/us/politics/transcript-democratic-presidential-debate.html
The quote in that post conveniently left out the "I would say" part and is breaking its neck trying to pretend that everything that was said was a quote from someone else when that is clearly not the case when you look at the entire quote.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Bernie was quoting an African American person, not making the statement himself. Most of the criticism of Bernie about this is based on ignorance.
renate
(13,776 posts)That makes this a COMPLETE non-issue. Sheesh.
Thank you for that clarification. I doubt I'm the only person in America (possibly the only one on DU, though ) who hadn't heard that crucial detail.
Thank you for the entire quotation and providing the context.
I'm a bernie supporter and didn't even know he was quoting a conversation.
Fuck the media, and everyone here who deliberately repeated that out of context and distorted it to smear him.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Your quote quite conveniently takes out the "to answer your question" and the monumental "I WOULD SAY" which clearly puts the quote back on Sanders:
So to answer your question, I would say, and I think its similar to what the secretary said, when youre white, you dont know what its like to be living in a ghetto. You dont know what its like to be poor. You dont know what its like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/07/us/politics/transcript-democratic-presidential-debate.html
KPN
(15,642 posts)How many times have we heard her say something to the effect of "I was wrong on that. And I take responsibility for that." Seems to me like just about every time she gets called on the carpet for something she said. If it happened once or twice, fine ... give her the benefit of the doubt -- but she does it too often for it to be genuine in my view.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Democrats apologize when they do something wrong. Republicans are the ones who refuse to apologize for their mistakes.
merrily
(45,251 posts)KPN
(15,642 posts)But I'm in the right place -- for now. But you missed my point. I don't take issue with sincere apologies when called for, but apologizing as a modus oiperandi lacks sincerity in my mind -- and HRC is coming close to fitting that mo.
Number23
(24,544 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)He has much work to do on this issue. I think his intent is good, but his delivery is not.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Hillary told a flat out lie in the service of rehabilitating one of the patron saints of the right. Her lie showed a casual disregard for gays; a group for whom she's offered only the most pandering, when-convenient-for-her-only support in the past.
Sorry.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)Bernie was quoting a young AA woman:
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Supposedly Hillary Clinton was making a claim based on comments from Nancy Reagan's son, but that still doesn't excuse it.
At any rate, it's a shame that Bernie actually plagiarized someone from BLM in an effort to pander. I didn't know that, but surely not crediting his source makes his comment even worse.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Plagiarism is all about concealing sources.
Number23
(24,544 posts)what it's like to be poor" came directly from Sanders.
Arkansas Granny
(31,514 posts)I would like to add, however, that I think Reagan got credit for doing something about AIDS because of the work of C. Everett Koop, Surgeon General during Reagan's time in office.
http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/02/28/c-everett-koop-the-surgeon-general-who-put-science-before-personal-ideology/
I don't know how many of you remember, but back in the late 80's, a letter explaining what was known about AIDS was sent to every mailbox in the US. Reagan was praised for this at the time, even though he had dragged his feet about even acknowledging the problem for years.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)Here's is what he said in entirety:
https://twitter.com/noreallyhowcome/status/707450697659359232
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Spin it any fucking way you please, a lie is a lie is a lie.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)They have been going after him because it's not literally true, because there are white people who are poor and get hassled by the cops. But his remark reflects a basic truth about our society. For the most part, white people don't know what it's like to live like that, and they certainly don't know what it's like to be treated a certain way because of skin color.
Clinton thought her remark would fall under the blanket excuse allowed for saying something nice about recently departed persons of importance. You're allowed to fib a little, but not allowed to tell an outrageous whopper that offends a whole segment of our society. oops! She needs to publicly say it was wrong, and admit she was lying to be nice. People will understand that.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"According to the most-recent statistics, North Lawndale is now on the wrong end of virtually every socioeconomic indicator. In 1930 its population was 112,000. Today it is 36,000. The halcyon talk of interracial living is dead. The neighborhood is 92 percent black. Its homicide rate is 45 per 100,000triple the rate of the city as a whole. The infant-mortality rate is 14 per 1,000more than twice the national average. Forty-three percent of the people in North Lawndale live below the poverty linedouble Chicagos overall rate. Forty-five percent of all households are on food stampsnearly three times the rate of the city at large. Sears, Roebuck left the neighborhood in 1987, taking 1,800 jobs with it. Kids in North Lawndale need not be confused about their prospects: Cook Countys Juvenile Temporary Detention Center sits directly adjacent to the neighborhood.
North Lawndale is an extreme portrait of the trends that ail black Chicago. Such is the magnitude of these ailments that it can be said that blacks and whites do not inhabit the same city. The average per capita income of Chicagos white neighborhoods is almost three times that of its black neighborhoods. When the Harvard sociologist Robert J. Sampson examined incarceration rates in Chicago in his 2012 book, Great American City, he found that a black neighborhood with one of the highest incarceration rates (West Garfield Park) had a rate more than 40 times as high as the white neighborhood with the highest rate (Clearing). This is a staggering differential, even for community-level comparisons, Sampson writes. A difference of kind, not degree.
In other words, Chicagos impoverished black neighborhoodscharacterized by high unemployment and households headed by single parentsare not simply poor; they are ecologically distinct. This is not simply the same thing as low economic status, writes Sampson. In this pattern Chicago is not alone.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/
Basically what Bernie said.
On the other hand, LGBT do not claim the Reagans were courageous leaders on AIDS, we call them monsters.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
merrily
(45,251 posts)You're saying he failed to identify his own racial blind spots accurately? Interesting theory.
I wonder what a "correct" answer to that loaded question would have been, one that no one could have pulled apart to use against him.
What was Hillary's impeccable answer to that same question? That using race as a wedge issue in two different primary campaigns against two different fellow Democrats may not be cool?
Speaking of loaded questions, you still have not explained your own loaded question, namely, "Which was worse?" What exactly was it about Sanders' reply that warranted including it in you OP?
revbones
(3,660 posts)Sheesh.
TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)Maybe you think he's a clueless idiot but when he's quoting a black person, it's hard to say the statement is clueless. I see absolutely nothing wrong with his statement and have a hard time seeing why anyone else does since it is a quote! Hillary's statement is just plain not true. It's not particularly offensive to me but I can see how it is to people affected by AIDS.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Try coming up with a blatant lie told by Bernie that completely misrepresents a situation perpetuated by callous right wingers.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and holding them up for observation?
*shut up Aerows* *shut up, you will get banned*
Number23
(24,544 posts)a raving, adulterous and PROUD homophobe endorsed the Senator.
You truly cannot make this stuff up.