Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jillan

(39,451 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:20 PM Mar 2016

About "I misspoke" - why am I not buying it.

A former First Lady does not make a comment on National Television about the life of another former First Lady on the same day the latter is being buried without first carefully preparing her statement(s).

Dignitaries walk on eggshells to not insult another dignitary at the time of their death, no matter how much they were disliked. Especially one that wants to be the President of the United States, which includes being President of the small part of America that thinks the Reagans walked on water.

It's called protocol.

Hillary did not go on television unprepared to make a remark on Nancy Reagan on the day she was being buried.
Nobody would.
Not even to mention the fact that Hillary is overly conscious when it comes to public speaking. That's not an attack.
It's a fact.


She didn't misspeak. She prepared those remarks ahead of time.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
2. She fell in 2012 and suffered a concussion. It's time for neurological exam to be sure
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:25 PM
Mar 2016

she is healthy.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
3. She needs to take a class in "CYA Apology Strategy".
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:25 PM
Mar 2016

Particularly difficult when the statement being apologized for when you introduce the topic and speak about it for 45 seconds on TV.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
8. The funny thing was Andrea Mitchell trying to bail Hillary out
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:39 PM
Mar 2016

with the "even if quietly behind the scenes" comment after Hillary stepped in it. If Andrea had been sure she was off camera, she probably would have been giving Hillary a throat slashing gesture and grimacing when Hillary started down that path.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
4. Of course she did
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:26 PM
Mar 2016

She saw an opportunity to suck up to the right and she calculated the risk and decided the LGBTQ people had nowhere else to go.

It's the same MO she's been utilizing since Day One and she isn't going to change. Oh, I mean she is going to change, every time the wind blows she's going to mouth a different platitude, stance, opinion whatever.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
7. I think that's pretty close to correct. Re change..
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:34 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary doesn't change or evolve. She re-volves, sooner or later what wasn't, is, again. She has a Swiss-army knife -like capacity to be a politician for all circumstances. She is whatever is needed at the moment

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
9. If the mega rich in the LGBTQ community were still behind her after DOMA
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:41 PM
Mar 2016

why would they abandon her over this?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. If they had been behind her Barack Obama might not be President today....
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

Those HRC types are not the big money, those are he wannabes and might be somedays. The mega money was to a large extent cheesed off at her and at Bill and this got Obama lots of early money because he looked like he could beat her. It was not so much for him as it was against her and that's the fact.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
5. Her suffering backlash for lauding Reagan is scrolling across the screen. I'm sure it was a mistake
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:29 PM
Mar 2016

and not a political calculation.




Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»About "I misspoke" - why ...