HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Why Hillary Needs Sanders...

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:17 PM

Why Hillary Needs Sanders to Drop Out of the Race (and Sanders Has No Need for Hillary to Drop Out)

Hillary has only two responses to Sanders.

Either Hillary lies about Sanders' record:



Or Hillary molds her flexible "core values" to become more and more like Sanders (as brilliantly parodied by SNL):



This second option is interfering with Hillary's election strategy because she is planning to swing hard right in the general election after she plans to get the nomination based on empty promises to the left, and the Sanders campaign is fucking with the timing of Hillary's about face.

Sanders does not have a similar problem because he's going to campaign in the general election on the exact same platform he's using to win the nomination.

This -- as much as anything -- is a key difference between the two campaigns.

78 replies, 6474 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 78 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why Hillary Needs Sanders to Drop Out of the Race (and Sanders Has No Need for Hillary to Drop Out) (Original post)
Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 OP
farleftlib Mar 2016 #1
reformist2 Mar 2016 #2
Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #6
SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #7
Karma13612 Mar 2016 #30
RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #12
7962 Mar 2016 #20
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #26
Raster Mar 2016 #31
zentrum Mar 2016 #23
PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #46
Lorien Mar 2016 #45
staggerleem Mar 2016 #59
jillan Mar 2016 #3
Duval Mar 2016 #14
ladyVet Mar 2016 #71
Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #4
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #27
PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #47
nxylas Mar 2016 #68
noiretextatique Mar 2016 #72
pdsimdars Mar 2016 #54
Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #5
PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #8
winter is coming Mar 2016 #10
Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #11
markpkessinger Mar 2016 #16
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #28
PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #49
sarge43 Mar 2016 #17
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #29
dflprincess Mar 2016 #35
truebluegreen Mar 2016 #60
shawn703 Mar 2016 #13
passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #15
pdsimdars Mar 2016 #55
Nickel79 Mar 2016 #9
rocktivity Mar 2016 #18
dflprincess Mar 2016 #37
geardaddy Mar 2016 #61
turbinetree Mar 2016 #19
Beacool Mar 2016 #21
Gore1FL Mar 2016 #22
leftofcool Mar 2016 #32
Gore1FL Mar 2016 #34
greiner3 Mar 2016 #25
leftofcool Mar 2016 #33
Gore1FL Mar 2016 #39
onenote Mar 2016 #76
anothergreenbus Mar 2016 #40
Beacool Mar 2016 #43
Ken Burch Mar 2016 #52
Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #69
Beacool Mar 2016 #73
warrprayer Mar 2016 #24
anothergreenbus Mar 2016 #36
Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #38
Dustlawyer Mar 2016 #41
winter is coming Mar 2016 #42
dana_b Mar 2016 #44
senz Mar 2016 #48
hay rick Mar 2016 #50
Vote2016 Mar 2016 #51
Onlooker Mar 2016 #53
asuhornets Mar 2016 #56
Major Nikon Mar 2016 #57
asuhornets Mar 2016 #58
gcomeau Mar 2016 #62
AlbertCat Mar 2016 #64
GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #65
asuhornets Mar 2016 #66
GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #67
lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #70
bvf Mar 2016 #63
Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #74
revbones Mar 2016 #77
Demsrule86 Mar 2016 #75
revbones Mar 2016 #78

Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:20 PM

1. It's obviously becoming more difficult for her to keep up the pretense

 

She seems to be losing it more and more every day. She is no progressive and the strain of the act is starting to tell.

Thanks for the OP. K & R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:22 PM

2. This is a really good point. If she is the nom, Hillary is going to look so silly swinging right

after the convention. Everyone will know she just spent months trying to be just like "socialist" Bernie, and we'll all be watching in amusement as she morphs into an economic moderate war hawk for the general election. And Hillary won't see the absurdity of it all. She'll be a laughingstock.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reformist2 (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:33 PM

6. Nope, I'm not going to be "watching in amusement as she morphs...".

I frankly don't know what I will be doing but amusement is not one of the options.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Peace Patriot (Reply #6)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:37 PM

7. Really.

This whole primary season, on both sides, would be hilarious if it weren't dead serious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #7)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:55 PM

30. +1000. It is way beyond just the Supreme Court.

Its our very trajectory into the heart of the 21 century, the climate, the planet as a whole.

Although I feel our US President needs to focus mostly on the US, they do have to consider the world as a whole, more so now than in past elections.

I don't like Hillary being mostly focused on her Global view (Clinton Global Initiative), but it's true that our candidates have to have a really good grasp of world issues.

I think Bernie walks the line well. He puts the US at the top of his list of priorities and yet has a great sense of the world and it's trajectory in light of global sociopolitical an climate issues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reformist2 (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:14 PM

12. And should Clinton get the nod, don't dare criticize her here or on Kos

 

You will get thrown out on your ass, and under the bus.
That's what Marcos and the admins have essentially said here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #12)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:41 PM

20. Hell, you can get a hide NOW for trivial crap!!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #12)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:40 PM

26. I told Kos to get fucked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enthusiast (Reply #26)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:57 PM

31. I think Marikos needs to keep in mind just what side his...

...Daily Kos bread is buttered on.

If he STUPIDLY tries to force Hillary on the Kosacks before it is absolutely fucking clear that she is the nominee, which very well may NOT BE THE CASE, he will see mass defections of very unhappy people. Once that happens, KOS will be a shell of it's former self... I don't think Marikos will be quite the media "darling" with a badly damaged website, and damage, I might add, of his own making.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reformist2 (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:18 PM

23. I don't think she cares.

Her arrogance in relation to ordinary people is quite evident. She thinks they're so short attention span and low information, they won't remember. She'll pull Bill out of the woodwork to smarm them and keep telling them her version of history. I think that's her theory.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zentrum (Reply #23)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:21 AM

46. Her proof is the Reagan comment on AIDS.

To say ANYTHING positive about that administration when it comes to minorities means you either don't know jackshit about your constituent's history, a real problem or that you DO know and just don't care how it comes off. That's messed up, either way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reformist2 (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:08 AM

45. Well, it is where she feels most at home:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reformist2 (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:38 PM

59. To whom, exactly, will she look "silly"?

 

To the few political junkies here on DU and over on KOS, Alternet, etc.? How much do we count for in the general election? The media EXPECTS (and, truth be known, WANTS) her to tack right, so they're not gonna tell the low-info crowd that she'd doing anything silly - so they won't think it's silly at all! It'll be taken as a "politics as usual" move - nothing more & nothing less.

Here's what I KNOW will happen on the morning of November 9th if a Democratic Candidate wins the election. If it's Bernie, his first move will be to build a transition team and start making cabinet nominations. If it's Hillary, her first move will be to fund the PACs & Super PACs for 2020.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:26 PM

3. Thinking that I hope Bernie goes last tonite at the townhall so he will be able to respond

to her crap. I'm certain that Brock Corp is going thru every bill that Bernie voted for or against to find a controversial amendment that was added to that bill - once again to tell Americans they are stupid and do not know how legislation gets passed.

Bring your tarp, Bernie, she is going down in the polls & you are going to need it tonite.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jillan (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:24 PM

14. Unfortunately, it didn't happen. Sigh!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duval (Reply #14)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 04:56 PM

71. He goes first so she has to shift to meet whatever he said.

It's a brilliant strategy. She's always humping to keep up, and he just sails on, saying what he's always said.

I'd love to see him pull a joke on her, like that old Bugs Bunny/Daffy Duck skit: Bugs says it's duck season, Daffy says, no, it's rabbit season. They go back and forth for a while and then Bugs says, it's rabbit season, Daffy says it's duck season. Bam! No more duck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:30 PM

4. She has nowhere to go.

I keep posting she cannot grow her base. She started out at the peak of her support and has lost varying parts of her base as Bernie has become better known. She is NOT attracting new voters now and certainly will not in the GE.

Just sayin....



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Land of Enchantment (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:43 PM

27. You are right, of course.

It's true.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Land of Enchantment (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:25 AM

47. Her message has been "No we can't".

For many of the things Bernie proposes and even some of the things she could easily change her mind on with no repercussions she steadfastedly attaches to, like talking about doing studies on the effects of Marijuana before legalizing it. WTF?! Oh wait, this is because her private prison friends are getting a cheap date and a good amount of profit with all those non-violent offenders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PyaarRevolution (Reply #47)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:12 PM

68. Nothing excites the voters like cautious incrementalism

With apologies to Tom Tomorrow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nxylas (Reply #68)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:40 PM

72. Yep

A real winning message that will mobilize the youth vote. The plan was to let Drumpfenstein loose to terrorize the villagers into voting for Hillary. Bernie is messing up the plan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Land of Enchantment (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:37 AM

54. That is the known reality and the data backs this up but . . .

 

The Hillarians refuse to comprehend it, just like global warming deniers refuse to accept that data.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:30 PM

5. The is utter nonsense.

Her entire strategy thus far has been to recreate the Obama coalition, which won two general elections. That means appealing to PoC, single women, and other groups that certainly won't respond well to her moving "hard right." If we get our people to the polls, we win. This imaginary group of cross-over Republicans who will respond to her moving to the right doesn't exist.

You are welcome to your opinions, but this is factually wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bleacher Creature (Reply #5)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:50 PM

8. Her recent effusive praise of both Reagans was an early indicator. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PoliticAverse (Reply #8)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:04 PM

10. Her playing Hokey Pokey with whether she's a progressive or a moderate

is another tell. She claimed that "no one took a back seat" to her when it came to being a progressive, then a short time later proclaimed herself to be a proud moderate. Then Bernie's campaign failed to wither and suddenly she was a progressive, trying to cover all of Bernie's positions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PoliticAverse (Reply #8)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:04 PM

11. Please tell me this is a joke.

Trying to say something nice at a dead woman's funeral is now a harbinger of a major shift in strategy?

Are the Bernie folks even listening to what they're saying anymore?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bleacher Creature (Reply #11)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:33 PM

16. She didn't just "say something nice" . . .

. . . Sanders released a nice statement. Nobody expected her to spit on Nancy's grave. But we sure as HELL didn't expect her to fabricate a non-existent history concerning the appalling obscenity that was the Reagans' (both of them) AIDS legacy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to markpkessinger (Reply #16)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:44 PM

28. +1!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to markpkessinger (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:29 AM

49. She could've said something nice and safe about stem cell research.

Her pushing it. Instead she says the biggest, boldface lie on the Reagan Administration that all those in the GLBT community know is bullshit. I mean it's like seeing someone's fist a mile away and you run towards it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bleacher Creature (Reply #11)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:36 PM

17. Lying at a dead woman's funeral is not "nice".

Of course, in an alternate universe the Reagan administration did put the full force of the federal gov't to work helping AIDS victims and finding a cure. It also made several public statements to that effect. In that universe Clinton did say something "nice".

Do Clinton supporters ever listen to themselves?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarge43 (Reply #17)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:45 PM

29. +1!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarge43 (Reply #17)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:10 PM

35. They apparently don't listen to their candidate either. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bleacher Creature (Reply #11)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:55 PM

60. Even if we disregard that little bit of "misspeaking"

 

or "misremembering" or whatever it was, how do you characterize her recent offer to "compromise" on abortion? Like it should be up to any politicians. Ugh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bleacher Creature (Reply #5)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:16 PM

13. What was it Obama's chief of staff called progressives

When we took issue with him pivoting right and dropping the public option? Why do you think one Wall Street candidate will be any different than the other?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bleacher Creature (Reply #5)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:31 PM

15. So why do you think she has swung so hard to the left

during this campaign? Doesn't it worry you at all? It isn't natural to swing like that and then stick to it after you win.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bleacher Creature (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:41 AM

55. Bernie and the Republican vote

 

Thom Hartmann says that he used to live in Vermont and Bernie routinely got 20% of the Republican vote because they knew him and trusted him.
That ain't happenin' with Hill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:51 PM

9. Comedy and satire

 

are such an effective way of communicating the truth, as evidenced by people such as Jon Stewart and Bill Maher.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:39 PM

18. You're welcome.




rocktivity

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rocktivity (Reply #18)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:11 PM

37. I saw that last night - one of the best things SNL has done in a long time

and so honest I'm sure it was painful for her supporters to watch.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rocktivity (Reply #18)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:01 PM

61. This should be its own OP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:40 PM

19. The ultimate game...................................



Honk-----------------------for a political revolutions Bernie 2016





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:42 PM

21. Sanders can stay until the convention, Hillary will still be the nominee.

Pledged delegates and popular vote.......

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beacool (Reply #21)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:02 PM

22. Maybe. But we'll actually want to have elections and count the votes. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gore1FL (Reply #22)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:08 PM

32. Hillary will still be ahead in the popular vote and delegates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #32)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:09 PM

34. Maybe.

But we still will want to have the elections and count the votes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beacool (Reply #21)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:40 PM

25. If Hillary doesn't have the magic number of delegates

 

Prior to the convention and only gets in by SDs then the stink will be heard through the election and through her only term.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to greiner3 (Reply #25)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:08 PM

33. She will have them. She is more than half way there already

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #33)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:13 PM

39. You define "half" differenlty that I have seen it used in the past.

According to CNN she is ahead by 221 pledged delegates

That isn't half.

Even if you include super delegates 1244/4765 is less than 50%.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gore1FL (Reply #39)

Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:45 AM

76. I think the point was that Clinton is halfway to the 50.1 percent mark in delegates

Which is what it takes to win the nomination.

2383 delegates are need to win. Halfway there is 1192. According to CNN, Clinton is at 1096 in pledged delegates, or less than 100 delegates shy of the half way mark relying only on pledged delegates. If super delegates are included, she's at 1568, which puts her well past halfway to a winning margin (two-thirds of the way if my math is right).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to greiner3 (Reply #25)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:14 PM

40. She won't have a term.

 

If we want to return to progressive values let them try this and see what happens.
In four years there will be hell to pay.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to greiner3 (Reply #25)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:00 AM

43. Then it'll be like 2008.

In that election neither Obama nor Hillary had the necessary pledged delegates to win the nomination outright. Obama was ahead in both the popular vote and in pledged delegates by a small amount (I think it was something like 104 delegates). For the sake of the unity of the party, at the convention Hillary released her super delegates from any commitment to her and they switched to Obama.

If there's a similar situation this year, the super delegates will go with the person who is ahead in pledged delegates. That will probably be Hillary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beacool (Reply #21)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:29 AM

52. only at the moment. Most Dems haven't voted yet.

 

n/t.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beacool (Reply #21)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:13 PM

69. Michigan.

Ohio. Florida. Illinois. New York. California.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Major Hogwash (Reply #69)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 07:04 PM

73. Delegates......

He only won MI by 1.5%, which meant that she got almost as many delegates as he did.

He will not get a blow out win in the remaining big states. Hillary is ahead by 208 pledged delegates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:34 PM

24. K&R

For Bernie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:11 PM

36. Brilliant A in T.

 

That sums it up perfectly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:13 PM

38. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, Attorney in Texas.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:20 PM

41. +1!!! Yes, commentators and pundits talk about a shift in earlier campaign promises

as if this is the way things should be. By their open discussions of the expected shift for the General Election, they get their audience to accept that this is the way things are, and that its ok. Basically, they admit that the candidates have to say one thing to one group, and something else to another.

Bernie doesn't play that way. The MSM doesn't know how to handle it (see Tweety's interview of Bernie). If it weren't for their marching orders to be dismissive and repeat Hillary's smears, they would be lost.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:28 PM

42. Well said. I've seen some pushing the idea that we need to

"unite the party" behind a nominee now so we'll have a leg up for November. Seriously? We need seven-and-a-half months to unite?

We don't need that time to unite. HRC needs that time to evolve again without looking like a rubber band snapping back into place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:18 AM

44. That may be true but he has said that he's in it until the convention

so she better start telling the truth and embracing her positions, or coming up with a new game plan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:26 AM

48. Thanks, AiT. The two campaigns couldn't be more different.

 

Hers is forced and fraudulent, his is natural and truthful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:33 AM

50. She's going for the lesser evil vote.

It's all she wants from me and the most I have to offer. At this point I view her candidacy as a powerful demonstration of the need for a third party.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:24 AM

51. kicked and rec'd

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:33 AM

53. Hillary and Sanders have their own separate strengths and weaknesses

 

Sanders is an ideologue, Hillary is a politician.
Sanders lived where he rarely had to compromise, Hillary lived where she had to compromise.
Sanders grew up with the privileges of being white and male, Hillary grew up with the challenges of being female in a sexist time.
Sanders views are 50 years old, Hillary's views have evolved.
Sanders will be presented by the right as a Communist, Hillary will be presented as dishonest.
Sanders has difficulty with people of color; Hillary has difficulty with millennials.
Etc.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:41 AM

56. No. The key difference

is if Sanders is the Democratic nominee, the Dems will lose the general election. I still don't get why you guys think Bernie will win in the GE. He doesn't even look like a president. The political revolution does not exist, and if it does, it is not a diverse coalition. which is what he needs to win the GE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to asuhornets (Reply #56)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:32 AM

57. Results...


On Mon Mar 14, 2016, 07:52 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

No. The key difference
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1487560

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

"He doesn't even look like a president." Really? Are we back to attacking candidates' looks? Disruptive and inappropriate.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:01 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh my. Silly alert.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Inappropriate body-shaming.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Brilliantly stupid post, but suggest saving the lame alerts for the hillbots.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seems like an opinion to me.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm not sure what is the correct "look" for a presidential candidate to have. Nonetheless, let the post stay as part of the discourse, so that those who disagree with him can get in their two cents. - mahatmakanejeeves
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: We do not attack personal appearance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Major Nikon (Reply #57)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:54 AM

58. Oh well

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to asuhornets (Reply #56)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:20 PM

62. All polling on the matter says you're full of it.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to asuhornets (Reply #56)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:47 PM

64. He doesn't even look like a president.

 

Uh.... neither does Hillary.

But looks, in case you don't know, are not the main concern when choosing a president. Neither is gender nor are surnames.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to asuhornets (Reply #56)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:51 PM

65. What the heck does "He doesn't even look like a president" mean ?

also:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GreatGazoo (Reply #65)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:52 PM

66. Well I don't want to get too personal, with all the alerts and all...n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to asuhornets (Reply #66)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:08 PM

67. maybe you could describe what a president looks like and I'll fill in the blanks?

Here is what I have heard already: suit fits too loose, too much hand waving, the iconic Yoda/Albert Einstein hair... (?)

None of those matter to me and I'm not sure they matter to others. 8 years ago this country, thankfully, elected a man who not only looked like no prior president but also had what many considered a funny name. I take that as proof that that stuff doesn't matter anymore. Or at the least, it does not matter more than their record, their platform and the alternative candidate.

I hear you on the alerts. Personally I don't expect everyone on here to agree with me and I am not easily offended. I don't believe that the alert system should be used to drive others off of DU. MIRT does fine in extreme or obvious cases. I come for an open discussion and have generally enjoyed them until about 2 months back...when the alert wars started.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to asuhornets (Reply #56)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:19 PM

70. Exactly! He hardly looks presidential at all! Not like Obama or Hillary who totally do. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:42 PM

63. Perfectly logical take on this.

 

The lies have just begun, and will become even more vile, but will not go unanswered.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Wed Mar 16, 2016, 01:26 AM

74. Still think Hillary should drop out?

 

After she won all five states tonight?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #74)

Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:46 AM

77. Yes. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:37 AM

75. Sander can not win after last night

Sanders only hurts the Democrats chances by staying in...there is no point. He needs to suspend his campaign and turn towards the general.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #75)

Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:47 AM

78. Aside from that being false

 

Hillary stayed in the race in 2008 and it didn't seem to hurt Obama...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread