Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:04 PM Mar 2016

DNC Vice Chair: Bernie Sanders "extremely disgraceful" for stating the obvious



https://twitter.com/donnabrazile/status/709582115843805186

Everyone knows independent candidates don't get media coverage or money and risk being a spoiler candidate.

Sanders has repeatedly said these are his reasons for running in the Democratic primary process. And Donna Brazile knows that. Her fake outrage makes it clear that she never was neutral, and the DNC is not neutral, that the DNC favors Hillary Clinton. Which we all knew anyway. It also shows how much the Democrats' political establishment resents the idea of a grass roots progressive challenge.
122 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DNC Vice Chair: Bernie Sanders "extremely disgraceful" for stating the obvious (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 OP
Yeah, right Donna , now go away. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #1
She should have gone away a long time ago. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #2
Agree!! choie Mar 2016 #5
yes 840high Mar 2016 #82
Wonder if she supports 300% Loan Sharks Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #13
She supported Obama in '08 and '12...so does that mean Obama supports loan sharks? Oh no! nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #80
I supported Obama in 08 and 12 too. PotatoChip Mar 2016 #99
I voted to Big O 3 times Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #111
I am sure they all do! marew Mar 2016 #93
I don't believe that. Sanders made it very clear at the beginning why he ran, because he didn't still_one Mar 2016 #3
Donna Brazile? She's the DNC vice-Chair. I thought they had to be neutral. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #16
Even if Sanders said something like it, its taken out of context since he has repeatedly said from still_one Mar 2016 #24
If it is out of context so why is a top Party official using it to attack Bernie Sanders? Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #31
I have no problem with the fact that belonging to one of the two major party's in the country gives still_one Mar 2016 #49
He did say it Armstead Mar 2016 #114
Well if someone is trying to "stir things up" Aerows Mar 2016 #28
Oh, absolutely! nt marew Mar 2016 #89
I've seen several Hillary supporters try to bring this up here passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #55
Probably another Brock talking point. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #102
He said it in the Chuck Todd interview kristopher Mar 2016 #116
Their a PAC of opportunists who don't give a damn about Progressive Values, He is a Democrat by orpupilofnature57 Mar 2016 #4
Fake outrage is right, looks like they are not that confident from their win last night. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #6
Timed to influence the March 15 vote possibly. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #11
I did not know that, how nice of Donna...ugh. The DNC is pathetic. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #20
Sore winners... R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2016 #12
Recommend! nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #7
Well duh. Yeah he ran as a Dem for media coverage and to not be a spoiler Autumn Mar 2016 #8
Ya know, I think they would be happy Bernie decided to run in the primary system. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #74
I think they are scared shitless, who says shit like that when they are comfortable and confident? Autumn Mar 2016 #76
I have an idea, why don't ya'll DNCers push Bernie to break away as an independent? Schema Thing Mar 2016 #9
To hell with the DNC leadership. Did they not know he is a Democratic Socialist? aikoaiko Mar 2016 #10
Fuck off, Donna. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #14
+1 Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #67
+2 Duppers Mar 2016 #85
Had same reaction. berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #90
K&R for exposure. Wilms Mar 2016 #15
I love DBs political commentary. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #17
As much as you love Stormfront's? Scootaloo Mar 2016 #26
Oh, you din't! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #57
Ahhh the Hillarity never stops here coyote Mar 2016 #79
They did not see him as threat UglyGreed Mar 2016 #18
I hope so too. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #100
Really shows how many people want to change the party.... mariawr Mar 2016 #101
She's right. But Bernie has a chance to make it right. DanTex Mar 2016 #19
Telling Democratic donors and voters Aerows Mar 2016 #22
Who said anything about "kissing ass"? Not sure what you mean. DanTex Mar 2016 #25
Feigned confusion Aerows Mar 2016 #29
OK, don't answer then. DanTex Mar 2016 #44
I did. Aerows Mar 2016 #51
you know damn well what he meant. desmiller Mar 2016 #36
Oh, Bernie will get in line, you'll see. The only question is when. DanTex Mar 2016 #46
Now you need the special, fecund fragrance Aerows Mar 2016 #86
No he doesn't need to suspend his campaign, endorse Hillary, and campaign vigorously for her. Autumn Mar 2016 #23
If he cares about the future of the country he does. We'll see how much he really DanTex Mar 2016 #27
Oh, that is fucking rich. frylock Mar 2016 #33
It's accurate. He's got one move left: endorse Hillary. DanTex Mar 2016 #37
I'm certain that you believe it to be accurate. frylock Mar 2016 #41
Right? vintx Mar 2016 #38
He does care, and he will stay in this race till the very end. Autumn Mar 2016 #47
I'm glad to see that they are Aerows Mar 2016 #84
As if he needs your forgiveness. djean111 Mar 2016 #30
Not mine, the party's. He used the party, now time for him to help us beat Trump. DanTex Mar 2016 #40
I say to make it right he should take it all the way to the convention. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #32
Bernie's smart enough to know that running as an Indy would hand Trump the presidency. DanTex Mar 2016 #35
Why the hurry? All a "settled" primary will do is give the media an excuse to ignore our party Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #39
That's a fair point. A few things. DanTex Mar 2016 #43
People dont need 8 months to listen to an endorsement, if it is one that is going to influence them. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #48
I'm thinking along the lines of "time heals all wounds". DanTex Mar 2016 #54
Shutting things down before a lot of people have had a chance to weigh in, wont help IMHO Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #56
Maybe you're right. DanTex Mar 2016 #70
She can campaign alongside Bernie after she drops out and endorses him. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #59
Yeah I don't like that idea. She can say one thing in support then scram. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #78
My wounds were inflicted Beowulf Mar 2016 #69
Hear hear! Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #83
Forgiveness? Buns_of_Fire Mar 2016 #88
Is this a joke? roody Mar 2016 #115
Good to know Aerows Mar 2016 #21
LOLs Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #73
More disgraceful than the DNC chair working w/sheldon adelson to put med. marijuana users in jail? Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #34
Donna, get over it. I actually used to admire you. Now I see that the DNC is more Karma13612 Mar 2016 #42
Sanders apologists in full force cosmicone Mar 2016 #45
That's not what is happening here at all. It's a "neutral" DNC official attacking Sanders for Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #62
Better if he ran third party or lied? Dems and the GOP go out of their way to merrily Mar 2016 #50
Seems to be a theme: Pretend to be neutral so you can hold a position of trust Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #95
And then, there were the DUers who pretended to be supporters of Bernie. That was fun. merrily Mar 2016 #98
It's tough being an honest politician... nt SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #52
Donna, DWS told you to say it, didn't she? Impedimentus Mar 2016 #53
Donna Brazile is, from personal experience, an expert on disgrace azretired Mar 2016 #58
Gore did win the popular vote. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #61
More verbal diarrhea from the Establishment... AzDar Mar 2016 #60
+1 this Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #121
REC riversedge Mar 2016 #63
lols Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #64
So.... workinclasszero Mar 2016 #65
He said he's supporting the nominee. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #66
And hopefully elljay Mar 2016 #77
If the DNC's goal is to break the Democratic Party up into little pieces, they're doing Marr Mar 2016 #68
They don't seem to worry about that at all. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #71
Yep. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #104
It's disgraceful that MSM blacks out coverage of Bernie Jenny_92808 Mar 2016 #72
Cry me a river Donna - even though the DNC has burned the bridge to get over it. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #75
It's not at all disgraceful to real people. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #81
A closed primary coming up... Skwmom Mar 2016 #87
Arizona? kristopher Mar 2016 #117
It is disgraceful. When he thought he had a chance he took ownership of his "democratic" self, seabeyond Mar 2016 #91
Why are Wasserman Schultz and Brazile so unprofessional in their DNC responsibilities? marew Mar 2016 #92
They are well-paid to protect corporate interests. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #106
Ding! Ding Ding! marew Mar 2016 #110
Doesn't Donna work as a Media Talking Head? demwing Mar 2016 #94
She holds two major positions of trust and power by pretending to be neutral Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #97
our media has NEVER covered third party candidates. only third wayers ViseGrip Mar 2016 #96
What more can they possibly do to tell folks they don't want our votes? onecaliberal Mar 2016 #103
I'm ever so impressed with Hillary's disdain and refusal of media coverage...oh wait. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #105
Meh...I don't see a problem here. stone space Mar 2016 #107
His triangulation was efficient and effective, and very politically expedient. LanternWaste Mar 2016 #108
Donna you might claim to be "neutral" on CNN but this kind of tweet doesn't reflect that. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #109
The 2 big political parties have an institutional monopoly on the political process. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #112
I guess she prefers typical lying politicians Armstead Mar 2016 #113
Right as is if "being a Democrat" is some spiritual condition Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #120
It is amazing how things get deliberately distorted Samantha Mar 2016 #118
DISGRACEFUL!!!!!! Seeinghope Mar 2016 #119
CNN just now presenting Donna Brazile as neutral Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #122

PotatoChip

(3,186 posts)
99. I supported Obama in 08 and 12 too.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 02:29 PM
Mar 2016

He gave us hope. Now it's time for the change. Even if that change does not come in the form of a Sanders presidency, it will come eventually.

Win or lose, Bernie's revolution was never just about this election. It is much more than that. His candidacy alone has already succeeded in planting the seeds of change.

So the current establishment can go ahead and try to squash the hopes and dreams of and entire generation of young people. They may succeed this time, but demographics are not on their side going forward.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
111. I voted to Big O 3 times
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:59 PM
Mar 2016

and I extremely disappointed in him

I'd say that his insane push for TPP proves with out a doubt that he in fact DOES support much much worse.

BTW has he come out against the 300% club?

still_one

(92,136 posts)
3. I don't believe that. Sanders made it very clear at the beginning why he ran, because he didn't
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:09 PM
Mar 2016

want to split the Democratic vote which a third party run would do.

I am not sure where this is coming from, but someone is trying to stir thing up

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
16. Donna Brazile? She's the DNC vice-Chair. I thought they had to be neutral.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:16 PM
Mar 2016

Rules don't apply sometimes.

still_one

(92,136 posts)
24. Even if Sanders said something like it, its taken out of context since he has repeatedly said from
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:25 PM
Mar 2016

the beginning why he is running as a Democrat is so he doesn't split the ticket

I don't buy it, whether it comes from Donna Brazile or someone else.



 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
31. If it is out of context so why is a top Party official using it to attack Bernie Sanders?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

And why is it wrong to state an obvious fact that independent candidates don't get media coverage? Everyone knows that. It's just a fact.

still_one

(92,136 posts)
49. I have no problem with the fact that belonging to one of the two major party's in the country gives
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:41 PM
Mar 2016

the respective candidates more media coverage. That is a fact. All I am saying is that wasn't his main reason for running as a Democrat. That does not exclude secondary reasons. They are not mutually exclusive

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
114. He did say it
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 12:37 AM
Mar 2016

Somewhat more tactfully, but he said ONE OF the reasons he ran is because third party candidates are ignored by the media, and he wanted his message to be part if this election.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
28. Well if someone is trying to "stir things up"
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:30 PM
Mar 2016

I would suggest you start with the person that is the fucking Vice Chair of the DNC, since she is the one that opened her mouth and said it.

I am becoming more convinced by the day that everybody in DC and on Wall Street just WANTS to hand the presidency over to an insider, lunatic or not, as long as they are the insiders that know where the bodies are buried. That way everything is safe for them.

Hell, Trump better watch his back, too, and I want him no where near the White House.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
55. I've seen several Hillary supporters try to bring this up here
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:48 PM
Mar 2016

as a negative for Bernie. She's not the first to say it.


kristopher

(29,798 posts)
116. He said it in the Chuck Todd interview
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 03:16 AM
Mar 2016

They re-aired it and the Clinton-Matthews interview several times today (Sunday).

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
4. Their a PAC of opportunists who don't give a damn about Progressive Values, He is a Democrat by
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:09 PM
Mar 2016

Definition & Action, they are because the have the Political Society behind them, a society made up of MSM and the robbers they work for .

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
8. Well duh. Yeah he ran as a Dem for media coverage and to not be a spoiler
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:12 PM
Mar 2016

Her concern is certainly noted, and enjoyed.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
74. Ya know, I think they would be happy Bernie decided to run in the primary system.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 02:37 AM
Mar 2016

He could have done a Huge amount of damage outside. Donna Brazile's comment strikes me as a somewhat shocking low blow.

I thought DNC officials were supposed to be neutral.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
18. They did not see him as threat
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:19 PM
Mar 2016

in the beginning now they regret the miscalculation. It also shows how many people want true change. The cat is out of the bag and I hope this is the start of a new direction for us regular folks.

mariawr

(348 posts)
101. Really shows how many people want to change the party....
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:00 PM
Mar 2016

..as he continues all will get a chance to be counted.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
19. She's right. But Bernie has a chance to make it right.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:20 PM
Mar 2016

He needs to suspend his campaign, endorse Hillary, and campaign vigorously for her. The sooner the better. If he does that, then all the unpleasant things he's done are forgiven. All that matters now is beating Trump.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
22. Telling Democratic donors and voters
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:24 PM
Mar 2016

to kiss your ass is good politics?

My God, I am glad you aren't the Vice Chair of the DNC, but if you keep that up, I'm sure you will be going up the ladder quickly!

desmiller

(747 posts)
36. you know damn well what he meant.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:35 PM
Mar 2016

You and your fellow "Hill-extremists" might get a kick out of giving Hillary's rump "lip-service," but it'll be a cold day in hell before Bernie even fall in line for Hillary. Using all that money that "we the people" have donated to him just to help Hillary win?!! Talking about stepping on land mines.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
46. Oh, Bernie will get in line, you'll see. The only question is when.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

The sooner the better. Bernie might have some fans who want to see Trump be president, but Bernie is smarter than that.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
86. Now you need the special, fecund fragrance
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:50 AM
Mar 2016

to finish off your style.

Everyone knows when you are wearing ()D()R.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
23. No he doesn't need to suspend his campaign, endorse Hillary, and campaign vigorously for her.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:24 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie doesn't need forgiveness.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
27. If he cares about the future of the country he does. We'll see how much he really
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:27 PM
Mar 2016

cares about the ordinary people he claims to care about.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
37. It's accurate. He's got one move left: endorse Hillary.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:35 PM
Mar 2016

The sooner the better. The only question now is will Hillary be president, or will it be Trump/Cruz.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
32. I say to make it right he should take it all the way to the convention.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016

And if he doesn't win the nomination, he should run as an independent, because I'll be writing his name in anyway.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
35. Bernie's smart enough to know that running as an Indy would hand Trump the presidency.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:34 PM
Mar 2016

All that's left for him to do now is to bring his supporters on board with Hillary.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
39. Why the hurry? All a "settled" primary will do is give the media an excuse to ignore our party
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:35 PM
Mar 2016

Entirely.


His chances are certainly slimmer, but a vigorous contest and continued engagement of the millions of democrats in primary states that have not voted yet, will only benefit us.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
43. That's a fair point. A few things.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:38 PM
Mar 2016

First, the media is already going to ignore the Dem primary, because everyone already knows it's over.

More important, the sooner he gets on board, the more time he has to rally his supporters in favor of Hillary. Given some of the vitriol that I've seen, I think that is going to require some effort, and the more time he has to do that, the better.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
48. People dont need 8 months to listen to an endorsement, if it is one that is going to influence them.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:40 PM
Mar 2016

He can do it at the convention.

Rather, now would be an excellent time for hillary and her strategists to examine how they can broaden her appeal, particularly with millennials.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
54. I'm thinking along the lines of "time heals all wounds".
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:45 PM
Mar 2016

And, yes, Hillary should examine how she can broaden her appeal. I think campaigning alongside Bernie would help.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
56. Shutting things down before a lot of people have had a chance to weigh in, wont help IMHO
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

We had a bitter, contested primary up to the wire in 08 and hillary's endorsement of obama made a lot difference, to most everyone except a few PUMAs.

And it didnt hurt our turnout in the GE.

I think the calls for bernie to drop out are premature and, frankly, counterproductive.

Hillary supporters should realize they likely have it in the bag, and as such exercise a bit of patience - particularly with the folks they will want to get on board before november.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
70. Maybe you're right.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:10 PM
Mar 2016

It's true, the PUMAs in 2008 mostly came around, so maybe the Bernie-or-Busters will come around the same way this year, even if Bernie holds out all the way to the convention. But I'm not sure about that. Frankly, I thought the PUMAs were a bunch of irrational whiners in '08, and I feel the same way about BoBers this time around, but I'm not sure that all irrational whiners will behave the same way when the chips are on the table.

And the other problem we face this year is -- let's face it -- Hillary is not the same caliber of politician as Obama. Obama was once in a generation, Hillary is not. We can't afford to take unnecessary risks.

I think a good time for Bernie to drop out might be after losing NY on April 19. He gets to win a bunch of states in the next couple weeks. Losing a big state is a credible reason for suspending a campaign. And it gives him a few months before the convention to mend fences.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
69. My wounds were inflicted
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:03 PM
Mar 2016

long before Bernie decided to run. Hillary's campaign merely poured salt on them. This isn't 2008. These are superficial wounds or bruised feelings.

What Bernie decides to do will have no effect on what I choose to do. I will support Bernie as best I can unless he declares his campaign is over. At that point I will decide how best to advance the causes most important to me.

For me there are urgent problems facing this country. This election cycle is about discovering if there is enough flexibility in the systems of power to allow a popular movement to begin to address those problems. In other words could someone like Bernie Sanders earn a major party's nomination for president and win the general election. Right now, it's not looking good. Hillary is a nonstarter. She is from the very power structures that will resist any significant change. For the problems the 99% face are the very sources of the elites' power and wealth. A Hillary presidency only allows the elite to grow even more powerful.

So spare me the calls to get in line. I can see where that line goes and it is no where I want to be.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,174 posts)
88. Forgiveness?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 05:22 AM
Mar 2016

Anyone who thinks Bernie has done "unpleasant things" hasn't been paying attention to Caligula-in-Waiting over there.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
21. Good to know
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:23 PM
Mar 2016

that if I just didn't give a fuck about the Democratic party and the constituents the Vice Chair purports to represent, I too, could be the DNC Vice Chair.

I guess I'll just have to give less a fuck about Democratic party members in the future, and then I'm on my way!

Seriously - a call for neutrality and to support the Democratic Party.

Two hours later, then the direct DNC Vice Chair tells us to kiss her ass.

Some tone-deaf shit is going on. I am a damn Democrat, but statements like this make me thing it isn't me that is the problem - the Democratic party is the problem.


 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
73. LOLs
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:21 AM
Mar 2016

Oh my.

By the way she said that comment on March 14, the day before that bunch of states voted.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
34. More disgraceful than the DNC chair working w/sheldon adelson to put med. marijuana users in jail?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016

I guess my disgrace-o-meter must be off.

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
42. Donna, get over it. I actually used to admire you. Now I see that the DNC is more
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:38 PM
Mar 2016

important to you than the 99%.

Well, it is going to get pretty bad when people leave the Democratic party in droves, to support Bernie Sanders and other progressives.

Buh Bye!

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
45. Sanders apologists in full force
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

1. Sanders didn't say anything
2. If he said something it was taken out of context
3. He had every right to say it and he is being honest
4. It is a conspiracy that this story is being leaked
5. In reality, Hillary said it.
6. If Hillary didn't say it, she said something similar.
7. It is just a hit peace by a Clinton supporter.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
62. That's not what is happening here at all. It's a "neutral" DNC official attacking Sanders for
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:04 PM
Mar 2016

stating an obvious fact that everyone in America knows is true.

Third party candidates don't get anywhere.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
50. Better if he ran third party or lied? Dems and the GOP go out of their way to
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:41 PM
Mar 2016

make it as hard as possible for third parties. Sorry, you can't have it every which way.

Besides, Brazile is not exactly objective about Third Way or the Clintons.

What really is extremely disgraceful? An officer of the DNC talking that way about someone running as a Dem.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
95. Seems to be a theme: Pretend to be neutral so you can hold a position of trust
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:33 PM
Mar 2016

We see that theme repeated from the top of the DNC, to the big media, to bloggers, and all the way down here with members of DU.

Bernie supporters don't seem to do that as much. Tulsi Gabbard resigned because she wanted to take sides.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
98. And then, there were the DUers who pretended to be supporters of Bernie. That was fun.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:43 PM
Mar 2016

Pointless, because they weren't very good at pretending, but still fun to watch.

Impedimentus

(898 posts)
53. Donna, DWS told you to say it, didn't she?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:43 PM
Mar 2016

I pay more attention the seeds the birds eat in the bird feeder than I do to Donna or Deb.

 

azretired

(31 posts)
58. Donna Brazile is, from personal experience, an expert on disgrace
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:56 PM
Mar 2016

Wasn't she the genius who led Gore's campaign to defeat by Bush 2?

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
61. Gore did win the popular vote.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:02 PM
Mar 2016

I wouldn't hit her with that. But her treatment toward Bernie Sanders is disgraceful.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
65. So....
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:24 PM
Mar 2016

What does Bernie have in mind after Hillary wins the nomination and is the democratic candidate for prez?

elljay

(1,178 posts)
77. And hopefully
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 02:56 AM
Mar 2016

his support will be conditioned on Hillary's continuing her recent conversion to the more liberal side of the party.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
68. If the DNC's goal is to break the Democratic Party up into little pieces, they're doing
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:48 PM
Mar 2016

a wonderful job of it.

The left has felt ignored by the party establishment for a long time-- and for good reason. But that establishment is stepping way outside the boundaries in this campaign. It's just too in-your-face, and there's going to be a cost.

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
72. It's disgraceful that MSM blacks out coverage of Bernie
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:27 PM
Mar 2016

Mainstream Media has met its maker



"The Eulogy
About your sudden passing, I've only just learned
You wore yourself thin, taking your last wrong turn.
Your act caught up to you as we all knew it would
I'd tell you I'm sorry if only I could.
So I write these last words, to put to rest
These things I never got off my chest.
I remember when we first met,
My life turned on your every breath,
But then my feelings started to change,
You talked about war as if it were a game.
Still some were fond of you--who don't question or argue.
And I secretly promised to never be like you.
It's sad, one does not leave a funeral the way that one enters,
The mind gets consumed with death, but this one quite differs.
I speak to you now because there are no other takers,
To proclaim that Mainstream Media has met it's maker."
Taken from RT News.
 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
81. It's not at all disgraceful to real people.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:05 AM
Mar 2016

We wanted him to run; he did, as a Democrat. Like we wanted him to.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
117. Arizona?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 03:34 AM
Mar 2016

That isn't a primary - it's a presidential preference election.

They do have a primary, but it's later in the year and only for down ballot state races. The "primary" is open registration. The PPE is closed.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
91. It is disgraceful. When he thought he had a chance he took ownership of his "democratic" self,
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:35 AM
Mar 2016

excusing the hypocrisy of running in the Democratic party, after past comments about the party. Now, he is all this. Yes, to take and not give, then trash in disgusting.

marew

(1,588 posts)
92. Why are Wasserman Schultz and Brazile so unprofessional in their DNC responsibilities?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:10 AM
Mar 2016

They know very well Hillary is a DINO! She may call herself a Democrat but that does not make her one. If I call myself a tree, does that make me a tree?

Remember Hillary's gratuitous self-pitying comment about being 'dead broke"! Turns out in 1999, they bought a five-bedroom home in Chappaqua, N.Y., for $1.7 million. In December 2000, just as they were leaving the White House, they bought a seven-bedroom house near Embassy Row in Washington, D.C. The price was $2.85 million. It was, is, and always will be about her. She knew very well of the millions and millions she and Bill could and did make in speeches and numerous other activities.

The "dead broke" comment, unbeknownst to her, gave us a look into her true character. She had no concept, no depth, of what that comment in just a few words revealed to us all about her and her core values.

But lets get beyond labels here. To vote for anyone simply because of what they call themselves is short-sighted and dangerous. What I look for is the person who shares my values and who has supported those same values consistently and over time.

Wasserman Schultz (she has been working ferociously to gut new rules intended to rein in predatory payday lending- a real Democrat herself?- hardly!) and Brazile know very well Hillary is a badly flawed candidate and this is exactly why they feel a compulsion to disparage Bernie. They have become part of the corporate elite which rarely plays fair with the American people.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
106. They are well-paid to protect corporate interests.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:05 PM
Mar 2016

Being 'fair' to populist rebellions isn't in their job description.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
94. Doesn't Donna work as a Media Talking Head?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:26 AM
Mar 2016

so everyday, everything she does, is done with media coverage in mind?

We are sick of you Donna Brazile, you and every other belt way bullshit artist.

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
96. our media has NEVER covered third party candidates. only third wayers
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:36 PM
Mar 2016

He looked at everything....on running as indy or dem. there is no structure, and no media coverage. but they denied him anyway. so I will be the one to deny, next.

onecaliberal

(32,826 posts)
103. What more can they possibly do to tell folks they don't want our votes?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:02 PM
Mar 2016

Surely no one thinks they can win the election without those independents. There are MORE of them than democrats or republicans. Someone should tell her surrogates to shut the fuck up already. They alienate more people by the day, and if they think those folks are afraid of president trump than they are even dumber than I think they are.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
105. I'm ever so impressed with Hillary's disdain and refusal of media coverage...oh wait.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:03 PM
Mar 2016

Well, maybe, she'll start turning down photo ops....someday.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
107. Meh...I don't see a problem here.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:09 PM
Mar 2016

Debs did pretty good when he got a million votes campaigning from his prison cell (despite being unable to vote for himself due to felony disenfranchisement), but the Socialist Party USA (with which the Iowa Socialist Party was affiliated with back when I was a member) really didn't get much media, either, so we probably weren't the optimal choice for a candidate serious about winning.

Democrats get better media coverage than we ever did. Not Trump level media coverage, of course, but still much, much better media coverage than the SPUSA ever did.

I have no sore feelings over his decision, and I don't personally know anybody who does.




 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
108. His triangulation was efficient and effective, and very politically expedient.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:12 PM
Mar 2016

His triangulation was efficient and effective, and very politically expedient, regardless of its sincerity.

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
109. Donna you might claim to be "neutral" on CNN but this kind of tweet doesn't reflect that.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:21 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 17, 2016, 04:02 PM - Edit history (1)

Bernie stated an obvious political fact of realty in modern day American politics, if you're not a member of the two major political parties, your exposure to the nation via debates and television is hugely limited, unless you're a billionaire along the lines of Perot.

People claim that Bernie's "pie in the sky" policy proposals aren't based in reality and yet when he candidly states his deliberations on how he decided to run using sound logic, you condemn him for it.

I have no doubt you would be giving him hell if Bernie ran as an Independent siphoning precious votes away from the Democratic Party instead of invigorating it and ensuring a Republican win in November.

Thanks for the thread, Cheese Sandwich.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
112. The 2 big political parties have an institutional monopoly on the political process.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 12:27 AM
Mar 2016

They are technically private organizations, but they have a de facto semi-governmental role as gatekeepers of the political process. In some cases their advantages are even written into law.

Bernie said it right, and he said it honestly. It's a choice an independent candidate has to make.

It's so dishonest for Party officials pretend like it's offensive to acknowledge these realities.

thank you.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
113. I guess she prefers typical lying politicians
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 12:34 AM
Mar 2016

She would have preferred him to be dishonest and say hechad a conversion on the road to Damascus or something.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
120. Right as is if "being a Democrat" is some spiritual condition
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 03:58 PM
Mar 2016

Democrats range from Zell Miller to Michael Bloomberg approximately. Bernie told the truth. Donna B.'s comment was totally uncalled for.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
118. It is amazing how things get deliberately distorted
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 04:02 AM
Mar 2016

Chuck Todd asked him why he chose to run as a Democrat and made a small joke, saying "You never would have had me on your show if I hadn't." He did also say he didn't have the money to self-finance, he wasn't a billionaire. I don't see anything disgraceful at all about his answer. He was just honest.

Sam

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC Vice Chair: Bernie Sa...