Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jg10003

(975 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:57 PM Mar 2016

The DNC created super-delegates. Bernie using the rules to his advantage is just good politics.

Bernie is politician, not a saint. Saints don't get elected. Having a President Sanders is more important to our future then the nomination process. Universal healthcare, Wall Street reform, and a government that is not controlled by billionaires is more important than whether or not the super-delegates over rule the pledged delegates.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The DNC created super-delegates. Bernie using the rules to his advantage is just good politics. (Original Post) jg10003 Mar 2016 OP
Ok? Tarc Mar 2016 #1
..... riversedge Mar 2016 #2
i have to admit, thats cute. nt restorefreedom Mar 2016 #3
I had a good laugh. riversedge Mar 2016 #6
:) nt restorefreedom Mar 2016 #8
Brilliant and too close to the truth comradebillyboy Mar 2016 #9
LOL. DanTex Mar 2016 #18
Then the system shouldn't be criticized ... frazzled Mar 2016 #4
What possible reason would Clinton's super delegates have comradebillyboy Mar 2016 #5
"Momentum." That is a real argument Tad Devine made on the 'Path Forward' call today. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #21
I listened to that call. Devine sounds like some boiler room geek tragedy Mar 2016 #38
The momentum of having lost the last five states? yardwork Mar 2016 #39
Supporting tyranny over democracy is a non-starter for me, regardless of whom benefits from it. LonePirate Mar 2016 #7
Agree. The superdelegate system is a way for the leadership to subvert the will of the voters. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #15
Agreed. Super delegates should be scrapped or required to vote identically to their states LonePirate Mar 2016 #24
That's a lot of moveon.org petition signatures Codeine Mar 2016 #10
really? SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2016 #13
I'm dying too..... wildeyed Mar 2016 #20
No choice noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #11
lol, so much for principles nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #12
That's fine by me RandySF Mar 2016 #14
Amusing, really. MineralMan Mar 2016 #16
Things people hate are potentially usefull all the time. They're not mutually exclusive. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #23
No, I'm not saying that. MineralMan Mar 2016 #25
They're playing the game...Bernie isn't... bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #27
This is the most undemocratic progressive revolution ever. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #17
The People(TM) will have their revolution, whether they want it or not. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #35
Tad Devine: "It's not a matter of delegate arithmatic." *facepalm* CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #19
And Clinton is/was an actual Democrat wildeyed Mar 2016 #22
Hell yes, flip them RobertEarl Mar 2016 #26
So you want the super-delegates to go with they candidate in second place? hrmjustin Mar 2016 #28
NPR reported super delegates can actually be paid by the candidates. azretired Mar 2016 #29
In retrospect, it was probably a mistake for Bernie fans to stalk them across social media bigtree Mar 2016 #30
It's the little things that kill. nt Codeine Mar 2016 #31
Hmmm, yes, maybe that wasn't the wildeyed Mar 2016 #37
Tears of laughter..... yardwork Mar 2016 #41
I am just posting to be in this thread. Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #32
You're a better person than I am. yardwork Mar 2016 #42
bookmarked for later lunamagica Mar 2016 #33
Disagree Turin_C3PO Mar 2016 #34
We like the idea of superdelegates. We have always liked the idea of superdelegates. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #36
Bernie will be doing fundraisers at Goldman Sachs at this rate. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #40

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
1. Ok?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:59 PM
Mar 2016


So now that the super-delegates may be Sanders' only chance at the nomination, his supporters are embracing the process, after months spent hollering about how they were undemocratic?

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
4. Then the system shouldn't be criticized ...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:03 PM
Mar 2016

as "party elites" and "unfair." And the other candidate should not be criticized for having super delegates supporting her. In other words, don't embrace them as evil when the other candidate has them in her corner, and as simple politics when you want them as your candidate's last restor. What's good for the gander is equally good for the goose ...

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
21. "Momentum." That is a real argument Tad Devine made on the 'Path Forward' call today.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:39 PM
Mar 2016

Not votes, not state wins, not delegates, but "momentum."

How is Sanders co-signing this stuff? Or worse, is he somehow not aware of it?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
38. I listened to that call. Devine sounds like some boiler room
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:31 PM
Mar 2016

bullshitter trying a pump and dump scheme.

LonePirate

(13,414 posts)
7. Supporting tyranny over democracy is a non-starter for me, regardless of whom benefits from it.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:04 PM
Mar 2016

There is no difference between what you're saying and advocating for presidential electors to vote for the opposing candidate in the GE despite how their state voted. Changing the rules mid-game because you don't like the perceived outcome is never a good strategy.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
15. Agree. The superdelegate system is a way for the leadership to subvert the will of the voters.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:26 PM
Mar 2016

It doesn't matter which group of voters it affects. I don't judge the morality of a situation differently when I find I am on the other side of the fence. If it's wrong then it is wrong.

The party should not be called Democratic if the leadership feels that the will of the voters is just window dressing but not really too important. I think it is a crap system which should be scrapped and would be something I would expect in Saudi Arabia or Uzbekistan.

That being said, camp weathervane has lied, cheated, smeared, and used elites in the party and the media to tilt the playing field and screw Bernie out of a fair competition. If Bernie were to lose after a fair balanced fight that would be one thing.

But given the whole "politics ain't bean bag" justification for Hillary's dirty tricks he should apply the golden rule and do to them whatever they intend to do to him.

They are going to cheat their asses off, and he needs to document and draw public attention to every questionable and odd occurrence, and call them out on it.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
10. That's a lot of moveon.org petition signatures
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:07 PM
Mar 2016

people are going to have to delete now. Irony, thy name is lulz.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
20. I'm dying too.....
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:37 PM
Mar 2016

It's ok to compromise and make politically expedient choices, but ONLY if you are Bernie Sanders. Hillary Clinton may not, under ANY circumstances, change her mind or make political compromises because she is a third-way shill from CAMP WEATHERVANE!!11!!!!

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]



noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
11. No choice
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:09 PM
Mar 2016

I still hate having super-delegates. I hate even more that the media has used them to fool low information voters into thinking Hillary has a bigger lead than she does. We all know that super-delegates (at least the elected ones..not lobbyists) will switch to match the candidate who has the most delegates elected by the voters. If they didn't our nominee would get trounced in the November election.

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
16. Amusing, really.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:27 PM
Mar 2016

One week, a guy hates superdelegates. The next week they're potentially useful. Whatever works, I guess.

Here's a hint, though: Those superdelegates are experienced politicians. They know nonsense when they hear it. Good luck with that, folks...

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
23. Things people hate are potentially usefull all the time. They're not mutually exclusive.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:43 PM
Mar 2016

But you're saying the super delegates are insiders and they won't let an outsider in their club, and you don't seem to have a problem with that, even though it is incredibly anti-democratic.

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
25. No, I'm not saying that.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:49 PM
Mar 2016

If i were I would have written that. I said that those superdelegates are smart, experienced politicians who know what they are doing. Just like Bernie, they understand very well how this all works. Bernie has amateurs working for his campaign. They are the ones putting this forward. Bernie knows it will not work, I guarantee.

Please don't put words in my mouth. I say exactly what I mean to say.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
17. This is the most undemocratic progressive revolution ever.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:27 PM
Mar 2016

Btw, Tad Devine created the superdel system.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
19. Tad Devine: "It's not a matter of delegate arithmatic." *facepalm*
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:37 PM
Mar 2016

Devine, who has lost 4 presidential campaigns prior to this one, is now floating the idea of trying to get Clinton's pledged delegates to vote against the way the people of their state voted. Clinton made the same argument back in 2008, but it was recognized then as a sign of desperation, and it's really the same thing this time around.

Clinton is running Obama's 2008 campaign, while Bernie is running Clinton's. We already know how this turns out.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
22. And Clinton is/was an actual Democrat
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:40 PM
Mar 2016

with ties to the party and super delegates. I was mad as hell that she tried to pull that, but fearful that she could pull it off too. The idea that they would jump for Sanders without the popular vote is laughable. What possible incentive cold they have to do that?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
26. Hell yes, flip them
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:49 PM
Mar 2016

We should all be ready to raise hell with these delegates. They represent us and it is our duty to make sure they vote correctly.

Anyone saying otherwise is in favor of dictators.

Then at the convention look for challenges to many many of the other delegates so that some of them do not cave to dictators.

Democracy is a good thing.

 

azretired

(31 posts)
29. NPR reported super delegates can actually be paid by the candidates.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:57 PM
Mar 2016

If NPR is correct, do you wonder who that rule favors?

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
30. In retrospect, it was probably a mistake for Bernie fans to stalk them across social media
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:02 PM
Mar 2016
Allan Brauer ?@allanbrauer 19h19 hours ago
In retrospect, it was probably a mistake for your fans to stalk them across social media and call them whores.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
32. I am just posting to be in this thread.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016
Bernie using the rules to his advantage is just good politics.


Sitting on my hands.

Turin_C3PO

(13,952 posts)
34. Disagree
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:40 AM
Mar 2016

I would not be in favor of either candidate stealing the nomination by Super Delegates. The SD's have an ethical obligation to support whomever has the most pledged delegates or majority pop. vote, be it Clinton or Sanders.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The DNC created super-del...