2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMaddow is talking about Sanders new tactic to win, by wooing super delegates
over to his side---This **after months of railing against them.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Won't bother me.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He rails against them. He might wanna not try that route since she is better at it.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)William769
(55,145 posts)Coincidence
(98 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)cuz that is where I read it. A Hill supporter wrote it though, so you have a point.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Every reporter who posted about this on Twitter was listening to the Sanders' campaigns "Path Forward" phone call, where such strategy was discussed.
Sorry, no "It's just Twitter, ignore it" for this one. This is legitimate news.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)"going after pledged delegates"
"pledged delegates"
"pledged"
...uh huh.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)They will not get supers to flip unless and until Bernie gets a majority of the pledged delegates. I think that is the actual strategy by Weaver botched the statement.
LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)Except it was much closer and Obama ended up with more regular delegates than Clinton.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)vdogg
(1,384 posts)Because....yeah....That's democratic.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)He said the exact same thing that the clinton campaign said in 2008. Rachel should know better.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2008/02/clinton-seeks-flip-pledged-delegates
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)In which case, it's not debunked.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)I see by your journal posts that you are purposely being obtuse. Have a good day now.
riversedge
(70,187 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)The first line from your link and then later in the article
Politico's Roger Simon is reporting ....
But how much credibility can we assign to the report? Simon cites a single, unnamed source. The only quote from that source is this:
"I swear it is not happening now, but as we get closer to the convention, if it is a stalemate, everybody will be going after everybody's delegates... All the rules will be going out the window."
Please come back and tell us how the Clinton's were planning on doing this back in 2008 when you've got a better source than this.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)And it obviously never carried it out.
Can't you even read the links you post? This is from the link you just posted:
"Update: Clinton campaign issues a strong denial."
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)@ 1:43 in the video posted below specifically. She was, however, unsuccessful in persuading pledged & superdelegates to change their minds and votes. She was an idiot to say this then, just like Tad Devine is an idiot for saying it now.
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)This smells like desperation to me.They are beginning to look like they are desperate.First they say they don't like super delegates now they say they are trying to get them to switch to there side when Clinton is 322 pledged delegates ahead of them plus has almost two million more votes than he does.If he wants to stay in the race that's fine but this tactic just looks idiotic
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)At this point he thinks he should be the nominee no matter what the voters say. That is quite pathetic.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Pathetic indeed. He's in it till the end. The Queen has not been anointed yet.
riversedge
(70,187 posts)William769
(55,145 posts)Response to William769 (Reply #23)
Post removed
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)shadowandblossom
(718 posts)That's some pretty creative use of language.
riversedge
(70,187 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)before the first primary was ever held.
Sam
riversedge
(70,187 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)shadowandblossom
(718 posts)Why doesn't he call and talk to his coworkers?
LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)William769
(55,145 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And it really says everything you need to know.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)it's good enough for Sanders and Clinton.
According to Nate Silver's blog (is he under or out from under the bus these days?), several dozen superdelegates, to include John Lewis and Walter Mondale, switched from Clinton to Obama.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)He came a long way but after yesterday's results . . . it's time to move on to the GE.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Required to win nomination:
2383
Delegates available in upcoming contests:
2308
Sanders Pledged Delegates + (required to win):
825 + (1558) = 2383
Needs 67.5% of remaining to clinch nomination
Clinton Pledged Delegates + (required to win):
1139 + (1244) = 2383
Needs 54% of remaining to clinch nomination
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511511766
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Except, Hillary was closer to Obama than Sanders is to Hillary. Ulness she has to drop from the care for some reason, there is NO WAY he can win every remaining contest by more than 70% of the votes.
She is leading him -- greatly in total votes and super delegates, and her lead in pledged delegates is mathematically a sure thing.
It's a numbers game, and she's doing what Obama did in 2008 -- she will get the nom.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Hillary can't motivate, she only manipulates.
Huge difference.
DebDoo
(319 posts)And I have no problem with that.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)It wasn't that long ago that the Sanders campaign was depicting super delegates as "undemocratic", now they view super delegates as a path to seize victory from the jaws of defeat. Amazing!
By the way, super delegates are the only thing keeping Hillary from locking up the nomination before the convention. Think about it, in a two person race, without the super delegates once the primaries and caucuses are over, one candidate or the other will emerge the winner. It is only because of the super delegates that the race might continue until the first ballot of the convention.
But make no mistake, after the first ballot at the latest, Hillary will claim victory.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Hmmm.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I mean, look at the shirt!
...