Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow is talking about Sanders new tactic to win, by wooing super delegates (Original Post) riversedge Mar 2016 OP
I read he is going after already pledged delegates. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #1
Then I hope she goes after HIS pleged delegates. bravenak Mar 2016 #6
Sure, they can trade delegates. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #8
Yeah. I think he might have more trouble getting the 'establishment democrats' to switch. bravenak Mar 2016 #11
I never said it would be possible. I just said I wouldn't care if it happened. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #13
I think it makes him look very bad. bravenak Mar 2016 #14
Yeah I know doesn't matter if it is true or not Kalidurga Mar 2016 #17
Yes. That would work well for him. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #37
You mean to tell me he doesn't know what a pledged delegate is? William769 Mar 2016 #22
Must be true if you read it on twitter. Coincidence Mar 2016 #26
Or on DU Kalidurga Mar 2016 #30
There's a difference between an established reporter's Twitter and some rando. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #52
"I read he is going after already pledged delegates" NuclearDem Mar 2016 #27
Sad to see him subvert democracy like this. scscholar Mar 2016 #2
My position hasn't changed. morningfog Mar 2016 #3
I think that is pretty much what happened in 2008. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #38
This is just embarassing at this point. bravenak Mar 2016 #4
My thoughts, too. Where's the dignity? NurseJackie Mar 2016 #49
Going after pledged delegates too. vdogg Mar 2016 #5
debunked two hours ago Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #7
So, in other words, he said it 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #12
no. try reading again. Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #15
His campaign manager is talking about it. riversedge Mar 2016 #18
Re: Clinton Campaign from 2008 SFnomad Mar 2016 #24
The source on this is campaign strategist Tad Devine and spokesperson Jeff Weaver. Recognize them? CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #53
Wrong. The Clinton campaign strongly DENIED this anonymous claim in 2008. pnwmom Mar 2016 #41
Here she's talking about pledged delegates being fair game because they can change their minds. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #45
hillary said if there was a deadlock BlueStateLib Mar 2016 #47
Yeah I just saw that segment at the end of her show bigdarryl Mar 2016 #9
Sanders is in freefall KingFlorez Mar 2016 #10
Now you know how we feel Politicalboi Mar 2016 #16
Hillary is in till the WH Oval Office. That is the end point. riversedge Mar 2016 #19
So you're saying fuck the voters? William769 Mar 2016 #23
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #29
"The Queen" has 2.5 million more votes than Sanders. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #28
"anointed" meaning elected by a majority of voters and 'queen" meaning elected representative. shadowandblossom Mar 2016 #32
To me it seems more and more he is on an ego trip riversedge Mar 2016 #43
Bill Clinton was calling superdelegates and leaning on them to commit to Hillary Samantha Mar 2016 #20
Well, Sanders camp could have done the same. riversedge Mar 2016 #25
Yeah and that ended well nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #31
Sanders has been working with these people for 25 years and he was a superdelegate himself. shadowandblossom Mar 2016 #34
Sanders has never been a super delegate until this year. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #39
OMFG! William769 Mar 2016 #21
A total desperation move MaggieD Mar 2016 #33
If the superdelegates game is good enough for Obama and Clinton... SMC22307 Mar 2016 #35
None of them are going to budge, even if there's an indictment, and there won't be. ucrdem Mar 2016 #36
Not really kristopher Mar 2016 #40
Except he cannot win -- it's what happened to HRC in 2008 obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #50
Sanders isn't Hillary. People love Sanders' and his message. kristopher Mar 2016 #56
He's going after the super delegates from the states he won DebDoo Mar 2016 #42
This is the definition of desperation - the super delegates are now Sanders' last hope CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #55
So you're saying that Rachel is going full bore anti-Sanders. delrem Mar 2016 #44
Thats no bernie fan, thats a bernie BRO! Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #46
HA! Cha Mar 2016 #48
amazing how fast these memes ricochet DrDan Mar 2016 #51
This plan is not going to work Gothmog Mar 2016 #54
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
11. Yeah. I think he might have more trouble getting the 'establishment democrats' to switch.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:14 PM
Mar 2016

He rails against them. He might wanna not try that route since she is better at it.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
52. There's a difference between an established reporter's Twitter and some rando.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:57 AM
Mar 2016

Every reporter who posted about this on Twitter was listening to the Sanders' campaigns "Path Forward" phone call, where such strategy was discussed.

Sorry, no "It's just Twitter, ignore it" for this one. This is legitimate news.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
27. "I read he is going after already pledged delegates"
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:50 AM
Mar 2016

"going after pledged delegates"

"pledged delegates"

"pledged"

...uh huh.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
3. My position hasn't changed.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:05 PM
Mar 2016

They will not get supers to flip unless and until Bernie gets a majority of the pledged delegates. I think that is the actual strategy by Weaver botched the statement.

LiberalFighter

(50,888 posts)
38. I think that is pretty much what happened in 2008.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:47 AM
Mar 2016

Except it was much closer and Obama ended up with more regular delegates than Clinton.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
15. no. try reading again.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:26 PM
Mar 2016

I see by your journal posts that you are purposely being obtuse. Have a good day now.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
24. Re: Clinton Campaign from 2008
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:27 PM
Mar 2016

The first line from your link and then later in the article

Politico's Roger Simon is reporting ....


But how much credibility can we assign to the report? Simon cites a single, unnamed source. The only quote from that source is this:

"I swear it is not happening now, but as we get closer to the convention, if it is a stalemate, everybody will be going after everybody's delegates... All the rules will be going out the window."


Please come back and tell us how the Clinton's were planning on doing this back in 2008 when you've got a better source than this.
 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
53. The source on this is campaign strategist Tad Devine and spokesperson Jeff Weaver. Recognize them?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:58 AM
Mar 2016

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
41. Wrong. The Clinton campaign strongly DENIED this anonymous claim in 2008.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 02:03 AM
Mar 2016

And it obviously never carried it out.

Can't you even read the links you post? This is from the link you just posted:

"Update: Clinton campaign issues a strong denial."

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
45. Here she's talking about pledged delegates being fair game because they can change their minds.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 05:33 AM
Mar 2016

@ 1:43 in the video posted below specifically. She was, however, unsuccessful in persuading pledged & superdelegates to change their minds and votes. She was an idiot to say this then, just like Tad Devine is an idiot for saying it now.

 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
9. Yeah I just saw that segment at the end of her show
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:10 PM
Mar 2016

This smells like desperation to me.They are beginning to look like they are desperate.First they say they don't like super delegates now they say they are trying to get them to switch to there side when Clinton is 322 pledged delegates ahead of them plus has almost two million more votes than he does.If he wants to stay in the race that's fine but this tactic just looks idiotic

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
10. Sanders is in freefall
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:12 PM
Mar 2016

At this point he thinks he should be the nominee no matter what the voters say. That is quite pathetic.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
16. Now you know how we feel
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:29 PM
Mar 2016

Pathetic indeed. He's in it till the end. The Queen has not been anointed yet.

Response to William769 (Reply #23)

shadowandblossom

(718 posts)
32. "anointed" meaning elected by a majority of voters and 'queen" meaning elected representative.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:08 AM
Mar 2016

That's some pretty creative use of language.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
20. Bill Clinton was calling superdelegates and leaning on them to commit to Hillary
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:18 PM
Mar 2016

before the first primary was ever held.

Sam

shadowandblossom

(718 posts)
34. Sanders has been working with these people for 25 years and he was a superdelegate himself.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:13 AM
Mar 2016

Why doesn't he call and talk to his coworkers?

LiberalFighter

(50,888 posts)
39. Sanders has never been a super delegate until this year.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:58 AM
Mar 2016

The only Senator that was a delegate in 2008 and 2012 was Patrick Leahy.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
35. If the superdelegates game is good enough for Obama and Clinton...
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:23 AM
Mar 2016

it's good enough for Sanders and Clinton.

According to Nate Silver's blog (is he under or out from under the bus these days?), several dozen superdelegates, to include John Lewis and Walter Mondale, switched from Clinton to Obama.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
36. None of them are going to budge, even if there's an indictment, and there won't be.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:27 AM
Mar 2016

He came a long way but after yesterday's results . . . it's time to move on to the GE.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
40. Not really
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 02:02 AM
Mar 2016

Required to win nomination:
2383
Delegates available in upcoming contests:
2308

Sanders Pledged Delegates + (required to win):
825 + (1558) = 2383

Needs 67.5% of remaining to clinch nomination


Clinton Pledged Delegates + (required to win):
1139 + (1244) = 2383

Needs 54% of remaining to clinch nomination
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511511766

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
50. Except he cannot win -- it's what happened to HRC in 2008
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:51 AM
Mar 2016

Except, Hillary was closer to Obama than Sanders is to Hillary. Ulness she has to drop from the care for some reason, there is NO WAY he can win every remaining contest by more than 70% of the votes.

She is leading him -- greatly in total votes and super delegates, and her lead in pledged delegates is mathematically a sure thing.

It's a numbers game, and she's doing what Obama did in 2008 -- she will get the nom.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
56. Sanders isn't Hillary. People love Sanders' and his message.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 04:08 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary can't motivate, she only manipulates.

Huge difference.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
55. This is the definition of desperation - the super delegates are now Sanders' last hope
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:17 AM
Mar 2016

It wasn't that long ago that the Sanders campaign was depicting super delegates as "undemocratic", now they view super delegates as a path to seize victory from the jaws of defeat. Amazing!

By the way, super delegates are the only thing keeping Hillary from locking up the nomination before the convention. Think about it, in a two person race, without the super delegates once the primaries and caucuses are over, one candidate or the other will emerge the winner. It is only because of the super delegates that the race might continue until the first ballot of the convention.

But make no mistake, after the first ballot at the latest, Hillary will claim victory.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Maddow is talking about S...