Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:05 AM Mar 2016

Bernie's Growing Troubles with Illegal and Foreign Contributions

-snip-

In February, the Federal Election Commission sent the Sanders campaign two letters breaking down the campaign's possible illegal and foreign contributions. Both letters - one addressing the campaign's quarterly report for the quarter ending in December and another addressing the campaign's January report point out two overriding themes in Sanders' campaign finance trouble besides for the fact that they don't seem to be able to add (in both letters, FEC noted the Sanders' campaign's problem balancing the ledger): illegal over-contributions and donations from foreign addresses not properly accounted for to confirm their US citizenship.

Bernie's campaign line has been to dismiss these concerns. So many people are donating to us, they say, it's mighty hard to keep the books straight on all of them.

But as the deadline for the Sanders campaign to respond to its first FEC notice nears on March 17, that explanation is woefully inadequate. As more and more states vote, voters deserve to know, definitively, whether Bernie Sanders is accepting illegal campaign donations from foreign nationals, and just what is keeping them from implementing a technologically simple check on who's donating how much money.

Since October of 2015 to the end of January, the FEC counted a total of 665 potentially illegal foreign donations to the Sanders campaign, and hundreds of donors who have exceeded their contribution limits. The FEC noted more foreign contributions in just the month of January than in the previous three months combined, and has flagged over 3,500 contributions as over-limit. Through the end of December alone, the Sanders campaign had collected more than $23 million in donations without sourcing them or certifying that those came from donors whose aggregate total giving is below $200.

The rest: http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/3/14/bernie-sanders-potentially-illegal-campaign-contributions

Looks like today is the FEC deadline.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie's Growing Troubles with Illegal and Foreign Contributions (Original Post) JaneyVee Mar 2016 OP
Gee now that you all are crowing about how your candidate has won Warren Stupidity Mar 2016 #1
FEC violations in a campaign advocating campaign finance transparency... JaneyVee Mar 2016 #3
So out of millions of donations Bernie has 3500 that may have accidentally donated too much think Mar 2016 #2
... Corporations... with shareholders all over the world... Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #4
This tired old shit. Give it a rest. Your person is going to win. HERVEPA Mar 2016 #5
I don't understand why there wasn't a system in place to check these before the Lucinda Mar 2016 #6
I'm willing to conceded that they were caught off-guard and were initially unprepared, BUT ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #8
Maybe they just didnt want to spend the money for the programs once they realized Lucinda Mar 2016 #10
Lol! I'm quite sure KPN Mar 2016 #7
"possible". "potentially". If you'd have put those two words in your subject line this post would cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #9
foreign contributions are illegal. there's no maybes on that one. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #11
Yeah except for the maybes in the article. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #15
Hopefully, Bernie's campaign will resolve this. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #16
... unless they come from US citizens. surrealAmerican Mar 2016 #18
It's funny that this is a huge deal to some NWCorona Mar 2016 #12
OMG thepeoplesview.net! whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #13
Spam Dan and the "People's" View. Wilms Mar 2016 #14
If this were Hillary it would be all over the cable news and Newspapers. And she would be labeled Jitter65 Mar 2016 #17
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
1. Gee now that you all are crowing about how your candidate has won
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:12 AM
Mar 2016

perhaps you could stop with the daily horseshit?

 

think

(11,641 posts)
2. So out of millions of donations Bernie has 3500 that may have accidentally donated too much
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:12 AM
Mar 2016

Meanwhile corporations that actively violate US laws can donate millions to Hillary's super pac.

Cry me a river.....

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
4. ... Corporations... with shareholders all over the world...
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:30 AM
Mar 2016

... A $200 limit on individual contributions, to be from US cits only? Hmmm.

(And this in a polity that recently (Shrub-Cheney) openly asserted that it is and or intends to be an Empire)...

Wow, just wow.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
5. This tired old shit. Give it a rest. Your person is going to win.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:30 AM
Mar 2016

What friggin purpose do you think you are serving other than alienating Bernie supporters you need to vote for Clinton in the general. Use common sense.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
6. I don't understand why there wasn't a system in place to check these before the
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:33 AM
Mar 2016

donations were accepted. I assume software exists to track this stuff....?

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
8. I'm willing to conceded that they were caught off-guard and were initially unprepared, BUT ...
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:12 PM
Mar 2016

... after a certain amount of time, it would have been clear that they needed to do SOMETHING. So, I'm left wondering, why DIDN'T they address the problem sooner? Did someone believe that it would just solve itself? Did someone believe that following the rules wasn't a big deal? Did someone assume that it would be overlooked by regulators?

It's impossible to know what anyone was thinking, but it's clear to me that they didn't give it the attention that it deserved.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
10. Maybe they just didnt want to spend the money for the programs once they realized
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

it was getting out of hand. I know how hard it can be to put the genie back in the bottle though.
I don't think they had any clue how big this was going to get. So I agree, I can see how it happened, but still...

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
9. "possible". "potentially". If you'd have put those two words in your subject line this post would
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:14 PM
Mar 2016

sink like a rock.

I can see why you left them out.

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
18. ... unless they come from US citizens.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:52 PM
Mar 2016

Given his large majority in the primary from "Americans abroad", this is a distinct possibility.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
14. Spam Dan and the "People's" View.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:35 PM
Mar 2016

I mean, if you got a reliable source, let's discuss the issue.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
17. If this were Hillary it would be all over the cable news and Newspapers. And she would be labeled
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

guilty no matter what the explanation.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie's Growing Troubles...