FULL UNEDITED VIDEO is on the 12news site, Sanders did not walk out, he sat back ...

[slipslidingaway]

Last edited Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:48 AM - Edit history (1)

down, maybe to do another interview.

Thanks to Revanchist for providing the direct link!!!

But the video with Jane Sanders should be viewed as well, some Clinton supporters were saying that Jane Sanders had a planned meeting with Arpaio and or a photo op with him, that is simply not true.


http://www.12news.com/news/bernie-sanders-walks-out-of-interview/88844882


http://www.12news.com/news/politics/jane-sanders-meets-with-sheriff-joe-arpaio-tours-tent-city/82814617

The full interview comes on directly after the interview with Jane Sanders.

"Jane Sanders wasn't planning a tour of Tent City on Monday, but Sheriff Joe Arpaio made her an offer she couldn't refuse.

Sanders planned to view Tent City from the fence, with the help of Puente leader Carlos Garcia. But Arpaio hustled over here from another news conference ..."


Hustled over ... NO MEETING was planned with Arpaio, he came and 'crashed' her meeting with Carlos Garcia.

[peacebird]

1. Hillary supporters are in full on 'artful smear' mode against Jane.

[slipslidingaway]

4. It is revolting to witness. nt

[NWCorona]

14. Exactly!

I'm utterly disgusted and posted my views on the other threads.

[metroins]

76. The more I've learned about Jane

The less I've liked.

But, she's not the candidate, so she should be "close" to off limits in my opinion.

I think it's wrong to attack the family, even if they're in the public eye.

[NWCorona]

16. There are some people with whom I disagreed with but still

Respected their opinions. Not anymore

Still won't hit block tho

[840high]

40. Disgusting - time to put more

of them on ignore.

[ljm2002]

48. Wait, whut?

Are Hillary supporters attacking... a... woman?????

How can that be?

Hillary Clinton, the woman who got her political start as First Lady by trying (and, it must be noted, failing) to fix our broken health care system, would begrudge another woman taking an active role in her husband's campaign? Or is it only her faux-feminist followers who do that?

[peacebird]

59. It's only misogeny if it's directed at Hillary apparently

[HerbChestnut]

51. Agreed. It's sad to see.

They've crossed the line into "negative campaigning" in my opinion. It's one thing to compare candidates' records, but it's another thing to distort reality and mischaracterize positions. Clinton supporters and her campaign have crossed that line.

[GreatGazoo]

65. not exactly artful

[arcane1]

2. You mean DUers LIED about Sanders???

Say it isn't so!

[slipslidingaway]

6. They were lazy, all you had to do was look at their site ...

[rhett o rick]

7. The new banner for Clinton is "the ends justify the means". The Ruling Class will do literally

anything to keep power.

[arcane1]

12. "Whatever It Takes(tm)"

[DisgustipatedinCA]

23. I have a good memory. I suspect you do too. I know I'll never forget this primary season.

I'll never forget some of the names associated with it. And I'll never forget many of the lies that I'm able to document in ironclad fashion. The rules of the site almost guarantee that some people are in for a very big and unpleasant shock come November. The rest of the world will have already steeled itself against what's coming.

[TheBlackAdder]

63. I doubt someone lied. If someone lies about stupid shit like this, then they are just assholes!

[winter is coming]

3. Lie after lie... does that look like the strategy of a winning campaign? n/t

[jwirr]

8. Sounds like a good way to lose the GE.

[dana_b]

9. If he is nothing to worry about

And Hillary has it in the bag, then why spen anytime on Bernie at all??

I think they know it's not going to be as easy as they were hoping for and he
may actually pull it off.
😉

[surrealAmerican]

31. I've tried asking that.

I never got an answer though.

They could just sit back and wait if it's only a matter of a few weeks anyway.

[slipslidingaway]

10. Not to me! nt

[grossproffit]

5. The interviewer said that he walked out.

[slipslidingaway]

11. If you watch the full interview that comes on directly after Jane Sanders you will see that he ...

takes off his microphone, hands it to the reporter, they discuss time allowed and then Sanders sits back down in the same chair.

Do not use the link on the right of this page, that is the edited version.

[floriduck]

18. And the person interviewing was a primadona.

He didn't like having someone else determine when the interview was finished. But the Clintonite interpretation was bull.

[CoffeeCat]

53. I knew there was some serious spinning going on this afternoon

when I saw Hillary fans admonishing Jane Sanders for meeting with Joe Arpaio. They were furiously hand wringing over the notion that Jane would dare to meet with a racist.

Turns out, there was no formal meeting. He blustered in like the Kool Aid guy, while she was touring tent city.

And this putz of a reporter seemed to be working REALLY HARD to further the same talking points. Bernie was having none of it and he spelled out clearly what had happened to that reporter and quickly pivoted to another subject.

Then, the reporter's next question was about Bernie's ties to the Minutemen.

Seriously????

And that shithead reporter wondered why the interview was cut short?

I don't think any Sanders supporter should shy away from admitting that the interview was cut short. Good! That reporter was a hack who was playing National Enquirer games with Sanders. He wasn't interested in a substantive interview. He was furthering destructive, and lie-based talking points. What's the point of being interviewed and wasting your time with someone who was so unprofessional?

[floriduck]

61. CC, you put it much more eloquently than I.

Nice work!

[GoneFishin]

13. When they post on these types of topics I skip over them completely. I figure if I wait for an

hour until someone else posts on the same topic without the lies and slanted editing I can save myself some time that would have been wasted having to debunk the bullshit myself.

[sufrommich]

15. I don't know what interview you're watching,

he stands up,takes his mic off and walks away.

http://www.12news.com/news/12-news-one-on-one-with-bernie-sanders/87672745

[NWCorona]

19. That video is heavily edited

And he doesn't walk away. He does stand up abruptly and takes of his Mike but he justs stands there.

I want to know what the question was.

[sufrommich]

22. The question was about the vice presidency. And he did exactly what

the station claimed he did,told the interviewer the interview was over,took off his Mic and walked away. It's pretty obvious from the tape that the interviewer was getting under Sanders skin way before he took his Mic off too. He was angry about the questions he was being asked.

[NWCorona]

26. I get that but I still want to know the question asked

As this has been a point of contention. I'm not denying that Sanders seemed pissed but the video still doesn't show him walking off.

[still_one]

30. I will assume every you are saying is accurate. My question would then be, who edited the video,

and why did those who edited the video present it that way?

I only saw the edited video, but he seemed to be doing just fine with his answers in the interview, so it does seem weird that he would appear to walk away when the interview was not complete.

[NWCorona]

36. I don't know either but would love to know

It just seems odd and given the hoopla you'd figure we would have seen the whole thing by now.

[zalinda]

66. I'm guessing it was edited at the station

for a later broadcast. It had the tag line that Sanders walked away from the interview. When watching the entire video, Sanders did not walk away, he stood up. It was the reporter who said he walked away, and Sanders corrected him and said that he gave him the 4 minutes that was agreed upon.

The room was set up as most rooms are for multiple interviews, the lighting stays, but reporters bring in the cameras and mics. Each reporter is given so many minutes, what they do with them is their responsibility. This happens not only for video reporters but also those who write for papers. If Sanders (or any other politician ) had to go to a separate place for each interview, nothing would get done.

As for the Jane Sanders clip, that was heavily edited. It almost seemed like the interview didn't start until the Sheriff showed up. That video was a complete fuck you to Sanders.

Z

[still_one]

69. Then the campaign should demand an apology from the station for the misrepresentation

They probably won't get one, but it is important to set the record straight

[riversedge]

20. Yes, if OP means this video--there are a few seconds more--but he does get up

and walks out. If anything, this validates the earlier tapes and threads posted. But they all show Sanders getting up ending the interview abruptly. The OP seems confused.


http://www.12news.com/news/12-news-one-on-one-with-bernie-sanders/87672745

[slipslidingaway]

24. After the Jane Sanders video another video starts right afterwards, it is the unedited four plus

minutes where they discuss time etc.

That is why I mentioned in the OP that it comes on later, you cannot use the link on the right of their page, I tried. That is the edited version

You just have to let the video run, he takes off the microphone and then sits down in the chair again, guessing another interview???

Dinner is ready

[NWCorona]

27. You should try and rip it if you can.

I tried to watch the video but it didn't autoplay for me. I'm gonna tryagain later when I get a chance.

[riversedge]

33. Even if it goes on as you say (which it does not me).--why did Sanders get up

as the reporter was asking another question--just for him to sit down (for what ever reason). ???

[tblue37]

50. Apparently he did several short interviews in a row with different reporters, who all knew how much

time they were allotted, but this one kept talking after time was called. Even the reporter himself acknowledges that.

[Live and Learn]

17. I think we know the Sanders well enough to know that the other posts were complete manure.

I didn't even need any validation.

[riversedge]

21. In watching this video there is no difference. Sanders gets up and walks

away as he reporter starts to ask another question.

[slipslidingaway]

25. Yes there is, do not click on the link they have displayed, it will come on after Jane Sanders.nt

[Armstead]

68. Bullshit...Maybe you're watching a different one

[felix_numinous]

28. People are chomping at the bit waiting for their Dean scream

to get us back for exposing Hillary's corruption.

[still_one]

34. I'm not, but I will agree this is the season where the respective supporters on each side look for a

gotcha event, and try to make it larger than it is.

No matter what the circumstances were, this will be forgotten by tomorrow, if not sooner

[Thinkingabout]

29. The link is Jane Sanders meeting with Arpaio, did not see Bernie sit back down.

[kgnu_fan]

32. wow, another twisted story? Who is making all those manipulation?

[riversedge]

35. Seems the OP has his own twisted story IMHO.

[UglyGreed]

37. I tried to view the full interview

but it seems the station has gotten rid of it..........

[slipslidingaway]

41. Wow, they changed the next video, but it is supposed to air on Sunday morning...

that edited version was BS which will be played on the corporate media.

[UglyGreed]

42. The edited one was all

I could find..... perfect example of the media and propaganda

[slipslidingaway]

45. See the link in reply #43, it worked for me and yes a perfect example of propaganda! nt

[UglyGreed]

46. Thank you

for the heads up slipslidingaway!!!

[slipslidingaway]

47. Thanks to Revanchist, I could not get the direct link to the full interview and they added other

videos in between.

Not going crazy, at least not tonight!

[AzDar]

38. I believe the term is "Clintonian": Dirty, Lying , And CORRUPT. ANYTHING to win...

[Fairgo]

39. Lying Liars are known for one thing

If that is the role you wish to play, If that is your part in history, you are welcome to it.

[Revanchist]

43. Link to full interview

http://www.12news.com/news/bernie-sanders-walks-out-of-interview/88844882

[slipslidingaway]

44. Thank You!!! Yes it is 4:42 minutes and he sits back down at the end as if waiting for another ....

interview.

Thanks again!!!

[whistler162]

73. The nerve of Bernie... I say the nerve of him....

not giving the reporter all the time the reporter demands! SHAME ON BERNIE. It is not like the Senator had other commitments.

[Avalux]

49. Thank you for posting the truth. I continue to hope that truth will win. n/t

[Kalidurga]

52. If Hillary had done what they accused Bernie of the applause would be deafening

But, even when you show them Bernie didn't do what they said he did they are all like don't matter he's like not Hillary.

[BeanMusical]

54. Kick and R

[slipslidingaway]

55. Thanks everyone, it is clear he ended the interview when the time was up. nt

[riversedge]

60. The only thing that is clear is that Sanders rudely, abruptly ended the

interview. Your few extra so-called 'unedited' seconds at the end of the video only, once again confirms that point.

[misterhighwasted]

56. LOL..

[Wilms]

57. ^

[uponit7771]

58. He walked away, then sat back down still acting like a petulant kid... neither puts him in a good

... light.

There will always be tough interviews

[Armstead]

67. Why don't you find out what the situation was first?

It is also possible he had other reporters backed up waiting to talk to him, and he was just trying to move the line along?

[slipslidingaway]

70. I do not think it had anything to do 'with a tough interview' my guess is he had other interviews...

which is why he sat right back down. He answered all the questions and moved along.

The Maddow interview aired that evening had the same backdrop.

I doubt this was set up just for a four minute interview with 12 news.

[slipslidingaway]

62. Kick, the edited version is still being pushed here on DU and in the media. nt

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

64. The nation is stunned, frightened, and despairing that Sanders wouldn't play the game.

Not to mention the millions of traumatized children aghast at the horrifying sight of grown man not pandering to a reporter!!

[slipslidingaway]

71. !!! and lol ...

[beam me up scottie]

72. Why do you hate America?

[senz]

74. Falsehood, deceit, and smear campaigns

have a way of boomeranging back onto their source.

[cherokeeprogressive]

75. That's what happens when "history" and "gender justice" trumps leadership.

So many of Hillary's supporters are wound around the historical aspect of having a female elected President that no lie is out of bounds, no behavior is disallowed, no bullshit doesn't fly high and straight. #44TimesAMan has played itself out already.

I'm down for a female President but Hillary's the wrong person at the right moment and that's too bad for all of us.

[noretreatnosurrender]

77. Thanks for posting

I clicked on the first link in the OP and I saw where he sat back down. He did not walk away. The original narrative on this event was wrong. Anyone can make a mistake like this when someone with no ethics edits the truth out of a video and unsuspecting people post it. Now that we know the original video was deceitful I think those who used it to tarnish Sanders need to own up to the fact that they were unwittingly used. It's the honorable thing to do. Maybe this should be a lesson to all of us to be wary of posting things that can easily blow up in our faces.