Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
is there a standard of accuracy for Hillary Clinton supporters? (Original Post) reddread Mar 2016 OP
Of course there is AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #1
I led with the wrong word, didnt I? reddread Mar 2016 #2
I think you went for the double negative: Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #18
LOL grasswire Mar 2016 #3
they're Maenads looking for someone to tear into meat-scraps MisterP Mar 2016 #4
Above yours. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #5
Is there any limit to the condescension of Sanders supporters? redstateblues Mar 2016 #6
Says the poster who just accused Sanders supporters of supporting Kasich Matt_in_STL Mar 2016 #7
Yep- The BSS who won't vote Democratic think he is the best bet to redstateblues Mar 2016 #8
I'll wait for your link on the majority of Sanders supporters who back Trump or Kasich Matt_in_STL Mar 2016 #9
It's not a majority-never said it was. redstateblues Mar 2016 #11
What is the % now of BSS who claim they won't vote Democratic? redstateblues Mar 2016 #10
ZERO percent, as long as Sanders is the nominee - Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #20
Thread winner so far. Feel free to drop the mic. eom Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #19
Try JPR leftofcool Mar 2016 #21
looking at Hillary's foreign policy record? No. reddread Mar 2016 #12
I'm a Bernie supporter at present, and I check the fact checkers cry baby Mar 2016 #13
H.A. Goodman. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #14
Of course there is. "HILLARY said". That's it and that's ALL. John Poet Mar 2016 #15
Sad. nt cwydro Mar 2016 #16
LOL, of course not. senz Mar 2016 #17
 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
1. Of course there is
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:37 PM
Mar 2016

it's the same standard of accuracy we've come to know and expect from both Hillary and her husband.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
18. I think you went for the double negative:
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 05:44 AM
Mar 2016

Standards are impossible with moving goalposts and shifting positions all over the place.

Accuracy is... impeded by a desire to win at all costs.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
6. Is there any limit to the condescension of Sanders supporters?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:59 PM
Mar 2016

That attitude must be winning many converts as you guys continue to disparage HRCs supporters

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
7. Says the poster who just accused Sanders supporters of supporting Kasich
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:05 PM
Mar 2016

Additionally accusing them of supporting Trump. Maybe you should bring that shit out of your protected hidey-hole and back it up with proof.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
9. I'll wait for your link on the majority of Sanders supporters who back Trump or Kasich
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:14 PM
Mar 2016

I'm sure it will be highly credible.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
11. It's not a majority-never said it was.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:17 PM
Mar 2016

Just a lot of gleeful trash talk about how Hillary can't beat Kasich

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
20. ZERO percent, as long as Sanders is the nominee -
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 05:46 AM
Mar 2016

and he could well be the nominee, because the primaries are far from over.

cry baby

(6,682 posts)
13. I'm a Bernie supporter at present, and I check the fact checkers
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:26 PM
Mar 2016

for both Hillary and Bernie. They both do pretty well.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»is there a standard of ac...