Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:56 AM Mar 2016

We need to pass a federal law for a minimum number of polling places per population.

A county with 4 million people shouldn't have only 60 polling places.

That was the situation in Maricopa County, Arizona today. County Recorder Helen Purcell apparently had sole authority in this matter, which let her reduce the number of polling places from 200 in 2012 to 60 today.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We need to pass a federal law for a minimum number of polling places per population. (Original Post) Eric J in MN Mar 2016 OP
Amen! ReallyIAmAnOptimist Mar 2016 #1
Yes, we mail them in in Oregon. potone Mar 2016 #2
Damn skippy we should! ebayfool Mar 2016 #3
It's a state thing, for fucks sake. bettyellen Mar 2016 #4
Yes, it's a state thing under current law. Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #5
Helen Purcell is a Republican. joshcryer Mar 2016 #6
Could use federal guidelines for ease & comfort of voting, accurate & verifiable counts. senz Mar 2016 #7

potone

(1,701 posts)
2. Yes, we mail them in in Oregon.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:26 AM
Mar 2016

It works very well. I think the whole country should adopt this system. It is simple, convenient and not corrupt.

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)
3. Damn skippy we should!
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:27 AM
Mar 2016

Some Latino neighborhoods were said to have zero to one polling places. That matters no matter who you support!

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
5. Yes, it's a state thing under current law.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:45 AM
Mar 2016

But the federal government can set minimal standards for federal elections.

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
6. Helen Purcell is a Republican.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:59 AM
Mar 2016

This was an epic ratfuck. Here's the thing, the Republicans get away with being incompetent, because it's expected of them, and often the Democrats are blamed for the Republicans' incompetency.

So you have these Republican leaning poll officers and they get a registration in the mail and they see it's someone who's registering democrat, they flip it to independent, because they know that it'll cause that person problems if they go to the polls. Maybe it's only one in ten that they do it to, but it would add up over the days and weeks of going over hundreds of registrations a day.

Then what happens? The Democrats eat their own without pointing the finger at who is responsible.

Anyway, I'm rambling, I am saying I agree with you, elections should be federally handled, with federal procedures, and a verifiable paper ballot system. We need an across the board standard for voting and we need a national voting holiday. Automatic registration. This isn't that big of a deal to implement, it would take a decade, take your time, get it right, get all the good best practices, and just get it done.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
7. Could use federal guidelines for ease & comfort of voting, accurate & verifiable counts.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:07 AM
Mar 2016

Voting is a good thing and should be encouraged.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We need to pass a federal...