Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 12:05 AM Mar 2016

Should broadcast media hold off showing results or projecting winners when voting is extended?

Last night, Arizona was called while huge numbers of people were STILL waiting to vote.


20 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes, they should both hold off showing vote totals AND avoid projecting winners
20 (100%)
The should hold off projecting winners, but still show vote totals
0 (0%)
They should show totals and project winners anyway.
0 (0%)
Other
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should broadcast media hold off showing results or projecting winners when voting is extended? (Original Post) Ken Burch Mar 2016 OP
sanders supporters wouldnt be asking this question if he WON arizona lol. nt msongs Mar 2016 #1
Clinton supporters who have a clue are outraged about the voter supression in AZ nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #3
Yes we would. We don't want anyone discouraged from voting. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #6
Should broadcast media pretend a primary is close for ratings? nt onehandle Mar 2016 #2
They should make sure nothing is done to discourage anyone from voting. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #7
We went through this with Bush and Gore... fun n serious Mar 2016 #4
I will take it a step further during the GE they should stuff it nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #5
Good point. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #8
Yup nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #9
Those of you not old enough to remember the 1980 Presidential election SheilaT Mar 2016 #10
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
3. Clinton supporters who have a clue are outraged about the voter supression in AZ
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 12:20 AM
Mar 2016

perhaps you are not, but people with a clue understand this is not a partisan issue.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
6. Yes we would. We don't want anyone discouraged from voting.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 12:53 AM
Mar 2016

What possible good reason could there be to announce results and project winners while large numbers of people in the state in question, wherever that state might be, are still waiting to vote?

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
4. We went through this with Bush and Gore...
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 12:21 AM
Mar 2016

As a Hillary supporter I say YES. Hold off the media. Let people VOTE.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
5. I will take it a step further during the GE they should stuff it
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 12:22 AM
Mar 2016

until the next day. This shit affects turnout in the West Coast where it is not just about a Presidential election. And Hawaii has not even started to vote.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
8. Good point.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 01:43 AM
Mar 2016

That could be achieved by simply getting broadcasters and state election departments to voluntarily agree to that.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
10. Those of you not old enough to remember the 1980 Presidential election
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:53 AM
Mar 2016

should look it up.

The race was called for Ronald Reagan well before the polls closed on the west coast. There were many reports of voters leaving the line, knowing there was no point in voting.

While Reagan was going to win, no matter when the election was called, that early call probably had a huge impact on the down ticket races in the western states.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Should broadcast media ho...