2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLA Times Interviews Bernie Sanders
By Bernie Sanders
Source: LA Times
March 25, 2016
Nicholas Goldberg (editor of the editorial pages): Thanks for doing this on such short notice. Were excited because it means that the California primary, even though it comes so late in the cycle, is not meaningless.
Bernie Sanders: To me it is not meaningless.
[ROOM LAUGHS]
Goldberg: Good. We have a lot of questions. Were on the record. We are almost exclusively people from the opinion side of the paper. But we do have a person from the news pages as well. You are being recorded, so stuff could end up in the paper. If you want to go off the record, just tell us and thats fine. We have a lot of people with a lot of questions, I think, so dont let your answers go on too long just so we can get more of them in.
Sanders: OK.
Nick Goldberg: Ill start with a touchy-feely question. Im sure people will have more specific programmatic questions. But I wanted to ask if you could talk about how your ideas on poverty and wealth and income inequality and economic fairness were formed. It seems to be such a deep and integral part of your being. I wonder whether if it came from books, something you lived, something you witnessed?
Sanders: I think, Nick, thats a good question. Ive thought about that a lot. I cant give you a definitive answer. But I think, to a significant degree, it resulted from the family life I grew up in. My father came to this country at the age of 17. He had no money, couldnt speak English. Never made a whole lot of money. He was a paint salesman. We lived, for the first part of my life, in a three-and-a-half-room rent-controlled apartment in Brooklyn, N.Y.
There was always a lot of tension in our house with regard to money. My mother, her dream was that she would own her own home. Not an apartment. She died young. She never achieved that dream. So there was always stress in the household over money. I learned that economics lesson at a very young age. Ive studied economics since. But I would answer your question knowing what lack of money does to a family.
Im not suggesting we were poor or hungry. That was not the case. But it had a major impact on my political thinking.
Full article: https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/la-times-interviews-bernie-sanders/
LWolf
(46,179 posts)it is giving meaning to many other smaller (delegate-wise) states whose late primaries are usually meaningless.
I'm grateful.
The whole thing is a good read; I especially liked the conversation around the ubiquitous question about how he'd get around obstruction in Congress to get things done; here's just a bit:
If you check my record going back to the House, there were many years where I passed more amendments on the floor with Republican support than any other member. So I know how to work with the Republicans.
But what I am suggesting to you, is that at the end of the day, the powers that exist in Washington Wall Street, who has endless supplies of money, the wealthy campaign contributors every day, the legislation that comes down is not the legislation that the American people want. It is often the exact opposite. Every poll thats out there [says] raise the minimum wage. Republicans, many of them now want to abolish the concept of the minimum wage. Rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. Republicans dont want to spend any money on infrastructure. Expand Social Security. Thats what the American people want. What do Republicans want? Cut Social Security.
How do we win? How do we take them on? You take them on when you say, Hey, Mitch, look out the window. Theres a million young people out there now. And theyre following politics in a way they didnt before. If you want to vote against this legislation, go for it. But you and some of your friends will not have your seats next election. Thats the way I do politics. And that is the way I believe were going to deal with our crises today.
He's said he can't do it alone. He's said he can't do it without us. Are there enough Democrats who WANT to engage in the fight to take this country back from the 1%, or do they just want to cast a vote in November and go back to their lives of complaining about how it's all the fault of Republicans?
That remains to be seen.
If the first, they'll vote for Sanders. If the second, they'll vote for Clinton and let the next 4 years be all about her, or about Trump; not about us.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)about working with the GOPers.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)It's quite simple.
Sanders has demonstrated that one can find common ground and work on that common ground without "compromising" previously made gains away, while not eroding that line in the sand while constantly backing up and drawing it again as the right-wing tide rolls forward.
Clinton has been part of eroding that line in the sand.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)"Shut up, get in line, and vote for the candidate we gave you."
Exactly.
If California goes too early, then the smaller states get overshadowed with "well, s/he won California so it's too hard to catch up now!"
Uncle Joe
(58,272 posts)Thanks for the thread, polly.
polly7
(20,582 posts)He's a good man ... I'd like you to clone him, please.
Uncle Joe
(58,272 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Thanks for posting.