Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
132 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Accusations of Vote Fraud at the Democratic Caucus in Alaska (Original Post) bravenak Mar 2016 OP
Me neither. I wonder what the issue was. nm floriduck Mar 2016 #1
After the second vote some Hillary people left bravenak Mar 2016 #8
In Washington, they could leave after the second vote floriduck Mar 2016 #16
Same thing here. bravenak Mar 2016 #20
Imagine that. Loki Mar 2016 #117
K&R.. Mahalo for caucusing for Hillary in Alaska, brave! Cha Mar 2016 #2
It was fun! bravenak Mar 2016 #9
Oh wow.. That does sound like Fun! Cha Mar 2016 #35
I guess the Tweets I posted can't be so easily dismissed now. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #3
??? 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #5
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #7
Another link Krytan11c Mar 2016 #10
I doubt it. There were six sources and I am Jewish and the son of a holocaust survivor. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #14
And you're also a journalist Krytan11c Mar 2016 #24
I did plenty of verification. There are six sources. That is four more than most journalists need. stevenleser Mar 2016 #27
And.. Krytan11c Mar 2016 #37
I only see one. BTW, are the other five sources I posted in my hidden posts accused of antisemitism stevenleser Mar 2016 #45
You see one, I see three nbd Krytan11c Mar 2016 #48
Supply an excuse for shabby partisan behavior sounds more like. Hortensis Mar 2016 #105
Scroll down Krytan11c Mar 2016 #120
You absolved yourself, of course, but those Hortensis Mar 2016 #122
Six twitter accounts. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #55
Aren't real "journalists" NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #121
I know the difference Krytan11c Mar 2016 #123
No, he's not a journalist by definition. Using his position NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #125
That was a bad hide. bravenak Mar 2016 #49
Yeah, that one was bull Krytan11c Mar 2016 #50
No prob bravenak Mar 2016 #51
It was fascinating to see your thread locked Dem2 Mar 2016 #17
Yep. I would say there is a double standard, but even that is too generous for whats happening stevenleser Mar 2016 #21
Yes, it is fascinating to see people cite antisemitic twitter accounts when it advances their cause. jeff47 Mar 2016 #29
It wasnt an antisemitic twitter account. And there are six sources. Not even a good try. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #31
Really? jeff47 Mar 2016 #34
By all means, lets bring Behind the Aegis, host of the Jewish group here to see if he agrees. stevenleser Mar 2016 #38
Because that would change the history of past tweets? jeff47 Mar 2016 #42
Don't hold your breath... Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #58
WHY THE HELL WAS THAT POST HIDDEN? 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #32
C'mon, you and I both know the answer to that question. stevenleser Mar 2016 #33
One of his main sources in that post has a history of antisemitic tweets. jeff47 Mar 2016 #36
How many jurors referred to that? ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #53
No idea, since I wasn't on the jury. jeff47 Mar 2016 #54
See my post #38. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #39
Guess not bravenak Mar 2016 #6
Not the first time for calls to arrest. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #12
I was shocked to hear that. bravenak Mar 2016 #15
Now you may know how others have felt, this day is over, on to the Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #23
Yep. bravenak Mar 2016 #43
Yes and we can still hold our heads high and stay on the high road Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #52
Not to mix metaphors... bvf Mar 2016 #59
One would think. Pretty fascinating actually. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #13
Fascinating ain't even the half of it. bravenak Mar 2016 #18
Yes they can, that was not harrasment from mythical bernie bros nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #19
Nope, they can't. Bravenak and I have talked privately about what was happening there. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #22
Of course you have nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #25
If you doubt it, ask her, she's right here. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #28
Why even bother Nadin? We have the party section in one corner and the potty section in the other. nc4bo Mar 2016 #26
I don't know, but hawaii might be cooking nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #30
Yep, I see what you mean. nt nc4bo Mar 2016 #46
Interesting. Thanks for posting and for caucasing, Brave lunamagica Mar 2016 #4
It was fun!! bravenak Mar 2016 #11
Voter fraud???? George II Mar 2016 #40
Yeah bravenak Mar 2016 #41
This should be investigated, I would think mcar Mar 2016 #44
I did! bravenak Mar 2016 #47
But you don't even like Hillary. nt Smarmie Doofus Mar 2016 #111
Whoops libtodeath Mar 2016 #115
Election fraud is a serious issue Lordquinton Mar 2016 #56
There was no Clinton interference bravenak Mar 2016 #57
#hillarybros Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #60
OMG bravenak Mar 2016 #61
Hope you had fun, bravenak Chitown Kev Mar 2016 #62
I had a great time. bravenak Mar 2016 #63
Awwww sooky sooky now! No wonder why a few folks are so BERRNED up that they couldn't shut you Number23 Mar 2016 #64
Same in person as here. Samesies. bravenak Mar 2016 #65
I TOTALLY get the rage now. They've been trying for months to shut you up. To run you off this site Number23 Mar 2016 #66
He was so EARNEST!! bravenak Mar 2016 #67
For shits and giggles, I just read quite a few stories in the int'l press on the haps today Number23 Mar 2016 #68
That's why she's losing 80/20, 70/30, in Washington, Alaska, Hawaii. delrem Mar 2016 #70
It's like the point I was making to bravenak just sailed over your head. And you still felt compelle Number23 Mar 2016 #71
He didn't just "win" those states. He won them decisively. delrem Mar 2016 #72
And she has won equally as decisively in other states with far more significant delegate counts Number23 Mar 2016 #73
Yes, you are correct. delrem Mar 2016 #74
Post them. Post EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. Right here in this thread. Number23 Mar 2016 #75
OK, with bravenak's permission, I will post them. /nt delrem Mar 2016 #76
Fuck that. You say you have PM's that prove your BS, I give you permission to post them right here Number23 Mar 2016 #78
No. The PMs were from bravenak. delrem Mar 2016 #79
POST THE PMs. I'm sure bravenak won't mind. Since you got PM's that show where I called every white Number23 Mar 2016 #80
You don't seem to be a friend of bravenak. delrem Mar 2016 #83
POST YOUR PM's. You raced into this thread to toss around your lies and now I'm saying "post your Number23 Mar 2016 #85
You seem disturbed. delrem Mar 2016 #86
I was fine until you came in with your garbage. Why don't you toddle off now and find someone else Number23 Mar 2016 #88
Hey, if that'll settle you down, OK. delrem Mar 2016 #89
I'd tell you exactly what to do with yourself, but you're not worth the hide Number23 Mar 2016 #90
Hey, it wasn't me who came up with the term "BernieBro", or #Berniesoblack delrem Mar 2016 #91
Neither bravenak or myself came up with it either. And how fucked up is it that you are acting as Number23 Mar 2016 #92
I've got a memory. Too bad for that. /nt delrem Mar 2016 #93
Anyone reading this thread can see what you "got." Nothing Number23 Mar 2016 #94
I invite all persons to read this thread. Let any of the poor buggers decide. /nt delrem Mar 2016 #96
The poor "buggers" will see you talking crap and scurrying away when repeatedly asked for proof Number23 Mar 2016 #98
Made it up bravenak Mar 2016 #99
Like I said, the hatred some here have for others is fucking astonishing Number23 Mar 2016 #100
My ignore list is so damn LONG bravenak Mar 2016 #101
They're not saying stuff TO you, brave Bobbie Jo Mar 2016 #130
Are they still at it? bravenak Mar 2016 #131
That one is on some real different shit ... LOL. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #119
I have never spoken about Number23 to you bravenak Mar 2016 #95
Post them bravenak Mar 2016 #97
OK delrem Mar 2016 #102
What does any of that have to do with her? bravenak Mar 2016 #103
Honestly, I wouldn't even worry about it Matt_in_STL Mar 2016 #104
No need to even bring him up bravenak Mar 2016 #82
Wow ... that one is really "interesting". n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #118
81.6 vs 18.4 percent. delrem Mar 2016 #69
Shit post Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #77
Bull bravenak Mar 2016 #81
Shit post I watched it Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #84
Like i care one damn bit what anybody thinks about my posts bravenak Mar 2016 #87
Yeah? How's the big Federal investigation going? The one where you claim to have received mean mail? DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #106
You sure do love reading my posts bravenak Mar 2016 #109
This message was self-deleted by its author DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #110
The feeling is mutual. bravenak Mar 2016 #112
Good enough. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #113
Then why are you constantly posting, bravenak? Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #107
Don't worry about what I do bravenak Mar 2016 #108
Ok, thanks for your concern. Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #114
After some important revelations I am sure that feeling is more then mutual. libtodeath Mar 2016 #116
Nice and redundant bravenak Mar 2016 #126
Make your bed thing ya know. libtodeath Mar 2016 #128
Sanders sent one of his many SuperPACs to Alaska. I suspect that like the rest of his campaign... CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #124
You do understand that when your hypothesis is based on a lie, the whole thing is bunk, don't you? DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #127
Sanders had a SuperPAC in Alaska whose office was set up next door to one of his campaign offices. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #129
Wow! He is doing that a lot and in every state. nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #132
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
8. After the second vote some Hillary people left
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:03 PM
Mar 2016

They (sanders supporters)wanted their votes thrown off but it had been certified after the second round. They also disagreed with the numbers too, but it had been certified by the party.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
16. In Washington, they could leave after the second vote
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:06 PM
Mar 2016

and it counted. Not sure how Alaska runs things. Thanks for explaining it to me.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
117. Imagine that.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:53 AM
Mar 2016

Not understanding the rules, or thinking the rules just don't apply to them. Sound Familitar?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
9. It was fun!
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:04 PM
Mar 2016

I got some free Hillary signs to put up in my windows. Need them for the General.

Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #5)

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
24. And you're also a journalist
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:09 PM
Mar 2016

Which means you should do some verifying before posting.

In light of recent events on this board people are taking even whiffs of antisemitism very seriously.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
27. I did plenty of verification. There are six sources. That is four more than most journalists need.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016

And that person is being accused of being antisemitic from one questionable tweet that is not particularly antisemitic.

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
37. And..
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:18 PM
Mar 2016

You know they are talking about the same event?
You asked these sources about what happened? Or did you just go off the tweets?
Is there any video?

And btw in the link i posted above there are 3 antisemitic tweets, obvious ones, not one iffy tweet.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
45. I only see one. BTW, are the other five sources I posted in my hidden posts accused of antisemitism
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:24 PM
Mar 2016

too?

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
48. You see one, I see three nbd
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:29 PM
Mar 2016

And as far as I know of no, they're not. However, you should know that one bad source can ruin a story.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
105. Supply an excuse for shabby partisan behavior sounds more like.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:36 AM
Mar 2016

As truth and free speech lovers (surely you are), shouldn't you deplore this hide?

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
120. Scroll down
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:01 AM
Mar 2016

You'll see that I called his hide in this thread bull. I didn't alert or serve on the jury for his other thread. I was just pointing out why it could have been hidden and having a discussion with him about it.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
122. You absolved yourself, of course, but those
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:20 AM
Mar 2016

who did this thing are not. Shabby excuses and none at all among those you are arguing on behalf of are all too common.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
121. Aren't real "journalists"
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:15 AM
Mar 2016

typically fair and unbiased as opposed to partisan? I think "pundit" is the word you were searching for.

Pundit - A pundit (sometimes also called a talking head) is a person who offers to mass media his or her opinion or commentary on a particular subject area.

Journalist - The social work and work-craft, and profession (high-level) of reporting on the events, facts, and people that are the "news of the day," such that a society is "informed,"and including the principles of — truthfulness, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness and public accountability — as these apply to the acquisition of newsworthy information and its subsequent dissemination to the public.

When he chose to advocate FOR a Hillary Clinton based on his "Opinion", and to use his position to actively work to the detriment of the Sanders campaign he ceased being a "journalist" and moved into the role of "pundit". A true journalist is unbiased in their reporting, not using their position to advocate.

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
123. I know the difference
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:15 AM
Mar 2016

He calls himself a journalist AFAIK. That's why I was pointing out the issues with his previous thread.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
125. No, he's not a journalist by definition. Using his position
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:21 AM
Mar 2016

to advocate for a particular candidate as opposed to fair, unbiased reporting, puts him in the role of paid punditry, or pay for advocacy under the seeming guise of journalism.

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
50. Yeah, that one was bull
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:34 PM
Mar 2016

BTW thanks for caucusing today even though I disagree with your choice of candidate.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
17. It was fascinating to see your thread locked
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:07 PM
Mar 2016

But a single anecdotal report by someone on Facebook - it's good.

Skinner needs to get to this jury issue sooner than later.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
21. Yep. I would say there is a double standard, but even that is too generous for whats happening
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:08 PM
Mar 2016

around here.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
29. Yes, it is fascinating to see people cite antisemitic twitter accounts when it advances their cause.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
34. Really?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

You might wanna actually break out that journalistic training and look at the past tweets from that account. They are rather interesting.

But hey, anything to advance your cause, right?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
38. By all means, lets bring Behind the Aegis, host of the Jewish group here to see if he agrees.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:18 PM
Mar 2016

I'll PM him. He and I have had many discussions about such things in the past.

I can predict what he will say and let's see if he agrees. He and I have noted that many folks who have seemingly had no interest in antisemitism and Jewish issues before will all of a sudden show extreme interest and elevate what is at most an insensitive comment to full blown Nazism if it satisfies a political cause of the moment. I'm betting he sees the one comment by that twitter poster exactly that way.

Stand by.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
42. Because that would change the history of past tweets?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:20 PM
Mar 2016

Ya got caught being sloppy. The proper thing to do is move on and not be so sloppy next time.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
36. One of his main sources in that post has a history of antisemitic tweets.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

I wasn't on the jury, but some might find that problematic.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
54. No idea, since I wasn't on the jury.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:49 PM
Mar 2016

The alerter could have pointed them to the tweet history. Or not.

Steve could post the jury results.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
6. Guess not
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:01 PM
Mar 2016

I was surprised at the disturbance. After such a great win, I thougt people would be cheering, not calling for arrests.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
23. Now you may know how others have felt, this day is over, on to the
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:09 PM
Mar 2016

Next primaries, thanks for working for Hillary. Don't fall to intimidation.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
18. Fascinating ain't even the half of it.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:07 PM
Mar 2016

There were thing going on the entire time that I will keep to myself.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
19. Yes they can, that was not harrasment from mythical bernie bros
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:08 PM
Mar 2016

nice effort at conflating, I give you a B, maybe a B+ for effort

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
25. Of course you have
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016

whatever buddy

She said she did not see anything in the OP, so what is it?

Anyway, watching hawaii myself.

and this from the OP_

Very interesting. I saw nothing wrong myself.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
26. Why even bother Nadin? We have the party section in one corner and the potty section in the other.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016

Neither are compatible with one another at this time.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
30. I don't know, but hawaii might be cooking
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:13 PM
Mar 2016

twitter is already full of reports, that of course I cannot confirm... so will give them the same validity as what Steven posted about mythical bernie bros. (That is until I find somebody I know in person)

George II

(67,782 posts)
40. Voter fraud????
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:19 PM
Mar 2016


Unbelievable, especially when you play the game from the outside in.

I guess the big problem was that some voters were distracted because they could see Russia from their caucus!

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
56. Election fraud is a serious issue
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 10:01 PM
Mar 2016

I'm sure it will be treated as seriously as all the documented reports of Clinton interference of Caucasus over the past several months.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
57. There was no Clinton interference
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 10:04 PM
Mar 2016

I was at the Caucus, so I know that it was all certified before I walked out.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
63. I had a great time.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:36 AM
Mar 2016

I have no idea who they wanted to go to prison... They just did not understand how the process worked, lol. It went on for a while before I started filming....

Number23

(24,544 posts)
64. Awwww sooky sooky now! No wonder why a few folks are so BERRNED up that they couldn't shut you
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:45 AM
Mar 2016

up??!

Girl, you are taking this to a whole 'nother level now! No wonder they are so pissed!!!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
65. Same in person as here. Samesies.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:48 AM
Mar 2016

I was kinda calmed after seeing it in person full force. Prison? OMG. And yes. I was told about the wonderful MLK. Because I must not have known anything about him. It was surreal. Like, never mind. Meeting 'you know who' in person. It was like that.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
66. I TOTALLY get the rage now. They've been trying for months to shut you up. To run you off this site
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:50 AM
Mar 2016

and you, not only have not left, but are now taking this shit right to 'em from an entirely different angle.

And yes. I was told about the wonderful MLK.

Do tell. I guess we should be comforted in knowing that the particular brand of paternalistic cluelessness that has blanketed this site for months on end is not just confined to DU.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
67. He was so EARNEST!!
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:52 AM
Mar 2016

Like he had finally found a student to teach. Like it was 'Dangerous Minds'... I told him I had to GO.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
68. For shits and giggles, I just read quite a few stories in the int'l press on the haps today
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:31 AM
Mar 2016

Without fail, every last story regardless of whether the news organization was left wing or not, was "Bernie sweeps Saturday! Still lags terribly behind Clinton" or "Bernie wins three states! Still faces massive shortcomings against front runner Clinton." Every one. Without fail.

Most of the articles noted that Clinton barely even refers to him anymore, she's lasered in on Trump.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
70. That's why she's losing 80/20, 70/30, in Washington, Alaska, Hawaii.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:51 AM
Mar 2016

It's like you guys haven't a clue.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
71. It's like the point I was making to bravenak just sailed over your head. And you still felt compelle
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:57 AM
Mar 2016

to respond. And her wins in Mississippi and South Carolina and other states was every bit as thorough as his wins today. The difference is, the states she won were heavy on delegates unlike the vast majority of Sanders' wins.

So let me do this again: "Sanders wins three states: STILL DESPERATELY LAGS BEHIND CLINTON" and "Sanders sweeps Saturday! Still has almost insurmountable delegate deficit to overcome."

She is still winning. Handily. Which is exactly what the press is saying and which you are desperately trying to act as though you don't understand.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
72. He didn't just "win" those states. He won them decisively.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:02 AM
Mar 2016

That's what you and bravenak don't get.

The meme you and bravenak have been running with is that Sanders' supporters are racists.
That meme isn't supported by facts. It's just pushed and pushed and pushed, relentlessly.
As if by a PAC.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
73. And she has won equally as decisively in other states with far more significant delegate counts
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:05 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:57 AM - Edit history (1)

Which is why she's winning the delegate count, the popular vote, the super delegate count and pretty much everything else.

The meme you and bravenak have been running with is that Sanders' supporters are racists.

Your guy is losing. Lying about me and bravenak won't change any of that. It really won't. Your post says everything that needs to be said about how psychotic this web site is now. You are flat out LYING about me.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
74. Yes, you are correct.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:07 AM
Mar 2016

But don't you tell me that you and bravenak haven't been calling "white progressives" who support Sanders racists.
Because you have. I have the PMs to prove it.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
75. Post them. Post EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. Right here in this thread.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:08 AM
Mar 2016

And let me add your bullshit to my post before you "accidentally" hit that self delete button:

delrem (9,253 posts)
74. Yes, you are correct.

But don't you tell me that you and bravenak haven't been calling "white progressives" who support Sanders racists.
Because you have. I have the PMs to prove it.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
76. OK, with bravenak's permission, I will post them. /nt
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:10 AM
Mar 2016

eta: I will post them all. My own responses included so full context is provided.
Why not?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
78. Fuck that. You say you have PM's that prove your BS, I give you permission to post them right here
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:11 AM
Mar 2016

Number23

(24,544 posts)
80. POST THE PMs. I'm sure bravenak won't mind. Since you got PM's that show where I called every white
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:15 AM
Mar 2016

Sanders supporter a racist, POST THEM.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
83. You don't seem to be a friend of bravenak.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:19 AM
Mar 2016

You don't know what you're trying to egg on.

Or maybe you do.

But I'm going to leave you go, buster.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
85. POST YOUR PM's. You raced into this thread to toss around your lies and now I'm saying "post your
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:24 AM
Mar 2016

proof" and you're posting every damn thing but proof. Most folks would have at least a twinge of decency to behave this way but it's clear that with some of you, the amount of hatred you guys have for certain folks here is fucking astonishing.

I don't know what I did to get on your bad side and I don't give the first damn about it. I'd do it all over again if I knew. I don't know what you people's problem is but I just thank God that you and the type of people you represent will never be my ally on ANY issue.

And I'm copying in this too just in case that self-delete button gets "accidentally" pressed:


delrem (9,258 posts)
83. You don't seem to be a friend of bravenak.

You don't know what you're trying to egg on.

Or maybe you do.

But I'm going to leave you go, buster.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
88. I was fine until you came in with your garbage. Why don't you toddle off now and find someone else
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:26 AM
Mar 2016

to lie about?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
90. I'd tell you exactly what to do with yourself, but you're not worth the hide
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:28 AM
Mar 2016

And I don't even care about hides.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
91. Hey, it wasn't me who came up with the term "BernieBro", or #Berniesoblack
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:37 AM
Mar 2016

or any of the fun stuff that you guys indulged in.
Don't give me credit for that.

I was kinda like "wtf", myself.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
92. Neither bravenak or myself came up with it either. And how fucked up is it that you are acting as
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:41 AM
Mar 2016

though we did? What is wrong with you?

Perhaps, instead of screaming "STOP CALLING ME A RACISt!!11" and covering your delicate ears, you could have actually read, listened and made even the tiniest effort to understand what the THOUSANDS of black folks that participated in those themes and other ones were trying to say.

But instead, it's apparently much easier for you NINE MONTHS LATER to come racing into a thread and accuse two posters here of doing something knowing good andgod damned well that we didn't. But we share the same melanin quotient as the folks that came up with with the #Berniesoblack tag so we gotta be guilty some kind of way, right? Do you people HEAR your damn selves?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
99. Made it up
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:56 AM
Mar 2016

I never discuss YOU with HIM. He was on ignore until this subthread. Putting him back on now, with everybody else.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
100. Like I said, the hatred some here have for others is fucking astonishing
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:58 AM
Mar 2016

I don't know what in God's name is wrong with so many of the people here. I truly don't. And I want nothing to do with so many of them.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
101. My ignore list is so damn LONG
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:02 AM
Mar 2016

And it feels GOOD. Just sayin. No need to abuse yourself reading nonsense anymore. You know I tried to reason. Nothing ever helped. I just say fuck it now and just post my ops and use ignore liberally. I know they saying stuff to me, and I enjoy not reading it.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
130. They're not saying stuff TO you, brave
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:51 PM
Mar 2016

They're saying stuff about you among themselves.

It's incredibly childish not to mention creepy as hell.
These targeted pile ons remind me of the crap you used to see in grade school, but we're talking about fucking grown people here.

I suppose there's safety in numbers, because it's never just one of them.

It needs to stop, and at this point I think admin needs to stop enabling this kind of harassment.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
131. Are they still at it?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:53 PM
Mar 2016

Kinda strange that people are always talking and thinking about me. I refuse to participate in that kinda stuff.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
95. I have never spoken about Number23 to you
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:53 AM
Mar 2016

I just looked through my pms because I was wondering wtf you were on about. You claimed I called you racist. I told you I don't care. I have them right here. I sent them to her. Now, post this evidence or just go on. Down to making stuff up at this point. Why in the name of all that's good would I EVER discuss her with somebody like YOU? I would not.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
102. OK
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:19 AM
Mar 2016

bravenak
I lied when I said I put you on ignore. Congrats on the election!

delrem
Re: I lied when I said I put you on ignore. Congrats on the election!
Mail Message

you hurt me in a way I hadn't been hurt in years!
I don't understand because I don't even know you.

bravenak
Re: Re: I lied when I said I put you on ignore. Congrats on the election!
Mail Message
I felt the same way!!

>
> you hurt me in a way I hadn't been hurt in years!
> I don't understand because I don't even know you.

delrem
Re: Re: Re: I lied when I said I put you on ignore. Congrats on the election!
Mail Message
Well, at this point I don't give a damn.
You call me a racist, I don't give a damn.
I just don't give a damn and I'm going to trash you for real.

Bye.

bravenak
Re: Re: Re: Re: I lied when I said I put you on ignore. Congrats on the election!
Mail Message
I call them like I see them. You treat all of us blacks like shit them complain when we notice. I don't give a fuck if you trash me you stupid vainglorious asswipe. You act fucking racist so u get called on it.
If it wasn't true ur stupid ass wouldn't be so pissed. Truth fucking hurts huh? After that black lives matters shit, we got a bunch of fucking racists on bernie's side. Deal with it. I can curse too fucktard.
> Well, at this point I don't give a damn.
> You call me a racist, I don't give a damn.
> I just don't give a damn and I'm going to trash you for real.
>
> Bye.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
103. What does any of that have to do with her?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:24 AM
Mar 2016

You said I said she called you ALL names. None of that said anything about her.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
104. Honestly, I wouldn't even worry about it
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:30 AM
Mar 2016

When an avowed anti-Semite goes around accusing everyone else of racism I think it is just a mechanism to cover up those racist beliefs.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
81. Bull
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:19 AM
Mar 2016

This is video evidence of the events today. You can talk mess, but you cannot say it did not happen.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
87. Like i care one damn bit what anybody thinks about my posts
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:25 AM
Mar 2016

Really. I do not care what any of you guys think about anything

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
106. Yeah? How's the big Federal investigation going? The one where you claim to have received mean mail?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:40 AM
Mar 2016

Tell me another one, bravenak. I love all of your stories.

Response to bravenak (Reply #109)

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
114. Ok, thanks for your concern.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:47 AM
Mar 2016

Heading to the beach with a friend today; will be live-recording another friend playing cajón, claves cubanas, shakers, several guitars and a ukele through an iPad and loopstation in a local bar here in the island village tonight.

It's good to relax every now and then.

Spring has sprung! 22°C!

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
124. Sanders sent one of his many SuperPACs to Alaska. I suspect that like the rest of his campaign...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:21 AM
Mar 2016

...they had trouble following the rules as well.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
127. You do understand that when your hypothesis is based on a lie, the whole thing is bunk, don't you?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

GDPro is played such that you're compelled to base your statements on verifiable facts.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
129. Sanders had a SuperPAC in Alaska whose office was set up next door to one of his campaign offices.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:59 PM
Mar 2016
http://time.com/4261350/bernie-sanders-super-pac-alaska-millenials/

The Anchorage-based America’s Youth PAC, made up almost entirely of former Bernie 2016 campaign staffers, is the latest unconventional outside group to throw its support behind the Vermont senator. Its leaders broke off from the Sanders campaign last week and have holed up in an old mall on the outskirts of town, just steps away from the official campaign’s office in the same building.

Now, what were you saying again? Yeah, I thought so.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Accusations of Vote Fraud...