2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHahahahaha!! They thought they can get away with fraud.
[link:https://twitter.com/Parker9_/status/713907623205076993|
desmiller
(747 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Onlooker
(5,636 posts)So far, it just seems like some anonymous claim being forwarded to the public by a very enthusiastic Bernie supporter, but if it's true the person should certainly be prosecuted, as should the people in Alaska who intimidated or even threatened Hillary supporters.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I saw allegations of fraud and we shared videos with each other to prove it false. Took two second for people to pull out phones and ipads. In this case they were just saying fraud but there was nothing going on.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)we don't need that much evidence.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)People say stuff.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Extraordinary claims deserve extraordinary evidence.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Response to RepubliCON-Watch (Original post)
TDale313 This message was self-deleted by its author.
CincyDem
(6,355 posts)"pics or it ain't true".
In today's day and age, there were probably dozens and dozens of people who could have taken a video of any part of this. Until one/many of them surface, this is just a twit tweet.
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)DU owners are also trying to sway the vote in their way to try election swaying. Shame on you DU owners.
I cannot vote on jurys because I am a Bernie supporter and that was your decision. How evil of you!!!
I think I would be better off at jackpineradicals.org.
You are evil!
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)That's like super duper evil, right?
MADem
(135,425 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)Why? Because someone disagrees with you?
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)That is so patently false I can't imagine why you would even say it. Bernie supporters vote on juries here all the time.
As far as the OP illustrating "more election fraud by the hill gang," perhaps you have noticed by now that so far not one scintilla of evidence has been presented. Election fraud is a serious crime and I would urge, if true, prosecution to the fullest extent of the law. The person in question allegedly had a designated precinct function and would be easy to identify by name. We haven't heard a name, we haven't seen a face, all we have is some anonymous internet story about a lady who "made Hillary cupcakes."
I do agree with your penultimate sentence.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)They:
1. used to refer to two or more people or things previously mentioned or easily identified.
"the two men could get life sentences if they are convicted"
2. used to refer to a person of unspecified sex.