Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Delegates: Sanders 956, Clinton 1234 -- 2383 needed to win (Original Post) TheDormouse Mar 2016 OP
Doesn't include most of Washington either. TDale313 Mar 2016 #1
Its actually going to be a lot closer. basselope Mar 2016 #2
If you factor in Segami Mar 2016 #5
yeah the map looks good going forward for Bernie TheDormouse Mar 2016 #3
Keep in mind that in WA the "party establishment" was also very heavily pro-Hillary strategery blunder Mar 2016 #4
NY is where momentum is so important. Barack_America Mar 2016 #6
Pennsylvania should concern you as well nt. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #7
hoping his registration drive there this week was successful. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #9
Viability and assignment Kittycat Mar 2016 #8
 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
2. Its actually going to be a lot closer.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:27 AM
Mar 2016

Out of 101 delegates from WA they have only accounted for 31 of them. 23 for Bernie 9 for Clinton. Most likely Bernie will end up with about 70 and Hillary with about 30... so after Hawaii, Bernie may be over 1000 and Clinton at about 1260, with some big wins still to come for Bernie.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
5. If you factor in
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:57 AM
Mar 2016

and assign the full WA 101 delegates (proportionally), Bernie will have trimmed Hillary's delegate lead by about 66.



Hillary - 1229 + 4 + 7 + 27 = 1267

Bernie - 933 + 12 + 18 + 74 = 1037


1267 - 1037 = 230 delegates (Hillary)

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
3. yeah the map looks good going forward for Bernie
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:30 AM
Mar 2016

But I am worried about NY. That's a LOT of delegates there, and Hillary has a leg up because she served as senator there, the Clintons live there, and they've got the party establishment, from Schumer on down, completely locked up there.

The saving grace is that it isn't winner-takes-all.

strategery blunder

(4,225 posts)
4. Keep in mind that in WA the "party establishment" was also very heavily pro-Hillary
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:16 AM
Mar 2016

Also our party establishment is also very pro-TPP because our state probably actually stands to net benefit from it, albeit at the expense of the rest of the Union. And yet, we all saw what the WA rank-and-file thought about THAT.

Now, that doesn't negate Hillary's other advantages in NY (current homestate, represented the state as Senator), but I'm not sure the party establishment is all that UNTIL it's reckoning time at the convention. The supers don't actually get to vote until AFTER the people have voted.

WA just gave our own party establishment a big "FU, we'll vote how we want, keep your thumb off the scales." Granted we don't have quite the influence as NY, but we are THE biggest caucus state by population (13th in the Union, the 12 above us are all primary states).

If anything, we just told everyone, "Don't let the supers control YOUR vote."

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
6. NY is where momentum is so important.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:16 AM
Mar 2016

I think he can close the gap considerably there.

I worry more about NJ and CT, actually.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
8. Viability and assignment
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:42 AM
Mar 2016

There were some areas that Hillary wasn't even viable in last night. So Bernie should receive more than just a state proportional split of delegates. Alaska for example, had 6 nonviable wins. I wonder how long until they're all assigned?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Delegates: Sanders 956, C...