Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:03 PM Mar 2016

Journalism 101: News vs Propaganda

News headline: Sanders wins in three western states, gaining on Clinton in delegate count.

Proaganda headline: Sanders wins in three western states; Clinton maintains huge lead in delegates.

It's called "framing" and it can take news and make it propaganda.

Which did your favorite "news" sources use?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
1. There are no facts, only interpretations. Friedrich Nietzsche
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:08 PM
Mar 2016

Interpretations frequently differ.

My interpretation: Bernie won three states by massive margins due to being the best candidate.

elleng

(130,644 posts)
2. Bernie Sanders Seizes 3 States, Sweeping Democratic Contests.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:14 PM
Mar 2016
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/us/politics/election-results.html?

Bernie Sanders crushes Hillary Clinton in Alaska, Washington and Hawaii.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/26/sanders-wins-washington-alaska-caucus-election-results-delegates-clinton

Bernie Sanders sets sights on Hillary Clinton's home turf after wins in west.
Senator voices optimism following success in Washington, Alaska and Wisconsin despite remaining well behind frontrunner in delegate count.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/27/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democratic-nomination-victory


Good point you're making. NYT not too bad, imo.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
3. Unfortunately I have NO favorite news source anymore. They all put out the propaganda by
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:15 PM
Mar 2016

the bushel full.
I did like MSNBC but Rachel is following her masters in order to keep her lucrative position and Olbermann is gone and Hayes is good, but he's not enough to keep me there.

Something else I've noticed, Rachel, Hayes, and others are now talking as fast as they can on their shows. I think it's to make more time for commercials, and I hate, hate, hate them.

Companies should only be allowed to show new products. How many times do I need to see the bears with the toilet paper?? I know we need toilet paper, I buy the kind I like and they will never sell me toilet paper unless it's a buy one get 4 (or more) free.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
4. MSNBC is -- and has always been -- like a nightclub stripper
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:33 PM
Mar 2016

She titillates you just enough to keep the money flowing.
But she has never had any intentions of going home with you.
(Unless, of course, you're willing to pay. And, trust me, you couldn't afford it.)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Journalism 101: News vs P...