Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:55 AM Mar 2016

Democrats in Denial: Hillary's Email/FBI Issues NBD, Edwards would NEVER cheat on his wife

let alone have a child he didn't acknowledge with another woman while his wife was dealing with breast cancer, and Bill never had sexual relations with "that woman"!

NBD = No Big Deal

Well, John's mistress was named Riley, the child's name is Frances, and the two continued their relationship through February 2015 (per Wikipedia), Bill got impeached because oral counts, and the FBI does not devote 150 people to investigating something unless they think some kind of major crime is involved.

If you don't like Bernie, who else do you think would be a good pick?

I personally think Bernie is the perfect candidate because he has actually been out there fighting for it and is not beholden to the people who appear to be involved with the folks being investigated by the FBI.

And for those who really believe the Clintons have been working strictly for the good of humanity, kindly get your fingers out of your ears, because they are NOT Jimmy Carter!!!

83 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats in Denial: Hillary's Email/FBI Issues NBD, Edwards would NEVER cheat on his wife (Original Post) IdaBriggs Mar 2016 OP
Agreed. Clinton is a much, much weaker candidate than Sanders. PatrickforO Mar 2016 #1
The cognitive dissonance among HRC supporters is staggering Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #2
Let me just say it before "they" do, we are men and how possibly could we understand "them" insta8er Mar 2016 #64
John Edwards had an affair, so clearly Hillary is going to be indicted. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #3
The Edwards example just highlights how people run when they clearly shouldn't be NWCorona Mar 2016 #5
It is called an analogy. It is a noun. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #7
What it is, is silly. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #17
And "denial is not just a river in Egypt" for the lose - thank you for playing! nt IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #28
Very original. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #45
I am not an ethicist but I don't see how cheating on your dying life is tantamount... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #8
A valid point - his cheating was morally horrible. Her "mistake" is IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #13
here's one that's really absurd bigtree Mar 2016 #4
Bernie is honest. Some Republicans find that refreshing. think Mar 2016 #9
His supporters, not so much. randome Mar 2016 #10
So there really isn't an FBI investigation of the presumptive Democratic nominee for president? think Mar 2016 #12
No. There isn't. Clinton is not the subject of an investigation. randome Mar 2016 #26
OK. For a minute there I thought investigation centered on Hillary's use of a private email server think Mar 2016 #29
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #15
The more you trash-talk Clinton, the less likely you will be supported. randome Mar 2016 #51
So what do you do? Trash-talk Bernie supporters. KPN Mar 2016 #57
I don't really trash-talk Sanders. randome Mar 2016 #58
So just put 'em on Ignore and be done with it. Buns_of_Fire Mar 2016 #60
Hey, it was the glorious dawn of pervasive television! randome Mar 2016 #71
+ 1 JoePhilly Mar 2016 #20
I kind of doubt that. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #78
Yeah .... cosmicone Mar 2016 #23
It's not "Free Stuff". It's SINGLE PAYER. Are you that afraid of the GOP that you can't even call think Mar 2016 #33
"confiscatory tax to dole out free stuff"... ljm2002 Mar 2016 #61
I bet lower income Republicans would prefer his redistributionist policies as long as you Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #67
Yeah .... cosmicone Mar 2016 #70
BENGHAZI! Dem2 Mar 2016 #6
Turns out the Benghazi investigation is leading to an FBI interview. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #11
Pushing the right wing scandal machine? Dem2 Mar 2016 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #16
LMAO!! Dem2 Mar 2016 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #30
C'mon. Dem2 Mar 2016 #41
Do you even know where Benghazi is? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #31
It's a committee designed to destroy a Democratic candidate, as admitted to by it's members. Dem2 Mar 2016 #40
So you believe the FBI and the NSA are now owned by the Right Wing? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #24
BENGHAZI!!!!!! = fake email scandal Dem2 Mar 2016 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #32
Right-wing attack machine. Dem2 Mar 2016 #39
Dude, you just proved the point -- how can you not get this? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #47
Yes, as initiated by the right-wing attack machine Dem2 Mar 2016 #50
Denial. In this scenario, your candidate is a victim. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #54
Another analogy Half-Century Man Mar 2016 #63
Nothing will come from these attempts to disqualify her Dem2 Mar 2016 #52
The FBI is under the jurisdication of the Obama administration pinebox Mar 2016 #49
Sorry that is not true. St Aug girl Mar 2016 #80
The Inspecter General of the DOS St Aug girl Mar 2016 #81
OK, but the Benghazi!! committee got the ball rolling. Dem2 Mar 2016 #82
Why don't you guys stop with the "people dislike Bernie supporters" bull sh*t pdsimdars Mar 2016 #65
FBI (and thus, at the top, Obama) =/= right wing Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #18
Bullshit!! Dem2 Mar 2016 #25
Actually you are wrong NWCorona Mar 2016 #35
Yep - apparently since nothing was on the government servers, IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #38
Thanks for pointing that out...dead wrong noiretextatique Mar 2016 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author Marr Mar 2016 #48
Golly, what a convincing argument! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #59
did you ever read her testimony? she lied repeatedly. The emails revealed this and were used against amborin Mar 2016 #21
+2 dchill Mar 2016 #46
Meh ... n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #19
John Edwards, unlike Bill Clinton, had no known history John Poet Mar 2016 #34
I was so disappointed in him. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #36
I was one who didn't believe the stories for the longest time. snagglepuss Mar 2016 #62
Screw the email thing, that'll get resolved one way or another, BUT-- John Poet Mar 2016 #37
Agreed, but the fact that the EMAILS ARE EVIDENCE IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #42
Yeah, it compounds the problem. Marr Mar 2016 #55
That is one of the best, single sentence summations I have EVER READ. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #56
Do you have any objection to my quoting this line in other threads? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #75
Oh no problem. :D Marr Mar 2016 #79
Their denial is endangering a lot of people. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #43
Nobody really knows what will or won't happen with this. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #44
What? Not taking sides? THEN YOU'RE PART OF THE CONSPIRACY! randome Mar 2016 #53
I've been reading these things and it definitely seems to be "something big" pdsimdars Mar 2016 #66
Independents in Denial: Sanders can appeal to a large percentage of minorities. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #68
So (if Hillary steps out due to "personal reasons") who do you like instead? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #69
He just did: HI, MI, OK, and AK noiretextatique Mar 2016 #74
K & R AzDar Mar 2016 #72
This is what really worries me..... vi5 Mar 2016 #76
Edwards has zero to do with Hillary. ZERO. Bad analogy. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #77
Disagree - the level of unnecessary STUPIDITY being displayed IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #83

PatrickforO

(14,570 posts)
1. Agreed. Clinton is a much, much weaker candidate than Sanders.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:57 AM
Mar 2016

If she's our nominee, there will be an 'October surprise' indictment and she will LOSE us the election.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
2. The cognitive dissonance among HRC supporters is staggering
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:59 AM
Mar 2016

I can never get past her bragging about Kissinger being her friend and advisor.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
7. It is called an analogy. It is a noun.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:06 AM
Mar 2016

Analogy: "a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification"

I hope this explanation helps you in your reading comprehension skills going forward in life.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
8. I am not an ethicist but I don't see how cheating on your dying life is tantamount...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:06 AM
Mar 2016

I am not an ethicist but I don't see how cheating on your dying life is tantamount to using a private e-mail server.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
13. A valid point - his cheating was morally horrible. Her "mistake" is
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:23 AM
Mar 2016

Being investigated for CRIMINAL INDICTMENT.

My analogy was more about how difficult it is for people to accept having been deceived by people we like, up until the evidence is beyond irrefutable.

I personally did not want to believe Edwards was such a skeeve. They celebrated their anniversary at a fast food restaurant, for heaven's sake. It was romantic and loving.

And he talked a married guy into pretending to be the father of his child. ICK.

Meanwhile, "just a private server" ended up with screen shots of Hillary's emails circling the globe *before* anyone in the public eye knew it existed. No danger to national security there!

on the "no danger" bit

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
4. here's one that's really absurd
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:03 AM
Mar 2016

...'republicans would support Sanders more than they would Hillary'

The more Sanders and his supporters push this right-wing republican bullshit, the more you all's credibility crumbles. I don't believe a fucking thing any of you say, at this point.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. His supporters, not so much.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:13 AM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

 

think

(11,641 posts)
12. So there really isn't an FBI investigation of the presumptive Democratic nominee for president?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:18 AM
Mar 2016

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
26. No. There isn't. Clinton is not the subject of an investigation.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:30 AM
Mar 2016

By the very logic of the OP, we should also fear that Sanders has some dark, unseemly past because, well, sometimes seemingly good people are really evil. Right?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

 

think

(11,641 posts)
29. OK. For a minute there I thought investigation centered on Hillary's use of a private email server
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:33 AM
Mar 2016

Silly me...

Response to randome (Reply #10)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
51. The more you trash-talk Clinton, the less likely you will be supported.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

I've said it before: it's hard not to at least root for Sanders to fail because of the smart-ass, vindictive, foul-mouthed supporters I see on DU every day. The last thing in the world I would want is for those posters to get validation.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

KPN

(15,642 posts)
57. So what do you do? Trash-talk Bernie supporters.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:18 AM
Mar 2016

Bet that works wonders for you -- I'm sure you feel better.

We Berners don't need to trash. All we gotta do is point out Hillary's record, including her flip flops (some call those lies, deceptions), and the issues she's embroiled in --email server, PAC funding/in bed w/ corporations Wall St., etc. .... It's about facts, not trash.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
58. I don't really trash-talk Sanders.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:23 AM
Mar 2016

Contrary to most Clinton supporters, I think he could win handily against Trump. And I don't particularly like Clinton but I have to acknowledge that the math is with her at this point.

Sure, Clinton has some 'image problems' to overcome but the email thing is not one of them. Periodic OPs like this to 'remind' us that she used a private server contribute nothing to the discussion. It's not like any minds are going to be swayed one way or another so why bother starting an OP if not simply to start yet another online fight?

It's the same with the periodic 'reminders' about the math. No one's going to change their minds so why don't we wait and see what happens next?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

Buns_of_Fire

(17,174 posts)
60. So just put 'em on Ignore and be done with it.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:34 AM
Mar 2016

Personally, I won't allow a couple smart-ass, vindictive, and foul-mouthed Bernie supporters to influence my decision any more than I'll allow a couple arrogant, dismissive, and entitled Hillary supporters to influence it.

But do as you think best, by whatever criteria you choose. I remember back when people voted for Kennedy over Nixon simply because Nixon had a sweaty lip during their debates.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
71. Hey, it was the glorious dawn of pervasive television!
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:02 PM
Mar 2016

No, I won't be put anyone on Ignore. Never have, never will. If I want to ignore the seething cauldron of online discussions, I'll just step away from DU for a while. Which is something I should do more often, come to think of it.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
23. Yeah ....
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:29 AM
Mar 2016

Republicans are really chomping at the bits to have confiscatory tax to dole out free stuff.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
33. It's not "Free Stuff". It's SINGLE PAYER. Are you that afraid of the GOP that you can't even call
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:39 AM
Mar 2016

it what it is?

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
61. "confiscatory tax to dole out free stuff"...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:46 AM
Mar 2016

...so I guess that means you're one of those Republicans who supports Hillary then?

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
67. I bet lower income Republicans would prefer his redistributionist policies as long as you
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:26 PM
Mar 2016

don't call it socialism.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
11. Turns out the Benghazi investigation is leading to an FBI interview.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:13 AM
Mar 2016

White Water was nothing but the next thing you know, Bill got impeached.

Wait!

Is it possible Hillary (who once famously assured the American public her husband would never cheat on her) might be WRONG AGAIN?

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
14. Pushing the right wing scandal machine?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:24 AM
Mar 2016

If there's one thing that makes people dislike Bernie supporters more than anything, it's coddling the right wing attack machine for political gain.

It's despicable.

I like Bernie a lot, many of his supporters, not so much.

Response to Dem2 (Reply #14)

Response to Dem2 (Reply #22)

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
41. C'mon.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:50 AM
Mar 2016

You know that's not true.

State Department Turns Over 1,600 Newly-Discovered Clinton Documents to Benghazi Committee

1 day ago
The House Select Committee on Benghazi announced it received the records on Friday, ...


You were saying?
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
31. Do you even know where Benghazi is?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:35 AM
Mar 2016

Or why it was/is significant? Or do you just repeat the word because you think it means something?

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
40. It's a committee designed to destroy a Democratic candidate, as admitted to by it's members.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:49 AM
Mar 2016

You can convince yourself now that it was not if it suits you.

State Department Turns Over 1,600 Newly-Discovered Clinton Documents to Benghazi Committee

1 day ago
The House Select Committee on Benghazi announced it received the records on Friday, ...


You were saying?
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
24. So you believe the FBI and the NSA are now owned by the Right Wing?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:30 AM
Mar 2016

Look, I am a reasonable person. I support Bernie. I can't support Clinton for a multitude of reasons, but honestly, I don't think she's going to make it to the convention before stuff starts flying.

I base this on my own reading and understanding of the situation.

If you don't agree that Bernie would be a good President, who else do you want there?

There are thousands of good quality Democrats in this country. If Hillary drops out due to "personal business" do you want to default to Bernie, or do you have another preference?

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
27. BENGHAZI!!!!!! = fake email scandal
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:32 AM
Mar 2016

They wouldn't even be investigating this if it wasn't for that bullshit committee.

You know what? Go ahead, help the right-wingers take down our candidate.

Did I not say I like Bernie a lot? Why make shit up out of thin air? I LIKE BERNIE.

It's his awful attack dog supporters who ruin it for him. I like him IN SPITE of jerks who hate Hillary and love Bernie.

I like them both.

Response to Dem2 (Reply #27)

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
39. Right-wing attack machine.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:48 AM
Mar 2016

You can convince yourself now that it was not if it suits you.

State Department Turns Over 1,600 Newly-Discovered Clinton Documents to Benghazi Committee

1 day ago
The House Select Committee on Benghazi announced it received the records on Friday, ...


You were saying?
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
47. Dude, you just proved the point -- how can you not get this?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:55 AM
Mar 2016

She was subpoenaed for stuff. She said it didn't exist. That was a lie.

The committee found out she lied because other people submitted the stuff because they had copies of the emails, too.

That is called cover-up, and it took President Richard Nixon out of the White House.

Then we start getting into the content of the emails....

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
50. Yes, as initiated by the right-wing attack machine
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:58 AM
Mar 2016

You admitted the right-wing Benghazi committee poked and prodded until they were able to find something they thought was untoward, even though it was unrelated to Benghazi directly.

You promote those who set up a committee designed deliberately to "get" Hillary, by hook or by crook.

Good job.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
54. Denial. In this scenario, your candidate is a victim.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:06 AM
Mar 2016

The Benghazi committee did their job - they found out someone was a) making bad decisions, b) sharing top secret communication with someone who didn't have clearance, c) illegally in possession of government property at a private residence, d) lying/spreading misinformation to the public about an attack on American diplomatic personnel, and e) netted information that has kept 150 FBI agents investigating criminal behavior.

To you, it looks like an attack on a Democrat. To me, I am shocked to say I think they were actually doing their job.

I think I just puked a little in my mouth. ICK.

ON EDIT: Benghazi is in Libya. Go google Blumenthal Libya and Blackwater to see why anyone cares.

Kind of done now. Sigh.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
63. Another analogy
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:55 AM
Mar 2016

Barney pulls over an out of town car and goes on a forty five minute rant about safety making the driver repeatedly cycle all the lights. Andy walks up to see what the commotion is all about, and sees the handle of a revolver sticking out from under the passenger seat. While searching the car, Andy finds 100 kilos of meth in the trunk next to a dead hooker.

The most controversial episode of "Andy Griffith" ever (snark).




Okay, the FBI is searching the car now. Everybody else is standing across the street speculation on what might be happening. Will they find any meth, a dead hooker, neither, or both?
When 150 Feds are carefully disassembling that car and tagging everything, it looks like something big is going on. Far more than proving a tail light was flickering due to corroded connections.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
49. The FBI is under the jurisdication of the Obama administration
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:58 AM
Mar 2016

You are aware of this, correct?
Dude you had better start reading up. You can start here http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-clinton-email-probe-20160327-story.html

St Aug girl

(29 posts)
80. Sorry that is not true.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:20 PM
Mar 2016

The FBI investigation started out of civil lawsuit on a FOIA request when the State Department found that it had zero records to disclose because they were archived on her private server because she did not use (apparently even once) her State Department issued email. It did not arise due to the Congressional hearing.

St Aug girl

(29 posts)
81. The Inspecter General of the DOS
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:25 PM
Mar 2016

Submitted a referral when DOS realized it had zero Hillary emails in violation of FOIA. Stop blaming this situation on Bengahzi.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
82. OK, but the Benghazi!! committee got the ball rolling.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:52 PM
Mar 2016
Other requests for Clinton records met the same fate — until the State Department received a demand from the newly formed House Select Committee on Benghazi in July 2014. The committee wanted Clinton’s email, among other things, to see what she and others knew about the deadly attack in Libya and the response by the U.S. government.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/how-clintons-email-scandal-took-root/2016/03/27/ee301168-e162-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
65. Why don't you guys stop with the "people dislike Bernie supporters" bull sh*t
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:05 PM
Mar 2016

That's just a meme, just another lie, doesn't exist in nature. It's something they made up so they'd have something to say, another finger to point.
If people dislike people, it's American voters who don't like Hillary, as seen in poll after poll. And they don't trust her either.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
18. FBI (and thus, at the top, Obama) =/= right wing
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:27 AM
Mar 2016

Right wing my skinny pale ass. This is an FBI investigation under a liberal, Democratic president's authority. This isn't partisan politics.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
25. Bullshit!!
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:30 AM
Mar 2016

Do I have to keep reposting how the email "thing" was directly derived from the Benghazi!! boondoggle?

Please!

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
38. Yep - apparently since nothing was on the government servers,
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:48 AM
Mar 2016

All FOIA search requests were coming up blank. One of the questions is whether that was one of the reasons it was done that way - to hide illegal activity from the public.

Almost 70K emails, and they only turned over half/deleted the rest because "they weren't work related".

Except the FBI recovered them, and oops! She was mistaken AGAIN.

Response to Dem2 (Reply #25)

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
59. Golly, what a convincing argument!
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:33 AM
Mar 2016

You can re-post ill-considered twaddle all you like. Won't make it one whit more convincing.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
21. did you ever read her testimony? she lied repeatedly. The emails revealed this and were used against
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:29 AM
Mar 2016

her during the proceedings:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511468802

Separately from this is the original crime----pressuring Obama to bomb Libya. The NY Times exposed this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511362141

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
34. John Edwards, unlike Bill Clinton, had no known history
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:41 AM
Mar 2016

of marital infidelity prior to that affair...


So I think I had at least some reason to be surprised at the way he jumped the shark there...

Damned politicians...


 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
36. I was so disappointed in him.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:43 AM
Mar 2016

I really liked him, prior to discovering he was scum. I felt so bad for his family - what a mess!

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
62. I was one who didn't believe the stories for the longest time.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:53 AM
Mar 2016

What is similar and disturbing is that both of them seem so undevious (yeah i know its not a word, but can't think of another word that fits). Bill OTOH has from the very get go struck me as slick and devious)

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
37. Screw the email thing, that'll get resolved one way or another, BUT--
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:47 AM
Mar 2016

leaks say that the larger portion of FBI agents are devoted to investigating possible corruption and QUID PRO QUOS between money received by the Clinton Foundation from foreign countries, and actions taken by Hillary's State Department in favor of those countries.

If there's anything there, then THAT is the much bigger 'problem' with her, easier for the public-at-large to understand, and goes way beyond violating security protocols, illegal though that may be...


Not a 'problem'-- but a complete campaign killer.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
42. Agreed, but the fact that the EMAILS ARE EVIDENCE
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:51 AM
Mar 2016

is getting ignored because "it's just an email server tech thingy" so who cares?

Except the FBI was able to retrieve the emails she and her staff deleted which is a whole nother world of hurt.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
55. Yeah, it compounds the problem.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:07 AM
Mar 2016

If this thing really is about Clinton essentially selling her services as Secretary of State to foreign interests, the presidency is a non-issue. She'll be lucky to stay out of a prison cell.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
75. Do you have any objection to my quoting this line in other threads?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:38 PM
Mar 2016

It is a brilliant summation of the real problem.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
43. Their denial is endangering a lot of people.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:51 AM
Mar 2016

Bernie is the most electable and for them to dismiss him for someone unlikable with the 150 fbi on her tail is just maddening and foolish beyond words.

I will keep donating to keep Bernie going. My car repairs can wait. This is way more important.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
44. Nobody really knows what will or won't happen with this.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:52 AM
Mar 2016

I understand that the hero worshiping devotees of Hillary have convinced themselves that it is nothing, but there is no evidence to base that on.

Some Bernie supporters believe that there will be some major fall out from this, but there is no evidence to base that on either.


We need to just ride this out. With any luck, something will be announced by the time the convention rolls around.

Of course, then The House and Senate investigative committees will fire up and turn it into another Benghazi witch hunt, but we are not there yet. It is reasonable to assume that the conclusions of the FBI will be fact based and not just political leverage.


Lets just hope the FBI finishes up before the GE heats up. If not, it could get ugly.



 

randome

(34,845 posts)
53. What? Not taking sides? THEN YOU'RE PART OF THE CONSPIRACY!
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:02 AM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
66. I've been reading these things and it definitely seems to be "something big"
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:22 PM
Mar 2016

My main question is if anything will actually happen. will there be any consequences? I read a lot of the opinions, . but the rich and powerful always tend to get away with it. What ever happened with Reagan and the arms deal with the contras? It is sickening. . . But Nixon had to step down.
Where is the threshhold or the rhyme and reason that would give us a handle as to what might be the consequences?
Will she really be able to waltz right through the race to the convention and possibly beyond?

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
69. So (if Hillary steps out due to "personal reasons") who do you like instead?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:45 PM
Mar 2016

Assuming it all has to be negotiated at the convention (like may happen to the Republicans)?

Kerry is phenomenal at state/lost and didn't fight in 2004, Biden is still dealing with the loss of his son, Warren is very powerful in the Senate -- what are your preferences?

Treat it as a hypothetical, worst case scenario. I still like Bernie personally, but I always saw O'Malley as "fighting for VP" and don't know much else about him.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
76. This is what really worries me.....
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:49 PM
Mar 2016

I never, ever in a million years believed Edwards would run for president, accept the VP slot or seek a national profile while having an affair while his wife was battling cancer. I never believed ANYONE could be that fucking stupid.

Since finding out the truth I don't assume ANYONE no matter how politically savvy they are would not be THAT...FUCKING....STUPID.

That's not to say I think Hillary's e-mails are anything other than the usual witch hunt, but the fact is that sometimes witch hunts turn up the unexpected.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
83. Disagree - the level of unnecessary STUPIDITY being displayed
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:19 PM
Mar 2016

is shockingly similar.

All she had to do to avoid the "email scandal" was use a dratted desktop for work and keep her personal Clinton Foundation stuff separate Just Like All the Other Employed Grown-Ups Do.

Now her supporters are going to do the denial/betrayal dance, just like we all did with Edwards.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democrats in Denial: Hill...