HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Arizona Sec of State admi...

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:28 PM

Arizona Sec of State admits voter party registrations were switched

Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan (R) just admitted to the AZ House elections committee that some voters' party affiliations were changed, which led to them not being able to cast normal votes on the presidential preference election day last week. Some of those voters cast provisional ballots as a result. Reagan says this happened to someone in her own office.

She says her staff are now reviewing paper registration forms to try to pinpoint where the problems occurred. She also said that they have made counting the provisional ballots a top priority.

http://www.abc15.com/live

66 replies, 4606 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 66 replies Author Time Post
Reply Arizona Sec of State admits voter party registrations were switched (Original post)
TheDormouse Mar 2016 OP
ibegurpard Mar 2016 #1
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #5
pacalo Mar 2016 #14
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #16
ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #21
PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #49
pacalo Mar 2016 #18
LineLineLineLineReply .
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #19
pacalo Mar 2016 #26
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #28
Politicalboi Mar 2016 #27
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #29
DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #41
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #43
DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #44
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #45
bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #55
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #60
bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #61
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #62
bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #63
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #64
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #51
ibegurpard Mar 2016 #56
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #59
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #34
Dem2 Mar 2016 #36
JudyM Mar 2016 #39
Dem2 Mar 2016 #50
apnu Mar 2016 #37
SheenaR Mar 2016 #42
apnu Mar 2016 #46
HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #38
GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #2
Gwhittey Mar 2016 #6
LonePirate Mar 2016 #12
Gwhittey Mar 2016 #15
Karma13612 Mar 2016 #31
LonePirate Mar 2016 #33
TheDormouse Mar 2016 #47
Karma13612 Mar 2016 #57
Snotcicles Mar 2016 #7
VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #9
ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #22
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #3
TheDormouse Mar 2016 #4
NV Whino Mar 2016 #24
brooklynite Mar 2016 #8
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #10
DURHAM D Mar 2016 #11
LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #13
GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #17
brooklynite Mar 2016 #20
ibegurpard Mar 2016 #58
pat_k Mar 2016 #23
TheDormouse Mar 2016 #25
pat_k Mar 2016 #30
amborin Mar 2016 #32
ViseGrip Mar 2016 #35
JoePhilly Mar 2016 #48
Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #40
EyeOnLife Mar 2016 #52
Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #53
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #54
Peachhead22 Mar 2016 #65
Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #66

Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:30 PM

1. And not a word from Hillary

Still sitting on her "win" there...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ibegurpard (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:32 PM

5. Clinton won AZ, there's no need for scare quotes, and she's not the one

 

at fault.

If people care about vote suppression, they'll stop using it as an excuse to launch cheap shots in the primary contest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:50 PM

14. Quote marks are used in lieu of the term "so-called".

Nothing "scary" about that. See how that works?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pacalo (Reply #14)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:54 PM

16. Clinton won AZ. People on the Internet irrationally deny all kinds of facts.

 

I know how scare quotes and 'so-called' works. Republicans use it when they refer to "Obama's so-called birth certificate."

The meaning is crystal clear, even though the thought process behind it is not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:07 PM

21. Maybe she didn't win. We'll never know how many Sanders voters were disenfranchised. I would bet

 

there were many more than Hillary voters. Explains Hillary's bizarre silence on what should be a slam dunk issue for a true progressive to address. Gives the appearance of hiding something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ThePhilosopher04 (Reply #21)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:08 PM

49. She should be screaming.

There's a chance this type of bs could bite her in the butt come election day. If she thinks that Republicans won't try to commit fraud on voting machines she's sorely mistaken.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:04 PM

18. The term "scare quotes" doesn't make sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to geek tragedy (Reply #19)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:19 PM

26. DU is the only place I see it.

I think it is used here as a slur.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pacalo (Reply #26)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:20 PM

28. you are incorrect, it is not an uncommon phrase

 

this is usually the case when a phrase has its own Wikipedia entry

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:20 PM

27. Like launching a cheap husband to the polls

 

That's voter suppression too. But to some, we just need to get over it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #27)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:21 PM

29. lol, Clenis Interreptus nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:59 PM

41. How do you know she won? They just held a thoroughly corrupt election.

 

You know, the one you're not interested in doing anything about. I think we should see who actually won the state.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DisgustipatedinCA (Reply #41)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:06 PM

43. We know who won. Clinton did. Period. That some Sanders dead enders choose to wallow in absurd

 

conspiracy theories when he lost by 70,000 votes--15% margin-- doesn't change that fact.

There was vote suppression, but there's no evidence of any kind of fraud. And the vote suppression that occurred did not single out Sanders supporters, it affected Sanders supporters, Clinton supporters, and also Trump supporters and Cruz supporters.

That's the scandal, not some Infowars nonsense about Clinton stealing an election.

No one outside the Bernie Bubble is disputing that Clinton won Arizona.

We know she won the same way we know Sanders won Michigan and Oklahoma. They counted the votes and one candidate had more than the other, in this case by a WIDE margin that was picked up in polls.

Sore loserism is not a good look.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #43)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:08 PM

44. That's not a truthful claim.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DisgustipatedinCA (Reply #44)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:09 PM

45. You are free to deny reality if you want.

 

But do not blame those who live outside the Bernie Bubble for not taking sore loser conspiracy theories seriously.

The vote suppression is a very real problem.

Sanders supporters whining about losing, not so much.

There is ZERO evidence that Clinton didn't win the state.

ALL EVIDENCE AND FACTS SHOW SHE WON THE STATE.

Sore loser temper tantrums are not a substitute for evidence and facts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #45)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:01 PM

55. Its in all caps, it must be true!

The fact is voter suppression occurred, and until it is investigated to know how much, your claims are null and void.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bobbobbins01 (Reply #55)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:05 PM

60. Vote suppression occurred, and as a matter of legal fact Hillary Clinton

 

won the state of Arizona and a majority of its pledged delegates, according to the official count of ballots.

You can dwell in your alternate reality where some evil conspiracy you can't even imagine let alone describe stole it from Bernie (who was massively behind in the polls), but that has about as much relevance as King Canute ordering the sea back.

TL; DR: Hillary is getting the majority of delegates from AZ, regardless of any sour grapes thrown her way.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #60)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:19 PM

61. So you think voter suppression occured without it being a conspiracy?

How did it happen then? Some fat fingered intern just hit the wrong keys a few times? Bernie outperforms polling, so him being behind in the polling wouldn't stop them from suppressing the vote, they wouldn't want another Michigan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bobbobbins01 (Reply #61)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:39 PM

62. yes, Republicans are capable of vote supression and running a poor records

 

organization without help from Hillary Clinton.

Here's a hint: Hillary Clinton is not the root of all evil. Maybe y'all will realize this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #62)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:41 PM

63. Ok, but you did see how Sanders supporters were disproportionately effected, right?

So this was a republican conspiracy against him? I'm not sure what it is you're claiming anymore.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bobbobbins01 (Reply #63)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:43 PM

64. no I haven't seen any evidence that there was a targeting of Sanders

 

I've seen lots of online speculation to that effect. But nothing showing that there was any systemic or systematic bias against Sanders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:56 PM

51. The more Bernie supporters accuse Clinton, when it is the GOP responsible, the easier

it is for the GOP to do it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Reply #51)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:02 PM

56. I'm not implying Clinton is responsible

I'm stating it's fucking disgusting for her to sit on her "win" (and I use the quotes because the entire fucking election was a farce) rather than forcefully advocate something be done a out it. This is just further evidence of what kind of politician she is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ibegurpard (Reply #56)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:04 PM

59. Exactly, she is a POLITICIAN, look at what I just told someone else

as regard Hillary not wanting to debate now



You are obviously intelligent and have been around, you know the game they all play.

Would Bernie now not want to debate if he was ahead? Who knows, he is a unique duck, for sure.

But comparing Hillary to him is ridiculous when Bernie is one of a kind when compared to ALL other politicians.

That is what is so untenable about the Bernie or Bust idea, to hold the Bernie ideal up makes no sense when ALL (just about all anyway) others are typical politicians.

Which is why I support Bernie but will support Hillary if I have to.

Makes perfect sense, if you are able to admit it.


Can you admit this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ibegurpard (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:31 PM

34. Would you expect anything different? This is how she has become so hated. /

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ibegurpard (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:42 PM

36. Lol

Any opportunity to kick Hillary!

It's her fault that Republicans fucked up some people's registrations and her, being pragmatic, is wait and see until they can investigate, like most normal people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dem2 (Reply #36)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:55 PM

39. No, she in no way sets the tone for her minions by circumventing rules and ethical standards. Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JudyM (Reply #39)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:54 PM

50. Does she?

Fact checkers seem to say otherwise?

I need help here because I like both candidates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ibegurpard (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:50 PM

37. It is pure fiction to think Hillary had anything to do with this.

The fuckup in AZ has been done by Republicans. There is no chance in hell they are working with Hillary on anything. They hate her and they fear her, more so than Bernie. They actually want Bernie in the GE, not Hillary.

Arizona is a deep red state, an ex-slave state, and a place with a history of suppression of minorities. It was directly affected by the Voting Rights Act which prevented the state from doing exactly what it did this year. But since the SCOTUS gutted the Voting Rights Act, the number of polling places in Maricopia County alone was less than half of what they had in 2012. (was 200, down to 60). The reduction was done under the auspices of "cost". Which is exactly one of the things the South did under Jim Crow.

There is zero chance Hillary is involved in that also.

Voter suppression happened in AZ, and its all at the Republican's feet. They did this, no one from the Democratic side has anything to do here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to apnu (Reply #37)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:02 PM

42. Why oh why

are Republicans trying to get Dems not to vote in the Dem Primary? GE I understand. This was deliberately done at the highest level of computer clearance.

Who stood to gain more from this... AZ Republicans or Sec. Clinton?


Edit: I am not accusing Sec Clinton. But it's a fair question as to who would stand to gain more and to counter your "zero chance" comment. It's America. There is always a chance something crappy went down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SheenaR (Reply #42)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:39 PM

46. Because the GOP are racist, bigoted pricks in AZ.

It is what they do. Its their own incompetence and hatred of the "other" resulted in this mess.

Making it hard to get to the polling place in poor and non-white areas solidifies the majority's grip on power. It stuff's down change and progress.

Any Democratic gain in AZ would be progress, and the Republicans can't have that. So to answer your question, the Republicans have more to gain than Hillary at suppression of the vote. Are they sitting around some smoke filled back room cackling about their plan to suppress the vote? Probably not. But their disinterest the plight of non-whites, and the poor, leads them to say "fuck those guys, I don't want to pay for polling places for them in Phoenix" There's the racism and bigotry.

Hillary is good at her job as a politician. She believes keeping her trap shut in this situation is the smartest play. Might not be the play we, the liberal, the progressive, and the Left, want her to play, but its the smart typical political way to go. By being quiet, she gives the Republicans all the rope they need to hang themselves on this issue. And hang themselves they are.

Now Bernie disagrees with that. He's a full throated roar guy, and so are his followers. They shake trees and rage at the storm. That's also right and good to do, but gives the R's less rope to hang themselves. They'll still hang themselves, because they're so inept in Arizona they can't help but do so. And through Bernie's tactic we, on the left, get to have fun shouting about it too. Because if Bernie does it (or any other pol for that matter), that gives us implied permission to do the same.

Consider this, who owns this "computer clearance"? Who has to keep track of party affiliation for Arizona's closed primary system? Who prints the ballots? Who buys and administers the voting machines? The polling places are neutral, its not like the caucus system where parties meet in different locations, these are the actual polling places that are used in every election, be it primary or general.

The answer to that question is the State and the county after that. Since AZ is deep red and Democrats have the smallest of toe-holds there, the systems are controlled by the Republicans. There is no way Hillary Clinton has anything to do with those systems. She or her national staff can't have touched them in any way. As for local Democrats, keep in mind that in Maricopia county out of five board supervisors, four are Republicans. You don't seriously think they are in cahoots with Hillary Clinton do you?

I'm not saying shenanigans didn't occur in Arizona, they did. I'm saying there's "zero chance" Hillary had anything to do with it. It was the Republican controlled government that closed the polling places in the past 4 years. It was the Republican controlled government that holds the computer system that tracks party affiliation, this is all on them.

Conservatives have a history of doing this stuff, one of the ironies of American politics is the Republican's spend a lot of time and energy crowing about how broken our election system is and why we need road blocks to register voters and also to have voter IDs and all that neo-Jim Crow stuff they yammer about, but they're the ones caught when the system goes pear shaped.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ibegurpard (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:53 PM

38. Winners usually grin, it's losers who usually want a new deal n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:30 PM

2. Ooooo Doggie

 

All these Hillary supporters were calling people conspiracy theorists. Turns out it was all true.

We need to abolish closed primaries; In GA we have open primaries and it works fine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:32 PM

6. Yea odd the open primaries where fine

 

when it was SC. But now it is a problem. I voted in SC and it seems better to not worry about who or what party it has me listed under.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gwhittey (Reply #6)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:43 PM

12. I think deadlines and mistaken memories plague closed primaries more than people want to admit.

I'm sure plenty of people did change their party affiliation. Yet, did all of them do so before the necessary deadlines? Were they aware of any such deadlines, if they existed? Are they misremembering when they changed affiliations? Or did they meet all of the deadlines but some bureaucrat or some form taker screw up, either intentionally or accidentally?

I fully expect to hear numerous reports of people not being allowed to vote in NY's upcoming primary despite changing their affiliation months ago (Nov. - Jan.) even though you had to change it by the Oct. deadline.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LonePirate (Reply #12)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:53 PM

15. Well AZ

 

They just testified that many people where switched for some undermined reason.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LonePirate (Reply #12)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:24 PM

31. Our local Board of elections here in rural (red area)

NY has already stated that due to a high volume of registrations, they were overwhelmed.

Ooops might happen.....

Can't wait to see what happens on April 19th, our NY Closed Primary day.

THERE.WILL.BE.TEARS.

And I am already worried that my Democratic affiliation might mysteriously switch and when I show up at my polling place, they tell me I can't vote.

I will be livid.

And that doesn't even cover the fact that we have the most remote/longest deadline between switching affiliation, and primary day :

six months

The deadline to switch affiliation from XXX to Democratic in order to vote in the Democratic primary was back on the First Friday in October.

Yes, you are right, that was BEFORE the first Democratic debate.

So, you are blank-out-of-luck if you watch a few debates, and decided it might be nice to switch from the Independent or Green party to the Dem party to vote for Either Hillary or Bernie.

Nope, the Dem party won't get your vote.

Yea, I just love closed Primaries.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Karma13612 (Reply #31)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:28 PM

33. Any registration postmarked or received before the deadline should be accepted.

At the very least, the names of these voters should be added to a list that automatically accepts provisional ballots if their registrations cannot be processed in time for the actual election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Karma13612 (Reply #31)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:02 PM

47. check your registration NOW; why wait until election day?

You can check online.
(And if for some reason you can't, you can go to the office of elections and check in person.)

This goes for everybody.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Reply #47)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:02 PM

57. Oh, you can be sure I will.

I haven't figured out how to do it on line, but I have a day off coming up soon, before the primary, so I am going to visit the local BOE and just double-check.

I also have a little postcard I got before the last opportunity vote, and it clear states I am registered as a Democrat. So, there's that proof at least!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:33 PM

7. Michigan too. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:35 PM

9. Sounds like a hearty helping of crow deserves to be eaten to me. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:08 PM

22. Those who trash whistle blowers are usually guilty

 

chickens coming home to roost.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:30 PM

3. that's some rare candor nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:31 PM

4. Sec of State also said the state did not tell the counties

not to post any vote tallies until all the polls were closed, even though it is illegal for the state to release tallies before the polls are closed, because, according to her, the state did not have statutory authority to tell the counties not to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:12 PM

24. Huh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:34 PM

8. I'm confused; how do I blame this on HC and DWS?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #8)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:37 PM

10. cite something by some anonymous bloggers nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #8)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:37 PM

11. You don't need a reason.

Just go for it..................




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #8)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:48 PM

13. Well if it wasn't someone elses fault then it must be HC and DWS.

Does that work? It usually works for those that don't want to know the facts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #8)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:57 PM

17. Who has blamed HRC or DWS for this? We were told that...

 

All of this talk of voter registrations being switched was a lie and Sanders' supporters were just too lazy to register in time to vote... Nice try on the baiting though

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #17)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:06 PM

20. Hillary Clinton's Election Fraud in Arizona Exposed

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511593507

Hillary Clinton's Election Fraud Masterpiece

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511562203

Not at all unbelievable, Hillary has counted on cheating to get her lead

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280154594 #3


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #8)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:04 PM

58. you don't have to blame them

To wonder why the hell they aren't raising the roof about it...because she doesn't want to taint her "win." She is the type of disgusting politician that us wrong with our entire aystem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:08 PM

23. Wow! Provisional ballots will actually be counted! (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pat_k (Reply #23)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:13 PM

25. I didn't quote her verbatim; there was some wiggle room in there

about focusing on provisional ballots. Not sure she meant they will all be counted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Reply #25)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:12 PM

30. Checking registration paper trail...

...and making provisional ballots a "top priority" sounded pretty promising. Of course, I could be reading it too optimistically.

I guess we just need to wait and see.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:26 PM

32. so the provisional ballots will be added in?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:40 PM

35. Hillary's silence places her on the other side of democracy.

 

This goes beyond Bernie getting a few more AZ delegates, as they are going to count the provisional ballots. There should be no member on DU against counting the votes, and applying them correctly. No one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ViseGrip (Reply #35)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:05 PM

48. She should suspend her campaign, or she hates America!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:59 PM

40. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, TheDormouse

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:57 PM

52. She needs to spend time in Tent City.

 

I'd say life would be just fine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:57 PM

53. "It happens sometimes. People just explode."

"Natural causes"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:59 PM

54. They already acknowledged they were hacked!

What is she talking about she will try to pinpoint

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:43 PM

65. This is why I don't want Trump in the General

Because 'shit happens'. And when it's an election 'shady shit happens'.

Even though either of our candidates would beat Trump like a drum if it was a totally honest election. That dangerous idiot on the ballot means he's just one step from the White House. And in elections, shit happens. Often shady shit happens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheDormouse (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:50 PM

66. Link does not work for me---just commercials...is there text? nt


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread