HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Mother Jones: "This Is Ho...

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:55 PM

Mother Jones: "This Is How Bernie Sanders Will Win the Nomination"

Link to This Is How Bernie Sanders Will Win the Nomination; excerpt:

After sweeping victories in three contests over the weekend, Bernie Sanders' campaign has a message for Hillary Clinton: "Reports of our death are greatly exaggerated."

Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver made that statement on a conference call with reporters on Monday, during which top aides argued that Sanders can still overcome Clinton's delegate lead in the Democratic primary contest. ... "We are certainly in this to win it," said Weaver, "and there is a path to do so."... Going forward, the Sanders campaign said it would compete in all upcoming contests, including Wisconsin on April 5, New York on April 19, California on June 7, and even in Washington, DC, the final Democratic contest on June 14. The campaign was optimistic that it would overtake Clinton's pledged delegate lead—she is currently ahead 1,243 to 975, with 2,383 delegates needed to clinch the Democratic nomination...


9 replies, 1317 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
Reply Mother Jones: "This Is How Bernie Sanders Will Win the Nomination" (Original post)
Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 OP
dubyadiprecession Mar 2016 #1
musiclawyer Mar 2016 #2
pdsimdars Mar 2016 #3
Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #4
paulthompson Mar 2016 #6
Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #8
MADem Mar 2016 #5
MadBadger Mar 2016 #7
BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #9

Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:36 PM

1. CNN just reported he needs 77% of the remaining delegates...

in the rest of the country to win the nomination.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dubyadiprecession (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:03 PM

2. And CNN is lying.

If you are watching corporate tv exclusively you see nothing but disinformation. Turn it off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dubyadiprecession (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:03 PM

3. They need a smiley with the head up its ass.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dubyadiprecession (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:29 PM

4. You know that's bullshit, right? Sanders needs about 56% of the remaining vote to go into the caucus

with a majority of pledged delegates.

If you like Nate Silver (and must Hillarians do), his state-by-state analysis suggests that Sanders is achieving about 92% of where he should be in the delegate count to be on track for a win.

That may sound like a steep climb, but it is actually good news for Sanders.

Nate Silver's projection is assuming that the race is tied and has been tied fro the beginning and will be tied through to the end (i.e., his projection is assuming a static race).

In February, Sanders was only hitting 81% of his target.

In the first half of March, Sanders improved to 84% and then 86% and then 88% of his target.

In the second half of March, Sanders improved to 89% and now 92% of the target.

This steady improvement has been the result of the fact that Sanders is not just meeting his targets to win in recent states; he surpassed his most recent targets to win in Democrats Abroad, Idaho, Utah, Alaska, Hawaii, and Washington.

Here is why:



That's a chart of all the live cell phone plus landline national polling of likely voters in 2016.

Nate Silver's "targets" assume a static race, BUT THE RACE ISN'T STATIC. Hillary's lead is steadily falling from 15% to 5% in 2016 (and if you consider that her biggest leads are in states that have already voted but which are nevertheless included in the nationwide polling, she is likely no longer leading in the part of America that has not voted yet). The fact that Sanders started the race hitting about 81% of his target and is now exceeding his targets by so much so that he has improved his overall performance from 81% of his goal to 92% of his target shows that Sanders' performance is improving dramatically.

In terms of where Sanders "should be" in the pledged delegate race to remain on target to win, he's only 92 pledged delegates short of where he ought to be in order to be on track for a win.

Hillarians like to pretend that she's crushing (because she did crush in the Bible Belt and she's been coasting on that delegate lead since then) but she's only 92 pledged delegates ahead of where she ought to be if she's on track to win.

The reason why Sanders is only 92 delegates short of his goal despite the fact Hillary is about 230 pledged delegates ahead of Sanders is that Hillary's best states were front-loaded onto the primary calendar and Sanders best states were back-loaded and he's only just started dipping into the progressive pro-Sanders part of the primary calendar.

As the national race tips more and more in favor of Sanders (as the graph shows), it should become easier and easier for Sanders to exceed his goals in more and more states and get to 100% of his total pledge delegate target by the end of the race.

Keep in mind, Hillary is still the favorite, and Sanders is still the long-shot underdog, but the race remains very winnable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:03 PM

6. Numbers

It's a simple fact that there's a big difference in support in the South and the rest of the country.

Clinton beat Sanders an average of 66% to 34% in the South. Sanders has beat Clinton 54% to 46% everywhere else. All the South has voted, except Kentucky. Sanders needs 56.5% of the vote in the remaining states to lead the pledged delegate race.

It'll be tough, esp. with some states like New York coming up, but 54% is not that far off from 56.5%.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to paulthompson (Reply #6)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:51 AM

8. Exactly It's an uphill battle, but it's definitely within grasp.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:40 PM

5. SUBTITLE (on the website): According to the Sanders campaign.

And they took note of the fact-based pushback to this narrative, as well:





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:07 PM

7. Your blurb at least doesnt say how he is going to win

It just says he is going to compete.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:14 AM

9. Bernie has a narrow path, but there is some pretty weak spin by Jeff Weaver in there

Bernie has lost a number of states where he competed, including some by a wide margin. He did a bunch of campaign events in Florida. He made at least 4 or 5 appearances in South Carolina and also competed in North Carolina and Texas. He made at least one appearance in the Atlanta area before the Georgia area and that was not the first time he's been there.

Weaver should not be playing the spin game like that, IMO.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread