2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders supporters' courtship of Clinton superdelegates may be backfiring
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-superdelegates-idUSMTZSAPEC2TAP0RGDBackers of Democratic presidential contender Bernie Sanders have launched a campaign to win over some of his rival Hillary Clinton's most prized supporters - the superdelegates that can make the difference in a tight race for the party's nomination.
But some emails, phone messages, and petitions sent by the Sanders boosters have backfired, upsetting superdelegates with their aggressive tone and leading many to dig in their heels for Clinton, according to interviews conducted by Reuters.
(snip)
However, the unofficial push could complicate the U.S. Senator from Vermont's efforts to woo the critical bloc in the coming months.
The effort has at times taken an angry tone, some of the messages reviewed by Reuters showed, reflecting the anti-establishment tinge of the 2016 presidential race where many voters are unhappy with Washington insiders.
Evidently the aggressive tone used by many of those contacting Super delegates supporting Hillary have upset those delegates and are causing them to dig in their heels, strengthening their determination to support Clinton.
dchill
(38,462 posts)Supersensitive superdelegates!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)dchill
(38,462 posts)YOU and they want as the takeaway from this piece of crap "journalism."
Autumn
(45,023 posts)I hope their precious little fee fees get better.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)...it's usually best to be nice and it never pays to be demanding and abrasive - Human Relation 101.
Autumn
(45,023 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Interesting....
Autumn
(45,023 posts)Wait a minute... What happened to Human Relation 101. Only counts for other people?
Cha
(297,029 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)Three trade deals in the pipeline, and their literally hundreds of thousands of dollars per person in extra costs.
Not many people realize how much $$$$ is at stake for each of us.
I'm sure the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries realize but other people not so much.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)But if it does, we'll be sure to tell them you said "it's not okay".
Beacool
(30,247 posts)The gall of suggesting that they should switch to Sanders, even if Hillary is ahead in the pledged delegate count, is heavy handed and undemocratic.
JudyM
(29,225 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)in pledged delegates. First of all, Sanders wasn't even a Democrat until he decided to run for president. These super delegates feel no allegiance to him. Second, they will not switch to the person who ends with less pledged delegates. They will not subvert democracy. That's why they switched to Obama in 2008, he was ahead in pledged delegates. Hillary currently has double the pledged delegate lead that Obama had in 2008.
I find it the height of hypocrisy for the man who claims to represent the people to ignore the will of those same people.
JudyM
(29,225 posts)Their raison d'etre is to prevent popular grass roots candidates from winning.
JesterCS
(1,827 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:04 PM - Edit history (1)
To keep grassroots candidates who do not properly represent the party and/or who would have trouble getting elected from absconding with the nomination. With the super delegates there would be some concern with respect to the latter reason and a great deal of concern with the former given that a canidate decided suddenly after 35 years in public life to run as a Democrat to "to get media attention".
Remember that the Democratic Party nomination is not a public office - the party can set up any rules it wishes to be used to choose its nominee. It could still be making its choice in smoke filled rooms if it wishes. Bernie knew the rules going in.
I find it interesting that Sanders supporters at first very critical of the super delegates calling them "unconstitutional", but then you seemed to have no trouble supporting the notion of flipping the super delegates even if Hillary wins the most Pledged delegates. You guys seem to get upset with rules only
when they don't favor your canidate.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)And during a primary of all times.
artislife
(9,497 posts)I stressed how I voted in all elections, big and small and said I wouldn't automatically vote for them again.
We had a 3 to 1 ratio. They joined back when it seemed like no one else would challenge her. Well, Bernie has and he won our state handily. Our governor race was closer than they liked.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:10 PM - Edit history (1)
If you were demanding, you may be part of the problem.
artislife
(9,497 posts)You think you work for them. They work for us.
And I was polite, reminding them that I have been a Dem voter since 91 in every election. But I could be rude if I had wanted to be...because as your side likes to say....politics is a tough business. Not for the faint of heart.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)....who they are trying to convince to flip over to Bernie side, I'm the problem.
Wow, now that logic is compelling.
artislife
(9,497 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)... that you were trying to change the subject and that what I was pointing out . Evidently recognizing subtlety is not one of your strong suites.
Maybe I should have been more to the point - something like "Hey, stick to the topic, we were discussing Sanders people ticking off super delegates, and quit trying to make this about me. We weren't discussing me."
You can probably understand that. Maybe...
artislife
(9,497 posts)Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)It is also foolish for Bernie to unleash his mob on them instead of attempting a softer approach.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)....he's got another thing coming.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #20)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)OTOH, there are many of us who capable of making up our own minds.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)The race is close enough for that - but they won't. They literally hold Bernie's future in their collective hands.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)JSup
(740 posts)...this article is a month old.
I'm all for Hillary but I've never been a fan of posting 'old' (but currently relevant) articles as news.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)speak about the voters in the south really pisses a lot of life-long Democrats off.
Hawaiianlight
(63 posts)They don't call them "super" delegates for nothing. Let them be silent and eat cake!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)UMTerp01
(1,048 posts)n/t
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)Attacking super delegates is not a smart strategy. This strategy did not work on Sen. Warren and will not work on other super delegates
Number23
(24,544 posts)with Republicans and independents voting in Dem primaries is hypocrisy and cynicism at its finest.
When you factor in that these caucuses that Sanders has been winning don't even represent 10% of the population of the states, it makes it even more ridiculous.