Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:44 PM Mar 2016

Sanders supporters' courtship of Clinton superdelegates may be backfiring

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-superdelegates-idUSMTZSAPEC2TAP0RGD

Backers of Democratic presidential contender Bernie Sanders have launched a campaign to win over some of his rival Hillary Clinton's most prized supporters - the superdelegates that can make the difference in a tight race for the party's nomination.

But some emails, phone messages, and petitions sent by the Sanders boosters have backfired, upsetting superdelegates with their aggressive tone and leading many to dig in their heels for Clinton, according to interviews conducted by Reuters.

(snip)

However, the unofficial push could complicate the U.S. Senator from Vermont's efforts to woo the critical bloc in the coming months.

The effort has at times taken an angry tone, some of the messages reviewed by Reuters showed, reflecting the anti-establishment tinge of the 2016 presidential race where many voters are unhappy with Washington insiders.


Evidently the aggressive tone used by many of those contacting Super delegates supporting Hillary have upset those delegates and are causing them to dig in their heels, strengthening their determination to support Clinton.
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders supporters' courtship of Clinton superdelegates may be backfiring (Original Post) CajunBlazer Mar 2016 OP
"They're 'upset.'" New meme! dchill Mar 2016 #1
I think the lesson learned is - "Don't tick them off" CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #3
Gee another Clinton Gwhittey Mar 2016 #7
No, that's the false impression... dchill Mar 2016 #16
Poor little dears. Autumn Mar 2016 #2
When you are asking people to do something they don't have to do... CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #4
Yep. You all ought to remember that and do remind your elected democrats of that too. Autumn Mar 2016 #5
So they are not "your" elected democrats? CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #6
Oh I voted for them. When I was a democrat, that changed back in Jan. Autumn Mar 2016 #8
Of course it is. Cha Mar 2016 #9
If the popular votes goes one way and they go another way its not okay. Baobab Mar 2016 #10
Not to worry, it won't because Bernie won't cach up CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #28
Of course it was bound to backfire. Beacool Mar 2016 #11
(Cough) Um. Say again, *what* is undemocratic? Take a closer look at their intended role. JudyM Mar 2016 #13
You can cough all you want, but Hillary will be the nominee if she maintains her lead Beacool Mar 2016 #14
Super delegates throwing their votes behind Hillary when Bernie took their state = undemocratic. JudyM Mar 2016 #15
+1000000 n/t JesterCS Mar 2016 #18
That's exactly why the super delegates were introduced CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #29
God forbid constituents practice democracy by petitioning party leaders hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #30
My WA reps just got another email from me artislife Mar 2016 #12
But were you nice or were you demanding? CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #34
You are the problem artislife Mar 2016 #40
Oh see, when Sanders supporters are rude to the super delegates... CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #41
Trying read comprehension.. it will help you. artislife Mar 2016 #42
I read everything you wrote, and therefore I am well aware.... CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #43
hahahahahahaha artislife Mar 2016 #44
After this election Super Delegates need to go Trenzalore Mar 2016 #17
If Bernie thinks he can bully the super delegates..... Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #19
Gosh. We certainly wouldn't want to upset politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Mar 2016 #21
They're very delicate creatures who are unused to listening to their employers. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #23
And yet they hold Bernie's future in their hands.. CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #32
Only if anyone bases their votes on the endorsements of politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #35
No, superdelegates could literally give Bernie the nomination CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #36
Which says a lot about our current political system that favors the rich and powerful. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #37
Yep, and there will be no revolution CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #39
Not that I disagree, but... JSup Mar 2016 #22
If they in anyway sound like Sarandon, I can see why. Plus the way the Sander's supporters Jitter65 Mar 2016 #24
How dare the peasants show their displeasure! Hawaiianlight Mar 2016 #25
Works for me CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #33
Not surprised given how rabid many of them tend to be UMTerp01 Mar 2016 #26
I am not surprised at the lack of success and the negative feedback from these efforts Gothmog Mar 2016 #27
+ 1 JoePhilly Mar 2016 #31
Exactly. And I think that the screaming over superdelegates from people who are right as rain Number23 Mar 2016 #38
Oh I'm sure! Same people who lobbied for Obama. Give it a rest. snowy owl Mar 2016 #45

dchill

(38,462 posts)
16. No, that's the false impression...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:51 PM
Mar 2016

YOU and they want as the takeaway from this piece of crap "journalism."

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
4. When you are asking people to do something they don't have to do...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:07 PM
Mar 2016

...it's usually best to be nice and it never pays to be demanding and abrasive - Human Relation 101.

Autumn

(45,023 posts)
8. Oh I voted for them. When I was a democrat, that changed back in Jan.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:19 PM
Mar 2016

Wait a minute... What happened to Human Relation 101. Only counts for other people?

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
10. If the popular votes goes one way and they go another way its not okay.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:25 PM
Mar 2016

Three trade deals in the pipeline, and their literally hundreds of thousands of dollars per person in extra costs.

Not many people realize how much $$$$ is at stake for each of us.

I'm sure the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries realize but other people not so much.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
28. Not to worry, it won't because Bernie won't cach up
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:39 AM
Mar 2016

But if it does, we'll be sure to tell them you said "it's not okay".

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
11. Of course it was bound to backfire.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:29 PM
Mar 2016

The gall of suggesting that they should switch to Sanders, even if Hillary is ahead in the pledged delegate count, is heavy handed and undemocratic.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
14. You can cough all you want, but Hillary will be the nominee if she maintains her lead
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:41 PM
Mar 2016

in pledged delegates. First of all, Sanders wasn't even a Democrat until he decided to run for president. These super delegates feel no allegiance to him. Second, they will not switch to the person who ends with less pledged delegates. They will not subvert democracy. That's why they switched to Obama in 2008, he was ahead in pledged delegates. Hillary currently has double the pledged delegate lead that Obama had in 2008.

I find it the height of hypocrisy for the man who claims to represent the people to ignore the will of those same people.

JudyM

(29,225 posts)
15. Super delegates throwing their votes behind Hillary when Bernie took their state = undemocratic.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:44 PM
Mar 2016

Their raison d'etre is to prevent popular grass roots candidates from winning.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
29. That's exactly why the super delegates were introduced
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:05 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:04 PM - Edit history (1)

To keep grassroots candidates who do not properly represent the party and/or who would have trouble getting elected from absconding with the nomination. With the super delegates there would be some concern with respect to the latter reason and a great deal of concern with the former given that a canidate decided suddenly after 35 years in public life to run as a Democrat to "to get media attention".

Remember that the Democratic Party nomination is not a public office - the party can set up any rules it wishes to be used to choose its nominee. It could still be making its choice in smoke filled rooms if it wishes. Bernie knew the rules going in.

I find it interesting that Sanders supporters at first very critical of the super delegates calling them "unconstitutional", but then you seemed to have no trouble supporting the notion of flipping the super delegates even if Hillary wins the most Pledged delegates. You guys seem to get upset with rules only
when they don't favor your canidate.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
30. God forbid constituents practice democracy by petitioning party leaders
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:07 AM
Mar 2016

And during a primary of all times.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
12. My WA reps just got another email from me
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:31 PM
Mar 2016

I stressed how I voted in all elections, big and small and said I wouldn't automatically vote for them again.

We had a 3 to 1 ratio. They joined back when it seemed like no one else would challenge her. Well, Bernie has and he won our state handily. Our governor race was closer than they liked.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
34. But were you nice or were you demanding?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:00 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:10 PM - Edit history (1)

If you were demanding, you may be part of the problem.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
40. You are the problem
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:07 PM
Mar 2016

You think you work for them. They work for us.

And I was polite, reminding them that I have been a Dem voter since 91 in every election. But I could be rude if I had wanted to be...because as your side likes to say....politics is a tough business. Not for the faint of heart.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
41. Oh see, when Sanders supporters are rude to the super delegates...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:10 PM
Mar 2016

....who they are trying to convince to flip over to Bernie side, I'm the problem.

Wow, now that logic is compelling.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
43. I read everything you wrote, and therefore I am well aware....
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:26 PM
Mar 2016

... that you were trying to change the subject and that what I was pointing out . Evidently recognizing subtlety is not one of your strong suites.

Maybe I should have been more to the point - something like "Hey, stick to the topic, we were discussing Sanders people ticking off super delegates, and quit trying to make this about me. We weren't discussing me."

You can probably understand that. Maybe...

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
17. After this election Super Delegates need to go
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:51 PM
Mar 2016

It is also foolish for Bernie to unleash his mob on them instead of attempting a softer approach.

Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #20)

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
35. Only if anyone bases their votes on the endorsements of politicians.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:03 PM
Mar 2016

OTOH, there are many of us who capable of making up our own minds.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
36. No, superdelegates could literally give Bernie the nomination
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:47 PM
Mar 2016

The race is close enough for that - but they won't. They literally hold Bernie's future in their collective hands.

JSup

(740 posts)
22. Not that I disagree, but...
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:24 PM
Mar 2016

...this article is a month old.

I'm all for Hillary but I've never been a fan of posting 'old' (but currently relevant) articles as news.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
24. If they in anyway sound like Sarandon, I can see why. Plus the way the Sander's supporters
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:28 PM
Mar 2016

speak about the voters in the south really pisses a lot of life-long Democrats off.

Hawaiianlight

(63 posts)
25. How dare the peasants show their displeasure!
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:32 PM
Mar 2016

They don't call them "super" delegates for nothing. Let them be silent and eat cake!

Gothmog

(145,046 posts)
27. I am not surprised at the lack of success and the negative feedback from these efforts
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:18 PM
Mar 2016

Attacking super delegates is not a smart strategy. This strategy did not work on Sen. Warren and will not work on other super delegates

Number23

(24,544 posts)
38. Exactly. And I think that the screaming over superdelegates from people who are right as rain
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:13 PM
Mar 2016

with Republicans and independents voting in Dem primaries is hypocrisy and cynicism at its finest.

When you factor in that these caucuses that Sanders has been winning don't even represent 10% of the population of the states, it makes it even more ridiculous.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders supporters' court...