Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
127 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Susan Sarandon represents what this country needs more of: Independent Thinkers. (Original Post) Skwmom Mar 2016 OP
She's too uppity for some. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #1
The looks on the faces of the corp hacks when they are confronted w/someone who isn't buying into Skwmom Mar 2016 #3
Women's opinions are only valid if they agree with mine, dammit! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #5
Here's to all of the people who don't fall in line! CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #9
Indeed. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #16
Truth! NWCorona Mar 2016 #21
Exactly. nt LWolf Mar 2016 #93
By putting a Republican in office if Hillary is nominated. Not my kind of reality. HERVEPA Mar 2016 #2
No faith in your candidate? No Worries! Raygun Dems pledge to 2banon Mar 2016 #36
I know Republicans who are planning on voting for her. So she won't need progressives like me. lostnfound Mar 2016 #102
I keep reading Republicans hate her, and then shit like this. Seriously, get your stories straight. bettyellen Mar 2016 #110
I'd think more independently too if I had $50 million+ in the bank. oasis Mar 2016 #4
And yet she fights to pay more taxes. dogman Mar 2016 #6
She isn't greedy enough and actually gives a damn about the working class. Skwmom Mar 2016 #10
Easy for her to roll the dice like she did with Nader. oasis Mar 2016 #30
So she gave us w? dogman Mar 2016 #34
Easy for many DUers to say Hillary "gave us the Iraq invasion" oasis Mar 2016 #41
Yes a single vote in a GE is comparable to a Senators vote. dogman Mar 2016 #44
Just a guess but oasis Mar 2016 #54
Those votes were theirs to toss. dogman Mar 2016 #56
I love how it's never the fault of the dems for running bad candidates on a bad platform with a bad GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #86
For some it's never the establishment that loses revbones Mar 2016 #104
So true! GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #107
by the logic that blames Hillary entirely for Iraq it does treestar Mar 2016 #89
In a Senate vote where the choice was between siding with Bush or all those against the invasion... Armstead Mar 2016 #95
Considering Hillary has been a strong advocate of the Bush Family Hydra Mar 2016 #38
When Trump installs three Scalia clones on the Supreme Court oasis Mar 2016 #52
Well, considering Hillary is 50/50 against Trump and has an active FBI investigation on her Hydra Mar 2016 #55
Beating the e-mail rap would take a miracle? oasis Mar 2016 #57
No, beating the Trump monster they invited to the Party Hydra Mar 2016 #60
Not to worry. The dreaded "Clinton Machine" oasis Mar 2016 #63
Lol, the Clinton Machine is currently upset about a bird Hydra Mar 2016 #66
The TPP has more bearing on and will harm more people than the scotus will. Autumn Mar 2016 #61
Citizens United, voting rights, women's health issues. oasis Mar 2016 #64
TPP . That is all nt Autumn Mar 2016 #65
because we are bringing back all the factories any day now, right.... bettyellen Mar 2016 #68
Those factories are gone and they aren't coming back. Such a silly remark. nt Autumn Mar 2016 #72
Bill "invited Trump to this years election"? Which episode was that in? bettyellen Mar 2016 #67
Aww...you seem to have missed all the fun at the beginning of the Primary! Hydra Mar 2016 #75
I thought they both denied it. But if so, it is pretty brilliant. Trump is not going to win in Nov. bettyellen Mar 2016 #82
maybe Joe and Jill sixpack haven't seen any improvement in their economies under Obama. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #92
I find some great independent thinkers among the working class. On the other hand, Skwmom Mar 2016 #7
"Burn down the village in order to save it" oasis Mar 2016 #73
bless her heart, she means well. isn't that enough? bettyellen Mar 2016 #83
yes. And she means well by supporting sanders for President. Armstead Mar 2016 #96
Many people with 50 milliion sit on their asses or Armstead Mar 2016 #14
"Saving the whales" becomes her, while "Jumping the shark x2" oasis Mar 2016 #76
Expressed my views exactly. Love her! n/t Peregrine Took Mar 2016 #8
Who'd vote for Trump if Sanders isn't nominated? madamesilverspurs Mar 2016 #11
Did she say that? I must have missed that part. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #13
She didn't NWCorona Mar 2016 #17
She would most likely write in Bernie's name or vote for Jill Stein. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #19
Jill has my vote if Bernie doesn't make it NWCorona Mar 2016 #26
Favorite group: Hillary Clinton BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #46
Echos the feeling of too many Sanders supporters. baldguy Mar 2016 #85
What did she say? Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #12
Here is a link. Skwmom Mar 2016 #25
Thanks.nt Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #27
I guess I don't see what people are upset about. nt Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #32
General panic over the GE Hydra Mar 2016 #40
Or rich people who can afford to vote for Donald Trump... most Americans can't afford to take that.. uponit7771 Mar 2016 #15
Funny. I think that about all of the rich people endorsing Clinton (e.g., Clooney). Skwmom Mar 2016 #18
Rich people for Bernie: Seth McFairlane, Danny Devito, Susan Sarandon. Dawson Leery Mar 2016 #20
And the Gordon Gecko dude nt Rebkeh Mar 2016 #28
Steve Wozniak too. Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #91
Rich people for Hillary: Katy Perry; Lena Dunham; Kim Kardashian; closeupready Mar 2016 #108
"when you talk about ghettos traditionally, what you talk about is African-American communities. " uponit7771 Mar 2016 #22
Oh give it a rest, out of context quotes don't work here, we're not stupid. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #29
There's no context for that statement that's not negative and blacks aren't rich according to... uponit7771 Mar 2016 #33
We had the full quote here nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #35
ummm, no... we can all read and his statement was fucked up period full stop. Either way,... uponit7771 Mar 2016 #39
Yes we can, and by the way, ghetto is not just a word that applies to African Americans nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #42
Racist bullshit is Sanders having Cornell West stump for him but mostly in front of white people uponit7771 Mar 2016 #45
Racist bullshit is trying to silence PoC you do not like nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #47
No one wants to silence Cornell West but Sanders, I've not seen hide nor hair of the dude since IA.. uponit7771 Mar 2016 #49
Nice try but like I said people here aren't stupid, we see what you're doing. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #50
People don't have to be smart either to see that statement in many context is bad. There's nothing uponit7771 Mar 2016 #98
History and context matter even if you don't understand them. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #99
I understand history just fine, Sanders repeated a meme that started in the 80s and it was wrong uponit7771 Mar 2016 #100
No he didn't, that's your spin and it has nothing to do with what he said or meant. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #101
Independent? NuclearDem Mar 2016 #23
K&R Clintonian Third Way DLC has got to go! GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #24
I wish I had her resources RandySF Mar 2016 #31
If you supported the right candidate you wouldn't have to worry about the shit storm. ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #43
I think we will do fine without Ms. Sarandon. RandySF Mar 2016 #51
In the Bubble, she's being shamed Politicalboi Mar 2016 #37
Yes, I think we have a new term BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #48
She helped elect George W. Bush. onehandle Mar 2016 #53
Conservadems in Florida did that actually nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #58
George W Bush was never elected n/t Hydra Mar 2016 #62
well I loved her in Bull Durham Mary Mac Mar 2016 #59
Here's to uppity women everywhere who support a man who supports them Autumn Mar 2016 #69
Cheers! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #70
Here's to us Autumn Mar 2016 #74
Bottoms up! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #77
Susan Sarandon the Naderite ... who gave us GW Bush cosmicone Mar 2016 #71
Nah, that was the supreme court. No prize for you. Autumn Mar 2016 #78
History is hard. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #79
Yeah you would think it would be easy since it was only 16 years ago. Autumn Mar 2016 #80
It's why DU was created. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #81
It was so easy for many to transfer their hate and anger away from the suprme court Autumn Mar 2016 #84
She reduces women to body parts because they do not vote how she wants. seabeyond Mar 2016 #87
No, she doesn't believe people should vote depending on which body parts they have polly7 Mar 2016 #105
She reduces women to body parts. There is no reason to reduce women to a mere body part, seabeyond Mar 2016 #109
Ya ........... everything to you is reduced to body parts. polly7 Mar 2016 #111
FIRST sentence. Ya, ... when reducing to body part like, calling women vaginas, I am gonna call it seabeyond Mar 2016 #115
Who called women vaginas? polly7 Mar 2016 #120
How ironic, this woman telling us not to vote our vagina, as she suggest a Repug, taking away girls seabeyond Mar 2016 #118
How fucking ironic. polly7 Mar 2016 #121
Sarandonfucked up and is now back pedaling as fast as she can. Gotcha. seabeyond Mar 2016 #123
Nah ........ seabeyond fucked up, just as you did with those horrible, nasty Femen women. polly7 Mar 2016 #124
back pedal, back pedal.... seabeyond Mar 2016 #125
Back pedal? Riding your stationery? That's excellent, you should go forward though, polly7 Mar 2016 #126
You'll need to document your claim. Proof is required--an unfortunate consequence of the DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #114
Well dude, it is kinda all over the net. BWTH, if one doesnt follow the campaigns and the happening seabeyond Mar 2016 #116
What?? nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #122
Merely being in a small minority of thought treestar Mar 2016 #88
Remember your posts telling LGBT we had 'plenty of rights already'? I sure do. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #94
Me, too. Thank you. closeupready Mar 2016 #113
... LexVegas Mar 2016 #90
The Daily Beast is lying about what Susan said. nt Duppers Mar 2016 #97
But as you know The Daily Beast and Blue Nation REview are the only two FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #117
LoL! Duppers Mar 2016 #119
Someone thinking for themselves is frightening to the group thinkers. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #103
Anybody like Sarandon who would support Trump over Hillary or Bernie is an uneducated voter. LonePirate Mar 2016 #106
She supports BERNIE, and go watch what she said for yourself. have you seen it? peacebird Mar 2016 #127
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #112

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
3. The looks on the faces of the corp hacks when they are confronted w/someone who isn't buying into
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:49 PM
Mar 2016

their b.s. is priceless!

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
9. Here's to all of the people who don't fall in line!
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:54 PM
Mar 2016

History is filled with heroes and heroines who refused to "fall in line."

Raises glass!

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
36. No faith in your candidate? No Worries! Raygun Dems pledge to
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:19 AM
Mar 2016

vote for Hillary! En Masse. And Los Angeles Times reported that bernie supporters will flock to Hillary if she's the nom.

I guarantee you she's gonna pull in all the Neo Cons, no trump supporter, they. They're her base.

So really, no worries.

lostnfound

(16,162 posts)
102. I know Republicans who are planning on voting for her. So she won't need progressives like me.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:42 AM
Mar 2016

I never thought republicans would vote for her, but the sane ones are disgusted by trump, pleased by Hillary's familiar neocon-lite foreign policy, familiar status quo economics, and feeling good about themselves for being open minded enough to support a woman.

Amazing that the GOP found not one but TWO front runners that are objectionable to a
more than a third of their base. Enough in some cases to overcome their Clinton-phobia.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
110. I keep reading Republicans hate her, and then shit like this. Seriously, get your stories straight.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

Not buying the hate meme. Hate is for suckers.

oasis

(49,328 posts)
30. Easy for her to roll the dice like she did with Nader.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:11 AM
Mar 2016

So what if Joe and Jill Sixpack get stuck with a Dubya or a Trump. Susan won't need to adjust her spending habits to compensate for another downturn in the national economy.

That's how she rolls.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
34. So she gave us w?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:16 AM
Mar 2016

I wondered where he came from. I wonder why she doesn't just go out and spend her money?

oasis

(49,328 posts)
41. Easy for many DUers to say Hillary "gave us the Iraq invasion"
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:23 AM
Mar 2016

but, somehow, Sarandon giving us Bush is too much of a reach.

oasis

(49,328 posts)
54. Just a guess but
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:45 AM
Mar 2016

I'm sure Sarandon's campaigning for Nader in 2000 resulted in more than a single vote being tossed away.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
56. Those votes were theirs to toss.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:49 AM
Mar 2016

How many lazy asses failed to vote at all? But blame her if it gives you peace of mind.

GreenPartyVoter

(72,377 posts)
86. I love how it's never the fault of the dems for running bad candidates on a bad platform with a bad
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:59 AM
Mar 2016

campaign. It's the fault of the voter for not being able to see past all that, hold their nose, and pull the lever marked, "Please Sir, may I have some more?"

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
104. For some it's never the establishment that loses
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:48 AM
Mar 2016

It's only because the candidate wasn't establishment enough...

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
95. In a Senate vote where the choice was between siding with Bush or all those against the invasion...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:37 AM
Mar 2016

and in which the vote actually determined whether he was given authorization to pursue an insane course of action...Clinton sided with Bush and insanity.

That's pretty cut and dried.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
38. Considering Hillary has been a strong advocate of the Bush Family
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:19 AM
Mar 2016

And Bill invited Trump to this year's election...I find your post exceptionally ironic.

oasis

(49,328 posts)
52. When Trump installs three Scalia clones on the Supreme Court
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:37 AM
Mar 2016

you can enjoy the irony of it having little effect on the lives of the folks in Sarandon's income level.

The rest of us are stuck with two decades ultra right rulings from the bench.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
55. Well, considering Hillary is 50/50 against Trump and has an active FBI investigation on her
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:47 AM
Mar 2016

Does that mean we should forward all complaints to you and Team Hill for bringing us Trump if she can't pull out a miracle?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
60. No, beating the Trump monster they invited to the Party
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:56 AM
Mar 2016

The plan was to face Jeb in the GE, not an outsider who plays by no rules and has paid her in the past. Better start planning on how to deal with that now, and in more than "Cut it out!"

oasis

(49,328 posts)
63. Not to worry. The dreaded "Clinton Machine"
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:05 AM
Mar 2016

is way ahead of you on this, and any other angle the amateurs among us can dream up.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
66. Lol, the Clinton Machine is currently upset about a bird
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:10 AM
Mar 2016

And why Hawaiians don't feel the magic. And why caucuses are bad.

I'd pass you but I'm sure the that would get you in trouble :p

oasis

(49,328 posts)
64. Citizens United, voting rights, women's health issues.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:07 AM
Mar 2016

Pretty important stuff to be considered.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
67. Bill "invited Trump to this years election"? Which episode was that in?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:10 AM
Mar 2016

Are you sure you don't mean his daughter's baby shower, because I could see that? trump is amazing at one thing- choosing toys.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
75. Aww...you seem to have missed all the fun at the beginning of the Primary!
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:17 AM
Mar 2016

Bill provided a sounding board for Trump and encouraged him to get into the race. Lots of people thought it was a good idea at the time- it caused mass chaos among the clown car...and then things got out of hand. He didn't wash out as expected by even him.

Now, instead of actually doing something about it, Team Clinton is saying that only they can beat the monster they let loose...but only with all of our votes and unquestioned support.

Kinda funny how that works, isn't it? Someone in the establishment breaks something, but suddenly it's our problem to fix? Like Iraq/ISIS?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
82. I thought they both denied it. But if so, it is pretty brilliant. Trump is not going to win in Nov.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:30 AM
Mar 2016

Why would he listen to Clinton? What an idiot.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
92. maybe Joe and Jill sixpack haven't seen any improvement in their economies under Obama.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:26 AM
Mar 2016

I know I have not. I have lost ground. Many in the working class have. Trickle down has run it course and is proven to have not worked for all but the 1%. Why are the Dems still trying to prop it up?
Our party doesn't address the working people's problems anymore. I don't think Susan will be to blame if we end up with Trump.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
7. I find some great independent thinkers among the working class. On the other hand,
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:53 PM
Mar 2016

some of those with all of those great degrees mindlessly buy into the stupidest b.s.

oasis

(49,328 posts)
73. "Burn down the village in order to save it"
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:14 AM
Mar 2016

Those NOT living in the village have the luxury of debating how good of an idea it is.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
14. Many people with 50 milliion sit on their asses or
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:57 PM
Mar 2016

Do destructive greedy things to get even more money....or spend all their time shopping and vacationing

Good for her for trying to make the world a little bit better instead....and putting up with shit from people who don't lije it

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
19. She would most likely write in Bernie's name or vote for Jill Stein.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:05 AM
Mar 2016

I can't believe the lengths some people will go to to smear her.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
40. General panic over the GE
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:21 AM
Mar 2016

Some people skipped over the part where we vote before we get to that point.

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
15. Or rich people who can afford to vote for Donald Trump... most Americans can't afford to take that..
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:58 PM
Mar 2016

... chance

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
108. Rich people for Hillary: Katy Perry; Lena Dunham; Kim Kardashian;
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:12 PM
Mar 2016

Meryl Streep; Bill and Chelsea Clinton ...

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
22. "when you talk about ghettos traditionally, what you talk about is African-American communities. "
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:06 AM
Mar 2016

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
33. There's no context for that statement that's not negative and blacks aren't rich according to...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:14 AM
Mar 2016

... Sanders intimations here so all "rich" people aren't supporting Clinton

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
35. We had the full quote here
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:18 AM
Mar 2016

give it a rest. He was addressing the FUCKING MAINSTREAM MEDIA that go there every fucking time; You know it. So stop it.

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
39. ummm, no... we can all read and his statement was fucked up period full stop. Either way,...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:20 AM
Mar 2016

... all rich people are not support Clinton

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
42. Yes we can, and by the way, ghetto is not just a word that applies to African Americans
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:24 AM
Mar 2016

but whatever buddy, I am getting tired of the racist bullshit I get to read here.

I expected it, but I am getting fucking tired of the divisive CLINTON CAMPAIGN, got it fucking now?

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
45. Racist bullshit is Sanders having Cornell West stump for him but mostly in front of white people
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:28 AM
Mar 2016

... and not down South were folk know he's full of shit.

Again, there's NO CONTEXT where that statement like that wont get you fired at work or some shit.... its negative and he shouldn't have said it and by his own words blacks aren't the rich so no... all the rich aren't supporting Clinton

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
47. Racist bullshit is trying to silence PoC you do not like
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:30 AM
Mar 2016

which incidentally includes Cornell West.

have an excellent day, night what have you. My wall is far less hard to speak to, and I still need to read the fucking budget

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
49. No one wants to silence Cornell West but Sanders, I've not seen hide nor hair of the dude since IA..
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:34 AM
Mar 2016

... where he shouldn't have been associated with anyone's campaign anyway.

Have a good night

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
50. Nice try but like I said people here aren't stupid, we see what you're doing.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:36 AM
Mar 2016
Sanders told a moving story about how, as a newly elected congressman in Washington, D.C., about 20 years ago, he was shocked to learn that a fellow congressman, who was black, avoided taking cabs because it was humiliating when drivers would go past him because of his race.

He also said he was humbled when a young woman active in the Black Lives Matter movement came up and told him that he simply doesn’t understand what police do in many black communities on a regular basis, beyond the shootings that tend to get more attention.

“You don’t understand the degree to which we are terrorized. ... I‘m just talking about everyday activities where police officers are bullying people,” Sanders recounted the woman telling him.

“When you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto,” Sanders concluded. “You don’t know what it’s like to be poor. You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car. And I believe that as a nation in the year 2016, we must be firm in making it clear, we will end institutional racism and reform a broken criminal justice system.”


http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/bernie-sanders-ghetto_us_56dce712e4b03a405679062b


When Bernie referred to ghettos he wasn't saying only black people live in them, he's Jewish so he knows what the defintion is even if you don't.

Context matters.

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
98. People don't have to be smart either to see that statement in many context is bad. There's nothing
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:27 AM
Mar 2016

... you posted that changes that.

I don't care what he "also said", his point was made and it was wrong period.

Most blacks aren't poor and most blacks are not welfare concentrated either, another negative stereo type a non Hillary camp pushed this primary

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
99. History and context matter even if you don't understand them.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:29 AM
Mar 2016

We are you and know what you're doing, try peddling that meme somewhere else.

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
100. I understand history just fine, Sanders repeated a meme that started in the 80s and it was wrong
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:31 AM
Mar 2016

... then and its wrong now.

Sanders statement in regards to blacks and the ghetto being wrong isn't a meme though.... its fact, period end of story.

Of course there will be the usual amnesia in a month or two when people will bring up the fact that some tried to defend Sanders on this statement but that's been par of the course.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
101. No he didn't, that's your spin and it has nothing to do with what he said or meant.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:35 AM
Mar 2016

You can keep spinning it all day but like I said, DUers aren't stupid.

RandySF

(58,494 posts)
31. I wish I had her resources
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:12 AM
Mar 2016

to weather the shitstorm of a four years that a President Cruz or a President Trump would be if enough like her refuse to vote for Hillary if she is the nominee. Talk about being out of touch with the rest of the country.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
43. If you supported the right candidate you wouldn't have to worry about the shit storm.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:26 AM
Mar 2016

You bring it on yourself if you vote for Hillary.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
48. Yes, I think we have a new term
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:32 AM
Mar 2016

There's fat shaming, there's skinny shaming....now there's Hillary shaming, when people try and tell you that if Bernie doesn't win the nomination you just HAVE to vote for Hillary! You might not? What?????? But...but....Trump!!!!!

Autumn

(44,982 posts)
80. Yeah you would think it would be easy since it was only 16 years ago.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:28 AM
Mar 2016

But no... they keep ignoring it. Oh well how does it go? If you only have a hammer everything is a nail.

Autumn

(44,982 posts)
84. It was so easy for many to transfer their hate and anger away from the suprme court
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:32 AM
Mar 2016

who had no right to do what they did to a person who had every right to run.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
87. She reduces women to body parts because they do not vote how she wants.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:05 AM
Mar 2016

That hardly is respectful to independent thinking.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
105. No, she doesn't believe people should vote depending on which body parts they have
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:52 AM
Mar 2016

and that 'she' doesn't vote with her vagina. Seems like a simple and common sense statement.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
109. She reduces women to body parts. There is no reason to reduce women to a mere body part,
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:29 PM
Mar 2016

but to be disrespectful. The woman could have easily treated women as a whole human being with the words....

women shouldn't vote for women simply cause

She reduces women to body parts, playing in our patriarchal society.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
111. Ya ........... everything to you is reduced to body parts.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:46 PM
Mar 2016

I remember when the FEMEN women were just 'taking their clothes off for the menzzz'.

Strange that you can't see what she was obviously stating - people shouldn't vote based on gender. A vagina happens to represent a woman's gender. But that's a bad, bad word?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
115. FIRST sentence. Ya, ... when reducing to body part like, calling women vaginas, I am gonna call it
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:54 PM
Mar 2016
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
118. How ironic, this woman telling us not to vote our vagina, as she suggest a Repug, taking away girls
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:30 PM
Mar 2016

and women's medical rights, their very healthcare.

Ironic that, ya think? Of course as a Democrat, you would get just how fuckin' ironic it is for Sarandon to tell me, she does not vote with her vagina, and then telling me it is cool to vote in republicans, as they have already gutted girls and women's right to a legal medical procedure.

Surely as a Democrat, as a woman, or a mere vagina, you kinda like.... have an issue.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
121. How fucking ironic.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:07 AM
Mar 2016

Sarandon being pushed in an interview to state who she'd vote for and instead saying 'none of your fucking business' (paraphrasing) and laughing at the possibility of it being Trump. But she was exactly right, he would bring an instant revolution - and not a good one. I'd laugh if some asshole did the same to me ........ she's not a stupid woman, she knew what he was trying to get out of her.

Just as everyone here has been slobbering over for the last few days - something to twist into 'OMG, Sarandon - Bernie 'surrogate'! is saying vote for Trump!' Which is just another sad, pathetic lie.

She also tweeted she would never vote for Trump.

Are people REALLY this dense???

polly7

(20,582 posts)
124. Nah ........ seabeyond fucked up, just as you did with those horrible, nasty Femen women.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:14 AM
Mar 2016

Gotcha.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
126. Back pedal? Riding your stationery? That's excellent, you should go forward though,
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:17 AM
Mar 2016

it's better for the calves.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
114. You'll need to document your claim. Proof is required--an unfortunate consequence of the
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:56 PM
Mar 2016

way Clinton has run her campaign.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
88. Merely being in a small minority of thought
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:08 AM
Mar 2016

doesn't make you right.

As in the bandwagon fallacy - a thing isn't true simply because "everyone believes it." Neither is a thing true because only a few or only one person believe it.

People are not failing to think independently simply because they agree with a lot of other people.

I can "independently" think 4+4=2.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
94. Remember your posts telling LGBT we had 'plenty of rights already'? I sure do.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:33 AM
Mar 2016

You were speaking for the majority of uptight and to the right straight folks and you were disgustingly wrong and enormously bigoted:

"There is nothing bigoted about the fact

There there is only one right you do not have. And people who give no credit to Obama for what he did already while making as if it is the only issue that matters are just wrong. There's always going to be some new demand. I am a woman and we don't have all our rights all the time, or some are threatened, but this is the US where we can talk about it, protest and I don't go around saying I have no rights. Not when looking at women in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia for instance.

If I am a bigot for caring about other issues, then fine. I don't think gay marriage is the only civil rights issue there is. Or the only issue that matters. And there is free speech. And the rest of the bill of rights. You should be ashamed for not caring about anyone or anything else."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2952192

It is the sort of things believed by those who would favor the candidate who opposed marriage equality until 2013 and who claims the Reagans were great heroes of the AIDS crisis.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
103. Someone thinking for themselves is frightening to the group thinkers.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:45 AM
Mar 2016
The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. Friedrich Nietzsche

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
106. Anybody like Sarandon who would support Trump over Hillary or Bernie is an uneducated voter.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:02 AM
Mar 2016

She needs to be ignored for her stupidity.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Susan Sarandon represents...