2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAt What Point Should Hillary Suspend Her Campaign?
It's becoming more and more likely every day that the FBI is going to recommend an indictment. Should that happen, the DoJ is likely to appoint a Special Prosecutor who would determine whether or not to move forward with a prosecution. This process would take the decision to prosecute past the Democratic Convention and likely beyond the November election.
So, should Hillary suspend her campaign:
1. Now?
2. When the FBI recommends indictment?
3. When a Special Prosecutor Is Appointed?
4. She should not suspend at any time.
Decision time is coming folks, like it or not. Gamble on Hillary or go with the sure bet of Bernie.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Especially in the GE, over confidence is dangerous.
BirdieSanders
(26 posts)Trump is a result of a concerted media effort to foist him upon the people; Bernie 'happened' in spite of a concerted media effort to disappear him from the people.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Maybe today's the day!!!!!
greatauntoftriplets
(175,729 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Fitzmas all over.
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)I'm still wondering why she's bothering running. Things have changed a lot over the last 30 years, but I guess you have to mingle with the commoners to get that.
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)I expect these posts on DI but it is sad to see this silliness on DU
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)the PRIVATE server outside the government system without encryption
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)in govt have used private email systems?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Pretend for one second that Condaleeza Rice hid all of her government emails on a private server such that no FOIA requests yielded results, hid thousands of emails from a House committee investigating an incident that occurred under her watch, and then left emails pertaining to national security in a hackable server without adequate protections because she didn't like using a desktop computer?
If it was Rice, would you call this a "silly email" situation?
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)EyeOnLife
(37 posts)With classified email headers removed to be moved to nonsecure email, it's a violation. Done at least 22 times.
If it was you and me, we'd already be in prison for that kind of shit. It's nowhere near Benghazi
How about the fact that 1) the server was located in the basement of the Clinton home? and 2) Eventually moved to the bathroom of some guy in Colorado with Clinton connections?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Do you believe them to be stupid or corrupt?
Plus the two judges, the prosecutors and the grand jury?
Stupid? Corrupt? Other?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)the whole thing is made up and w/o substance, and if so, what do you know that the FBI doesn't and WHY the hell don't you contact them and straighten them out with your insider knowledge. If you truly support your candidate then your testimony is no doubt invaluable to her in defending against the FBI investigation. Contact them immediately and set them straight before it's too late.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)How many have to be involved before its serious?
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)if we get to #2 and she doesn't suspend It will be a grave mistake.
(notice how her supporters can't answer the question, all they can do is attack)
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)I can't tell anymore...
mythology
(9,527 posts)That is an absolute bullshit smear. Accusing Clinton supporters of being like O'Keefe is low and scummy. You should delete this stupid attack.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)O'Keefe is the one who makes up doctored videos to smear people. Isn't that just what happened yesterday with the "Bernie is Monster" fake video story.
Own it baby. that is YOUR candidate's smear tactics from HER smear machine.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)And Hillary supporters here certainly promote Brock's RW propaganda attacks on Bernie. As in yesterday's bullshit attack on the spousal relationship between Bernie and his Wife that was pushed by Brock, picked up by certain media, who then had to apologize and retract it.
So no, it's not a bullshit smear against Hillary supporters here, especially those who promote Brock's bullshit attacks.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)He's from the same cloth as O'Keefe. But Hillary supporters constantly repeat his bullshit.
I guess anything is OK if it supports her majesty.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)Sorry.
JI7
(89,244 posts)And i mean only pledged delegates.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)staying the course in her campaign. She is innocent until proven otherwise.
Having said that, IF (and it's still a very big IF at this point) she gets indicted beforre the general election, then she probably will have to withdraw because the air and money will come out of her campaign.
The old "Independent Counsel" has been renamed "Special Counsel" and that's probably who Attorney General Lynch, to avoid a confluct of interest, will have review the findings of the FBI and Inspector Generals before finalizing if anyone will get indicted. Since that will take a bunch of time after these FBI and Inspector Generals reports get done, it's unlikely there will be any indictment decision before the general election.
If Hillary wins the primary, she'll probably be campaigning with that dark cloud over her head.
If the FBI report or Inspector General reports get leaked recommending indictment, then she probably cannot win whether she stays in the election or not - even though she won't have been proven guilty at that point. It may be that the Democratic establishment is sitting back on this so that they get to pick her successor in that event - making sure recently Independent Sanders does not represent the Democrats.
MineralMan
(146,282 posts)Most of the reports are coming from "former FBI" people, who are guessing about what is going on. There's nothing tangible to indicate that the FBI will recommend prosecution at all.
Hillary Clinton will not "suspend" anything, and should not.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)from Sunday indicates that prosecutors are now preparing for a grand jury after the 147 FBI agents finish interviewing those involved, including Hillary.
Prosecutors can traditionally get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich (unless a police officer kills an unarmed black person, of course - ) so the big question is "who" with reasonable speculation being Hillary, especially after the "just copy the top secret stuff without the header and email it already" email showing she knew exactly what she was doing.
That doesn't include the stuff from the Clinton Foundation, of course, or the whole issue of having government documents at her home, or evading FOIAs, or discussing "top secret stuff" with no-security clearance Blumenthal/paid by Bill, or any issues regarding "pay for play" with foreign governments while she was Secretary of State, or whatever the hacker who was extradited has to say, or even the IT guy they gave immunity to who was forwarding everything to her "home" account....
Funny Aside: one of her first non-secure confidential emails was to Petraeus!
I made the mistake of actually looking into it - it's ugly. Very, very ugly. She may have even cost us an asset or two. It appears the intelligence community is Not Happy - first Plame, now this.
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)I don't think they said anything about a grand jury.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)she could step aside now, but i could see her staying until an indictment. and yes, technically she is innocent until proven guilty, but we know the fbi will not recommend this without overwhelming evidence. the ethical thing to do would be to step aside, focus on her defense, and the rest of us can focus on getting a president elected.
do i see her doing that? no. she has never put anyone or anything before her personal ambition. the dnc will have to force it if it comes to that.
unless of course they want to stand by her and watch a republican get elected. but we know how much party identity is important to the oligarchy so they would never do that
krawhitham
(4,641 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Then she'll start the Presidential campaign.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]
LiberalFighter
(50,826 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)5. When she is in prison.
Can you be president from prison?
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...the less damage an indictment would have on our chances in November.
Ideally, she should favor our chances of winning in November above her own selfishness. But she won't.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)I'll bet you $100 straight up that there is no indictment of Hillary Clinton.
mac56
(17,566 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)I work for a living.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)She won't be indicted. She's too well connected, just as Karl Rove and Dick Cheney and Chris Christie to name a few..
She will not be indicted. She likely won't have to appear in front of a grand jury either. I doubt seriously that it will come to that unless as a witness to a potential Blumenthal indictment.
I would frankly be shocked if that would ever happen despite whatever facts should arise which would get anyone else indicted.
But, what is guaranteed as an outcome of all this, will poison her campaign, and general election or if it comes down after she's in the White House, her presidency.
A re-run of everything we had to endure in the 90's with White Water etc. etc. etc. not to mention Bill's involvement vis a vis the Foundation.
A very dark cloud looms and I just find it most bizarre Clinton supporters thought it would be a fine idea to have them return to the White House again.
And that's just stuff we know about now.
BKH70041
(961 posts)Boy, you got a lot to learn about politics.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Hillary supporters seem to have a major void on what constitutes good character and why it is important.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)was given enough rope to hang herself, and he can clean up a whole bunch of corruption by taking her out.
Now, that would be a legacy!
ericson00
(2,707 posts)n/t
thereismore
(13,326 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)That's still a big "if". The odds remain that won't be the outcome, but if it is she would be doing a great disservice to the party and the country by staying in the race.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)regardless of a conviction or not. For the FBI to be confident enough of their case to recommend indictment, that's an official marker that should tell us she would be unsuitable as a President. I think a lot of people in the public and the party would see it that way too. Even if she were elected the Repubs would never let up on it as well.
It would result in a no confidence opinion all around.
For the FBI and a grand jury to say they have grounds, I think we can walk out on the rest of that movie.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)artyteacher
(598 posts)And she's kicking Sanders and trump ass.
dchill
(38,462 posts)More like "Barely holding her own, but weakening." And I thought you Hillfolk were the "pragmatic, realistic" types.
artyteacher
(598 posts)And likely to crush on the upcoming real primaries.... Well, we'll see, huh?
dchill
(38,462 posts)artyteacher
(598 posts)She's still way ahead in both kinds of delegates, we're heading into big real primaries, and she's heavily favored in betting sites and upcoming state polls.
dchill
(38,462 posts)And, the DNC said NOT to count the superdelegates before the convention. Doing it is a misrepresentation of the race at any given point.
artyteacher
(598 posts)Someone who isn't a Dem, Never helped the party , has actually talked against tha party, and is behind millions of votes and a couple hundred normal delgates.
dchill
(38,462 posts)Later, arty.
artyteacher
(598 posts)Lol
dchill
(38,462 posts)artyteacher
(598 posts)469 to 29.
dchill
(38,462 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)147 FBI investigators ahead. Yup, she's winning.
amborin
(16,631 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Because that's what people do when winning.
They stop.
Merryland
(1,134 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)moves in her campaign.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Why wait?
Get it over with.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Clinton will be the nominee, then president.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)David Brock is still a Democrat, just not your Democrat.
Big difference between that and you aligning with right-wingers, I'm afraid.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)I'll leave you to it.
PS: Some light reading... http://www.fallacyfiles.org/
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)There's no place like home
There's no place like home
There's no place like home
awake
(3,226 posts)There is no place for a home sever
There is no place for a home sever
blueintelligentsia
(507 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Right after she's sworn in as president
SDJay
(1,089 posts)that the repukes will put on another dog and pony show in Congress with some idiotic "hearings" about this than the FBI would indict her anytime soon. I would at least hope, for the good of the country, that if the DOJ was going to indict or even thought it likely that there would be an indictment that President Obama would step in and tell HRC to get out before it's too late. Whether HRC would actually do that is another entirely hypothetical question.
That's when such a step would be taken - when Lynch tells Obama that a shitstorm is on the way and when the President tells HRC to hunker down and defend herself. I don't think that's going to happen or the pragmatist that is Obama would've probably done something already.
k8conant
(3,030 posts)so she can work on her suspension speech before she's set to appear on the Rachel Maddow Show.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Time for change
(13,714 posts)Bernie's is +7. I would like to see her suspend it right now, but of course I'm biased in that regard.
My more tolerant side says let her continue to run if she wants. But she at least should take an active part in speaking out against all the voter suppression going on and demanding investigations into them, especially the disappearing Democratic voter registrations going on right now in NY.
Umbral18
(105 posts)creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)Until then she should stay in.
The investigation is expected to conclude in May. If they recommend charging her there will be no way to keep that out of the news. Hopefully, there will be time to find another candidate if need be.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)so she won't be suspending no matter what.
jcgoldie
(11,627 posts)After your candidate makes up a couple million votes in the race? It's a democracy after all... people have to actually vote for you.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Suspending a campaign has a specific meaning and it (IIRC) allows the candidate to keep the money in the campaign accounts and also to resume the campaign.
She does not need to suspend. She needs to drop out. Remove herself.
That is the only good path for the Democratic Party.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)That's the only way it's gonna happen.