Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:22 AM Mar 2016

At What Point Should Hillary Suspend Her Campaign?

It's becoming more and more likely every day that the FBI is going to recommend an indictment. Should that happen, the DoJ is likely to appoint a Special Prosecutor who would determine whether or not to move forward with a prosecution. This process would take the decision to prosecute past the Democratic Convention and likely beyond the November election.

So, should Hillary suspend her campaign:

1. Now?
2. When the FBI recommends indictment?
3. When a Special Prosecutor Is Appointed?
4. She should not suspend at any time.

Decision time is coming folks, like it or not. Gamble on Hillary or go with the sure bet of Bernie.

93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At What Point Should Hillary Suspend Her Campaign? (Original Post) berni_mccoy Mar 2016 OP
Nobody is a sure bet, this is an election anything could happen. Agschmid Mar 2016 #1
People only say "anything could happen" in this election because of Bernie BirdieSanders Mar 2016 #75
Daily call for an appearance by the Indictment Fairy, right on time!!!! JoePhilly Mar 2016 #2
It'll be here in 24 business hours! greatauntoftriplets Mar 2016 #5
! Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #11
2? I guess? hereforthevoting Mar 2016 #3
There will be no indictment of Hillary Clinton due to the silly e-mail claims Gothmog Mar 2016 #4
It's the SERVER pdsimdars Mar 2016 #20
I'm agnostic on this... so why is her private server worse than a server in a company where others Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #65
Just as an FYI, why do you refer to it as "silly emails"? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #35
This e-mail controversy is made up and has no substance Gothmog Mar 2016 #52
Unfortunately, it's very real, and has substance. EyeOnLife Mar 2016 #57
Why do you think the FBI is wasting their precious budget money investigating? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #60
The FBI is involved. Do you REALLY believe NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #68
147 FBI agents investigating 'silly emails'? HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #82
#2 Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #6
Are those her supporters or are they Brock-O'Keefe's minions? berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #7
In all sincerity mythology Mar 2016 #17
Own it baby pdsimdars Mar 2016 #23
Brock and O'Keefe are two of a kind berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #24
But Brock is OK? BillZBubb Mar 2016 #30
Brock functions pretty much like O'Keefe, and he's Hillary's man, no two ways about it. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2016 #69
Fitzmas in April! nt hack89 Mar 2016 #8
Your indictment porno fantasy is not going to come true emulatorloo Mar 2016 #9
when she can no longer get more delegates than Sanders. JI7 Mar 2016 #10
I'm a Bernie supporter. But I don't think you can fault her for Jarqui Mar 2016 #12
Indictment? How is it becoming more and more likely. MineralMan Mar 2016 #13
Actually, the LA times article from yesterday and the Washington Post article IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #37
The articles said they are preparing to interview people creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #85
1.5. i couldn't decide. restorefreedom Mar 2016 #14
Even if indicted Hillary will not Suspend Her Campaign krawhitham Mar 2016 #15
She should suspend her campaign for the nomination after she is nominated. randome Mar 2016 #16
I was going to suggest adding primary to campaign. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #73
What about an Option 5? pdsimdars Mar 2016 #18
NOW. The sooner she does it... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #19
Would you care to put some money on this? sharp_stick Mar 2016 #21
Mitt? Is that you? mac56 Mar 2016 #27
LOL, no $10,000 is a little out of reach sharp_stick Mar 2016 #41
nobody would ever confuse Mitt for a sharp stick. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #90
I don't have the money to wager, anyway you're right 2banon Mar 2016 #50
You really believe an Obama run Justice Dept will indict the likely Party nominee? BKH70041 Mar 2016 #22
And boy-howdy, you got a lot to learn about CHARACTER! pdsimdars Mar 2016 #26
+1000 BillZBubb Mar 2016 #34
I think Obama is going to make sure she goes down since she IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #39
once she wins the general, her campaign is over ericson00 Mar 2016 #25
That is a trivial statement. Say something with information value, please. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #29
No, because then she will have to start her anti-impeachment campaign. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #32
The day before yesterday. John Poet Mar 2016 #28
IF the FBI recommends an indictment, she should suspend. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #31
2. The character bar shouldn't be any lower than that Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #33
and she could not have a security clearance even so. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #91
she'll never be indicted... artyteacher Mar 2016 #36
"Kicking Sanders' ass," is an overstatement. dchill Mar 2016 #38
i think being way ahead artyteacher Mar 2016 #40
Those were the days, eh? dchill Mar 2016 #42
i dont get your point artyteacher Mar 2016 #44
If that's how you see it, then there's no realistic basis for a discussion. dchill Mar 2016 #45
they aint chaning their minds for... artyteacher Mar 2016 #46
Dear me! Several already have. dchill Mar 2016 #47
several... artyteacher Mar 2016 #48
Here are several... dchill Mar 2016 #49
isnt it still . artyteacher Mar 2016 #53
See post 42. dchill Mar 2016 #54
I bet a lot will. Bernie's campaign has the momentum and energy Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #67
she is way ahead of Sanders. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #63
now; and if there is no indictment, then there is no rule of law in the US amborin Mar 2016 #43
Today while she has more votes and delegates zappaman Mar 2016 #51
Now. n/t Merryland Mar 2016 #55
Strong Bernie fan here. However, it's Hillary's business when she makes ladjf Mar 2016 #56
When Hillary accepts the fact that she will never be Queen, even for a Day. n/t PeoViejo Mar 2016 #58
After she wins in November... beachbumbob Mar 2016 #59
1. Now. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #61
The McCoy hit pieces keep on coming Tarc Mar 2016 #62
If truth = hit pieces then. But I don't post Brock-Okeefe garbage like you berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #70
I've never posted or supported anything by O'Keefe Tarc Mar 2016 #72
There is little difference between Brock and O'Keefe, and Brock proved that yesterday. berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #74
There is a gulf of a difference, but as you seem to be firmly rooted in Logical Fallacy land Tarc Mar 2016 #76
I would say #2... but I doubt she would do that Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #64
click your heels together 3 times Dem2 Mar 2016 #66
There is no place for a home sever awake Mar 2016 #83
She's looking into it.....n/t blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #71
January 20 2017 would be a good date dlwickham Mar 2016 #77
I Think It's Much More Likely SDJay Mar 2016 #78
1.5 Tomorrow k8conant Mar 2016 #79
Should she suspend or will she suspend? She should but she ain't suspending. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #80
Her favorabillity rating is already minus 13 Time for change Mar 2016 #81
Yesterday. nt Umbral18 Mar 2016 #84
If the FBI recommends indictment creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #86
id say right now if it will stop the Hillbots from posting nonsense memes all day long. litlbilly Mar 2016 #87
This election is the only thing she cares about in the world senz Mar 2016 #88
How about jcgoldie Mar 2016 #89
I do not like the word "suspend" here. grasswire Mar 2016 #92
Tonight when you go to sleep. In your dreams. JTFrog Mar 2016 #93

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
1. Nobody is a sure bet, this is an election anything could happen.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:23 AM
Mar 2016

Especially in the GE, over confidence is dangerous.

BirdieSanders

(26 posts)
75. People only say "anything could happen" in this election because of Bernie
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:51 PM
Mar 2016

Trump is a result of a concerted media effort to foist him upon the people; Bernie 'happened' in spite of a concerted media effort to disappear him from the people.

hereforthevoting

(241 posts)
3. 2? I guess?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:24 AM
Mar 2016

I'm still wondering why she's bothering running. Things have changed a lot over the last 30 years, but I guess you have to mingle with the commoners to get that.

Gothmog

(145,046 posts)
4. There will be no indictment of Hillary Clinton due to the silly e-mail claims
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:25 AM
Mar 2016

I expect these posts on DI but it is sad to see this silliness on DU

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
65. I'm agnostic on this... so why is her private server worse than a server in a company where others
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:33 PM
Mar 2016

in govt have used private email systems?

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
35. Just as an FYI, why do you refer to it as "silly emails"?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:41 AM
Mar 2016

Pretend for one second that Condaleeza Rice hid all of her government emails on a private server such that no FOIA requests yielded results, hid thousands of emails from a House committee investigating an incident that occurred under her watch, and then left emails pertaining to national security in a hackable server without adequate protections because she didn't like using a desktop computer?

If it was Rice, would you call this a "silly email" situation?

 

EyeOnLife

(37 posts)
57. Unfortunately, it's very real, and has substance.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:47 AM
Mar 2016

With classified email headers removed to be moved to nonsecure email, it's a violation. Done at least 22 times.

If it was you and me, we'd already be in prison for that kind of shit. It's nowhere near Benghazi

How about the fact that 1) the server was located in the basement of the Clinton home? and 2) Eventually moved to the bathroom of some guy in Colorado with Clinton connections?

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
60. Why do you think the FBI is wasting their precious budget money investigating?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:08 PM
Mar 2016

Do you believe them to be stupid or corrupt?

Plus the two judges, the prosecutors and the grand jury?

Stupid? Corrupt? Other?

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
68. The FBI is involved. Do you REALLY believe
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

the whole thing is made up and w/o substance, and if so, what do you know that the FBI doesn't and WHY the hell don't you contact them and straighten them out with your insider knowledge. If you truly support your candidate then your testimony is no doubt invaluable to her in defending against the FBI investigation. Contact them immediately and set them straight before it's too late.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
6. #2
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:28 AM
Mar 2016

if we get to #2 and she doesn't suspend It will be a grave mistake.

(notice how her supporters can't answer the question, all they can do is attack)

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
17. In all sincerity
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:17 AM
Mar 2016

That is an absolute bullshit smear. Accusing Clinton supporters of being like O'Keefe is low and scummy. You should delete this stupid attack.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
23. Own it baby
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:25 AM
Mar 2016

O'Keefe is the one who makes up doctored videos to smear people. Isn't that just what happened yesterday with the "Bernie is Monster" fake video story.

Own it baby. that is YOUR candidate's smear tactics from HER smear machine.

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
24. Brock and O'Keefe are two of a kind
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:25 AM
Mar 2016

And Hillary supporters here certainly promote Brock's RW propaganda attacks on Bernie. As in yesterday's bullshit attack on the spousal relationship between Bernie and his Wife that was pushed by Brock, picked up by certain media, who then had to apologize and retract it.

So no, it's not a bullshit smear against Hillary supporters here, especially those who promote Brock's bullshit attacks.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
30. But Brock is OK?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:31 AM
Mar 2016

He's from the same cloth as O'Keefe. But Hillary supporters constantly repeat his bullshit.

I guess anything is OK if it supports her majesty.

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
12. I'm a Bernie supporter. But I don't think you can fault her for
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:44 AM
Mar 2016

staying the course in her campaign. She is innocent until proven otherwise.

Having said that, IF (and it's still a very big IF at this point) she gets indicted beforre the general election, then she probably will have to withdraw because the air and money will come out of her campaign.

The old "Independent Counsel" has been renamed "Special Counsel" and that's probably who Attorney General Lynch, to avoid a confluct of interest, will have review the findings of the FBI and Inspector Generals before finalizing if anyone will get indicted. Since that will take a bunch of time after these FBI and Inspector Generals reports get done, it's unlikely there will be any indictment decision before the general election.

If Hillary wins the primary, she'll probably be campaigning with that dark cloud over her head.

If the FBI report or Inspector General reports get leaked recommending indictment, then she probably cannot win whether she stays in the election or not - even though she won't have been proven guilty at that point. It may be that the Democratic establishment is sitting back on this so that they get to pick her successor in that event - making sure recently Independent Sanders does not represent the Democrats.

MineralMan

(146,282 posts)
13. Indictment? How is it becoming more and more likely.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:46 AM
Mar 2016

Most of the reports are coming from "former FBI" people, who are guessing about what is going on. There's nothing tangible to indicate that the FBI will recommend prosecution at all.

Hillary Clinton will not "suspend" anything, and should not.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
37. Actually, the LA times article from yesterday and the Washington Post article
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:53 AM
Mar 2016

from Sunday indicates that prosecutors are now preparing for a grand jury after the 147 FBI agents finish interviewing those involved, including Hillary.

Prosecutors can traditionally get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich (unless a police officer kills an unarmed black person, of course - ) so the big question is "who" with reasonable speculation being Hillary, especially after the "just copy the top secret stuff without the header and email it already" email showing she knew exactly what she was doing.

That doesn't include the stuff from the Clinton Foundation, of course, or the whole issue of having government documents at her home, or evading FOIAs, or discussing "top secret stuff" with no-security clearance Blumenthal/paid by Bill, or any issues regarding "pay for play" with foreign governments while she was Secretary of State, or whatever the hacker who was extradited has to say, or even the IT guy they gave immunity to who was forwarding everything to her "home" account....

Funny Aside: one of her first non-secure confidential emails was to Petraeus!

I made the mistake of actually looking into it - it's ugly. Very, very ugly. She may have even cost us an asset or two. It appears the intelligence community is Not Happy - first Plame, now this.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
85. The articles said they are preparing to interview people
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:10 AM
Mar 2016

I don't think they said anything about a grand jury.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
14. 1.5. i couldn't decide.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:53 AM
Mar 2016

she could step aside now, but i could see her staying until an indictment. and yes, technically she is innocent until proven guilty, but we know the fbi will not recommend this without overwhelming evidence. the ethical thing to do would be to step aside, focus on her defense, and the rest of us can focus on getting a president elected.

do i see her doing that? no. she has never put anyone or anything before her personal ambition. the dnc will have to force it if it comes to that.

unless of course they want to stand by her and watch a republican get elected. but we know how much party identity is important to the oligarchy so they would never do that

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
16. She should suspend her campaign for the nomination after she is nominated.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:08 AM
Mar 2016

Then she'll start the Presidential campaign.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
19. NOW. The sooner she does it...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:21 AM
Mar 2016

...the less damage an indictment would have on our chances in November.
Ideally, she should favor our chances of winning in November above her own selfishness. But she won't.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
21. Would you care to put some money on this?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:22 AM
Mar 2016

I'll bet you $100 straight up that there is no indictment of Hillary Clinton.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
50. I don't have the money to wager, anyway you're right
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:28 AM
Mar 2016

She won't be indicted. She's too well connected, just as Karl Rove and Dick Cheney and Chris Christie to name a few..

She will not be indicted. She likely won't have to appear in front of a grand jury either. I doubt seriously that it will come to that unless as a witness to a potential Blumenthal indictment.

I would frankly be shocked if that would ever happen despite whatever facts should arise which would get anyone else indicted.

But, what is guaranteed as an outcome of all this, will poison her campaign, and general election or if it comes down after she's in the White House, her presidency.

A re-run of everything we had to endure in the 90's with White Water etc. etc. etc. not to mention Bill's involvement vis a vis the Foundation.

A very dark cloud looms and I just find it most bizarre Clinton supporters thought it would be a fine idea to have them return to the White House again.

And that's just stuff we know about now.





BKH70041

(961 posts)
22. You really believe an Obama run Justice Dept will indict the likely Party nominee?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:24 AM
Mar 2016

Boy, you got a lot to learn about politics.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
34. +1000
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:36 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary supporters seem to have a major void on what constitutes good character and why it is important.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
39. I think Obama is going to make sure she goes down since she
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:56 AM
Mar 2016

was given enough rope to hang herself, and he can clean up a whole bunch of corruption by taking her out.

Now, that would be a legacy!

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
31. IF the FBI recommends an indictment, she should suspend.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:34 AM
Mar 2016

That's still a big "if". The odds remain that won't be the outcome, but if it is she would be doing a great disservice to the party and the country by staying in the race.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
33. 2. The character bar shouldn't be any lower than that
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:36 AM
Mar 2016

regardless of a conviction or not. For the FBI to be confident enough of their case to recommend indictment, that's an official marker that should tell us she would be unsuitable as a President. I think a lot of people in the public and the party would see it that way too. Even if she were elected the Repubs would never let up on it as well.

It would result in a no confidence opinion all around.

For the FBI and a grand jury to say they have grounds, I think we can walk out on the rest of that movie.

dchill

(38,462 posts)
38. "Kicking Sanders' ass," is an overstatement.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:53 AM
Mar 2016

More like "Barely holding her own, but weakening." And I thought you Hillfolk were the "pragmatic, realistic" types.

artyteacher

(598 posts)
44. i dont get your point
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:07 AM
Mar 2016

She's still way ahead in both kinds of delegates, we're heading into big real primaries, and she's heavily favored in betting sites and upcoming state polls.

dchill

(38,462 posts)
45. If that's how you see it, then there's no realistic basis for a discussion.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:11 AM
Mar 2016

And, the DNC said NOT to count the superdelegates before the convention. Doing it is a misrepresentation of the race at any given point.

artyteacher

(598 posts)
46. they aint chaning their minds for...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

Someone who isn't a Dem, Never helped the party , has actually talked against tha party, and is behind millions of votes and a couple hundred normal delgates.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
72. I've never posted or supported anything by O'Keefe
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:37 PM
Mar 2016

David Brock is still a Democrat, just not your Democrat.

Big difference between that and you aligning with right-wingers, I'm afraid.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
76. There is a gulf of a difference, but as you seem to be firmly rooted in Logical Fallacy land
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:53 PM
Mar 2016

I'll leave you to it.

PS: Some light reading... http://www.fallacyfiles.org/

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
66. click your heels together 3 times
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:33 PM
Mar 2016

There's no place like home

There's no place like home

There's no place like home

awake

(3,226 posts)
83. There is no place for a home sever
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:48 PM
Mar 2016

There is no place for a home sever

There is no place for a home sever

SDJay

(1,089 posts)
78. I Think It's Much More Likely
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:57 PM
Mar 2016

that the repukes will put on another dog and pony show in Congress with some idiotic "hearings" about this than the FBI would indict her anytime soon. I would at least hope, for the good of the country, that if the DOJ was going to indict or even thought it likely that there would be an indictment that President Obama would step in and tell HRC to get out before it's too late. Whether HRC would actually do that is another entirely hypothetical question.

That's when such a step would be taken - when Lynch tells Obama that a shitstorm is on the way and when the President tells HRC to hunker down and defend herself. I don't think that's going to happen or the pragmatist that is Obama would've probably done something already.

k8conant

(3,030 posts)
79. 1.5 Tomorrow
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:02 PM
Mar 2016

so she can work on her suspension speech before she's set to appear on the Rachel Maddow Show.

Time for change

(13,714 posts)
81. Her favorabillity rating is already minus 13
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:07 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie's is +7. I would like to see her suspend it right now, but of course I'm biased in that regard.

My more tolerant side says let her continue to run if she wants. But she at least should take an active part in speaking out against all the voter suppression going on and demanding investigations into them, especially the disappearing Democratic voter registrations going on right now in NY.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
86. If the FBI recommends indictment
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:13 AM
Mar 2016

Until then she should stay in.

The investigation is expected to conclude in May. If they recommend charging her there will be no way to keep that out of the news. Hopefully, there will be time to find another candidate if need be.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
88. This election is the only thing she cares about in the world
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:29 AM
Mar 2016

so she won't be suspending no matter what.

jcgoldie

(11,627 posts)
89. How about
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:44 AM
Mar 2016

After your candidate makes up a couple million votes in the race? It's a democracy after all... people have to actually vote for you.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
92. I do not like the word "suspend" here.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:57 AM
Mar 2016

Suspending a campaign has a specific meaning and it (IIRC) allows the candidate to keep the money in the campaign accounts and also to resume the campaign.

She does not need to suspend. She needs to drop out. Remove herself.

That is the only good path for the Democratic Party.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»At What Point Should Hill...