2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYet another attack: Bernie doesn't want to help down ticket Dems. He's selfish and not one of us!!
It's really sad that some Democrats are trying to turn a fantastic campaign based on PEOPLE POWER into a negative that once again tries to paint Bernie as a disingenuous bad guy who is using the Democratic Party.
I'm not going to waste my time writing out a defense of Bernie. If you don't already know what kind of man he is, then you either haven't looked at Bernie's record, or you're as dishonest as your candidate when you parrot this vile stuff.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Hillary has had no hesitation when it comes to fundraising for fellow down-ballot Dems.
How is Bernie supposed to bring about the "revolution" without elected Dems? I suppose he thinks he can wave a magic wand and make Congress disappear.
Also, many of those down-ballot Dems are super delegates.
They're not going to be too happy about being shunned by a johnny-come-lately.
dchill
(38,437 posts)Than any amount of Corporate PAC money. This attack is dishonestly ginned-up and specious. Bernie's donors do not have any interest in getting a Debbie Wasserman Schultz reelected. Nor should they.
revbones
(3,660 posts)and not about starting a bogus "Victory Fund" to let the campaign siphon money from...
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)the people or politicians?
I'll always bank on the people over politicians when it comes to making things happen, politicians are scared of the people this election cycle
RandySF
(58,464 posts)Because he's nothing for the rest of the ticket.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Meanwhile, he has gone to The People to fuind his campaign without the Big Corporate Masters.
If the "rest of the ticket" were smart they'd be looking at how to emulate his successful fundraising, by energizing contributions from voters themselves.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Start a bogus "Victory Fund" that supposedly will reward super-delegates that vote for her and that her campaign can siphon off unlimited money from?
How many have gotten funds thus far? If you find any, was it before or after they announced their vote?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It is fairly boring that they pick a poutrage of the day and repeat it endlessly.
You are absolutely correct. sanders has pioneered an amazing way to actually inspire average people to contribute small amounts, and thus raise a critical mass of funds for his campaign without the need to pander to Big Bidness and the wealthy.
Instead of knocking it, Democrats ought to be looking at how to emulate it on a party-wide basis.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)It's about his MOTIVES and intentions.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)to finally being the principles he and many otehyrs believe in to a position to actually make a difference.
Read about how he operated as Mayor of Burlington to see how his leadership style translates into positive change in the real world.
http://www.thenation.com/article/bernies-burlington-city-sustainable-future/
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/26/us/politics/as-mayor-bernie-sanders-was-more-pragmatic-than-socialist.html
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Just asking....
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I spent several minutes looking up those links for you in good faith.
And you just come back with lies and bullshit.
So much for you.
You got nothing.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)I don't see why you all even care about this supposed "attack", since Sanders answered exactly how his supporters would want him to.
If it wasn't for his own words none of this would even be up for discussion. Think about that before you start lashing out and crying blasphemy against the savior.
In 2018, a real Democrat will likely step up to run for the Senate in Vermont and I will donate to the person without hesitation.
hrmbaja
(59 posts)Respect your elders
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I'm not shocked many can't. Our citizens voted Bush in office twice. I am not shocked.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Stallion
(6,473 posts)I don't hear Bernie denying it
I'll be voting for the Democrat just like the vast majority of other actual Democrats
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)You've seen it... it's the one where she has dark glasses on and is using her Blackberry. In the pic she's doing Google searches which are displayed beside the picture.
how to train a bird
how to get a bird to land on my podium
where to buy a bird
how go teach a bird to say i'm with her
I had to pull over to the side of the road it made me laugh so hard.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Yes, it's funny.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I will admit that Hillary was a team player in 2008 after she conceded to Obama. She did a lot more than give him a pro forma endorsement and walk away, and I give her credit for that. However, she has not always been such a team player. I remember reading reports of how she poached Gore's donors in 2000, hitting them up to contribute to her Senate campaign instead of his campaign for president. And don't even get me started on how the Clintonistas hung Kerry out to dry in 2004.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)If Bernie sticks with his ethics, it will be hard for him to compete with Hillary and raise money for downstream Democrats. There's no doubt there are many Democrats he would support, but unless he changes his funding model, it's just not a luxury available to him. One advantage of raising money from the wealthy and from the SuperPacs, is you end up with more money to distribute. This will probably also help Hillary with the superdelegates.
WhiteTara
(29,692 posts)it wouldn't cost a thing and would give the revolution some more staying power. JMHO of course.
Dem2
(8,166 posts)The Vermont legislature passed a civil unions bill in 2000, 15 years before the United States Supreme Court legalized gay marriage throughout the country. Gay activists formed a political action committee to raise money to protect vulnerable Vermont Democrats from a fierce backlash to the vote.
But Mr. Sanders, a political independent, wasnt raising a lot of money for Democrats, said Ms. Murray, who organized the PAC. He wasnt a Democrat. And none of the progressives were in danger of not being re-elected.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Should be fairly simple to prove one way or the other
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Once again, the Clinton side proves they don't care about voters, they care about their own careers.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Will wonders never cease?
Trajan
(19,089 posts)But it appears our party has been hijacked by right wingers and mealy mouthed 'Democratic' party sycophants who kowtow to the right wingers controlling the Democratic Party ...
I don't know about you, but I believe we are either going to FIGHT to wrest control of the party BACK from those right wingers, OR we are going to split into a different party ....
I advise we take our party back ....