2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWho really interrupted Hillary's speech today?
Hillary Clinton claimed it was Bernie supporters and MSNBC repeated that as if it were a fact, but with no evidence, no interview from the protesters.
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, but how can MSNBC just repeat that claim without showing evidence?
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc-quick-cuts/watch/sanders-supporters-interrupt-clinton-event-655915075535
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)It occurred to me that David Brock might have been the instigator.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Hillary is one of those people.
How's the email probe going?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But that doesn't invalidate my point.
We will find out very soon!
HubertHeaver
(2,520 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)You are questioning the SOP of 21st Century "journalism"?
You're adorbs.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)got it thanks.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the delusions of others?
Alrighy, then!
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)under the delusion she is a democrat. I guess Zell Miller was a democrat also. So was Max Baucus. The right wing of the corporate left.
riversedge
(70,087 posts)Sad. and beyond the pale. 'the crowd she runs with" Nasty and shameful of you to post this.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Having Brock in HRC's campaign is the equivalent of Ed Muskie deciding to run again, and hiring Donald Segretti as his campaign manager.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)SamKnause
(13,088 posts)What a joke.
They have been listening and they don't support your
'No We Can't' vision for this country.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ya, real hard to tell whose supporters those are.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but without actually seeing them who knows but Hillary did have a response team at the ready
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)seeking to shut this kind of event down generally get shown the door
the voices were very young sounding
national press is reporting it as Benie people
and, y'all kind of have this reputation
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)you should pick a script, though:
1) the poor hecklers were being oppressed or
2) no way were those Bernie supporters, we're always respectful and inclusive
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)down the other group
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)are the victims here, oppressed by the people who were there to listen to the candidate speak.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Very possibly because they had Bernie t-shirts on or something like that.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Why is the national press repeating Hillary's claims as fact without showing any evidence?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)BTW
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to lie about this.
Hillary Clinton was giving a spirited defense of her campaign proposals and her lead in the Democratic primaries when she was disrupted by a group of Bernie Sanders supporters ahead of her home state's primary.
A few minutes into Clinton's remarks on the campus of Purchase College, about 20 Sanders supporters shouted, "If she wins, we lose," and began walking out.
AP report
http://abc7ny.com/politics/hillary-clinton-faces-disruptive-bernie-sanders-supporters-in-new-york/1270432/
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)All you're saying is that whatever the MSM report is automatically true and anybody who questions it is a conspiracy theorist.
All I'm saying is that that the MSM are a bunch of liars who constantly kiss the asses of people with money and power and they often repeat Hillary Clinton's statements as facts without presenting any evidence.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)camp.
Not in the "Hillary should have made them tea and baked them cookies' camp as others are.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)It seems like the media are simply repeating Clinton's claims without justification. They aren't justifying or explaining why they think these people are connected to the Sanders campaign.
I would like to see a video or blog post from the protesters where they explain their connection to the Sanders campaign. Then I would believe it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)they got an eyeball on them.
Most plausible scenario here is that they were wearing Bernie gear.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)dchill
(38,444 posts)Is the opposite impossible?
(The correct answer is "No."
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Or something like that.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)giant media conspiracy?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)when I specifically did not say it happened, but rather that it was possible that's what happened.
Anyways, we have proof that it was college kidz protesting Clinton, so enough is enough.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Nobody taught you that?
In any event, I was 100% right and all those trying to deny it were wrong.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)But you smear away
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)the topic of the OP is Clinton being heckled.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)That response didn't seem at all to be spontaneous.
"Bernie People"?
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)---
MisterP
(23,730 posts)in case of any interruption
human wall optional
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)... would never do something that cynical and calculated.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)But it definitely bears mentioning. And repeating.
Also
In other words, more than two million of Clinton's alleged Twitter followers are either fake or never tweet.
Put it this way: Based on abundant evidence regarding her curious shifts in positions as well as her conspicuous efforts to manufacture consent, if I were looking for a way to describe the Clinton campaign, "genuine" would not be the first word that springs to mind.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)We donated to her whether we wanted to or not.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"Genuine", if followed by "crap", works for me
Prism
(5,815 posts)But man, that seemed awfully choreographed.
And notice she's smiling the whole time. Usually, you see a hint of annoyance or anger or buh when a politician is interrupted, because they're not expecting it.
She smiled throughout. And she had a canned response to it.
That was really fucking weird.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and if she had frowned or acted upset, people would talk about what an unpleasant personality she has, is unlikeable, has contempt for the commoners etc.
those weren't the first punks to get in her face. ask the House Benghazi committee
Prism
(5,815 posts)You, who jumped on the backs of LGBTers for years for demanding equality. You want to make a play, "Well, you're clearly sexist!"
No, kiddo. Don't. It's stupid and pointless, and you'll just embarrass yourself further.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Run along now.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)get such a bad reputation on the Internet. Such respectful, rational people.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Then we can bother about your behavior.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)more compelling than any temper tantrum of mine could prove.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Just saying, if you had a Top Ten List of people who went after LGBTers for protesting their inequality, you managed to rank. You have a reputation as a not friendly type to the community.
Just own it or whatever. I don't care. You do you
JI7
(89,240 posts)I've seen that smile through a lot.
I think what gets me is the collective audience chant that just sprang up out of nowhere. Usually chants have a slow beginning and a build up. But there, it just arrived, collectively, in unison, immediately.
It's unnatural and suspicious.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Identities of the hecklers. She said, "oh I know, the Bernie people came to say that." That was a strange response. What made her think they were Bernie people?
Prism
(5,815 posts)And I'm really not a conspiracy type. I always go with the likeliest explanation for things. But everything about that video is weird on its face.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)And had her answer scripted.
She was so damn prepared for that disruption.
But the "spontaneous" chanting is why I'm questioning. You don't get a few hundred people on board with a chant in 3 seconds. Usually it's a slow build. But everything was so cut and dried there.
It definitely felt staged to me.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Everything they do and say is coordinated and designed to help their candidate.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)The two largest media corporations have given the most to HRC's campaign.
Simply wikipedia, TimeWarner and Comcast, and you'll see CNN and NBCUniversal (MSNBC) listed as subsidiaries.
jillan
(39,451 posts)that we will not vote for you.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)crowd was there for her instead of some random Bernie hecklers?
jillan
(39,451 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)National press is reporting that they were Bernie people.
Are you really surprised that Sanders supporters would heckle someone?
It's what they do on Facebook and Twitter all day.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Show me.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Hillary Clinton was giving a spirited defense of her campaign proposals and her lead in the Democratic primaries when she was disrupted by a group of Bernie Sanders supporters ahead of her home state's primary.
A few minutes into Clinton's remarks on the campus of Purchase College, about 20 Sanders supporters shouted, "If she wins, we lose," and began walking out.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)for months ... up until the actual voting started.
Kudos!
Mike__M
(1,052 posts)It's hard to get those wild birds to follow a script, so you do what you can. . . .
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)LonePirate
(13,408 posts)If the investigative journalism benefits a person's preferred candidate, then it is legitimate.
If the investigative journalism benefits the opponent of a person's preferred, then it is a conspiracy or illegitimate journalism.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)There's as much facts to support that as there are to support that it was Sanders supporters.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Because they want the video of the cops escorting them out. And because it multiplies the impact of their message.
Mike__M
(1,052 posts)has that video surfaced yet?
Protesters who don't want publicity -- seems kinda strange.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)and some were carrying a flag I think maybe a Palestinian flag? Not 100% sure on the flag.
DUer greek tragedy posted a video of it in the forum.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)out in full force today.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)was Chuck Todd of NBC who said something to the effect that it wasn't the media's job to correct false hoods in news stories
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)BainsBane
(53,015 posts)That is what your own link says.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)they were Bernie people. What made her think that?
BainsBane
(53,015 posts)and other logos. They usually do.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)As
BainsBane
(53,015 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)They didn't say anything about Bernie. What evidence is there that they were "Bernie people?"
BainsBane
(53,015 posts)Like this, for example: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1618799
The day is young.
I recall Sanders supporters here insisting protestors are a Trump rally weren't really Bernie supporters, despite the fact they were chanting "Bernie, Bernie." I am going to guess that evidence won't much matter. It never has before.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)how Hillary was so sure they were "Bernie people."
I would like to see evidence one way or the other.
BainsBane
(53,015 posts)The press has reported that they are Sanders supporters. You could write CNN, Time, or any of the news outlets reporting the story and ask how they know.
Yes, I believe Clinton knew who she was talking to. I don't see any reason to conclude she didn't.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Without sentences that start with "I", she'd have literally nothing to say.
I didn't realize how egotistical she is until contrasted with Sanders.
Facts in evidence: the media played a Clinton speech because "hecklers" interrupted it.
The only thing that makes me doubt that it was staged disruption is how nasty and ham-handedly she reacted. Maybe she thinks that's presidential. Not me, I think it looks Carly Fiorina.
BainsBane
(53,015 posts)to have the limelight all to herself. Oops. That was someone else.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)BainsBane
(53,015 posts)http://time.com/4278203/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-protesters-new-york/
riversedge
(70,087 posts)another event--I forget--but she has reached out to with those words before. I have heard them--or very similar words.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)go to youtube it's on GreenPeace's channel
BainsBane
(53,015 posts)riversedge
(70,087 posts)BainsBane
(53,015 posts)They were supporters yes, but that doesn't mean it was the campaign itself.
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)BainsBane
(53,015 posts)https://www.google.com/search?q=janesville+trump+rally+bernie&espv=2&biw=1422&bih=661&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNx630-uvLAhUF1xQKHSKiDSsQ_AUICCgD#tbm=isch&q=janesville+trump+rally+protest+bernie
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)The picture doesn't tell me anything. Just that someone put it on twitter. And any article shows the same thing. Not the link to CraigsList where we can actually see the real thing.
But thanks for those google searches. I did read about a man offering hugs at a Trump Rally and also the Trump supporter who pepper sprayed a girl who was protesting.
BainsBane
(53,015 posts)You can hunt down the links yourself. The event has already happened anyway.
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)sheesh folks, c'mon!
🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)If so, there's your answer.
🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦🐦
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Thanks so much for asking it!
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Kali
(55,003 posts)Response to Kali (Reply #146)
Name removed Message auto-removed