Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:05 PM Mar 2016

Very, very...very interesting (Sanders and Clinton D.C. ballot access)

In their 23 March 2016 online news release, the D.C. Board of Elections published a list of “Democratic Candidates in the June 14, 2016 Primary Election” that shows Hillary Clinton’s nominating petition filing date as 15 March 2016. There is NO Filing Date shown for Bernie Sanders, though.

How could that date be, because the D.C. Democratic Party stated that, while they received both candidates registration info before the D.C. Board of Elections Office closed at 4:45 pm on 16 Mar 2016, the last day to file, they didn't submitted either of their nominating petitions to the DCBOEE until 1:31 pm, 17 March 2016.

So the DCBOEE entered Clinton as not just filing before the deadline, but filing two days before the party actually late filed her petition. And the DCBOEE should have at least entered a date for Sanders, (if not the 15th, like Clinton's, then why not the late date of 17 March?), because the D.C. voter, and big Clinton supporter, who challenged Sanders' petition to the DCBOEE didn't do so until 24 March 2016, the day AFTER this list was posted.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Very, very...very interesting (Sanders and Clinton D.C. ballot access) (Original Post) JimDandy Mar 2016 OP
If it looks like ratfuckery and smells like ratfuckery..... djean111 Mar 2016 #1
It raises a huge ethical issue--perhaps even an issue of DCBOE's falsification of public records. JimDandy Mar 2016 #6
kick Segami Mar 2016 #2
'Confusion appeared to reign late Wednesday over just what happened and whether it could be fixed. elleng Mar 2016 #3
Smells marions ghost Mar 2016 #4
I loathe her more each day..nt monmouth4 Mar 2016 #5
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. If it looks like ratfuckery and smells like ratfuckery.....
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:09 PM
Mar 2016

Maybe somewhere, in a smelly little room, someone said hey, at least we can TRY just leaving Bernie off the ballot completely, and see if we can get away with it.

The troubling thing is - this does not seem in the least bit fanciful, it is Rovian and would be something Brock would do.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
6. It raises a huge ethical issue--perhaps even an issue of DCBOE's falsification of public records.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:36 PM
Mar 2016

Falsely posting Clinton's filing date as 15 March 2016 made it appear that she was within the legal filing deadline and therefore NOT SUBJECT TO A CHALLENGE!

The DCBOE rules for Petition Challenges state that, on the 3rd day after the petition filing deadline, the Board shall post for 10 consecutive days all nominating petitions for public inspection and the opportunity for challenge. Any challenge must occur within that 10 day period. Any candidate not challenged will appear on the ballot:

1406.9 If at the expiration of the challenge period referred to in this section, no challenge has been filed with respect to a nominating petition, the Executive Director, or his or her designee, shall certify the candidate, and the candidate’s name shall be printed on the ballot.


Their presentation of Sanders' and Clinton's listings (none for Sanders and a falsified on-time date for Clinton), while hiding the opportunity to challenge Clinton, was practically an invitation for someone to challenge Sanders.

If falsification of these dates by the governmental body can be proved, that may create an avenue to still challenge Clinton's access to the ballot.

elleng

(130,861 posts)
3. 'Confusion appeared to reign late Wednesday over just what happened and whether it could be fixed.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:19 PM
Mar 2016

D.C. Democratic Party Chairwoman Anita Bonds told The Washington Times that the party’s primary plan, which included the paperwork for all candidates, was submitted by 7 p.m. on the 16th. The D.C. Board of Elections offices closes at 4:45 p.m.'

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/30/bernie-sanders-left-dc-primary-ballot-after-democr/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Very, very...very interes...