Climate Change.. New York! Is Hillary's Integrity With Respect To Climate Change A Concern?

...a lot of people whom Rush Limbaugh refers to as environmental whackos.*

There is no fracking in New York.

Pipelines and compressor stations are fought tooth and nail.

Lot's of Bernie signs.

*Message to Rush: we also have a lot of clean air and water up here, too. Ask New York City about the water.

than oil or coal, then the best ways to extract that gas have to be considered. I am against fracking in most instances, but I'm not sure one should automatically condemn it in every case.

I think Clinton's position is reasonable:

She's against it "when any locality or any state is against it," "when the release of methane or contamination of water is present," and "unless we can require that anybody who fracks has to tell us exactly what chemicals they are using."

Until those conditions are met, "we've got to regulate everything that is currently underway, and we have to have a system in place that prevents further fracking." "By the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place," she added.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/03/hillary-clinton-debate-fracking


While Clinton has changed her position to that expressed above, Sanders does not see the nuances involved in promoting natural gas in the short-run. He's way too rigid, and afraid to tell the truth to potential voters, on most issues.

...have-it-both-ways position.

see here: http://www.thenation.com/article/global-warming-terrifying-new-chemistry/

the sky.

gas emissions.

There is no way to make it safe.

Politicians who say that are lying because they are shills for the oil industry.

"By the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place . . . . . ."

Seems quite blunt to me.

welcome birdieSanders
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511637637

She is the Queen of OBFUSCATION! Not a TRUTH teller by nature... She cannot give you the color of the shoes she has on w/o going into some multi-faceted discussion that never answers the question posed.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-fracking-causing-oklahomas-earthquakes/

http://ecowatch.com/2015/04/23/oklahoma-earthquakes-caused-by-fracking/

!

Thanks for the thread, CorporatistNation.

I would submit that she is not... And That is my point... Hillary's position on Climate Change is that ... it's not a net benefit for her based on her history... as noted. Glad to hear about all the Bernie signs... New Yorker's across the state are not easily duped!

In the end should bode well for Bernie and America! Thanks!

....'I agree with whatever the voters listening to this speech agree with.'

She does not want fracking in communities that don't want it, and vice versa.

That leaves a non-position for local communities to battle over.

and that's just the DEMOCRATS