HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Why is it acceptable for ...

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:42 PM

Why is it acceptable for Hillary Clinton to run for POTUS while under FBI investigation

And probably be indicted? I can't even imagine what the corporate media would be saying if it were Bernie. It's beyond the pale. I don't want another nano second of that scandal plagued pathalogic liar. Her hands are soaked in blood.

16 replies, 1365 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 16 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why is it acceptable for Hillary Clinton to run for POTUS while under FBI investigation (Original post)
onecaliberal Apr 2016 OP
DURHAM D Apr 2016 #1
Press Virginia Apr 2016 #8
CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #11
Joe the Revelator Apr 2016 #12
DURHAM D Apr 2016 #13
HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #2
Kalidurga Apr 2016 #3
onecaliberal Apr 2016 #4
Press Virginia Apr 2016 #9
Politicalboi Apr 2016 #5
Kalidurga Apr 2016 #7
amborin Apr 2016 #6
Downwinder Apr 2016 #10
demigoddess Apr 2016 #14
onecaliberal Apr 2016 #16
Post removed Apr 2016 #15

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:44 PM

1. She is not under FBI investigation.

Do you not have any better tripe?







Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:55 PM

8. Yeaaaah...it's her server that's in trouble

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:27 PM

11. Then WHO Pretell IS The FBI Investigating?

Unbelievable! THIS Is Legal? But Is It Ethical?






Rosario Dawson ... WHY She Supports Bernie...

&nohtml5=False

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:30 PM

12. You're just making up 'facts' everywhere tonight

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Joe the Revelator (Reply #12)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:32 PM

13. Joe,

I thought I told you to get some rest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:45 PM

2. First POTUS candidate ever to be under FBI criminal investigation while campaigning.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:47 PM

3. Because there are less than 140 but more than 0 who are working on a non-criminal investigation...

I think they had 140 at one time, but now that they have gone through all the emails and stuff I am guessing there are less than that working on a non-criminal investigation. Gebus that sounds hinky that so many FBI agents would be working on a non-criminal investigation. Could it be someone is trying to hoodwink us into believing it's a non-criminal investigation. And that Hillary isn't being investigated it's just the emails she sent from her server that is being investigated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kalidurga (Reply #3)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:50 PM

4. That is 100% not true. Maybe you should read about the investigation

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Reply #4)


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:51 PM

5. And now the Panama Papers

 

Clinton Foundation laundering money. Is that going to go away? I think this is worse than the FBI investigation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #5)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:54 PM

7. It definitely is worse.

She got speaking fees from a German bank that she had greatly enriched with her votes for the trade deal. I could think of worse things she did, but those things are matters of opinion. This however is well documented now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:53 PM

6. her quid pro quo behavior was shocking; she used the State Dept as a slush fund

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:06 PM

10. Eugene Debs ran from prison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 12:36 AM

14. Because if you do not allow someone to run when under investigation

then a really fast way to take out the opposition party is to have someone investigated. As it is, it is bad publicity and propaganda and the republicans do it anyway. Where were you in Government class, anyway??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demigoddess (Reply #14)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:02 AM

16. This isn't a bullshit investigation and you know it. I hear what you're saying but this woman

Damn well knew better and did what she was told not to do. She purposely went around the process, hid things, and didn't turn over ANY records even though they all belong to the government. Then lied about how they went through the emails after the fact. She broke the law, if you had done the same thing she did, you'd already be in prison.

On Edit: My government class didn't teach me that is was okay to break the law and threaten national security and get away with it because you're well connected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Reply to this thread