Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:22 PM Apr 2016

Why isn't it racist to dismiss or discount the importance of Democratic votes from the "deep south,"

knowing that the majority of Democrats in the deep south are African Americans?

If you were with them, looking them in the eye, would you tell them their votes didn't matter because they were from the South?

Why is it okay to essentially do that in a debate speech?

“Look, let me acknowledge what is absolutely true: Secretary Clinton cleaned our clock in the Deep South, no question about it. We got murdered there. That is the most conservative part of this great country. That's the fact,” Sanders said. “But you know what, we're out of the Deep South now. And we're moving up. We got here, we're going to California, we got a number of large states there. And having won 7 out of the last 8 caucuses and primaries, having a level of excitement and energy among working people and low-income people doing better.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/bernie-sanders-deep-south-conservative-222000#ixzz45vu9XHZP
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why isn't it racist to dismiss or discount the importance of Democratic votes from the "deep south," (Original Post) pnwmom Apr 2016 OP
It's not OK ... salinsky Apr 2016 #1
Agree totally workinclasszero Apr 2016 #13
I thought Hillary had them all sewn up? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #2
The numbers are solidly in her favor. But as long as the party remains divided pnwmom Apr 2016 #6
It obviously is DrDan Apr 2016 #3
Bernie did that? I know his supporters here do it all the time, and while I am a supporter Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #4
This is what he said: pnwmom Apr 2016 #12
That's one of the most deeply offensive statements workinclasszero Apr 2016 #17
You know who agreed with him? Larry Wilmore nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #30
Black people in the south voted much like black people have in other states. Bernie hasn't pnwmom Apr 2016 #33
STOP TREATING PEOPLE LIKE LEGO BLOCKS nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #35
Why? That's exactly what Bernie did when he denigrated Dems in the deep South. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #38
So you insist that the south is not conservative nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #41
I insist that the vote of AA people in the South is very similar to the vote of AA's in the North. pnwmom Apr 2016 #42
I insist that you stop treating demographics like lego blocks nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #43
Treating people like lego blocks? WTH does that mean? brush Apr 2016 #47
He did better with northern blacks, and he won Vermont blacks. jfern Apr 2016 #50
Nope. He couldn't even win the African American vote in Vermont. He hasn't carried the AA vote pnwmom Apr 2016 #56
Where's their information? jfern Apr 2016 #61
Because pointing out their irrelevancy in November has nothing to do with race. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #5
He wasn't talking about November. He was talking about now. nt pnwmom Apr 2016 #8
That makes no sense. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #11
He's discounting the fact that African Americans in Boston are more likely to vote pnwmom Apr 2016 #15
Actually people who moved out of the South with the Great Migration nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #32
Most aren't feeling the Bern no matter where they live. All you have to do is look at the primary pnwmom Apr 2016 #34
Free fuckinig hint this has not one iota to do with the election nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #37
YES, THANK YOU! elleng Apr 2016 #9
Ahhh . . . they showed their relevancy in the primaries. Duh! Which is why Clinton is ahead. brush Apr 2016 #48
more manufactured outrage from camp Weather-vane. The point was simply that we shouldn't front berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #7
Maybe Bernie only got off to a good start... CrowCityDem Apr 2016 #14
That's true. Imagine if those states hadn't come first. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #36
If you are asking whether winning the south during the primary morningfog Apr 2016 #10
That's where you're wrong. Winning African American votes is a huge sign pnwmom Apr 2016 #16
You don't get to the general if your performance is lacking in the primaries . . . brush Apr 2016 #49
Nice straw man there. Bernie never dismissed or discounted voters in the Deep South TheDormouse Apr 2016 #18
And those more conservative voters happen to be black. That's a problem for him. pnwmom Apr 2016 #20
I know my vote doesn't count and I don't know anybody Downwinder Apr 2016 #19
It is. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #21
It is. JTFrog Apr 2016 #22
and then brag about his fabulous winning streak in red states with ... HIS best demographic nt msongs Apr 2016 #23
It's racist to refer to the deep south now? Someone should inform the dictionaries: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #24
Alabama and Mississippi are no more or less important than Wyoming and Montana other than pampango Apr 2016 #25
Bernie is more popular with liberals of azmom Apr 2016 #26
African Americans in Boston have more in common politically with other A.A. in Atlanta pnwmom Apr 2016 #28
He has plenty of support from liberal POCs. azmom Apr 2016 #29
He doesn't have plenty of support from African American Democrats, and that's what he needs. pnwmom Apr 2016 #31
A wide spectrum of Dem voters exists in every state. We are not one policy fits all. n/t Lucinda Apr 2016 #27
Had he admitted that he lost Southern Democrats because his campaign Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #39
Because the south isnt a race. (you're welcome) jack_krass Apr 2016 #40
The large majority of Democrats in the Deep South -- those who didn't feel the Bern -- are black.n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #54
Oh my God, the Southern Primaries are over. All States count. Not just the South. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #44
It's absolutely racist...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #45
Because the Deep South... tonedevil Apr 2016 #46
Because all kinds of people live in the south HerbChestnut Apr 2016 #51
But if you're talking to a Democrat in the south, he or she is probably black. pnwmom Apr 2016 #53
See, now *you're* being racist. HerbChestnut Apr 2016 #64
Southern Democrats are not as conservative as Republicans. And most of the Democrats are black. pnwmom Apr 2016 #65
Oh it is. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #52
I'm Southern and it doesn't bother me. Fawke Em Apr 2016 #55
You're not African American, so why should it? Those are the southerners who heavily voted pnwmom Apr 2016 #57
The number of votes might be a legitimate measuring stick KPN Apr 2016 #58
When places like 538 calculate vote totals, they don't leave out the caucus states. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #59
So ... that doesn't make it legitimate. KPN Apr 2016 #63
Everyone knows that Southern blacks are Wall Street loving corporatists. Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #60
Because it isn't racist to talk about regional politics. cheapdate Apr 2016 #62

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
6. The numbers are solidly in her favor. But as long as the party remains divided
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:25 PM
Apr 2016

the Rethugs are the only ones who gain.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
4. Bernie did that? I know his supporters here do it all the time, and while I am a supporter
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:24 PM
Apr 2016

I have nothing in common with most of them here.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
12. This is what he said:
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:28 PM
Apr 2016

“Look, let me acknowledge what is absolutely true: Secretary Clinton cleaned our clock in the Deep South, no question about it. We got murdered there. That is the most conservative part of this great country. That's the fact,” Sanders said. “But you know what, we're out of the Deep South now. And we're moving up. We got here, we're going to California, we got a number of large states there. And having won 7 out of the last 8 caucuses and primaries, having a level of excitement and energy among working people and low-income people doing better.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/bernie-sanders-deep-south-conservative-222000#ixzz45vu9XHZP
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
17. That's one of the most deeply offensive statements
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:38 PM
Apr 2016

made by a so called "democrat" since the racist Dixiecrats were run out of the party and joined the republicans.

AA democrats need to make note of this. A movement in the democratic party is trying to marginalize, discount and push you out of your rightful place in the party.

They call it a "revolution".

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
30. You know who agreed with him? Larry Wilmore
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:05 PM
Apr 2016

you know what he also said? That he hopes someday people in the South will vote for progressives and progressive values.

And you know what? I tend to agree with SANDERS.

And yes, the South is very conservative. The north east and the West Coast are more progressive. Do you think that is an insult too? I am sure at this point, you do.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
33. Black people in the south voted much like black people have in other states. Bernie hasn't
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:08 PM
Apr 2016

carried the majority of African American voters -- or even come close to it -- in a single state.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
35. STOP TREATING PEOPLE LIKE LEGO BLOCKS
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:11 PM
Apr 2016

I beg of you. And yes, the SOUTH, whether you like it or not, is one of the most conservative regions in this country. There is a lot of poverty and a lot of lack of access to services and education, and even communications.

It is a reality. Live with it or not. I really give two shits about it. At this point this speaks about conservadems here.

Also it is a reality that conservadems still need liberals, two, most three cycles, before you achieve your goal. The planet though might not have time for you to learn from the mistakes you are making

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
41. So you insist that the south is not conservative
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:24 PM
Apr 2016

go correct GALLUP, among many, many, many, many, many

http://www.gallup.com/poll/125480/ideology-three-deep-south-states-conservative.aspx

Have a wonderful day... ignoring it will not make it go away. Perhaps you do not want to go away. In fact you don't

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
42. I insist that the vote of AA people in the South is very similar to the vote of AA's in the North.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:33 PM
Apr 2016

So if you can't get their votes in Atlanta, you won't in New York, either.

And I insist that they are more a part of the Democratic base than white independents in Wyoming.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
43. I insist that you stop treating demographics like lego blocks
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:34 PM
Apr 2016

which is exactly what you are doing.

have an excellent day. I really have no time for this kind of idiocy and goal post changing.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
56. Nope. He couldn't even win the African American vote in Vermont. He hasn't carried the AA vote
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:10 PM
Apr 2016

in a single state, not even his home state.

http://www.fastcompany.com/3057369/how-bernie-sanders-lost-the-black-vote-long-before-super-tuesday

Meanwhile, in the states Bernie did win—Minnesota, Colorado, Oklahoma, and Vermont—African Americans only make up 6%, 5%, 7%, and 1% of the population, respectively. Perhaps most telling is that even in his home state of Vermont, where support for Sanders should be highest, the senator still trailed Clinton by a small but significant margin, 43% to 57%.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
61. Where's their information?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:15 PM
Apr 2016

There was a PPP poll where Bernie had 100% of the black vote in Vermont, and they're hardly favorable to Bernie. Now, I know it's a small sample, but you don't need a very big sample for a 100-0 lead to be a statistically significant lead.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
5. Because pointing out their irrelevancy in November has nothing to do with race.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:24 PM
Apr 2016

It's true of all voters, of all races that don't live in swing states: irrelevant in the GE.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
11. That makes no sense.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:28 PM
Apr 2016

"Now" isn't in the picture. The Deep South voted weeks and weeks ago. It won't do so again until November. "Now" has nothing to do with it.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
15. He's discounting the fact that African Americans in Boston are more likely to vote
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:33 PM
Apr 2016

like blacks in the "deep South" than they are to whites in South Boston.

Moving north hasn't ended his race problem. He does best in the states with fewest African Americans. There isn't a single state where he's carried the African American vote in any region of the country.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
32. Actually people who moved out of the South with the Great Migration
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:07 PM
Apr 2016

have chanted, to the point that when they move right back home they are seen as uppity.

You should research that. There is plenty of material on that. And why are they seen as uppity. well, you can imagine why, or for god sakes research it. Oh and my local AA community is also very different from the Texas roots for many.

Again, STOP TREATING people like lego blocks.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
34. Most aren't feeling the Bern no matter where they live. All you have to do is look at the primary
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:11 PM
Apr 2016

results to know that. No other research required. Bernie's lucky when he gets a third of the vote of African Americans.

brush

(53,767 posts)
48. Ahhh . . . they showed their relevancy in the primaries. Duh! Which is why Clinton is ahead.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:51 PM
Apr 2016

And believe it or not, a couple of those red states may my tilt blue and they will again show their relevancy.

Such a nice work — relevancy.

berniepdx420

(1,784 posts)
7. more manufactured outrage from camp Weather-vane. The point was simply that we shouldn't front
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:25 PM
Apr 2016

load the primary with a regional block of voting.. spread it out... stop manufacturing this stuff..

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
14. Maybe Bernie only got off to a good start...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:32 PM
Apr 2016

because we front-loaded the process with two states that couldn't be more white if they tried. If the first two contests were, say Nevada and Ohio, Bernie would have been dismissed in January.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
10. If you are asking whether winning the south during the primary
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:26 PM
Apr 2016

is indicative of general election strength, it is not.

Of course the votes matter. They matter in the primary and in the general. All votes, all voters, all regions matter. But the results tell you diffent things about the candidates and their potential performance in the general.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
16. That's where you're wrong. Winning African American votes is a huge sign
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:35 PM
Apr 2016

of general election strength for Democrats. And Bernie is weak among African Americans in every state.

Romney carried both white men and white women. President Obama won because of minority support, and so can Hillary.

brush

(53,767 posts)
49. You don't get to the general if your performance is lacking in the primaries . . .
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:59 PM
Apr 2016

including Iowa , New Hampshire and all the southern state primaries.

Sanders did well in the mostly white early states but not the southern states.

Ya can't win the Democratic Party nomination with just winning mostly white votes. That time has passed, just as it passed for the general.

Romney won a huge majority of white votes but couldn't beat the Obama coalition of blacks, Latinos, LGBTers, Asians, women, AND progressive whites — not just progressive whites.

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
18. Nice straw man there. Bernie never dismissed or discounted voters in the Deep South
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:40 PM
Apr 2016

Rather, he has been saying that it's not a surprise that voters in that part of the country are more receptive to Hillary's candidacy because she is the more conservative of the two of them and voters in that part of the country tend to be more conservative.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
20. And those more conservative voters happen to be black. That's a problem for him.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:43 PM
Apr 2016

And it is a problem for him that black voters everywhere are not supporting him. There isn't a single state where he's carried a majority of African American voters, and he's not helping with statements like this. A black voter in Boston has more in common with a black voter in Atlanta than he does with a white voter in south Boston.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
19. I know my vote doesn't count and I don't know anybody
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:41 PM
Apr 2016

that would try to tell me different. If there are no Democratic candidates the election is decided by the Republican Primary. The Democratic Party has all but disappeared.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
25. Alabama and Mississippi are no more or less important than Wyoming and Montana other than
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 06:31 PM
Apr 2016

population, of course. They're all red states. Democrats in the former are largely Black and in the latter they are largely white.

Alabama and Mississippi are certainly 'conservative' but Wyoming and Montana qualify for that description, as well.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
26. Bernie is more popular with liberals of
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 06:40 PM
Apr 2016

all colors. He doesn't change his stripes depending on who he speaks to. It makes sense that more conservative states would go to Hillary.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
28. African Americans in Boston have more in common politically with other A.A. in Atlanta
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 06:59 PM
Apr 2016

than they do with white voters in South Boston.

So those elections in the "deep South" that Bernie denigrates gave a pretty good indication how weak his support would turn out to be among African Americans elsewhere in the country.

He's never carried the majority of black voters in any state; even in states he won handily.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
29. He has plenty of support from liberal POCs.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:02 PM
Apr 2016

This is specially true of the younger generation which tend to be much liberal than their elders.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
31. He doesn't have plenty of support from African American Democrats, and that's what he needs.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:06 PM
Apr 2016

You can win as a Democrat without majorities of white men or even white women -- President Obama proved that. But African Americans are a critical part of our base.

Howard Dean's 50 state strategy recognized that.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
39. Had he admitted that he lost Southern Democrats because his campaign
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:17 PM
Apr 2016

Did not address their concerns or engage them, it would have been a good.

Lumping Southern Democratic voters as "consetvatives" or as Red States is wrong.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
54. The large majority of Democrats in the Deep South -- those who didn't feel the Bern -- are black.n/t
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:04 PM
Apr 2016
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
44. Oh my God, the Southern Primaries are over. All States count. Not just the South.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:42 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary supporters spent days saying 'It is over. The People have spoken' after just a few primaries. They insisted that the rest of the country does not count. They have insisted that Native American votes do not really count, Asian votes and Latino votes kind of count, depending on the State of course California and Oregon do not count, should not expect to count in any way.

And let me tell you this: I am not under any obligation to favor a region which in its entirety allows discrimination against LGBT in housing and in employment. I have no reason to look at people who voted for DOMA and say 'that's the wise man, his endorsement is pure wisdom'. 5 Democrats voted for that hateful law in North Carolina, 5 Hillary endorsing Democrats. Do they count? Sure do. Do I have to agree with them? Fuck no, hell no and just no. They are BIGOTS. Do their primary votes count more than mine or those in States that are not hugely religious and anti LGBT? No. They got a fucking vote. They voted for the Moderate Christian DOMAcrat. Because they are more conservative in the South. It's a conservative, religious place that has legal discrimination.

Give it a rest. We all count. I personally hope that conservative and bigoted votes are vastly outnumbered. I'm not a Reagan Democrat or a DOMA-crat. I'm also not a devout member of a Baptist Church. And my vote counts, like it or not.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
51. Because all kinds of people live in the south
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:00 PM
Apr 2016

It's a conservative area regardless of the color of people's skin.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
53. But if you're talking to a Democrat in the south, he or she is probably black.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:03 PM
Apr 2016

So when you denigrate Southern Democrats, that's who you're denigrating.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
64. See, now *you're* being racist.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:27 PM
Apr 2016

All Bernie said was that the Southern States are conservative. That has nothing to do with race. You are the one trying to jam race into the conversation. Besides, not all southern democrats are black, and not all black people think alike. Stop trying to simplify the issue to suit your own personal agenda.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
65. Southern Democrats are not as conservative as Republicans. And most of the Democrats are black.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:30 PM
Apr 2016

And the African American vote in the South turned out to be very similar to the African American vote in other states.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
55. I'm Southern and it doesn't bother me.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:09 PM
Apr 2016

I know most of my fellow Southerners are more conservative than is necessary.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
57. You're not African American, so why should it? Those are the southerners who heavily voted
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:11 PM
Apr 2016

for Hillary, who Bernie is disparaging.

KPN

(15,642 posts)
58. The number of votes might be a legitimate measuring stick
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:12 PM
Apr 2016

if all States used votes by ballot as opposed to caucuses. Absent that, and given the number of cactus States, the number of votes is an erroneous measure. It isn't legitimate.

It has nothing to do with race.

KPN

(15,642 posts)
63. So ... that doesn't make it legitimate.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:19 PM
Apr 2016

Caucuses are not comparable to ballot voting in participation ... not by a long shot. And may not even represent the results a ballot vote might yield. Apples and oranges. 538 does what it does, but that doesn't make them accurate.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
62. Because it isn't racist to talk about regional politics.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:16 PM
Apr 2016

Although a racist could talk about regional politics in a racist way and with racist intent.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why isn't it racist to di...