Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Throwing money is such a dead give away of privelege. (Original Post) arely staircase Apr 2016 OP
Wall Street thows money at Hillary too. She's also white and also priveleged... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #1
I hadn't though of it that way ... but you know what? YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! NurseJackie Apr 2016 #2
So is paying $353,400 to sit next to a candidate. Autumn Apr 2016 #3
But paying $27,000 to sit with Clooney is .... ? GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #4
Will help Democratic win not only the WHite House. But Congress as well. arely staircase Apr 2016 #5
Do you not remember 1994? GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #14
A widow's mite to the champagne sippers at the fundraiser. mmonk Apr 2016 #6
You clearly don't understand the widdow's mite story. nt arely staircase Apr 2016 #7
I do. And the protesters were giving all they could, mmonk Apr 2016 #11
Thank you. Bernie's campaign IS a widow's mite campaign. senz Apr 2016 #28
I agree, these campaigns should stop buying commercials. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #8
No kidding... Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #9
Then what would throwing enormous amounts of money indicate? Orsino Apr 2016 #10
or something else Jeffersons Ghost Apr 2016 #16
Is taking money from white, wealthy, privileged investors a dead give away of corruption? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #12
Why? Did Hillary actually scap it up?? I mean it was right there on that tiny 1 lane road. jmg257 Apr 2016 #13
If someone throws you a dollar, would you actually buy a clue? jmg257 Apr 2016 #15
And riding by in huge limousine in a motorcade is a sign of hard knocks. mhatrw Apr 2016 #17
that's the first thought that came to my mind Sheepshank Apr 2016 #18
Flinging money - A WHOLE dollar??? jmg257 Apr 2016 #20
1000 x $1.00 you shouldn't parse facts, it brings your credibility into question. n/t Sheepshank Apr 2016 #21
Are you saying everyone there threw $1000?!? Each?!? LOL! Credibility indeed! jmg257 Apr 2016 #24
Is that what I said? Is that what you read? Sad, sad day for school teachers everywhere. Sheepshank Apr 2016 #25
Dumbest post of the day whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #19
Projection AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #22
I tend to think of it as clueless asshattery. Lucinda Apr 2016 #23
I thought it was paying $30 grand for a dinner? arcane1 Apr 2016 #26
WRONG. It's a 99% criticism of the 1%'s sold-out candidate. senz Apr 2016 #27
How can anyone who takes corporate money ever FIGHT privilege? Ken Burch Apr 2016 #29

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
2. I hadn't though of it that way ... but you know what? YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:03 PM
Apr 2016
Go, Hillary! We love you!



Note to Jury: The above statements represent my opinion. No DU rules or terms of service have been violated. It is not against the rules to have an opinion that differs from the Alerter. REMEMBER: Skinner is watching, and he has said that Jury Members who side with alerts that are obviously frivolous or that are without merit, will have their jury priveleges suspended without notice.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
5. Will help Democratic win not only the WHite House. But Congress as well.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:13 PM
Apr 2016

What has Bernie done to help down ballot dems?

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
14. Do you not remember 1994?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:26 PM
Apr 2016

Now here is an "awful legacy"...

Forty years of Democratic dominance in the U.S. Congress came to a stunning end on November 8, when the Republican Party rode a tidal wave of anti-incumbent sentiment to victory in the midterm elections. The Republicans took control of both houses of Congress for the first time since 1954 as voters delivered a strong rejection of Pres. Bill Clinton and his policies. The Republicans picked up a net gain of 53 seats in the House of Representatives and 7 in the Senate. The last time such carnage had been seen in Congress was in 1958, when Republicans lost 48 House and 13 Senate seats. Moreover, the Republicans won a majority of congressional seats from the South for the first time since the Civil War.


http://www.britannica.com/topic/1994-midterm-Elections-616578

Bernie is helping down ticket Dems by not being a person that many on this country will crawl over broken glass if necessary to vote against.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
11. I do. And the protesters were giving all they could,
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:22 PM
Apr 2016

not for her, but the protest and the moral thing.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
8. I agree, these campaigns should stop buying commercials.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:18 PM
Apr 2016

Millions, I tell you.

On the other hand, that protest at the Clooney fundraiser taught them all about how to get media for almost free. Brilliant PR!

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
10. Then what would throwing enormous amounts of money indicate?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:21 PM
Apr 2016

Might it be enormous privilege, of the enormously white and enormously wealthy? Against which throwing singles would be insignificant?

Jeffersons Ghost

(15,235 posts)
16. or something else
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:39 PM
Apr 2016

More than a feeling began playing on my radio. I'm going out to throw more money away! LOL

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
12. Is taking money from white, wealthy, privileged investors a dead give away of corruption?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:23 PM
Apr 2016

Disdain for $1 donations? Hubris? An indication that she's no longer "dead broke?"

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
13. Why? Did Hillary actually scap it up?? I mean it was right there on that tiny 1 lane road.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:24 PM
Apr 2016

Was it just left there?

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
15. If someone throws you a dollar, would you actually buy a clue?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:29 PM
Apr 2016

“it’s exciting to be, in effect, protesting”

Hillary Clinton Apr 6, 2016

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
18. that's the first thought that came to my mind
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:48 PM
Apr 2016

those who are supposedly struggling to make ends meet, decide that symbolism is more important than feeding the family? Of course not, these were not those struggling that are flinging money to the wind.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
25. Is that what I said? Is that what you read? Sad, sad day for school teachers everywhere.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:05 PM
Apr 2016

$1000 would buy a lot of families a lot of meals. I think that symbolism of feeding the hungry may have been a little more well received.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
27. WRONG. It's a 99% criticism of the 1%'s sold-out candidate.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:46 PM
Apr 2016

Most of us can throw a couple of dollars at her on her way to the $$$ fundraising dinners. Get enough of us lined up, and there will quite a few dollar bills flying around that big SUV caravan.

It makes a statement. A necessary statement.

So ... get on with your defense of the 1%.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
29. How can anyone who takes corporate money ever FIGHT privilege?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:48 PM
Apr 2016

You're either in the suites, or the streets.

It's not possible to represent the rich and the poor at the same time.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Throwing money is such a ...